{"id":61014,"date":"2023-12-08T20:24:20","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T11:24:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/?p=61014"},"modified":"2024-03-29T16:00:26","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T07:00:26","slug":"arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement","title":{"rendered":"Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed probl\u00e9my skute\u010dn\u00e9ho jm\u00e9na zpravodajstv\u00ed o zat\u010den\u00ed a p\u0159edchoz\u00edch trestech ~ Nejde o pomluvu a poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na soukrom\u00ed?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Fakt, \u017ee n\u011bkdo &#8220;byl odsouzen&#8221; nebo &#8220;byl zat\u010den&#8221;, je obvykle n\u011bco, co lid\u00e9 necht\u011bj\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u011b zve\u0159ejnit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dnosti o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech nebo zat\u010den\u00ed pod skute\u010dn\u00fdm jm\u00e9nem m\u016f\u017ee obecn\u011b sn\u00ed\u017eit soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed dan\u00e9 osoby a tak\u00e9 poru\u0161it jej\u00ed soukrom\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159esto \u010dasto vid\u00edme zpr\u00e1vy pod skute\u010dn\u00fdmi jm\u00e9ny v novin\u00e1ch a na televizi. To je proto, \u017ee se p\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1, \u017ee skute\u010dn\u00e9 jm\u00e9no samo o sob\u011b je &#8220;fakt t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho z\u00e1jmu&#8221;, nebo \u017ee v\u00fdhody zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9ho jm\u00e9na p\u0159eva\u017euj\u00ed nad v\u00fdhodami nezve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed, a proto nejsou spln\u011bny podm\u00ednky pro nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed z d\u016fvodu pomluvy nebo poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed novin\u00e1\u0159i a advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory ji\u017e dlouho tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee zpravodajstv\u00ed o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech, ve kter\u00fdch jsou oby\u010dejn\u00ed lid\u00e9 podez\u0159el\u00ed nebo ob\u017ealovan\u00ed, by m\u011blo b\u00fdt v z\u00e1sad\u011b anonymn\u00ed. Jak\u00fd je tedy soudn\u00ed n\u00e1zor na toto?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku se pod\u00edv\u00e1me na p\u0159\u00edpad mu\u017ee, kter\u00fd byl zat\u010den polici\u00ed v prefektu\u0159e Aichi a nebyl obvin\u011bn, a kter\u00fd po\u017eadoval od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed od t\u0159\u00ed novin, kter\u00e9 o n\u011bm informovaly pod jeho skute\u010dn\u00fdm jm\u00e9nem, proto\u017ee utrp\u011bl \u0161kodu v d\u016fsledku zpravodajstv\u00ed pod skute\u010dn\u00fdm jm\u00e9nem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Prehled_pripadu\" title=\"P\u0159ehled p\u0159\u00edpadu\">P\u0159ehled p\u0159\u00edpadu<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Namitky_zalobce\" title=\"N\u00e1mitky \u017ealobce\">N\u00e1mitky \u017ealobce<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Nazor_novin\" title=\"N\u00e1zor novin\">N\u00e1zor novin<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Rozhodnuti_Tokijskeho_okresniho_soudu\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu\">Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Rozhodnuti_Vrchniho_soudu_v_Tokiu\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu\">Rozhodnut\u00ed Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Shrnuti\" title=\"Shrnut\u00ed\">Shrnut\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/general-corporate\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement\/#Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\" title=\"P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e\">P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Prehled_pripadu\"><\/span>P\u0159ehled p\u0159\u00edpadu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Mu\u017e, kter\u00fd provozoval spole\u010dnost zam\u011b\u0159enou na podnikatelsk\u00e9 konzultace a podobn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti v Nagoyi, byl 10. \u00fanora 2010 (rok 22 Heisei) zat\u010den na z\u00e1klad\u011b podez\u0159en\u00ed z pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zna\u010dkou.