{"id":61371,"date":"2023-12-08T20:25:32","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T11:25:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/?p=61371"},"modified":"2024-03-26T10:36:47","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T01:36:47","slug":"personal-information-and-privacy-violation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation","title":{"rendered":"Je zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed osobn\u00edch informac\u00ed na internetu poru\u0161en\u00edm soukrom\u00ed?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>V jin\u00e9m \u010dl\u00e1nku na na\u0161em webu s n\u00e1zvem &#8220;Informace o nemoci a poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed&#8221; jsme napsali, \u017ee &#8220;informace o jednotlivcov\u011b nemoci jsou informace o soukrom\u00ed a jsou velmi citliv\u00e9&#8221;. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, i dal\u0161\u00ed osobn\u00ed \u00fadaje, jako je jm\u00e9no, v\u011bk, adresa, telefonn\u00ed \u010d\u00edslo atd., pokud jsou zve\u0159ejn\u011bny, p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed. N\u011bkdo, kdo zjist\u00ed va\u0161i adresu nebo telefonn\u00ed \u010d\u00edslo, m\u016f\u017ee projevit z\u00e1jem o v\u00e1s, m\u016f\u017ee se potulovat kolem va\u0161eho domu nebo v\u00e1m volat. Existuje tak\u00e9 riziko, \u017ee zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00e9 osobn\u00ed \u00fadaje budou shroma\u017e\u010fov\u00e1ny a vyu\u017eity pro jin\u00e9 trestn\u00e9 \u010diny, jako je nevy\u017e\u00e1dan\u00e1 po\u0161ta nebo podvodn\u00e9 p\u0159evody pen\u011bz. Pokud jsou tyto informace zve\u0159ejn\u011bny, mus\u00edte okam\u017eit\u011b jednat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disease-information-and-privacy-infringement\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disease-information-and-privacy-infringement[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\/#Publikace_jmena_adresy_povolani_rodinneho_slozeni_atd\" title=\"Publikace jm\u00e9na, adresy, povol\u00e1n\u00ed, rodinn\u00e9ho slo\u017een\u00ed atd.\">Publikace jm\u00e9na, adresy, povol\u00e1n\u00ed, rodinn\u00e9ho slo\u017een\u00ed atd.<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\/#Verejne_sdeleni_okolnosti_rozvodu\" title=\"Ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed okolnost\u00ed rozvodu\">Ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed okolnost\u00ed rozvodu<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\/#Verejne_sdeleni_informaci_o_puvodu_povaze_a_prubehu_rozvodu\" title=\"Ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed informac\u00ed o p\u016fvodu, povaze a pr\u016fb\u011bhu rozvodu\">Ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed informac\u00ed o p\u016fvodu, povaze a pr\u016fb\u011bhu rozvodu<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\/#Shrnuti\" title=\"Shrnut\u00ed\">Shrnut\u00ed<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Publikace_jmena_adresy_povolani_rodinneho_slozeni_atd\"><\/span>Publikace jm\u00e9na, adresy, povol\u00e1n\u00ed, rodinn\u00e9ho slo\u017een\u00ed atd.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/shutterstock_1496387495-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6798\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Publikov\u00e1n\u00ed adresy spolu s jm\u00e9nem a rodinn\u00fdm slo\u017een\u00edm je nejen poru\u0161en\u00edm soukrom\u00ed, ale tak\u00e9 \u00fanikem informac\u00ed, kter\u00fd by mohl v\u00e9st k trestn\u00fdm \u010din\u016fm, jako je stalking.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Existuj\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpady, kdy bylo po\u017eadov\u00e1no od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed a odstran\u011bn\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f, kter\u00e9 poru\u0161ovaly soukrom\u00ed t\u00edm, \u017ee na webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch zve\u0159ejnily jm\u00e9no, adresu, povol\u00e1n\u00ed atd., a zneu\u017e\u00edvaly \u010dest t\u00edm, \u017ee psaly o trestn\u00fdch \u010dinech, jako je kr\u00e1de\u017e nebo vyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed. \u017dalobce \u017eil se t\u0159emi d\u011btmi, ale od roku 2000 (rok Heisei 12) za\u010dal \u017e\u00edt s \u017ealovan\u00fdm a tento vztah pokra\u010doval a\u017e do probl\u00e9m\u016f. Do t\u00e9 doby nebyly \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 probl\u00e9my, ale kolem roku 2014 (rok Heisei 26) za\u010dal \u017ealovan\u00fd na sv\u00fdch webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch zve\u0159ej\u0148ovat \u010dl\u00e1nky t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se \u017ealobce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch byly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny informace jako jm\u00e9no \u017ealobce, adresa, povol\u00e1n\u00ed, vzd\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed, kari\u00e9ra, skute\u010dnost rozvodu, jm\u00e9na d\u011bt\u00ed atd., a bylo naps\u00e1no, \u017ee \u017ealobce sp\u00e1chal trestn\u00e9 \u010diny jako kr\u00e1de\u017e, vyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, podvod a po\u0161kozen\u00ed majetku, \u017ee jeho dluh za od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed \u0161kody dosahuje 10,4 milionu jen\u016f, \u017ee \u017ealobce tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee kr\u00e1de\u017e je 100% \u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e1, a \u017ee naj\u00edm\u00e1 pr\u00e1vn\u00edka pomoc\u00ed pen\u011bz ukraden\u00fdch od jin\u00fdch lid\u00ed, aby tyto skute\u010dnosti zakryl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud konstatoval, \u017ee neexistuj\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u00e9 d\u016fkazy pro uzn\u00e1n\u00ed obsahu \u010dl\u00e1nku jako skute\u010dnosti a \u017ee neexistuj\u00ed d\u016fkazy podporuj\u00edc\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u00e9 d\u016fvody pro v\u011b\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee uveden\u00e9 skute\u010dnosti jsou pravdiv\u00e9, a uznal existenci pomluvy. Krom\u011b toho, pokud jde o zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed v\u011bc\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se obecn\u011b pova\u017euj\u00ed za soukrom\u00e9 a kter\u00e9 by m\u011bly b\u00fdt chr\u00e1n\u011bny jako soukrom\u00ed, proto\u017ee by je osoba necht\u011bla sd\u011blit ostatn\u00edm,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Je obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 uznat skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u017ealobce sp\u00e1chal trestn\u00e9 \u010diny atd., kter\u00e9 jsou uvedeny v tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku, a tak\u00e9 nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 potvrdit nutnost zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fdch v\u011bc\u00ed, tak\u017ee v ka\u017ed\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, tato argumentace neovliv\u0148uje uzn\u00e1n\u00ed, \u017ee zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fdch v\u011bc\u00ed poru\u0161uje soukrom\u00ed \u017ealobce.<br>Tak\u017ee tento \u010dl\u00e1nek poru\u0161uje soukrom\u00ed \u017ealobce a v tomto smyslu je to nez\u00e1konn\u00fd \u010din.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Soud v Tokiu, rozsudek ze dne 16. \u010dervence 2015 (rok Heisei 27)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>A uznal poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed a na\u0159\u00eddil zaplatit od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed ve v\u00fd\u0161i 800 000 jen\u016f a odstranit \u010dl\u00e1nek. Mimochodem, v\u011bci, kter\u00e9 byly v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bny a kter\u00e9 pat\u0159\u00ed do soukrom\u00ed, byly povol\u00e1n\u00ed, adresa, datum narozen\u00ed, univerzita a fakulta, povol\u00e1n\u00ed rozveden\u00e9ho man\u017eela, m\u00edsto pr\u00e1ce v dob\u011b s\u0148atku, jm\u00e9na a v\u011bk t\u0159\u00ed d\u011bt\u00ed atd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/privacy-invasion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/privacy-invasion[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Publikov\u00e1n\u00ed adresy spolu s jm\u00e9nem a rodinn\u00fdm slo\u017een\u00edm je nejen poru\u0161en\u00edm soukrom\u00ed, ale tak\u00e9 v\u00e1\u017en\u00fdm \u00fanikem informac\u00ed, kter\u00fd by mohl v\u00e9st k trestn\u00fdm \u010din\u016fm, jako je stalking. &#8220;Zushi Stalker Incident&#8221; se stal, proto\u017ee pachatel zjistil adresu, kam se ob\u011b\u0165 p\u0159est\u011bhovala.