{"id":61005,"date":"2023-12-08T20:24:20","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T11:24:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/?p=61005"},"modified":"2024-03-29T17:51:22","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T08:51:22","slug":"twitter-private-account-defamation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation","title":{"rendered":"Je pomluva na zabezpe\u010den\u00e9m \u00fa\u010dtu na Twitteru pova\u017eov\u00e1na za po\u0161kozen\u00ed pov\u011bsti? Vysv\u011btlen\u00ed dvou p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\nTwitter je ve v\u00fdchoz\u00edm nastaven\u00ed p\u0159i registraci nastaven tak, aby byly tweety ve\u0159ejn\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bny. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, pro u\u017eivatele, kte\u0159\u00ed necht\u011bj\u00ed, aby jejich tweety vid\u011bli nezn\u00e1m\u00ed lid\u00e9, nebo kte\u0159\u00ed cht\u011bj\u00ed pou\u017e\u00edvat Twitter pouze pro komunikaci mezi p\u0159\u00e1teli, Twitter umo\u017e\u0148uje nastavit tweety jako neve\u0159ejn\u00e9. Existuje funkce, kter\u00e1 umo\u017e\u0148uje nastavit \u00fa\u010det takzvan\u011b &#8220;s kl\u00ed\u010dem&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\nExistuje mnoho trestn\u00fdch \u010din\u016f, kter\u00e9 mohou b\u00fdt sp\u00e1ch\u00e1ny prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm tweet\u016f na Twitteru, ale jak jsou o\u0161et\u0159eny p\u0159\u00edpady, kdy dojde k pomluv\u011b na \u00fa\u010dtu s kl\u00ed\u010dem, u soudu? Vysv\u011btl\u00edme dva precedenty t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se \u00fa\u010dt\u016f s kl\u00ed\u010dem na Twitteru.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/crime-on-twitter\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/crime-on-twitter[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Co_je_to_ucet_se_zamkem\" title=\"Co je to \u00fa\u010det se z\u00e1mkem\">Co je to \u00fa\u010det se z\u00e1mkem<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Ucty_se_zamkem_a_urazky\" title=\"\u00da\u010dty se z\u00e1mkem a ur\u00e1\u017eky\">\u00da\u010dty se z\u00e1mkem a ur\u00e1\u017eky<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Prubeh_soudniho_rizeni\" title=\"Pr\u016fb\u011bh soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed\">Pr\u016fb\u011bh soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Rozhodnuti_soudu\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed soudu\">Rozhodnut\u00ed soudu<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Ucty_se_zamkem_a_poskozeni_cti\" title=\"\u00da\u010dty se z\u00e1mkem a po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti\">\u00da\u010dty se z\u00e1mkem a po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Prubeh_soudniho_rizeni-2\" title=\"Pr\u016fb\u011bh soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed\">Pr\u016fb\u011bh soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Rozhodnuti_soudu-2\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed soudu\">Rozhodnut\u00ed soudu<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Shrnuti\" title=\"Shrnut\u00ed\">Shrnut\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/twitter-private-account-defamation\/#Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\" title=\"P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e\">P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Co_je_to_ucet_se_zamkem\"><\/span>Co je to \u00fa\u010det se z\u00e1mkem<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\nTwitter nepou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 n\u00e1zev &#8220;\u00fa\u010det se z\u00e1mkem&#8221;. Tweet s ikonou z\u00e1mku se naz\u00fdv\u00e1 &#8220;soukrom\u00fd tweet&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\nKdy\u017e nastav\u00edte sv\u00e9 tweety na soukrom\u00e9, dostanete \u017e\u00e1dosti od u\u017eivatel\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed v\u00e1s cht\u011bj\u00ed sledovat. Tyto \u017e\u00e1dosti m\u016f\u017eete bu\u010f schv\u00e1lit, nebo odm\u00edtnout.