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Podez\u0159en\u00ed spo\u010d\u00edvalo v tom, \u017ee p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b \u010dty\u0159i roky p\u0159edt\u00edm, ve spolupr\u00e1ci s ur\u010ditou \u017eenou, se pokusil z\u00edskat v\u00fdhodu v soudn\u00edm sporu, kter\u00fd tato \u017eena zah\u00e1jila ohledn\u011b spole\u010dn\u00e9 z\u00e1ruky dluhu, a p\u0159edlo\u017eil soudn\u00edmu dvoru prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm pr\u00e1vn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce t\u00e9to \u017eeny smlouvu o spr\u00e1v\u011b podniku, ve kter\u00e9 byla pad\u011bl\u00e1na \u010d\u00e1st t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se spole\u010dn\u00e9 z\u00e1ruky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mu\u017e neust\u00e1le pop\u00edral podez\u0159en\u00ed a byl zadr\u017een a\u017e do 3. b\u0159ezna, kdy bylo rozhodnuto o nezah\u00e1jen\u00ed trestn\u00edho st\u00edh\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Druh\u00fd den po zat\u010den\u00ed, t\u0159i noviny &#8211; Mainichi Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun a Chunichi Shimbun &#8211; zve\u0159ejnily skute\u010dnost zat\u010den\u00ed mu\u017ee pod jeho skute\u010dn\u00fdm jm\u00e9nem. Ve v\u0161ech \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch byl mu\u017e ozna\u010den jako &#8220;s\u00e1m sebe ozna\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed za \u010dlena veden\u00ed konzulta\u010dn\u00ed firmy&#8221; a byl p\u0159ipojen titulek &#8220;Mu\u017e zat\u010den za pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00e9 smlouvy&#8221;. P\u0159esto\u017ee bylo uvedeno, \u017ee &#8220;obvin\u011bn\u00fd pop\u00edr\u00e1 neopodstatn\u011bn\u00e9 obvin\u011bn\u00ed&#8221;, byly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny \u010dl\u00e1nky s popisem &#8220;mu\u017e, kter\u00fd pou\u017eil pad\u011blanou smlouvu&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na to mu\u017e reagoval t\u00edm, \u017ee podal \u017ealobu na n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody atd., tvrd\u00edc, \u017ee byla po\u0161kozena jeho \u010dest a byla poru\u0161ena jeho soukrom\u00ed a c\u00edt\u011bn\u00ed cti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sporn\u00fdmi body byly v\u00fdrazy v \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch jako &#8220;s\u00e1m sebe ozna\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed&#8221; a &#8220;pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed, odhalen\u00ed!&#8221; a ot\u00e1zka, zda je spr\u00e1vn\u00e9 zve\u0159ejnit skute\u010dn\u00e9 jm\u00e9no v souvislosti s t\u011bmito v\u00fdrazy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Co se t\u00fd\u010de v\u00fdsledk\u016f, r\u016fzn\u00e9 noviny dos\u00e1hly r\u016fzn\u00fdch v\u00fdsledk\u016f. Pod\u00edvejme se, jak\u00fd byl verdikt soudu a jak\u00e9 byly v\u00fdsledky v jednotliv\u00fdch novin\u00e1ch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Namitky_zalobce\"><\/span>N\u00e1mitky \u017ealobce<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-33145\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>ka\u017ed\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek uv\u00e1d\u00ed skute\u010dnosti, jako je skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u017eena podnikatelka, kter\u00e1 se spikla, byla tak\u00e9 obvin\u011bna, pr\u00e1vn\u00edk p\u0159ipustil, \u017ee byl pad\u011blan\u00fd, a je jist\u00e9, \u017ee byl pad\u011blan\u00fd, a skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u017ealobce p\u0159edlo\u017eil smlouvu o spr\u00e1v\u011b podnik\u00e1n\u00ed na Okresn\u00ed soud v Nagoji, co\u017e sni\u017euje jeho soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e1le, pokud \u010dtete novinov\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek, ve kter\u00e9m je k povol\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159id\u00e1no &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9&#8221;, obecn\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 by m\u011bl dojem, \u017ee dan\u00e9 povol\u00e1n\u00ed je fale\u0161n\u00e9, a pokud uvedete &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9&#8221; pro ty, kte\u0159\u00ed skute\u010dn\u011b vykon\u00e1vaj\u00ed toto povol\u00e1n\u00ed, sn\u00ed\u017e\u00ed to jejich soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tak\u00e9 tvrdil, \u017ee pokud jde o poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed, <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>byly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny tak\u00e9 osobn\u00ed \u00fadaje, jako je jm\u00e9no, v\u011bk, povol\u00e1n\u00ed, \u010d\u00e1st adresy atd., a tyto informace jsou informace, kter\u00e9 by jednotlivec necht\u011bl zve\u0159ejnit, pokud by se postavil do pozice dan\u00e9 osoby na z\u00e1klad\u011b citlivosti obecn\u00e9 osoby, a proto by m\u011bly b\u00fdt chr\u00e1n\u011bny jako soukrom\u00ed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>to uvedl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-feelings-part1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-feelings-part1[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Nazor_novin\"><\/span>N\u00e1zor novin<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-33146\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Na toto, noviny Chunichi Shimbun odpov\u011bd\u011bly:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Fakta uveden\u00e1 v \u010dl\u00e1nku nejsou o tom, \u017ee byl sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n trestn\u00fd \u010din pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a pou\u017eit\u00ed fal\u0161ovan\u00fdch dokument\u016f, ani o tom, \u017ee byl sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n trestn\u00fd \u010din pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a pou\u017eit\u00ed fal\u0161ovan\u00fdch dokument\u016f. Jsou to fakta o tom, \u017ee policie v prefektu\u0159e Aichi zadr\u017eela \u017ealobce pro podez\u0159en\u00ed z pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a pou\u017eit\u00ed fal\u0161ovan\u00fdch dokument\u016f, \u017ee policie v prefektu\u0159e Aichi ozn\u00e1mila tuto skute\u010dnost zadr\u017een\u00ed a \u017ee \u017ealobce pop\u00edr\u00e1 obvin\u011bn\u00ed z t\u011bchto trestn\u00fdch \u010din\u016f. Tato fakta nemohou sn\u00ed\u017eit soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed \u017ealobce.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Argumentovali tak\u00e9, \u017ee:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Co se t\u00fd\u010de ozna\u010den\u00ed \u017ealobce jako &#8220;konzultanta&#8221;, i p\u0159es skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u017ealobec zjevn\u011b sp\u00e1chal trestn\u00fd \u010din a nejev\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 zn\u00e1mky l\u00edtosti, to nevyvol\u00e1v\u00e1 dojem, \u017ee je to zl\u00fd \u010dlov\u011bk. Po ozn\u00e1men\u00ed policie v prefektu\u0159e Aichi jsme se p\u0159i rozhovoru s policisty dozv\u011bd\u011bli, \u017ee neexistuje \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd d\u016fkaz o tom, \u017ee \u017ealobec je konzultant. Proto jsme tuto situaci popsali jako &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9ho&#8221;. Pokud bychom napsali &#8220;konzultant&#8221; bez jak\u00e9hokoli d\u016fkazu, mohlo by to v\u00e9st k popisu, kter\u00fd neodr\u00e1\u017e\u00ed skute\u010dnou situaci. To je vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 je obecn\u011b p\u0159ijateln\u00e9 v soci\u00e1ln\u00edm smyslu.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>A co se t\u00fd\u010de zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9ho jm\u00e9na, argumentovali, \u017ee:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Je t\u0159eba zv\u00e1\u017eit, zda je poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed v r\u00e1mci p\u0159ijateln\u00fdch limit\u016f v soci\u00e1ln\u00edm \u017eivot\u011b, srovn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00edm pot\u0159eby svobody projevu a poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed. Identifikace podez\u0159el\u00fdch v zpravodajstv\u00ed o trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti je z\u00e1kladn\u00edm prvkem a je to d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e1 ve\u0159ejn\u00e1 z\u00e1le\u017eitost spolu s trestn\u00fdm \u010dinem samotn\u00fdm. M\u00e1 tak\u00e9 