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/stalker-regulation-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/stalker-regulation-law[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Verejne_sdeleni_okolnosti_rozvodu\"><\/span>Ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed okolnost\u00ed rozvodu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Existuje p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy b\u00fdval\u00e1 man\u017eelka podala \u017ealobu na NHK, proto\u017ee jej\u00ed b\u00fdval\u00fd man\u017eel v televizn\u00edm po\u0159adu jednostrann\u011b komentoval okolnosti jejich rozvodu, co\u017e podle n\u00ed po\u0161kozovalo jej\u00ed pov\u011bst a naru\u0161ovalo jej\u00ed soukrom\u00ed. Nakonec donutila NHK k opravn\u00e9mu vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V po\u0159adu &#8220;R\u00e1no s tebou&#8221; vys\u00edlan\u00e9m NHK pod n\u00e1zvem &#8220;Rozlou\u010den\u00ed od man\u017eelky &#8211; man\u017eel\u00e9 zmaten\u00ed n\u00e1hl\u00fdm rozchodem&#8221;, mu\u017e s rozvodovou zku\u0161enost\u00ed odpov\u00eddal na rozhovor se sv\u00fdm synem, studentem vysok\u00e9 \u0161koly, pod sv\u00fdm skute\u010dn\u00fdm jm\u00e9nem. Okolnosti, kter\u00e9 vedly k rozvodu, byly takov\u00e9, \u017ee a\u010dkoli byli man\u017eel\u00e9 dob\u0159e zn\u00e1m\u00ed ve sv\u00e9m okol\u00ed, p\u0159ed osmi lety se kv\u016fli pr\u00e1ci man\u017eel \u010dasto vracel dom\u016f pozd\u011b. Man\u017eel se sna\u017eil man\u017eelce v\u0161e vysv\u011btlit a p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dit ji, ale man\u017eelka se nesna\u017eila porozum\u011bt a jej\u00ed frustrace se jen zvy\u0161ovala. I p\u0159es mnoho diskus\u00ed se man\u017eelovi zd\u00e1lo, \u017ee man\u017eel\u010diny argumenty jsou nepodstatn\u00e9. Man\u017eelka p\u0159ipravovala rozvod za man\u017eelov\u00fdmi z\u00e1dy a n\u00e1hle po\u017eadovala rozvod. Tento mu\u017e souhlasil s rozvodem, ani\u017e by pochopil skute\u010dn\u00e9 pocity sv\u00e9 man\u017eelky. To, \u017ee man\u017eel nepochopil hlub\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdznam man\u017eel\u010diny zpr\u00e1vy, zhor\u0161ilo jejich vztah. Takov\u00fd byl obsah vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve skute\u010dnosti v\u0161ak tato man\u017eelka jasn\u011b po\u017e\u00e1dala man\u017eela o rozvod dev\u011bt let p\u0159ed vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00edm a nad\u00e1le po\u017eadovala rozvod. P\u0159ed sedmi lety se za\u010dala vyh\u00fdbat setk\u00e1n\u00ed s man\u017eelem doma a man\u017eel uznal, \u017ee man\u017eelka po\u017eaduje rozvod a d\u016fvody pro to. Av\u0161ak proto\u017ee man\u017eel nesouhlasil s rozvodem, man\u017eelka podala \u017e\u00e1dost o mediaci rozvodu a pot\u00e9 opustila d\u016fm. Po roce mediace byl rozvod schv\u00e1len. Proto\u017ee soud prvn\u00ed instance zam\u00edtl \u017e\u00e1dost, b\u00fdval\u00e1 man\u017eelka se odvolala a Tokyo High Court uznal po\u0161kozen\u00ed pov\u011bsti a naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed, zm\u011bnil p\u016fvodn\u00ed rozsudek a uznal \u017e\u00e1dost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud uznal, \u017ee b\u00fdval\u00fd man\u017eel \u0159ekl, \u017ee pokud b\u00fdval\u00e1 man\u017eelka provede protiinterview, nebude spolupracovat na rozhovoru s po\u0159adem nebo odm\u00edtne \u00fa\u010dast v po\u0159adu. Z toho vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee NHK se rozhodla neinterviewovat b\u00fdvalou man\u017eelku, ale jednostrann\u011b vytvo\u0159ila a produkovala po\u0159ad pouze na z\u00e1klad\u011b rozhovoru s b\u00fdval\u00fdm man\u017eelem a vys\u00edlala ho bez konzultace s b\u00fdvalou man\u017eelkou. Soud konstatoval, \u017ee nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt \u0159e\u010deno, \u017ee NHK splnila svou povinnost vyhnout se naru\u0161en\u00ed pov\u011bsti a soukrom\u00ed b\u00fdval\u00e9 man\u017eelky t\u00edm, \u017ee provedla mo\u017en\u00e9 rozhovory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Pr\u016fb\u011bh rozvodu a d\u016fvody pro rozvod jsou velmi soukrom\u00e9 z\u00e1le\u017eitosti pro z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00e9 strany a obvykle se n\u00e1zory