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\nVa\u0161e tweety, v\u010detn\u011b pernamentn\u00edch odkaz\u016f na tweety, budou zobrazeny pouze va\u0161im sleduj\u00edc\u00edm. Va\u0161i sleduj\u00edc\u00ed tak\u00e9 nemohou retweetovat nebo komentovat va\u0161e tweety pomoc\u00ed tla\u010d\u00edtka retweet. Tak\u017ee pokud si nastav\u00edte \u00fa\u010det se z\u00e1mkem, m\u016f\u017eete zabr\u00e1nit \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed sv\u00fdch tweet\u016f, a to i kdy\u017e byste to cht\u011bli.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\nNejd\u016fle\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00ed je, \u017ee tweety z \u00fa\u010dtu se z\u00e1mkem se nezobraz\u00ed p\u0159i hled\u00e1n\u00ed na Twitteru ani ve vyhled\u00e1va\u010d\u00edch (jako je Google nebo Yahoo!). Jedin\u00ed, kdo mohou hledat va\u0161e soukrom\u00e9 tweety na Twitteru, jste vy a va\u0161i sleduj\u00edc\u00ed.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\nA\u010dkoli to m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v mnoha ohledech u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9, pokud po\u0161lete odpov\u011b\u010f n\u011bkomu, kdo v\u00e1s nesleduje, m\u016f\u017eete vid\u011bt tweet s odpov\u011bd\u00ed, kterou jste poslali, ale p\u0159\u00edjemce nem\u016f\u017ee vid\u011bt tento tweet. Na \u00fa\u010dtu se z\u00e1mkem nem\u016f\u017eete vid\u011bt ani komentovat tweety lid\u00ed, kter\u00e9 navz\u00e1jem nesledujete.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\nJak\u00e9 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed probl\u00e9my by mohly vzniknout, pokud byste pomoc\u00ed takov\u00e9ho \u00fa\u010dtu se z\u00e1mkem publikovali p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky, kter\u00e9 by po\u0161kodily ciz\u00ed pov\u011bst? Pod\u00edvejme se na n\u011bkter\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edklady rozhodnut\u00ed soud\u016f.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/twitter-private-account-defamation.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-37317\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ucty_se_zamkem_a_urazky\"><\/span>\u00da\u010dty se z\u00e1mkem a ur\u00e1\u017eky<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Poru\u0161en\u00ed cti, tzv. ur\u00e1\u017eky, jsou v judikatu\u0159e definov\u00e1ny jako &#8220;cti, tj. subjektivn\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed, kter\u00e9 jedinec m\u00e1 o sv\u00e9 osobn\u00ed hodnot\u011b (subjektivn\u00ed \u010dest), je tak\u00e9 z\u00e1jem hodn\u00fd pr\u00e1vn\u00ed ochrany, a ur\u00e1\u017eliv\u00e9 chov\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e9 p\u0159ekra\u010duje hranice spole\u010densky p\u0159ijateln\u00e9 m\u00edry, jako je v\u00fdrazn\u011b vulg\u00e1rn\u00ed nebo ur\u00e1\u017eliv\u00e9, pomlouva\u010dn\u00e9, je pova\u017eov\u00e1no za poru\u0161en\u00ed osobnostn\u00edch pr\u00e1v a tvo\u0159\u00ed nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed odd\u011blen\u011b od pomluvy&#8221; (Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud, 13. dubna 2010 (Gregorian calendar year)).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pomluva a ur\u00e1\u017eka jsou ob\u011b &#8220;zlo\u010diny proti cti&#8221;, ale z\u00e1kon o pomluv\u011b je v trestn\u00edm z\u00e1kon\u011b definov\u00e1n jako:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Kdo ve\u0159ejn\u011b uv\u00e1d\u00ed skute\u010dnosti a po\u0161kozuje \u010dest jin\u00e9 osoby, bude potrest\u00e1n bez ohledu na pravdivost t\u011bchto skute\u010dnost\u00ed trestem odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody a\u017e na t\u0159i roky nebo pokutou do 500 000 jen\u016f.