d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fd v\u00fdznam pro zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed pravdivosti zpravodajsk\u00e9ho obsahu, sledov\u00e1n\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9ho sv\u00e9voln\u00e9ho manipulov\u00e1n\u00ed informac\u00ed vy\u0161et\u0159ovac\u00edmi org\u00e1ny a prevenci zbyte\u010dn\u00e9ho zmatku v m\u00edstn\u00ed komunit\u011b zp\u016fsoben\u00e9ho hled\u00e1n\u00edm pachatel\u016f nebo \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm nespr\u00e1vn\u00fdch zv\u011bst\u00ed prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm anonymn\u00edho zpravodajstv\u00ed. Pokud je ve\u0159ejn\u00fd a ve\u0159ejn\u00fd z\u00e1jem zpravodajsk\u00e9ho obsahu uzn\u00e1n a existuj\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u00e9 d\u016fvody pro v\u011b\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee obsah zpravodajstv\u00ed je pravdiv\u00fd nebo je pova\u017eov\u00e1n za pravdiv\u00fd, a pokud nen\u00ed spln\u011bn nez\u00e1konn\u00fd \u010din pomluvy, m\u011blo by se obecn\u011b pova\u017eovat, \u017ee nez\u00e1konn\u00fd \u010din na z\u00e1klad\u011b poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed tak\u00e9 nen\u00ed spln\u011bn.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>V\u0161echny tyto argumenty byly prezentov\u00e1ny, co\u017e je obecn\u00fd n\u00e1zor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_Tokijskeho_okresniho_soudu\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud se k popisu \u010dl\u00e1nku v den\u00edku \u010c\u00fa-ni\u010di \u0161ind\u017e\u00f3 vyj\u00e1d\u0159il takto:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Pokud se pod\u00edv\u00e1me pouze na hlavn\u00ed titulek, z v\u00fdrok\u016f &#8220;Pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed, prok\u00e1z\u00e1no!&#8221; a &#8220;Smlouva, neplatn\u00e1 podle posudku&#8221; by se dalo vy\u010d\u00edst, \u017ee n\u011bkdo se pokusil pou\u017e\u00edt pad\u011blanou smlouvu, co\u017e bylo odhaleno posudkem. To by p\u0159esahovalo skute\u010dnost, \u017ee je na n\u011bkoho vzneseno pouze podez\u0159en\u00ed. Av\u0161ak v podtitulku je uvedeno &#8220;Zat\u010den\u00ed podez\u0159el\u00e9ho \u0159editele firmy, pop\u00edr\u00e1&#8221;, a d\u00e1le v textu je uvedeno &#8220;Policie prefektury Ai\u010di&#8230; zat\u010dila a ozn\u00e1mila&#8221; a &#8220;Podle st\u0159edn\u00ed stanice&#8230; existuje podez\u0159en\u00ed&#8221;. Z toho vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee obecn\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 by mohl \u010d\u00edst \u010dl\u00e1nek jako zpr\u00e1vu zalo\u017eenou na policejn\u00edm prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed. Nelze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee je v n\u011bm definitivn\u011b uvedeno, \u017ee \u017ealobce sp\u00e1chal trestn\u00fd \u010din pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou. \u010cl\u00e1nek pouze uv\u00e1d\u00ed skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u017ealobce byl zat\u010den za podez\u0159en\u00ed z pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou, a jeho obranu proti tomu. Takov\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek nem\u016f\u017ee sni\u017eovat soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed \u017ealobce.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud rozhodl stejn\u011b i v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b dal\u0161\u00edch dvou novin a nep\u0159iznal \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti. Co se t\u00fd\u010de poru\u0161en\u00ed cti, soud uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>V\u00fdroky &#8220;Pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed, prok\u00e1z\u00e1no!