{"id":61549,"date":"2023-12-08T20:25:36","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T11:25:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/?p=61549"},"modified":"2024-03-29T17:38:03","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T08:38:03","slug":"corporation-compensation-for-damages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages","title":{"rendered":"Je mo\u017en\u00e9 \u017e\u00e1dat o n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody i pro pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 osoby? Vysv\u011btlen\u00ed na z\u00e1klad\u011b precedensu o pomluv\u011b"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Pokud jste na internetu pomlouv\u00e1ni a toto se pova\u017euje za ur\u00e1\u017eku na cti, je b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 podat soudn\u00ed \u017ealobu jako ob\u010danskopr\u00e1vn\u00ed spor o n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody. Kdo tedy bude hlavn\u00edm \u017eadatelem o n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody za ur\u00e1\u017eku na cti? Ot\u00e1zka se st\u00e1v\u00e1 probl\u00e9mem, proto\u017ee c\u00edlem ur\u00e1\u017eky na cti m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt nejen jednotlivec, ale tak\u00e9 pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 osoba.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pokud je ob\u011bt\u00ed ur\u00e1\u017eky na cti osoba provozuj\u00edc\u00ed spole\u010dnost nebo podobnou organizaci, m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt po\u0161kozena tak\u00e9 pov\u011bst spole\u010dnosti, co\u017e m\u016f\u017ee v\u00e9st k obchodn\u00edm ztr\u00e1t\u00e1m. V takov\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt \u017ealobcem pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 osoba, tedy spole\u010dnost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b obecn\u011b plat\u00ed, \u017ee spole\u010dnost pod\u00e1v\u00e1 \u017ealobu jako \u017ealobce A za poru\u0161en\u00ed d\u016fv\u011bry a pr\u00e1va na pov\u011bst, zat\u00edmco jednotlivec, nap\u0159\u00edklad \u017ealobce B, pod\u00e1v\u00e1 \u017ealobu za poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na pov\u011bst. Av\u0161ak proto\u017ee spole\u010dnost a jej\u00ed \u0159editel jsou odli\u0161n\u00e9 entity, mohou se st\u00e1t \u017ealobci a podat samostatn\u00e9 soudn\u00ed \u017ealoby.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vysv\u011btl\u00edme p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy bylo toto rozhodnut\u00ed jasn\u011b u\u010din\u011bno.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Pribeh_pripadu\" title=\"P\u0159\u00edb\u011bh p\u0159\u00edpadu\">P\u0159\u00edb\u011bh p\u0159\u00edpadu<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Prvni_pripad_kdy_se_generalni_reditel_stal_zalobcem\" title=\"Prvn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy se gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel stal \u017ealobcem\">Prvn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy se gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel stal \u017ealobcem<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Druhy_pripad_kdy_byla_nase_firma_zalobcem\" title=\"Druh\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy byla na\u0161e firma \u017ealobcem\">Druh\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy byla na\u0161e firma \u017ealobcem<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#%E2%80%9CZakaz_podani_duplicitni_zaloby%E2%80%9D_a_%E2%80%9CNe_bis_in_idem%E2%80%9D\" title=\"&#8220;Z\u00e1kaz pod\u00e1n\u00ed duplicitn\u00ed \u017ealoby&#8221; a &#8220;Ne bis in idem&#8221;\">&#8220;Z\u00e1kaz pod\u00e1n\u00ed duplicitn\u00ed \u017ealoby&#8221; a &#8220;Ne bis in idem&#8221;<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Shrnuti\" title=\"Shrnut\u00ed\">Shrnut\u00ed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\" title=\"P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e\">P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Pribeh_pripadu\"><\/span>P\u0159\u00edb\u011bh p\u0159\u00edpadu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>V b\u0159eznu 2017 bylo na blogu celkem p\u011btkr\u00e1t naps\u00e1no, \u017ee v\u00fdkonn\u00fd \u0159editel akciov\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti, kter\u00e1 poskytuje slu\u017eby v oblasti podnikov\u00e9ho konzultingu, byl obvin\u011bn z n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch nepravdiv\u00fdch informac\u00ed o zat\u010den\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>V \u00fanoru 2017 byl vysl\u00fdch\u00e1n jako podez\u0159el\u00fd z nucen\u00e9ho obsc\u00e9nn\u00edho chov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Byl zat\u010den za podez\u0159en\u00ed z nucen\u00e9ho obsc\u00e9nn\u00edho chov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dopustil se \u010dinu odpov\u00eddaj\u00edc\u00edho nucen\u00e9mu obsc\u00e9nn\u00edmu chov\u00e1n\u00ed, ale dohodl se s ob\u011bt\u00ed nebo se s n\u00ed usm\u00ed\u0159il<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Tyto \u010dl\u00e1nky byly publikov\u00e1ny \u017ealovan\u00fdm tak, \u017ee vypadaly, jako by je napsala spole\u010dnost \u017ealobce nebo zpravodajsk\u00e1 agentura.