{"id":61293,"date":"2023-12-08T20:24:59","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T11:24:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/?p=61293"},"modified":"2024-03-26T05:36:24","modified_gmt":"2024-03-25T20:36:24","slug":"unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties","title":{"rendered":"P\u0159\u00edpady, kdy pr\u00e1vn\u00edk nem\u016f\u017ee p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b pomluv na internetu, a dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>V jin\u00e9m \u010dl\u00e1nku na na\u0161em webu s n\u00e1zvem &#8220;P\u0159\u00edpady a d\u016fvody, pro\u010d pr\u00e1vn\u00edk odm\u00edt\u00e1 p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad&#8221; jsme uvedli n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed hlavn\u00ed d\u016fvody, pro\u010d pr\u00e1vn\u00edk m\u016f\u017ee odm\u00edtnout p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Nen\u00ed v r\u00e1mci jeho oboru<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ob\u00e1v\u00e1 se neschopnosti klienta zaplatit<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nen\u00ed pravd\u011bpodobn\u00e9, \u017ee by p\u0159\u00edpad vyhr\u00e1l<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Existuje konflikt z\u00e1jm\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vztah d\u016fv\u011bry s klientem<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>V tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku bychom cht\u011bli podrobn\u011bji vysv\u011btlit &#8220;konflikt z\u00e1jm\u016f&#8221; a diskutovat o &#8220;dvojit\u00e9m zastoupen\u00ed&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties\/#Konflikt_zajmu_a_smlouvy_se_sebou_samym_dvoji_zastoupeni\" title=\"Konflikt z\u00e1jm\u016f a smlouvy se sebou sam\u00fdm \/ dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed\">Konflikt z\u00e1jm\u016f a smlouvy se sebou sam\u00fdm \/ dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties\/#O_smlouvach_se_sebou_samym\" title=\"O smlouv\u00e1ch se sebou sam\u00fdm\">O smlouv\u00e1ch se sebou sam\u00fdm<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties\/#Co_je_dvojite_zastoupeni\" title=\"Co je dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed\">Co je dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties\/#Pravni_zastoupeni_obou_stran\" title=\"Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed obou stran\">Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed obou stran<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties\/#Pravnicka_kancelar_Monolith_a_dvoji_zastoupeni\" title=\"Pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolith a dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed\">Pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolith a dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/unacceptable-cases-representation-of-both-parties\/#Obhajoba_utocniku_pomluv_a_zastupovani_obou_stran\" title=\"Obhajoba \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f pomluv a zastupov\u00e1n\u00ed obou stran\">Obhajoba \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f pomluv a zastupov\u00e1n\u00ed obou stran<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Konflikt_zajmu_a_smlouvy_se_sebou_samym_dvoji_zastoupeni\"><\/span>Konflikt z\u00e1jm\u016f a smlouvy se sebou sam\u00fdm \/ dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Konflikt z\u00e1jm\u016f&#8221; je situace, kdy se z\u00e1jmy stran st\u0159et\u00e1vaj\u00ed. Jin\u00fdmi slovy, pokud jedna strana z\u00edsk\u00e1, druh\u00e1 strana ztr\u00e1c\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Smlouva se sebou sam\u00fdm&#8221; a &#8220;dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed&#8221; jsou \u0161iroce ch\u00e1p\u00e1ny jako typy konfliktu z\u00e1jm\u016f. V t\u00e9to souvislosti \u00a7108 Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku (japonsk\u00e9ho Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku) stanov\u00ed n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>(Smlouva se sebou sam\u00fdm a dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed atd.)