&#8221; a &#8220;Smlouva, neplatn\u00e1 podle posudku&#8221; mohou obsahovat n\u00e1znak posm\u011bchu \u017ealobce jako zlo\u010dince, kter\u00fd byl odhalen p\u0159i pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed, co\u017e by mohlo zaujmout \u010dten\u00e1\u0159e. Av\u0161ak nelze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee by \u0161lo o z\u00e1va\u017en\u00e9 poru\u0161en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 by kdokoli pova\u017eoval za naprosto nep\u0159ijateln\u00e9. Nelze tedy \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee by byla poru\u0161ena cti \u017ealobce nad r\u00e1mec soci\u00e1ln\u011b p\u0159ijateln\u00e9 tolerance, a proto nebylo sp\u00e1ch\u00e1no \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 protipr\u00e1vn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud rozhodl, \u017ee co se t\u00fd\u010de poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>A\u010dkoli se v Japonsku diskutuje o tom, zda by se m\u011bl princip zve\u0159ej\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00fdch jmen v trestn\u00edch zpr\u00e1v\u00e1ch p\u0159ehodnotit, st\u00e1le plat\u00ed, \u017ee identifikace podez\u0159el\u00fdch v trestn\u00edch zpr\u00e1v\u00e1ch je z\u00e1kladn\u00edm prvkem trestn\u00ed zpravodajstv\u00ed a je to d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e1 ve\u0159ejn\u00e1 z\u00e1le\u017eitost spolu s trestn\u00fdm \u010dinem samotn\u00fdm. Zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dnosti, \u017ee byl n\u011bkdo zat\u010den, spolu s osobn\u00edmi \u00fadaji podez\u0159el\u00e9ho, jako je jm\u00e9no, v\u011bk, povol\u00e1n\u00ed a \u010d\u00e1st adresy, je obecn\u011b nutn\u00e9 pro zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed pravdivosti a p\u0159esnosti zpravodajstv\u00ed. T\u00edmto zp\u016fsobem se zaji\u0161\u0165uje pravdivost zpravodajstv\u00ed, sleduje se, zda jsou vy\u0161et\u0159ovac\u00ed org\u00e1ny spr\u00e1vn\u00e9 a zda nedoch\u00e1z\u00ed k libovoln\u00e9 manipulaci s informacemi, a tak\u00e9 se p\u0159edch\u00e1z\u00ed zbyte\u010dn\u00e9mu hled\u00e1n\u00ed pachatel\u016f v okoln\u00ed oblasti. Nelze pop\u0159\u00edt, \u017ee to m\u00e1 takov\u00fd aspekt. Tak\u017ee pot\u0159eba zve\u0159ejnit skute\u010dnosti t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se soukrom\u00ed \u017ealobce nen\u00ed v\u016fbec mal\u00e1.<\/p>\n<cite>Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu ze dne 30. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2015 (2015)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud rozhodl, \u017ee \u010dl\u00e1nky, kter\u00e9 zve\u0159ejnily skute\u010dnost, \u017ee byl \u017ealobce zat\u010den, spolu s jeho jm\u00e9nem, v\u011bkem, povol\u00e1n\u00edm a \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed adresy, kter\u00e9 jsou z\u00e1kladn\u00edmi prvky p\u0159\u00edpadu, maj\u00ed v\u00fdznam a nutnost zve\u0159ejnit tyto informace, kter\u00e9 maj\u00ed p\u0159ednost p\u0159ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edmi z\u00e1jmy na nezve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed t\u011bchto informac\u00ed t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00edch se soukrom\u00ed. Soud tedy rozhodl, \u017ee nedo\u0161lo k poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Co se t\u00fd\u010de \u010dl\u00e1nku v den\u00edku Maini\u010di \u0161imbun, soud uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>I kdy\u017e \u010dl\u00e1nek neobsahuje skute\u010dnost podez\u0159en\u00ed z pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou, uv\u00e1d\u00ed, \u017ee \u017ealobce spolupracoval s \u017eenou na pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed smlouvy a byl zat\u010den za pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou, co\u017e se li\u0161\u00ed od policejn\u00edho prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed. A pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou a pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou jsou zcela odli\u0161n\u00e9 trestn\u00e9 \u010diny. Pokud by \u017ealobce sp\u00e1chal pouze trestn\u00fd \u010din pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou a trestn\u00fd \u010din pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou spolu s pou\u017eit\u00edm pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou, hodnocen\u00ed trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu by se li\u0161ilo. Proto nelze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee byla prok\u00e1z\u00e1na pravdivost d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti skute\u010dnosti, \u017ee \u017ealobce byl zat\u010den za pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou, i kdy\u017e byla uvedena skute\u010dnost, \u017ee byl zat\u010den za pou\u017eit\u00ed pad\u011blan\u00fdch dokument\u016f se zn\u00e1mkou.