&#8221;<\/p>\n<cite>Trestn\u00ed z\u00e1kon\u00edk \u010dl\u00e1nek 230 (Pomluva)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>a z\u00e1kon o ur\u00e1\u017ece je v trestn\u00edm z\u00e1kon\u011b definov\u00e1n jako:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Kdo ve\u0159ejn\u011b ur\u00e1\u017e\u00ed jinou osobu, i kdy\u017e neuv\u00e1d\u00ed skute\u010dnosti, bude potrest\u00e1n zadr\u017een\u00edm nebo pokutou.&#8221;<\/p>\n<cite>Trestn\u00ed z\u00e1kon\u00edk \u010dl\u00e1nek 231 (Ur\u00e1\u017eka)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Je to tak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zlo\u010din pomluvy je sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n t\u00edm, \u017ee se ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m prostoru (ve\u0159ejn\u011b), kde se o tom dozv\u00ed mnoho lid\u00ed, pouk\u00e1\u017ee na pravdiv\u00e9 nebo nepravdiv\u00e9 skute\u010dnosti a sn\u00ed\u017e\u00ed se tak soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed jedince. Zlo\u010din ur\u00e1\u017eky (poru\u0161en\u00ed cti) je sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n t\u00edm, \u017ee se ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m prostoru (ve\u0159ejn\u011b), kde se o tom dozv\u00ed mnoho lid\u00ed, uraz\u00ed jedinec, ani\u017e by byly uvedeny skute\u010dnosti. Pod\u00edvejme se na soudn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad, kter\u00fd se t\u00fdkal ur\u00e1\u017eky proveden\u00e9 na \u00fa\u010dtu se z\u00e1mkem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-infringement-of-self-esteem\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-infringement-of-self-esteem[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Prubeh_soudniho_rizeni\"><\/span>Pr\u016fb\u011bh soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159\u00edpad, kdy \u017ealobce podal \u017ealobu na n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody na z\u00e1klad\u011b nez\u00e1konn\u00e9ho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed proti \u017ealovan\u00e9mu, kter\u00fd byl jeho p\u0159\u00edtelem od st\u0159edn\u00ed \u0161koly, za to, \u017ee na Twitteru zve\u0159ejnil fotografii \u017ealobce a uvedl informace, kter\u00e9 poru\u0161ovaly jeho cti a pocity, co\u017e zp\u016fsobilo \u017ealobci du\u0161evn\u00ed utrpen\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce obdr\u017eel od t\u0159et\u00ed osoby screenshot obrazovky s p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdmi zpr\u00e1vami na Twitteru ulo\u017een\u00fd jako obr\u00e1zek na chatovac\u00ed obrazovce Instagramu. Na obr\u00e1zku byla fotografie \u017ealobce a jeho d\u00edt\u011bte a bylo tweetov\u00e1no na uzam\u010den\u00fd \u00fa\u010det &#8220;@\u25cb\u25cb&#8221;, kter\u00fd \u017ealobce nesledoval,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Holstein<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Serious birthing machine = impossible =<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>She gave birth to four children, she&#8217;s a real birthing machine<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>She&#8217;s 36, lol. Apparently, she&#8217;s called an old hag by high school students at her part-time job at a family restaurant, but that&#8217;s to be expected<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>She&#8217;s a real ugly fatso<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tvrdil, \u017ee tento tweet poru\u0161uje jeho pr\u00e1vo na obraz a jednostrann\u011b ho pomlouv\u00e1, co\u017e p\u0159edstavuje nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed v\u016f\u010di \u017ealobci.