<br> \u00a7108 Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku<br> 1. \u010ciny proveden\u00e9 jako z\u00e1stupce druh\u00e9 strany nebo jako z\u00e1stupce obou stran v r\u00e1mci stejn\u00e9ho pr\u00e1vn\u00edho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed se pova\u017euj\u00ed za \u010diny osoby bez zastupovac\u00ed pravomoci. Toto v\u0161ak neplat\u00ed pro pln\u011bn\u00ed dluhu a \u010diny, kter\u00e9 p\u0159edem schv\u00e1lil s\u00e1m z\u00e1stoupen\u00fd.<br> 2. Krom\u011b p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f stanoven\u00fdch v p\u0159edchoz\u00edm odstavci se \u010diny, p\u0159i nich\u017e doch\u00e1z\u00ed ke konfliktu z\u00e1jm\u016f mezi z\u00e1stupcem a zastoupen\u00fdm, pova\u017euj\u00ed za \u010diny osoby bez zastupovac\u00ed pravomoci. Toto v\u0161ak neplat\u00ed pro \u010diny, kter\u00e9 p\u0159edem schv\u00e1lil s\u00e1m zastoupen\u00fd.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"O_smlouvach_se_sebou_samym\"><\/span>O smlouv\u00e1ch se sebou sam\u00fdm<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve zn\u011bn\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nku 108 Japonsk\u00e9ho ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku (japonsk\u00fd ~ Minp\u014d) se uv\u00e1d\u00ed &#8220;jako z\u00e1stupce druh\u00e9 strany&#8221;, co\u017e se vztahuje na &#8220;smlouvy se sebou sam\u00fdm&#8221;. Tento term\u00edn ozna\u010duje situaci, kdy jedna a ta sam\u00e1 osoba vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 sv\u00e9 postaven\u00ed jako z\u00e1stupce obou stran p\u0159i stejn\u00e9m pr\u00e1vn\u00edm jedn\u00e1n\u00ed (nap\u0159\u00edklad p\u0159i uzav\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed smlouvy) a uzav\u00edr\u00e1 smlouvu sama se sebou. Nap\u0159\u00edklad, p\u0159edstavme si, \u017ee j\u00e1 a pan A uzav\u00edr\u00e1me kupn\u00ed smlouvu na ojet\u00e9 auto, kter\u00e9 vlastn\u00ed pan A. V tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, pokud se j\u00e1 jako kupuj\u00edc\u00ed stanu z\u00e1stupcem prod\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edho pana A a projev\u00edm v\u016fli prodat toto auto m\u00edsto n\u011bj mn\u011b, jedn\u00e1 se o &#8220;smlouvu se sebou sam\u00fdm&#8221;. Pokud bych uzav\u0159el smlouvu na prodej auta, kter\u00e9 by mohlo b\u00fdt prod\u00e1no odborn\u00edkovi za 2 miliony, za 1 milion, j\u00e1 bych na tom vyd\u011blal, ale z\u00e1jmy pana A by byly nespravedliv\u011b po\u0161kozeny. Z tohoto d\u016fvodu nen\u00ed obecn\u011b povoleno zastupovat druhou stranu. Takov\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed je pova\u017eov\u00e1no za &#8220;\u010din osoby, kter\u00e1 nem\u00e1 zastupovac\u00ed pravomoc&#8221;, a proto nen\u00ed uzn\u00e1no jako zastupovac\u00ed smlouva.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Av\u0161ak, je mo\u017en\u00e9 st\u00e1t se z\u00e1stupcem druh\u00e9 strany, pokud \u2460 jde pouze o pln\u011bn\u00ed dluhu nebo \u2461 pokud to osoba p\u0159edem schv\u00e1lila. Bod \u2460 &#8220;dluh&#8221; se vztahuje na dluh, kter\u00fd je splatn\u00fd a nen\u00ed mezi stranami sporn\u00fd. Pln\u011bn\u00ed dluhu je pouze vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed ji\u017e existuj\u00edc\u00edho vztahu mezi v\u011b\u0159itelem a dlu\u017en\u00edkem, tak\u017ee se nep\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1, \u017ee by do\u0161lo k jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e9 by nov\u011b po\u0161kodilo z\u00e1jmy osoby.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Co_je_dvojite_zastoupeni\"><\/span>Co je dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Podobn\u011b, v \u010dl\u00e1nku 108 Japonsk\u00e9ho ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku (Minp\u014d) je uvedeno &#8220;st\u00e1t se z\u00e1stupcem obou stran&#8221;, co\u017e se naz\u00fdv\u00e1 &#8220;dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed&#8221;. P\u0159edstavme si nap\u0159\u00edklad, \u017ee pan A a pan B uzav\u00edraj\u00ed kupn\u00ed smlouvu na ojet\u00e9 auto, kter\u00e9 vlastn\u00ed pan A. V tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, jak pan A, tak pan B cht\u011bj\u00ed po\u017e\u00e1dat pana C, aby je zastupoval. V\u00fdsledkem je, \u017ee pan C se stane z\u00e1stupcem jak prod\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edho pana A, tak kupuj\u00edc\u00edho pana B. Pan C, kter\u00fd se cht\u011bl vyhnout opakovan\u00fdm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm, \u0159ekl panu A n\u011bco nez\u00e1vazn\u00e9ho a dohodl se na velmi n\u00edzk\u00e9 cen\u011b, za co\u017e byl panem B, s n\u00edm\u017e se zd\u00e1, \u017ee bude m\u00edt i v budoucnu dobr\u00e9 vztahy, pod\u011bkov\u00e1n.