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud uznal po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti a poru\u0161en\u00ed cti a na\u0159\u00eddil zaplatit od\u0161kodn\u00e9 ve v\u00fd\u0161i 500 000 jen\u016f a n\u00e1klady na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed ve v\u00fd\u0161i 50 000 jen\u016f, celkem 550 000 jen\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce se proti tomuto rozhodnut\u00ed odvolal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_Vrchniho_soudu_v_Tokiu\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/arrest-history-real-name-coverage-privacy-infringement3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-33147\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Soud nejprve zam\u00edtl argument odvolac\u00edho \u017ealobce (\u017ealobce v prvn\u00edm stupni), \u017ee obecn\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 by pod dojmem a vlivem titulk\u016f \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f, kter\u00e9 jsou vyj\u00e1d\u0159eny definitivn\u011b, p\u0159i \u010dten\u00ed t\u011bchto \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f z\u00edskal definitivn\u00ed dojem, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce je zlo\u010dinec, kter\u00fd pou\u017eil pad\u011blanou smlouvu. Soud uvedl, \u017ee titulky \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f pouze ukazuj\u00ed fragment\u00e1rn\u00ed skute\u010dnosti, jako je skute\u010dnost, \u017ee byla odhalena pad\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed a \u017ee smlouva byla pop\u0159ena p\u0159i posouzen\u00ed, a \u017ee pad\u011blan\u00e1 smlouva byla pou\u017eita pro pen\u011b\u017en\u00ed po\u017eadavky na spoluz\u00e1ru\u010ditele. D\u00e1le soud uvedl, \u017ee dojem a vliv, kter\u00fd obecn\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 z\u00edsk\u00e1 p\u0159i \u010dten\u00ed t\u011bchto titulk\u016f, je velmi omezen\u00fd. Nav\u00edc, v textu ka\u017ed\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku je uvedeno, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce je v f\u00e1zi podez\u0159en\u00ed z trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu a \u017ee odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce pop\u00edr\u00e1 toto podez\u0159en\u00ed. Proto soud neshledal, \u017ee by obecn\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 z\u00edskal definitivn\u00ed dojem, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce je zlo\u010dinec, kter\u00fd pou\u017eil pad\u011blanou smlouvu, jen kv\u016fli p\u0159\u00edtomnosti t\u011bchto titulk\u016f.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud tedy op\u011bt neshledal, \u017ee by do\u0161lo k po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti. Co se t\u00fd\u010de pou\u017eit\u00ed slova &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9&#8221; v \u010dl\u00e1nku, soud uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Slovo &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9&#8221; je \u0161iroce a obecn\u011b pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1no i v p\u0159\u00edpadech, kdy nen\u00ed k dispozici \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 potvrzen\u00ed. Pokud se pod\u00edv\u00e1me na \u010dl\u00e1nky v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, vid\u00edme, \u017ee jsou pouze uvedeny informace jako &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00fd \u0159editel konzulta\u010dn\u00ed firmy&#8221; nebo &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00fd konzultant&#8221; po adrese odvolac\u00edho \u017ealobce. Neexistuje \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed uveden\u00ed, kter\u00e9 by p\u0159idalo nuanci &#8220;ve skute\u010dnosti to tak nen\u00ed&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tak\u017ee soud neshledal, \u017ee by obecn\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 z\u00edskal dojem, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce l\u017ee o sv\u00e9 profesi, jen na z\u00e1klad\u011b uveden\u00ed &#8220;samo-prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9&#8221;. Soud tak\u00e9 neshledal, \u017ee by toto vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed samo o sob\u011b sn\u00ed\u017eilo soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed odvolac\u00edho \u017ealobce.