Fukuock\u00fd vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud uvedl, \u017ee “zp\u016fsoby naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed v spole\u010dnosti jsou r\u016fznorod\u00e9, nejen prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm publikac\u00ed a jin\u00fdch ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch projev\u016f, ale tak\u00e9 jako naru\u0161en\u00ed klidu soukrom\u00e9ho \u017eivota, jako je \u0161pehov\u00e1n\u00ed, odposlech, fotografov\u00e1n\u00ed, zasahov\u00e1n\u00ed do soukrom\u00e9ho \u017eivota atd., mohou b\u00fdt problematick\u00e9”. Soud d\u00e1le uvedl, \u017ee “budova bytov\u00e9ho domu je postavena na pozemku v zadn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti, kter\u00fd je p\u0159\u00edstupn\u00fd z ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 cesty p\u0159es chodn\u00edk (\u010d\u00e1st pozemku slou\u017e\u00edc\u00ed jako chodn\u00edk a parkovi\u0161t\u011b). Budova bytov\u00e9ho domu nen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edmo orientov\u00e1na na ve\u0159ejnou cestu”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n“Obraz v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nen\u00ed zvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 zam\u011b\u0159en na fotografov\u00e1n\u00ed interi\u00e9ru bytu nebo balkonu, ale je to obraz, kter\u00fd se objevil p\u0159i fotografov\u00e1n\u00ed cel\u00e9ho okol\u00ed z ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 cesty. Balkon bytu je um\u00edst\u011bn hluboko od ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 cesty a pod\u00edl obrazu balkonu na celkov\u00e9m obr\u00e1zku je mal\u00fd. Nav\u00edc, nen\u00ed zcela jasn\u00e9, co je na balkonu um\u00edst\u011bno, tak\u017ee se mus\u00ed \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee pokud vezmeme v \u00favahu b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 lidi, nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt uzn\u00e1no, \u017ee by byl klid soukrom\u00e9ho \u017eivota naru\u0161en t\u00edm, \u017ee byl tento obraz po\u0159\u00edzen.”<\/p>\nVerdikt Fukuock\u00e9ho vy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze dne 13. \u010dervence 2012 (Gregori\u00e1nsk\u00fd kalend\u00e1\u0159)Soud tedy rozhodl, \u017ee \u010din fotografov\u00e1n\u00ed nep\u0159edstavuje nez\u00e1konn\u00fd \u010din a tedy ani ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 projevy nep\u0159edstavuj\u00ed nez\u00e1konn\u00fd \u010din. Soud tak\u00e9 nep\u0159ijal poru\u0161en\u00ed z\u00e1kona o ochran\u011b osobn\u00edch \u00fadaj\u016f a zam\u00edtl n\u00e1mitky \u017ealobce t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se poru\u0161en\u00ed povinnosti respektovat soukrom\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Pochybnosti o rozsudku Fukuoka High Court (Fukuoka Vrchn\u00ed soud)<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nTento soudn\u00ed proces byl pova\u017eov\u00e1n za n\u011bco, co by n\u011bkdo nakonec zah\u00e1jil, ale pokud se rozhodnut\u00ed, \u017ee se nejedn\u00e1 o poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed, stalo definitivn\u00edm a\u017e po boji a\u017e k Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edmu soudu, m\u016f\u017ee se st\u00e1t obt\u00ed\u017en\u011bj\u0161\u00edm pr\u00e1vn\u011b bojovat a vyhr\u00e1t v souvislosti se Street View v budoucnu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Av\u0161ak v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b soud nakonec rozhodl, \u017ee jedin\u00e9, co je na Street View vid\u011bt, je balk\u00f3n, na kter\u00e9m nen\u00ed jasn\u00e9, co je zav\u011b\u0161eno. Z report\u00e1\u017e\u00ed a zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00fdch soudn\u00edch rozhodnut\u00ed nelze \u0159\u00edci, jak\u00e9 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed fotografie byly v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b pova\u017eov\u00e1ny za probl\u00e9m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
P\u0159i posuzov\u00e1n\u00ed, zda do\u0161lo k poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed, se vych\u00e1z\u00ed z “oby\u010dejn\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka” jako standardu. Bohu\u017eel, st\u00ed\u017enosti lid\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed jsou obzvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b citliv\u00ed a c\u00edt\u00ed nepohodl\u00ed, i kdy\u017e nebyly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 fotografie, kter\u00e9 by byly pova\u017eov\u00e1ny za poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed podle standardu “oby\u010dejn\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka”, jsou v soudn\u00edch \u0159\u00edzen\u00edch t\u011b\u017eko uzn\u00e1v\u00e1ny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tento rozsudek pop\u00edr\u00e1 existenci poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed na z\u00e1klad\u011b vztahu mezi konkr\u00e9tn\u00edmi fotografiemi a standardem “oby\u010dejn\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka”, tak\u017ee pokud je jasn\u00e9, co je na fotografii, a pokud je to spodn\u00ed pr\u00e1dlo, m\u016f\u017ee doj\u00edt k odli\u0161n\u00e9mu z\u00e1v\u011bru.