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pokud bychom takov\u00e9 &#8220;dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed&#8221; neomezovali, mohlo by to nep\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u011b po\u0161kodit z\u00e1jmy jedn\u00e9 ze stran. Proto je takov\u00e9 dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed v z\u00e1sad\u011b nep\u0159ijateln\u00e9. Takov\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed je pova\u017eov\u00e1no za &#8220;jedn\u00e1n\u00ed osoby bez zastupovac\u00edch pr\u00e1v&#8221;, a proto nen\u00ed uzn\u00e1no jako zastupovac\u00ed smlouva.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Av\u0161ak, stejn\u011b jako u &#8220;smlouvy se sebou sam\u00fdm&#8221;, existuj\u00ed v\u00fdjimky, kdy je mo\u017en\u00e9 st\u00e1t se z\u00e1stupcem obou stran, pokud \u2460 jde pouze o pln\u011bn\u00ed z\u00e1vazku nebo \u2461 ob\u011b strany daly sv\u016fj souhlas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010cl\u00e1nek 108 odstavec 2 Japonsk\u00e9ho ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku (Minp\u014d) roz\u0161i\u0159uje pravidla na &#8220;konfliktn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;, kter\u00e9 se nevztahuje na &#8220;smlouvu se sebou sam\u00fdm&#8221; nebo &#8220;dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed&#8221;. Jak je uvedeno v textu z\u00e1kona, &#8220;smlouva se sebou sam\u00fdm&#8221; a &#8220;dvojit\u00e9 zastoupen\u00ed&#8221; se t\u00fdkaj\u00ed &#8220;stejn\u00e9ho pr\u00e1vn\u00edho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;, zat\u00edmco &#8220;konfliktn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221; se m\u016f\u017ee vztahovat i na r\u016fzn\u00e1 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nap\u0159\u00edklad, pokud jste ji\u017e jednou zastupovali pana A v soudn\u00edm sporu, nem\u016f\u017eete p\u0159ijmout zastoupen\u00ed pana B proti panu A. Pokud by pan A v\u011bd\u011bl o tajemstv\u00ed pana A a vyu\u017eil ho k pod\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealoby, pan A by m\u011bl probl\u00e9m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Pravni_zastoupeni_obou_stran\"><\/span>Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed obou stran<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/pixta_45408699_M-1024x684.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5151\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">&#8220;Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed obou stran&#8221; je v pr\u00e1vu pova\u017eov\u00e1no za st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f a je zak\u00e1z\u00e1no.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010cl\u00e1nek 108 ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku se vztahuje na \u0161irokou \u0161k\u00e1lu lid\u00ed, v\u010detn\u011b da\u0148ov\u00fdch poradc\u016f a realitn\u00edch agentur, ale jak z\u00e1kon o advokacii, tak z\u00e1kladn\u00ed pravidla advok\u00e1tn\u00ed praxe zakazuj\u00ed advok\u00e1t\u016fm &#8220;pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed obou stran&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Z\u00e1kon o advokacii, \u010dl\u00e1nek 25 (P\u0159\u00edpady, kdy advok\u00e1t nem\u016f\u017ee vykon\u00e1vat sv\u00e9 povol\u00e1n\u00ed)<br>Advok\u00e1t nesm\u00ed vykon\u00e1vat sv\u00e9 povol\u00e1n\u00ed v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch p\u0159\u00edpadech. Toto v\u0161ak neplat\u00ed, pokud klient, kter\u00fd si p\u0159eje zastoupen\u00ed v dan\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, souhlas\u00ed.<br> 1. P\u0159\u00edpad, kde advok\u00e1t p\u0159ijal n\u00e1vrh druh\u00e9 strany a podporuje ho, nebo p\u0159ijal jeho \u017e\u00e1dost.