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na to \u017ealovan\u00fd nam\u00edtl, \u017ee i kdyby byly poru\u0161eny cti a pocity \u017ealobce, bylo to d\u00edky \u010dinnosti t\u0159et\u00ed osoby, kter\u00e1 informovala \u017ealobce o p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku na uzam\u010den\u00e9m \u00fa\u010dtu, a ne d\u00edky \u010dinnosti \u017ealovan\u00e9ho. Na druhou stranu, \u017ealobce tvrdil, \u017ee vzhledem k povaze Twitteru jsou p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky neust\u00e1le k dispozici pro prohl\u00ed\u017een\u00ed sleduj\u00edc\u00edmi a mohou b\u00fdt snadno \u0161\u00ed\u0159eny pomoc\u00ed retweet\u016f nebo kop\u00edrov\u00e1n\u00ed a vkl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed, tak\u017ee bez ohledu na to, zda je \u00fa\u010det ve\u0159ejn\u00fd, tento p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek je \u010dinnost\u00ed, kter\u00e1 umo\u017e\u0148uje nespecifikovan\u00e9mu po\u010dtu t\u0159et\u00edch stran prohl\u00ed\u017eet obsah p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku, a proto\u017ee tento p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek byl proveden \u017ealovan\u00fdm, \u010dinnost \u017ealovan\u00e9ho poru\u0161uje cti a pocity \u017ealobce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Information-leak-crisis-management-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36554\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_soudu\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed soudu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud nejprve uznal, \u017ee v\u0161echny \u00fadaje uveden\u00e9 v tomto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku poru\u0161uj\u00ed c\u00edt\u011bn\u00ed na cti \u017ealobce. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, neuznal existenci ur\u00e1\u017eky (poru\u0161en\u00ed c\u00edt\u011bn\u00ed na cti) z n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch d\u016fvod\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u00da\u010det, kter\u00fd \u017ealovan\u00fd pou\u017e\u00edval, ozna\u010den\u00fd jako &#8220;@\u25cb\u25cb&#8221;, byl tzv. uzam\u010den\u00fd \u00fa\u010det, jeho\u017e obsah byl neust\u00e1le neve\u0159ejn\u00fd a jeho obsah mohli prohl\u00ed\u017eet pouze omezen\u00ed sleduj\u00edc\u00ed, kter\u00e9 \u017ealovan\u00fd povolil. Proto\u017ee bylo uzn\u00e1no, \u017ee \u017ealobce nebyl mezi t\u011bmito sleduj\u00edc\u00edmi, i kdyby \u017ealovan\u00fd tento p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek zve\u0159ejnil, neznamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee by informoval \u017ealobce o obsahu p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku, a nelze tvrdit, \u017ee by byl z\u00e1konem zak\u00e1zan\u00fd \u00fatok na c\u00edt\u011bn\u00ed na cti \u017ealobce prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm tohoto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku.<\/p>\n<cite>Soudn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu ze dne 29. kv\u011btna 2019 (2019)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Takto to bylo uvedeno.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Proto\u017ee \u017ealobce nebyl informov\u00e1n o obsahu p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku, nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt pova\u017eov\u00e1n za poru\u0161en\u00ed jeho c\u00edt\u011bn\u00ed na cti. Jin\u00fdmi slovy, pouh\u00e9 uveden\u00ed obsahu, kter\u00fd by mohl poru\u0161it c\u00edt\u011bn\u00ed na cti \u017ealobce, neznamen\u00e1, \u017ee by byl uzn\u00e1n jako nez\u00e1konn\u00fd \u010din proti \u017ealobci.