a argumenty z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00fdch stran na tento bod neshoduj\u00ed a \u010dasto se ostr\u00e9 konfrontuj\u00ed. Rozvod mezi oby\u010dejn\u00fdmi lidmi, jako je \u017ealobce a jeho man\u017eelka, nen\u00ed v\u011bc\u00ed, kter\u00e1 by sama o sob\u011b m\u011bla b\u00fdt p\u0159edm\u011btem opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e9ho z\u00e1jmu spole\u010dnosti. P\u0159i vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed tohoto t\u00e9matu by m\u011blo b\u00fdt zvoleno takov\u00e9 zp\u016fsob, aby nebylo mo\u017en\u00e9 identifikovat z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00e9 strany, nebo pokud to nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9, i kdy\u017e je to ve\u0159ejn\u00fd televizn\u00ed po\u0159ad, je t\u0159eba z\u00edskat souhlas z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00fdch stran, prov\u00e9st rozhovory s ob\u011bma stranami a usilovat o co nejlep\u0161\u00ed pochopen\u00ed pravdy. Je z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee \u017ealovan\u00fd nedostate\u010dn\u011b usiloval o to.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Rozsudek Tokyo High Court, 18. \u010dervence 2001 (rok 2001)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud uznal po\u0161kozen\u00ed pov\u011bsti a naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed a na\u0159\u00eddil platbu 1,3 milionu jen\u016f. Na z\u00e1klad\u011b \u010dl\u00e1nku 4 z\u00e1kona o vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00fd stanov\u00ed, \u017ee &#8220;pokud se zjist\u00ed, \u017ee n\u011bco nen\u00ed pravda, mus\u00ed b\u00fdt do dvou dn\u016f od zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed provedeno opravn\u00e9 nebo zru\u0161en\u00e9 vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed stejn\u00fdm vys\u00edlac\u00edm za\u0159\u00edzen\u00edm a vhodn\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem&#8221;, bylo na\u0159\u00edzeno opravn\u00e9 vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To plat\u00ed i pro televizn\u00ed po\u0159ady, ale pokud m\u00e1te mnoho probl\u00e9m\u016f na sv\u00e9 stran\u011b, kter\u00e9 vedly k rozvodu, a pokud b\u011bhem tohoto procesu opakovan\u011b prov\u00e1d\u00edte problematick\u00e9 chov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo n\u00e1sil\u00ed a p\u00ed\u0161ete \u010dl\u00e1nky na blogu, kter\u00e9 nazna\u010duj\u00ed, \u017ee probl\u00e9my jsou pouze na stran\u011b va\u0161eho partnera, bez jak\u00e9hokoli odkazu na to, je velmi pravd\u011bpodobn\u00e9, \u017ee budete obvin\u011bni z naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed. Pr\u016fb\u011bh rozvodu a d\u016fvody pro rozvod jsou velmi soukrom\u00e9 z\u00e1le\u017eitosti pro z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00e9 strany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/scope-of-privacyinfringement\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/scope-of-privacyinfringement[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Verejne_sdeleni_informaci_o_puvodu_povaze_a_prubehu_rozvodu\"><\/span>Ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed informac\u00ed o p\u016fvodu, povaze a pr\u016fb\u011bhu rozvodu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/shutterstock_249680629-1024x684.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6800\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Pokud jsou na internetu zve\u0159ejn\u011bny osobn\u00ed informace, kter\u00e9 byste rad\u011bji necht\u011bli sd\u00edlet s ostatn\u00edmi, obra\u0165te se na odborn\u00e9ho pr\u00e1vn\u00edka.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>V dubnu 1987 (rok 1987) v Los Angeles zmizel b\u00fdval\u00fd \u0159editel pobo\u010dky Itochu Corporation v Los Angeles a v prosinci t\u00e9ho\u017e roku byla jeho man\u017eelka, \u017ealobkyn\u011b, a osoba A zat\u010deni polici\u00ed m\u011bsta Los Angeles pro podez\u0159en\u00ed z vra\u017edy b\u00fdval\u00e9ho \u0159editele pobo\u010dky. \u017dalobkyn\u011b v\u0161ak pop\u0159ela toto obvin\u011bn\u00ed a byla propu\u0161t\u011bna n\u011bkolik hodin pozd\u011bji, stejn\u011b jako osoba A n\u011bkolik dn\u00ed pozd\u011bji. V lednu n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edho roku zatkla policie m\u011bsta