<br>Z\u00e1kladn\u00ed pravidla advok\u00e1tn\u00ed praxe, \u010dl\u00e1nek 27 (P\u0159\u00edpady, kdy advok\u00e1t nem\u016f\u017ee vykon\u00e1vat sv\u00e9 povol\u00e1n\u00ed)<br>Advok\u00e1t nesm\u00ed vykon\u00e1vat sv\u00e9 povol\u00e1n\u00ed v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch p\u0159\u00edpadech. Toto v\u0161ak neplat\u00ed, pokud klient, kter\u00fd si p\u0159eje zastoupen\u00ed v dan\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, souhlas\u00ed.<br> 1. P\u0159\u00edpad, kde advok\u00e1t p\u0159ijal n\u00e1vrh druh\u00e9 strany a podporuje ho, nebo p\u0159ijal jeho \u017e\u00e1dost.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Z\u00e1kaz je formulov\u00e1n t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 stejn\u00fdmi slovy, ale &#8220;p\u0159ijet\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu druh\u00e9 strany a podpora&#8221; v textu z\u00e1kona znamen\u00e1, \u017ee advok\u00e1t poskytuje konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed odpov\u011bdi na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed konzultace od klienta. V takov\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech, nebo pokud advok\u00e1t ji\u017e p\u0159ijal p\u0159\u00edpad druh\u00e9 strany, nem\u016f\u017ee p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud toto potvrdil, kdy\u017e uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Kdy\u017e advok\u00e1t p\u0159ijme konzultaci (poradu) o pr\u00e1vn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpadu od klienta a z n\u011bjak\u00e9ho d\u016fvodu odm\u00edtne konzultaci uprost\u0159ed, nebo pokud p\u0159ijme konzultaci a\u017e do konce, ale nevyj\u00e1d\u0159\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd n\u00e1zor na ni, m\u011blo by se to pova\u017eovat za nespadaj\u00edc\u00ed do kategorie &#8220;p\u0159ijet\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu druh\u00e9 strany a podpora&#8221; podle tohoto z\u00e1kona. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, pokud, jak je uvedeno v\u00fd\u0161e, dos\u00e1hne f\u00e1ze poskytnut\u00ed konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch pr\u00e1vn\u00edch prost\u0159edk\u016f po vyslechnut\u00ed okolnost\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed konzultace, obecn\u011b by m\u011blo b\u00fdt pova\u017eov\u00e1no za p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 k &#8220;podpo\u0159e&#8221; podle tohoto z\u00e1kona. To proto, \u017ee kdy\u017e advok\u00e1t poskytuje konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed prost\u0159edky jako odpov\u011b\u010f na konzultaci klienta, je to nic jin\u00e9ho ne\u017e vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed n\u00e1zoru, \u017ee dan\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad by m\u011bl b\u00fdt \u0159e\u0161en v\u00fdhodn\u011b t\u00edm, \u017ee se p\u0159ijmou tyto prost\u0159edky a metody. <\/p>\n<cite>Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud, rozhodnut\u00ed ze dne 14. \u010dervna 1958 (Showa 33)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>To je to, co soud prohl\u00e1sil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A tento z\u00e1kaz pr\u00e1vn\u00edho zastoupen\u00ed obou stran plat\u00ed i pro advok\u00e1ty pracuj\u00edc\u00ed ve stejn\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159i, jak je uvedeno v \u010dl\u00e1nku &#8220;P\u0159\u00edpady, kdy advok\u00e1t odm\u00edtne p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad a d\u016fvody pro to&#8221; (Z\u00e1kladn\u00ed pravidla advok\u00e1tn\u00ed praxe, \u010dl\u00e1nek 57). Nap\u0159\u00edklad, pokud advok\u00e1t na\u0161\u00ed advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e Monolith ji\u017e p\u0159ijal konzultaci od pana A, n\u00e1\u0161 vedouc\u00ed advok\u00e1t, pan Kawase, nem\u016f\u017ee p\u0159ijmout konzultaci od pana B, kter\u00fd je v konfliktu s panem A. To je proto, \u017ee by to bylo pova\u017eov\u00e1no za st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f podle pr\u00e1va, a pr\u00e1vn\u00ed konzultace by byly