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud tak\u00e9 uvedl, \u017ee i kdyby n\u011bkdo, kdo n\u00e1hodou informoval \u017ealobce, jako je t\u0159et\u00ed strana, kter\u00e1 prohl\u00ed\u017eela obrazovku a ulo\u017eila sn\u00edmek obrazovky jako obr\u00e1zek a odeslala ho, nem\u016f\u017ee se tvrdit, \u017ee by tento p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek mohl b\u00fdt \u0161\u00ed\u0159en nespecifikovan\u00e9mu po\u010dtu t\u0159et\u00edch stran, ani \u017ee by \u017ealovan\u00fd mohl p\u0159edv\u00eddat mo\u017enost \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A proto\u017ee nelze pop\u0159\u00edt mo\u017enost, \u017ee \u017ealobce s\u00e1m zve\u0159ejnil fotografii na Instagramu, pouh\u00e9 zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed t\u00e9to fotografie \u017ealovan\u00fdm na Twitteru nelze uznat jako poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na obraz \u017ealobce. Poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na obraz nebylo uzn\u00e1no a v\u0161echny n\u00e1roky \u017ealobce byly zam\u00edtnuty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ucty_se_zamkem_a_poskozeni_cti\"><\/span>\u00da\u010dty se z\u00e1mkem a po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Prubeh_soudniho_rizeni-2\"><\/span>Pr\u016fb\u011bh soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobkyn\u011b, kter\u00e1 byla \u010dlenkou rockov\u00e9 idol skupiny &#8220;\u25cb\u25cb&#8221;, zalo\u017een\u00e9 v b\u0159eznu 2016, podala \u017ealobu na \u017ealovan\u00e9ho, kter\u00fd byl tak\u00e9 \u010dlenem &#8220;\u25cb\u25cb&#8221; a opustil skupinu na konci \u010dervna 2019. Dne 2. \u010dervence t\u00e9ho\u017e roku \u017ealovan\u00fd na sv\u00e9m Twitter \u00fa\u010dtu zve\u0159ejnil tweet, ve kter\u00e9m napsal \u2460 &#8220;Ah, u\u017e jsi p\u0159estala pracovat v lesbick\u00e9m podniku v Shinjuku, \u017ee?&#8221; a dal\u0161\u00ed, a pot\u00e9 zve\u0159ejnil dal\u0161\u00ed tweet s fotografi\u00ed \u017ealobkyn\u011b, ve kter\u00e9m napsal \u2461 &#8220;Nemohl by n\u011bkdo uk\u00e1zat tuto fotku v obchod\u011b v Akihabara a zjistit v\u00edce?&#8221; \u017dalobkyn\u011b tvrdila, \u017ee tyto tweety po\u0161kodily jej\u00ed \u010dest a po\u017eadovala od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobkyn\u011b tvrdila, \u017ee p\u0159esto\u017ee nikdy nepracovala v sexu\u00e1ln\u00edm podniku, oba tweety nazna\u010dovaly, \u017ee v minulosti pracovala v sexu\u00e1ln\u00edm podniku nebo \u017ee tam st\u00e1le pracuje. Podle b\u011b\u017en\u00e9ho \u010dten\u00e1\u0159e by tyto tweety sn\u00ed\u017eily jej\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed. \u00da\u010det \u017ealovan\u00e9ho, na kter\u00e9m byly tweety zve\u0159ejn\u011bny, m\u011bl p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 500 sleduj\u00edc\u00edch a byl p\u0159\u00edstupn\u00fd ve\u0159ejnosti, argumentovala \u017ealobkyn\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na to \u017ealovan\u00fd odpov\u011bd\u011bl, \u017ee jeho \u00fa\u010det, na kter\u00e9m byly tweety zve\u0159ejn\u011bny, byl uzam\u010den\u00fd a mohli ho vid\u011bt pouze ti, kte\u0159\u00ed m\u011bli jeho souhlas (dob\u0159\u00ed p\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9). \u017dalovan\u00fd tvrdil, \u017ee jeho tweety byly pouze st\u00ed\u017enostmi sd\u00edlen\u00fdmi s dobr\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00e1teli.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A\u010dkoli to nebylo zvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 zm\u00edn\u011bno v rozsudku, zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee \u017ealobkyn\u011b byla jedn\u00edm ze sleduj\u00edc\u00edch uzam\u010den\u00e9ho \u00fa\u010dtu \u017ealovan\u00e9ho a mohla jeho tweety \u010d\u00edst.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/tweet-quote-kutoo-copyright-act-i.