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce argumentoval, \u017ee &#8220;uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na odvolac\u00edho \u017ealobce nem\u00e1 nic spole\u010dn\u00e9ho s ve\u0159ejnost\u00ed nebo ve\u0159ejn\u00fdm z\u00e1jmem&#8221;, ale soud uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Identifikace podez\u0159el\u00e9ho v zpravodajstv\u00ed o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech je z\u00e1kladn\u00edm prvkem zpravodajstv\u00ed o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech a je to d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e1 ve\u0159ejn\u00e1 z\u00e1le\u017eitost spolu s trestn\u00fdm \u010dinem samotn\u00fdm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e1le, p\u0159\u00edpady t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se zat\u010den\u00ed mohou naru\u0161it spravedlnost soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed a ohrozit d\u016fv\u011bru v cel\u00fd soudn\u00ed syst\u00e9m, tak\u017ee to rozhodn\u011b nejsou mal\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpady. Tyto p\u0159\u00edpady ovliv\u0148uj\u00ed z\u00e1jmy mnoha ob\u010dan\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed vyu\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed soudn\u00ed syst\u00e9m, tak\u017ee soci\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00fdznam zpravodajstv\u00ed o t\u011bchto p\u0159\u00edpadech je velk\u00fd. Proto je skute\u010dnost zat\u010den\u00ed v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b ve\u0159ejn\u00fdm z\u00e1jmem a zpravodajstv\u00ed o n\u00ed bylo provedeno v\u00fdhradn\u011b za \u00fa\u010delem ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho dobra. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159i zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed ot\u00e1zky, zda je v\u017edy povoleno zve\u0159ejnit osobn\u00ed informace, jako je jm\u00e9no, v\u011bk, povol\u00e1n\u00ed a \u010d\u00e1st adresy podez\u0159el\u00e9ho spolu s faktem zat\u010den\u00ed v \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech, je t\u0159eba vz\u00edt v \u00favahu, \u017ee podez\u0159el\u00fd, kter\u00fd byl zat\u010den, m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo na domn\u011bnku neviny, jak tvrdil odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce. P\u0159i zohledn\u011bn\u00ed tohoto bodu soud neshledal, \u017ee by v\u017edy bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 pop\u0159\u00edt, \u017ee v z\u00e1vislosti na obsahu podez\u0159en\u00ed v jednotliv\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech, postaven\u00ed a charakteristik\u00e1ch podez\u0159el\u00e9ho a dal\u0161\u00edch konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch okolnostech, m\u016f\u017ee po\u017eadavek na ochranu soukrom\u00ed p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017eit nad ve\u0159ejn\u00fdm z\u00e1jmem v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9ho druhu a \u017ee zpravodajstv\u00ed o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech obsahuj\u00edc\u00ed osobn\u00ed informace, jako je skute\u010dn\u00e9 jm\u00e9no, v f\u00e1zi podez\u0159en\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt pova\u017eov\u00e1no za pomluvu nebo nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed.<\/p>\n<cite>Rozhodnut\u00ed Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu ze dne 9. b\u0159ezna 2016 (2016)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159esto\u017ee soud uznal, \u017ee v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b tohoto zat\u010den\u00ed se jedn\u00e1 o z\u00e1va\u017en\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad a \u017ee soci\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00fdznam zpravodajstv\u00ed o tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b je velk\u00fd, soud neshledal, \u017ee by do\u0161lo k poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed, i kdy\u017e vzal v \u00favahu, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed \u017ealobce je v f\u00e1zi podez\u0159en\u00ed z trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu a je obecn\u00fdm soukrom\u00fdm ob\u010danem, a \u017ee zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed jeho jm\u00e9na je zpravodajstv\u00ed o ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m z\u00e1jmu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Je t\u0159eba poznamenat, \u017ee od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed, kter\u00e9 m\u00e1 b\u00fdt zaplaceno den\u00edku Mainichi Shimbun, bylo zv\u00fd\u0161eno na 1,1 milionu jen\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mu\u017e se proti tomuto rozhodnut\u00ed odvolal k Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edmu soudu, ale dne 13. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2016 (2016) T\u0159et\u00ed mal\u00e1 komora Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu odvol\u00e1n\u00ed zam\u00edtla a rozhodnut\u00ed Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu bylo potvrzeno.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Shrnuti\"><\/span>Shrnut\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Tokijsk\u00fd vrchn\u00ed soud upozornil, \u017ee v p\u0159\u00edpadech, kdy po\u017eadavek na ochranu soukrom\u00ed p\u0159eva\u017euje nad ve\u0159ejn\u00fdm z\u00e1jmem, m\u016f\u017ee zpravodajstv\u00ed o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech obsahuj\u00edc\u00ed osobn\u00ed \u00fadaje, jako je skute\u010dn\u00e9 jm\u00e9no podez\u0159el\u00e9ho, p\u0159edstavovat mo\u017en\u00e9 poru\u0161en\u00ed cti nebo nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b soud rozhodl, \u017ee se na dan\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad toto nevztahuje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Av\u0161ak, tento precedens nespecifikuje, kdy by mohlo zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9ho jm\u00e9na m\u00edt nez\u00e1konn\u00fd charakter. Je t\u0159eba vy\u010dkat na dal\u0161\u00ed soudn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed v t\u00e9to oblasti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/criminal-record-newspaper-database\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/criminal-record-newspaper-database[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\"><\/span>P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>V p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, kter\u00fd jsme tentokr\u00e1t p\u0159edstavili, byly n\u00e1zory rozd\u00edln\u00e9. V ot\u00e1zce po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti je vy\u017eadov\u00e1na vysok\u00e1 odbornost. Pokud se tato situace ne\u0159e\u0161\u00ed, informace se mohou \u0161\u00ed\u0159it a \u0161koda se m\u016f\u017ee d\u00e1le zv\u011bt\u0161ovat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Av\u0161ak, na\u0161e pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolith, je odborn\u00edkem na IT, zejm\u00e9na na internet a pr\u00e1vo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V posledn\u00edch letech informace o \u0161kod\u00e1ch zp\u016fsoben\u00fdch \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm f\u00e1m na internetu a pomluv\u00e1ch zp\u016fsobuj\u00ed v\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 \u0161kody jako &#8220;digit\u00e1ln\u00ed tetov\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;. Na\u0161e kancel\u00e1\u0159 nab\u00edz\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed pro boj proti &#8220;digit\u00e1ln\u00edmu tetov\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;. Podrobnosti jsou uvedeny v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fakt, \u017ee n\u011bkdo &#8220;byl odsouzen&#8221; nebo &#8220;byl zat\u010den&#8221;, je obvykle n\u011bco, co lid\u00e9 necht\u011bj\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u011b zve\u0159ejnit. Zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed skute\u010dnosti o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech nebo zat\u010den\u00ed pod skute\u010dn\u00fdm jm\u00e9ne [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63893,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[24,29],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61014"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61014"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61014\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63894,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61014\/revisions\/63894"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}