Los Angeles osobu B, p\u0159\u00edtele osoby A, jako podez\u0159el\u00e9ho z vra\u017edy b\u00fdval\u00e9ho \u0159editele pobo\u010dky, a na z\u00e1klad\u011b v\u00fdpov\u011bdi osoby B, kter\u00e9 byla ud\u011blena takzvan\u00e1 trestn\u00ed imunita, bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee osoba B a osoba A spole\u010dn\u011b zavra\u017edili b\u00fdval\u00e9ho \u0159editele pobo\u010dky. Na z\u00e1klad\u011b v\u00fdpov\u011bdi osoby B bylo nalezeno t\u011blo b\u00fdval\u00e9ho \u0159editele pobo\u010dky poh\u0159ben\u00e9 pobl\u00ed\u017e silnice Malibu Canyon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00e1sledn\u011b zm\u011bnila kancel\u00e1\u0159 okresn\u00edho prokur\u00e1tora v Los Angeles obvin\u011bn\u00ed proti \u017ealobkyni z &#8220;vra\u017edy&#8221; na &#8220;spolupachatelstv\u00ed po skutku&#8221; (v Japonsku &#8220;zni\u010den\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f&#8221; nebo &#8220;ukr\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00ed pachatele&#8221;), ale pozd\u011bji st\u00e1hla trestn\u00ed st\u00edh\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Od b\u0159ezna 1988 za\u010daly japonsk\u00e9 t\u00fdden\u00edky a dal\u0161\u00ed m\u00e9dia p\u0159\u00edpad zve\u0159ej\u0148ovat. Podle sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho hodnocen\u00ed to byla bou\u0159e pomluv, kter\u00e9 byly tak \u0161okuj\u00edc\u00ed, \u017ee se \u010dlov\u011bk div\u00ed, jak mohly b\u00fdt naps\u00e1ny. Japonsk\u00e9 t\u00fdden\u00edky v\u0161ak zd\u00e1nliv\u011b v\u011b\u0159ily, \u017ee \u017ealobkyn\u011b je vinn\u00e1 a \u017ee bude brzy zat\u010dena. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, nen\u00ed jasn\u00e9, na jak\u00e9m z\u00e1klad\u011b bylo toto rozhodnut\u00ed u\u010din\u011bno.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pomlouv\u00e1n\u00ed bez dostate\u010dn\u00fdch informac\u00ed je nep\u0159ijateln\u00e9 a nebezpe\u010dn\u00e9. Opakovan\u00e9 pomlouv\u00e1n\u00ed na internetu m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt tak\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edkladem toho, jak\u00e1 odpov\u011bdnost m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt vy\u017eadov\u00e1na.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobkyn\u011b podala \u017ealobu za poru\u0161en\u00ed sv\u00e9 cti, naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed a poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na obraz proti Shinchosha (t\u00fdden\u00edky &#8220;Shukan Shincho&#8221; a &#8220;Focus&#8221;), Mainichi Newspapers (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Sunday Mainichi&#8221;), Shogakukan (fotografick\u00fd t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Touch&#8221;), Asahi Shimbun (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Shukan Asahi&#8221;), Fusosha (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Shukan Sankei&#8221;) a Bungeishunju (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Shukan Bunshun&#8221;). Soud uznal poru\u0161en\u00ed cti, naru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed a poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na obraz v n\u011bkter\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch a p\u0159iznal n\u00e1rok na n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody. (Rozsudek Okresn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu ze dne 31. ledna 1994)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud nap\u0159\u00edklad uznal, \u017ee \u010dl\u00e1nek s titulkem &#8220;\u0160\u00edlenstv\u00ed! Man\u017eelka &#8216;star\u00e9 \u0161lechty&#8217; zabila sv\u00e9ho man\u017eela&#8221; a &#8220;Koneckonc\u016f, pachatelem byla man\u017eelka (51), kter\u00e1 se od man\u017eela odst\u011bhovala, a jejich nejstar\u0161\u00ed syn (21), kter\u00e9ho policie v Los Angeles sledovala ji\u017e del\u0161\u00ed dobu&#8221; v \u010dasopise &#8220;Focus&#8221; byl pomlouvaj\u00edc\u00ed, proto\u017ee &#8220;neexistuj\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u00e9 d\u016fkazy pro tvrzen\u00ed, \u017ee \u017ealobkyn\u011b je pachatelkou vra\u017edy b\u00fdval\u00e9ho man\u017eela, a neexistuje \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd d\u016fvod pro to, aby v to v\u011b\u0159ili&#8221;. Soud