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36637\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_soudu-2\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed soudu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud nejprve konstatoval, \u017ee tweety byly zam\u011b\u0159eny na \u017ealobkyni a \u017ee b\u011b\u017en\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 by norm\u00e1ln\u011b pochopil, \u017ee tweet \u2460 nazna\u010duje, \u017ee \u017ealobkyn\u011b pracovala v sexu\u00e1ln\u00edm podniku, a\u010dkoli je formulov\u00e1n jako ot\u00e1zka, zat\u00edmco tweet \u2461 je formulov\u00e1n jako \u017e\u00e1dost \u010dten\u00e1\u0159\u016fm. Oba tweety byly ch\u00e1p\u00e1ny jako nazna\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed, \u017ee \u017ealobkyn\u011b pracovala nebo st\u00e1le pracuje v sexu\u00e1ln\u00edm podniku. Soud uznal, \u017ee oba tweety v\u00fdrazn\u011b sni\u017euj\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed \u017ealobkyn\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Co se t\u00fd\u010de skute\u010dnosti, \u017ee \u00fa\u010det byl uzam\u010den\u00fd, soud uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u017dalovan\u00fd tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee jeho \u00fa\u010det, na kter\u00e9m byly tweety zve\u0159ejn\u011bny, byl tzv. uzam\u010den\u00fd \u00fa\u010det a mohli ho vid\u011bt pouze ti, kte\u0159\u00ed m\u011bli jeho souhlas (dob\u0159\u00ed p\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9). Tento argument \u017ealovan\u00e9ho lze ch\u00e1pat tak, \u017ee tweety nemaj\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00fd charakter a proto nesni\u017euj\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed \u017ealobkyn\u011b. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, krom\u011b skute\u010dnosti, \u017ee v dob\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed tweet\u016f bylo n\u011bkolik lid\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed m\u011bli souhlas \u017ealovan\u00e9ho (a mohli tedy tweety \u010d\u00edst), a \u017ee rozhodnut\u00ed o ud\u011blen\u00ed souhlasu bylo ponech\u00e1no na \u017ealovan\u00e9m, je tak\u00e9 mo\u017en\u00e9, \u017ee i ti, kte\u0159\u00ed v dob\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed tweet\u016f souhlas nem\u011bli, mohli tweety \u010d\u00edst pozd\u011bji, pokud by jim byl souhlas ud\u011blen. Nav\u00edc ti, kte\u0159\u00ed m\u011bli souhlas \u017ealovan\u00e9ho, mohli snadno \u0161\u00ed\u0159it tweety t\u00edm, \u017ee je kop\u00edrovali nebo jinak reprodukovali. Vzhledem k t\u011bmto okolnostem lze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee tweety mohly b\u00fdt \u0161\u00ed\u0159eny mezi nespecifikovan\u00fdm po\u010dtem lid\u00ed. Proto argument \u017ealovan\u00e9ho neovliv\u0148uje skute\u010dnost, \u017ee tweety v\u00fdrazn\u011b sni\u017euj\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed \u017ealobkyn\u011b.<\/p>\n<cite> Rozsudek Okresn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu ze dne 19. \u010dervna 2020 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud tak zam\u00edtl argument, \u017ee &#8220;\u00fa\u010det byl uzam\u010den\u00fd, a proto nem\u011bl ve\u0159ejn\u00fd charakter&#8221;. Soud nekomentoval skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u00fa\u010det m\u011bl &#8220;p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 500&#8221; sleduj\u00edc\u00edch, ale uznal, \u017ee n\u011bkolik lid\u00ed m\u011blo souhlas \u017ealovan\u00e9ho. S ohledem na argument \u017ealovan\u00e9ho, \u017ee jeho prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed bylo na uzam\u010den\u00e9m \u00fa\u010dtu, soud uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>\u017de rozhodnut\u00ed o ud\u011blen\u00ed souhlasu bylo ponech\u00e1no na \u017ealovan\u00e9m a \u017ee i ti, kte\u0159\u00ed v dob\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed tweet\u016f nem\u011bli souhlas, mohli tweety \u010d\u00edst pozd\u011bji, pokud by jim byl souhlas ud\u011blen.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u017de ti, kte\u0159\u00ed m\u011bli souhlas \u017ealovan\u00e9ho, mohli snadno \u0161\u00ed\u0159it tweety t\u00edm, \u017ee je kop\u00edrovali nebo jinak reprodukovali.