zak\u00e1z\u00e1ny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/refused-request-by-lawyer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/refused-request-by-lawyer[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Pravnicka_kancelar_Monolith_a_dvoji_zastoupeni\"><\/span>Pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolith a dvoj\u00ed zastoupen\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vn\u00edci a pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 kancel\u00e1\u0159e maj\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00fd sv\u00e9 specializovan\u00e9 oblasti pr\u00e1va. T\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 neexistuj\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edci nebo pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 kancel\u00e1\u0159e, kte\u0159\u00ed by byli schopni \u0159e\u0161it jak\u00fdkoli pr\u00e1vn\u00ed probl\u00e9m. Proto m\u016f\u017ee doj\u00edt k tomu, \u017ee pr\u00e1vn\u00edci nebo pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 kancel\u00e1\u0159e odm\u00edtnou p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad v oblasti, ve kter\u00e9 maj\u00ed m\u00e1lo zku\u0161enost\u00ed. To je proto, \u017ee m\u016f\u017ee existovat mo\u017enost lep\u0161\u00edho \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed. Nap\u0159\u00edklad na\u0161e pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolith je specializovan\u00e1 na pr\u00e1vo IT a internetov\u00fdch podnik\u016f, tak\u017ee pokud bychom byli po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1ni o konzultaci t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se rozvodu nebo dopravn\u00ed nehody, je velmi pravd\u011bpodobn\u00e9, \u017ee bychom mohli poskytnout pouze obecn\u00e9 rady. Je pravd\u011bpodobn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, \u017ee lep\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdsledky pro klienta by bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 dos\u00e1hnout t\u00edm, \u017ee by se obr\u00e1til na pr\u00e1vn\u00edka nebo pr\u00e1vnickou kancel\u00e1\u0159, kter\u00e1 se specializuje na rozvodov\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpady nebo p\u0159\u00edpady dopravn\u00edch nehod.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reference: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/practices\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/practices[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vn\u00edci a pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 kancel\u00e1\u0159e maj\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00fd sv\u00e9 specializovan\u00e9 oblasti pr\u00e1va, a proto pe\u010dliv\u011b zaji\u0161\u0165ujeme, aby se p\u0159\u00edpady nep\u0159ekr\u00fdvaly a nedoch\u00e1zelo k dvoj\u00edmu zastoupen\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nap\u0159\u00edklad pr\u00e1vn\u00edci a pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 kancel\u00e1\u0159e, kte\u0159\u00ed \u010dasto dost\u00e1vaj\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dosti o konzultace t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se rozvod\u016f nebo probl\u00e9m\u016f mezi mu\u017ei a \u017eenami, nejprve zkontroluj\u00ed &#8220;jm\u00e9na protistran (man\u017eel\u016f) nebo stran sporu&#8221;. To je proto, \u017ee by nem\u011bli p\u0159ij\u00edmat konzultace od man\u017eelky, kter\u00e1 je ve sporu se sv\u00fdm man\u017eelem, nebo zastupovat man\u017eelku, zat\u00edmco sou\u010dasn\u011b p\u0159ij\u00edmaj\u00ed konzultace o rozvodu od man\u017eela. Rovn\u011b\u017e by nem\u011bli p\u0159ij\u00edmat konzultace od \u017eeny, kter\u00e1 je po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1na o n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody za nev\u011bru, nebo zastupovat tuto \u017eenu, zat\u00edmco sou\u010dasn\u011b zastupuj\u00ed man\u017eelku, kter\u00e1 po\u017eaduje n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Obhajoba_utocniku_pomluv_a_zastupovani_obou_stran\"><\/span>Obhajoba \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f pomluv a zastupov\u00e1n\u00ed obou stran<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Na\u0161e kancel\u00e1\u0159 je zn\u00e1m\u00e1 jako pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159, kter\u00e1 se specializuje na \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed \u0161kod zp\u016fsoben\u00fdch pomluvami na internetu. P\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1me zak\u00e1zky od mnoha firem a jednotlivc\u016f na odstran\u011bn\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f s pomluvami a identifikaci autor\u016f. Proto jsme schopni zastupovat i stranu \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f v p\u0159\u00edpadech pomluv. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b strany \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f, pokud n\u00e1s nap\u0159\u00edklad kontaktujete prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm e-mailov\u00e9ho formul\u00e1\u0159e, je mo\u017en\u00e9, \u017ee ji\u017e zastupujeme stranu ob\u011bti. To by n\u00e1s uvedlo do pozice zastupov\u00e1n\u00ed obou stran, co\u017e by mohlo znamenat, \u017ee nem\u016f\u017eeme p\u0159ijmout va\u0161i zak\u00e1zku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Proto, pokud jste \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk, \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1me v\u00e1s, abyste n\u00e1m p\u0159i kontaktov\u00e1n\u00ed e-mailem nebo telefonicky neoznamovali sv\u00e9 skute\u010dn\u00e9 jm\u00e9no, ale sd\u011blili n\u00e1m n\u00e1zev firmy nebo jm\u00e9no jednotlivce, kter\u00fd je ob\u011bt\u00ed. Pokud ob\u011b\u0165 nen\u00ed firmou nebo jednotlivcem, kter\u00e9ho ji\u017e zastupujeme, budeme zva\u017eovat p\u0159ijet\u00ed va\u0161\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dosti o pr\u00e1vn\u00ed poradenstv\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nav\u00edc, i kdy\u017e v sou\u010dasn\u00e9 dob\u011b je\u0161t\u011b nem\u00e1me \u017e\u00e1dnou zak\u00e1zku na dan\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad, je mo\u017en\u00e9, \u017ee v budoucnu n\u00e1m bude zad\u00e1na zak\u00e1zka od strany ob\u011bti. Pro na\u0161i kancel\u00e1\u0159 znamen\u00e1 p\u0159ijet\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edho poradenstv\u00ed od strany \u00fato\u010dn\u00edka, \u017ee v budoucnu nebudeme schopni p\u0159ijmout zak\u00e1zku od strany ob\u011bti v dan\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b. Proto se omlouv\u00e1me, ale v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b obhajoby strany \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f v pomluv\u00e1ch nem\u016f\u017eeme p\u0159ijmout neform\u00e1ln\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dosti o pr\u00e1vn\u00ed poradenstv\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pro v\u00edce informac\u00ed o tomto t\u00e9matu, pros\u00edm, klikn\u011bte na &#8220;Obhajoba \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f pomluv&#8221; v sekci &#8220;Dal\u0161\u00ed informace&#8221; na na\u0161em webu a p\u0159e\u010dt\u011bte si &#8220;Specifika obhajoby strany \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f a omezen\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edk\u016f&#8221; a &#8220;Dva body k zv\u00e1\u017een\u00ed p\u0159i obhajob\u011b strany \u00fato\u010dn\u00edk\u016f&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation-perpetrator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation-perpetrator[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>V jin\u00e9m \u010dl\u00e1nku na na\u0161em webu s n\u00e1zvem &#8220;P\u0159\u00edpady a d\u016fvody, pro\u010d pr\u00e1vn\u00edk odm\u00edt\u00e1 p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad&#8221; jsme uvedli n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed hlavn\u00ed d\u016fvody, pro\u010d pr\u00e1vn\u00edk m\u016f\u017ee odm\u00edtnout p\u0159ijmout p\u0159\u00edpad: V tomto \u010dl [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63145,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61293"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61293"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63146,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61293\/revisions\/63146"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63145"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}