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Nep\u0159\u00edjemnosti a obavy spojen\u00e9 se Street View<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nN\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed lid\u00e9 vyjad\u0159uj\u00ed obavy ohledn\u011b Street View v obytn\u00fdch oblastech.Kdy\u017e se zept\u00e1te lid\u00ed na jejich n\u00e1zor na Street View, mezi odpov\u011b\u010fmi jako “z\u00e1bavn\u00e9” a “u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9” najdete tak\u00e9 ty, kte\u0159\u00ed odpov\u00eddaj\u00ed “nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00e9” a “znepokojuj\u00edc\u00ed”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>O “nep\u0159\u00edjemnosti”<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n“Nep\u0159\u00edjemnost” pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b pramen\u00ed z obav, \u017ee je naru\u0161ov\u00e1no jejich soukrom\u00ed. Ka\u017ed\u00fd m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo a z\u00e1jem na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed ochran\u011b sv\u00e9ho soukrom\u00ed a klidu sv\u00e9ho osobn\u00edho \u017eivota.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Je v po\u0159\u00e1dku, kdy\u017e se n\u011bkdo dostane do obytn\u00e9 oblasti a za\u010dne po\u0159izovat 360\u00b0 panoramatick\u00e9 fotografie? Google tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee “fotografujeme z ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch cest, tak\u017ee je to v po\u0159\u00e1dku”, a soudy, alespo\u0148 podle v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed, se zdaj\u00ed souhlasit, \u017ee “to nen\u00ed mimo hranice tolerance”. Ale toto m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpadu od p\u0159\u00edpadu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>O “obav\u00e1ch”<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\nCo se t\u00fd\u010de “obav”, n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed lid\u00e9 vyjad\u0159uj\u00ed obavy, \u017ee “je na prvn\u00ed pohled jasn\u00e9, kter\u00e9 domy vypadaj\u00ed, \u017ee maj\u00ed pen\u00edze, a mohou b\u00fdt c\u00edlem vloup\u00e1n\u00ed” nebo “m\u016f\u017ee to b\u00fdt vyu\u017eito stalkery”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ale v\u0161ichni v\u011bd\u00ed, kde jsou luxusn\u00ed obytn\u00e9 oblasti, a pokud trochu proch\u00e1z\u00edte, profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed zlod\u011bji snadno poznaj\u00ed, kde jsou domy, kter\u00e9 vypadaj\u00ed, \u017ee maj\u00ed pen\u00edze, a kter\u00e9 jsou snadno p\u0159\u00edstupn\u00e9. A stalkery budou pokra\u010dovat ve sv\u00e9m chov\u00e1n\u00ed, a\u0165 u\u017e existuje Street View nebo ne.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Shrnut\u00ed<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nZd\u00e1 se, \u017ee dosud neexistuje p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy by japonsk\u00fd soud uznal poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed v souvislosti s publikac\u00ed fotografi\u00ed na Google Street View. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fd rozsudek Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu tak\u00e9 prov\u00e1d\u00ed posouzen\u00ed na z\u00e1klad\u011b konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch publikovan\u00fdch fotografi\u00ed a konstatuje, \u017ee “podle b\u011b\u017en\u00fdch lid\u00ed, nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 uznat, \u017ee klid soukrom\u00e9ho \u017eivota byl naru\u0161en t\u00edm, \u017ee byla po\u0159\u00edzena tato fotografie”. Tak\u017ee se zd\u00e1, \u017ee existuje prostor pro uzn\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed v z\u00e1vislosti na publikovan\u00fdch fotografi\u00edch, nap\u0159\u00edklad pokud je na fotografii jasn\u011b vid\u011bt spodn\u00ed pr\u00e1dlo nebo pokud je vid\u011bt konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed soukrom\u00fd \u017eivot jednotlivce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fotografie z obytn\u00fdch oblast\u00ed, na rozd\u00edl od turistick\u00fdch m\u00edst a ru\u0161n\u00fdch ulic, kter\u00e9 nejsou v r\u016fzn\u00fdch zem\u00edch obzvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b problematick\u00e9, p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed jemn\u00fd probl\u00e9m ve vztahu k soukrom\u00ed jednotlivc\u016f. Zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b pokud jsou na Google Street View zve\u0159ejn\u011bny \u0161kodliv\u00e9 fotografie, zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee existuje prostor pro po\u017eadov\u00e1n\u00ed odstran\u011bn\u00ed prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm mimosoudn\u00edch jedn\u00e1n\u00ed nebo soudn\u00edch \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed proti Google.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Funkce Street View na Google Map, kter\u00e1 umo\u017e\u0148uje prohl\u00ed\u017eet krajinu pod\u00e9l silnic po cel\u00e9m sv\u011bt\u011b, je obl\u00edben\u00e1 pro r\u016fzn\u00e9 zp\u016fsoby pou\u017eit\u00ed. M\u016f\u017eete ji vyu\u017e\u00edt pro p\u0159edb\u011b\u017enou prohl\u00eddku m\u00edsta, kam se chyst\u00e1te […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":72617,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61283"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61283"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61283\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72620,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61283\/revisions\/72620"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}