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud uznal, \u017ee &#8220;tweety mohly b\u00fdt \u0161\u00ed\u0159eny mezi nespecifikovan\u00fdm po\u010dtem lid\u00ed&#8221; a uznal poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na ochranu cti. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, soud vzal v \u00favahu skute\u010dnost, \u017ee tweety byly na uzam\u010den\u00e9m \u00fa\u010dtu a \u017ee &#8220;po\u010det prim\u00e1rn\u00edch \u010dten\u00e1\u0159\u016f byl omezen\u00fd&#8221;, stejn\u011b jako skute\u010dnost, \u017ee byly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny pouze dva tweety, a na\u0159\u00eddil \u017ealovan\u00e9mu zaplatit od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed ve v\u00fd\u0161i 200 000 jen\u016f, n\u00e1klady na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed ve v\u00fd\u0161i 20 000 jen\u016f, celkem 220 000 jen\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I kdy\u017e byli v dob\u011b tweet\u016f &#8220;prim\u00e1rn\u00edmi \u010dten\u00e1\u0159i&#8221; pouze omezen\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed lid\u00ed a tweety nebyly \u0161\u00ed\u0159eny mezi nespecifikovan\u00fdm po\u010dtem lid\u00ed, existuje mo\u017enost, \u017ee by mohly b\u00fdt \u0161\u00ed\u0159eny mezi &#8220;sekund\u00e1rn\u00edmi \u010dten\u00e1\u0159i&#8221;. Toto rozhodnut\u00ed se li\u0161\u00ed od p\u0159edchoz\u00edho rozhodnut\u00ed Okresn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu ze dne 29. kv\u011btna 2019 ohledn\u011b ve\u0159ejnosti a mo\u017enosti \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Shrnuti\"><\/span>Shrnut\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Co se t\u00fd\u010de \u00fa\u010dt\u016f se z\u00e1mkem, b\u011bhem posledn\u00edho roku byly vyd\u00e1ny pouze dva rozsudky ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch soud\u016f a je zaj\u00edmav\u00e9 sledovat, jak\u00e9 budou dal\u0161\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed a jak bude rozhodov\u00e1no p\u0159i odvol\u00e1n\u00ed. Ka\u017edop\u00e1dn\u011b bychom m\u011bli vyhnout my\u0161lence, \u017ee &#8220;m\u016f\u017eeme \u0159\u00edkat cokoli, proto\u017ee m\u00e1me \u00fa\u010det se z\u00e1mkem&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\"><\/span>P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolis je pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 s vysokou odbornost\u00ed v oblasti IT, zejm\u00e9na internetu a pr\u00e1va. V posledn\u00edch letech informace o \u0161kod\u00e1ch zp\u016fsoben\u00fdch \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm na internetu a pomluvami zp\u016fsobuj\u00ed v\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 \u0161kody jako &#8220;digit\u00e1ln\u00ed tetov\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;. Na\u0161e kancel\u00e1\u0159 poskytuje \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed pro opat\u0159en\u00ed proti &#8220;digit\u00e1ln\u00edmu tetov\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;. Podrobnosti jsou uvedeny v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Twitter je ve v\u00fdchoz\u00edm nastaven\u00ed p\u0159i registraci nastaven tak, aby byly tweety ve\u0159ejn\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bny. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, pro u\u017eivatele, kte\u0159\u00ed necht\u011bj\u00ed, aby jejich tweety vid\u011bli nezn\u00e1m\u00ed lid\u00e9, nebo kte\u0159\u00ed cht\u011bj\u00ed pou\u017e\u00ed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61005"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61005"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61005\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63971,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61005\/revisions\/63971"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}