tak\u00e9 uznal, \u017ee &#8220;popis sporu o rozvod je, jak tvrd\u00ed \u017ealobkyn\u011b, z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed, kterou by \u010dlov\u011bk cht\u011bl udr\u017eet v tajnosti podle standard\u016f citlivosti b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 osoby, a poru\u0161uje soukrom\u00ed \u017ealobkyn\u011b&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e1le byly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny fotografie \u017ealobkyn\u011b, jedna z nich byla po\u0159\u00edzena, kdy\u017e \u017ealobkyn\u011b chodila p\u0159ed sv\u00fdm domem po sv\u00e9m prvn\u00edm propu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed z vazby, a druh\u00e1 byla fotografie \u017ealobkyn\u011b v plavk\u00e1ch, kter\u00e1 byla zve\u0159ejn\u011bna v \u010dasopise &#8220;Heibon&#8221; v prosinci 1956, kdy byla \u017ealobkyn\u011b vybr\u00e1na jako &#8220;Miss Heibon&#8221;. Soud uznal, \u017ee fotografie v plavk\u00e1ch poru\u0161uje pr\u00e1vo \u017ealobkyn\u011b na obraz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kone\u010dn\u011b, informace, kter\u00e9 byly poru\u0161eny, zahrnovaly p\u016fvod \u017ealobkyn\u011b, pr\u016fb\u011bh rozvodu, podez\u0159en\u00ed z trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, povahu atd., a v z\u00e1vislosti na obsahu a rozsahu poru\u0161en\u00ed byly p\u0159izn\u00e1ny n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li> Shinchosha (t\u00fdden\u00edky &#8220;Shukan Shincho&#8221; a &#8220;Focus&#8221;): 2 miliony jen\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Mainichi Newspapers (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Sunday Mainichi&#8221;): 700 tis\u00edc jen\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Shogakukan (fotografick\u00fd t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Touch&#8221;): 400 tis\u00edc jen\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Asahi Shimbun (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Shukan Asahi&#8221;): 300 tis\u00edc jen\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Fusosha (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Shukan Sankei&#8221;): 500 tis\u00edc jen\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Bungeishunju (t\u00fdden\u00edk &#8220;Shukan Bunshun&#8221;): 600 tis\u00edc jen\u016f<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Byly p\u0159izn\u00e1ny jako od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Shrnuti\"><\/span>Shrnut\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9, aby takov\u00e9to nedbal\u00e9 vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed a jednostrann\u00e9 rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed nezp\u016fsobovalo probl\u00e9my. Mo\u017en\u00e1 bylo rozhodnuto, \u017ee to nevad\u00ed, pokud se to prod\u00e1v\u00e1, ale zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee sou\u010dasn\u00e1 bitva o pomluvy na internetu je podobn\u00e1 bitv\u011b o p\u0159eh\u0159\u00e1t\u00e9 zpravodajstv\u00ed o poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed, kter\u00e9 v dob\u011b sv\u00e9ho vrcholu sout\u011b\u017eily fotografick\u00e9 t\u00fdden\u00edky. Je nutn\u00e9 rychle reagovat, pokud jsou na internetu zve\u0159ejn\u011bny osobn\u00ed informace, kter\u00e9 by ostatn\u00ed nem\u011bli v\u011bd\u011bt, jako je jm\u00e9no, adresa, pr\u016fb\u011bh a d\u016fvody rozvodu, p\u016fvod, povaha, slo\u017een\u00ed rodiny, podez\u0159en\u00ed z trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, p\u0159\u00edjem, osobn\u00ed vztahy atd.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>V jin\u00e9m \u010dl\u00e1nku na na\u0161em webu s n\u00e1zvem &#8220;Informace o nemoci a poru\u0161en\u00ed soukrom\u00ed&#8221; jsme napsali, \u017ee &#8220;informace o jednotlivcov\u011b nemoci jsou informace o soukrom\u00ed a jsou velmi citliv\u00e9&#038;#8221 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63287,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61371"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61371"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61371\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63288,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61371\/revisions\/63288"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}