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Podrobnosti nejsou jasn\u00e9, ale v b\u0159eznu 2019 byl \u017ealovan\u00fd odsouzen k trestu odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody na 1 rok a 2 m\u011bs\u00edce a k trestu odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody na 7 m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f za pomluvu spojenou s t\u011bmito p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky. Trestn\u00ed pomluva je ji\u017e pravomocn\u011b rozhodnut\u00e1. Trestn\u00ed pomluva je trestn\u00fd \u010din, kter\u00fd m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt st\u00edh\u00e1n pouze na z\u00e1klad\u011b st\u00ed\u017enosti ob\u011bti (\u010dl\u00e1nek 232 Japonsk\u00e9ho trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kona), tak\u017ee bez st\u00ed\u017enosti ob\u011bti nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt trestn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed zah\u00e1jeno. To znamen\u00e1, \u017ee \u017ealobce ji\u017e podal trestn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost a skute\u010dnost, \u017ee byl vynesen trest odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody, nazna\u010duje, \u017ee trestn\u00fd \u010din byl z\u00e1va\u017en\u00fd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/corporation-compensation-for-damages-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36620\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Prvni_pripad_kdy_se_generalni_reditel_stal_zalobcem\"><\/span>Prvn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy se gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel stal \u017ealobcem<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce, kter\u00fd je gener\u00e1ln\u00edm \u0159editelem akciov\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti poskytuj\u00edc\u00ed slu\u017eby v oblasti podnikov\u00e9ho managementu a konzultac\u00ed, podal po trestn\u00edm ozn\u00e1men\u00ed \u017ealobu, ve kter\u00e9 tvrdil, \u017ee dan\u00e9 \u010dl\u00e1nky p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed ur\u00e1\u017eku na cti a po\u017eadoval od \u017ealovan\u00e9ho n\u00e1hradu za du\u0161evn\u00ed \u00fajmu a dal\u0161\u00ed \u0161kody.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalovan\u00fd tvrdil, \u017ee d\u016fvodem pro jeho p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky byla sympatie k man\u017eelce \u017ealobce, kter\u00e1 od \u017ealobce nedost\u00e1vala \u017eivotn\u00ed n\u00e1klady a byla vystavena \u0161ikan\u011b. \u017dalobce naopak tvrdil, \u017ee \u017ealovan\u00fd neust\u00e1le kontaktoval jeho man\u017eelku, ke kter\u00e9 choval sympatie, a kdy\u017e to nebylo mo\u017en\u00e9, reagoval na toto zklam\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00edm, \u017ee publikoval dan\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V reakci na to soud rozhodl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;V p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b t\u011bchto \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f byla uzn\u00e1na ur\u00e1\u017eka na cti v civiln\u00edm pr\u00e1vu, proto\u017ee &#8216;sn\u00ed\u017eily objektivn\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed ze strany spole\u010dnosti&#8217;, a \u017ealovan\u00e9mu bylo na\u0159\u00edzeno zaplatit n\u00e1hradu za du\u0161evn\u00ed \u00fajmu ve v\u00fd\u0161i 1,2 milionu jen\u016f (asi 230 tis\u00edc K\u010d), n\u00e1klady na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed slu\u017eby ve v\u00fd\u0161i 150 tis\u00edc jen\u016f (asi 29 tis\u00edc K\u010d), celkem tedy 1,35 milionu jen\u016f (asi 260 tis\u00edc K\u010d).<\/p>\n<cite> Rozsudek Okresn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu ze dne 25. listopadu 2019 (rok 1 Reiwa) <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tak\u00e9 po\u017eadoval 617 388 jen\u016f (asi 120 tis\u00edc K\u010d), kter\u00e9 jeho spole\u010dnost zaplatila za n\u00e1klady na zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed toto\u017enosti pachatele, ale nebylo to uzn\u00e1no jako \u0161koda \u017ealobce, proto\u017ee n\u00e1klady nebyly hrazeny \u017ealobcem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-decline-in-social-reputation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-decline-in-social-reputation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/corporation-compensation-for-damages-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36622\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Druhy_pripad_kdy_byla_nase_firma_zalobcem\"><\/span>Druh\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy byla na\u0161e firma \u017ealobcem<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Mo\u017en\u00e1 se pt\u00e1te, pro\u010d nebyly uzn\u00e1ny n\u00e1klady na \u017e\u00e1dost o odhalen\u00ed informac\u00ed o odes\u00edlateli. Ve stejn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b se nyn\u00ed stala \u017ealobcem spole\u010dnost, jej\u00edm\u017e je \u0159editel \u017ealobce z prvn\u00edho p\u0159\u00edpadu, a byla pod\u00e1na \u017ealoba na zaplacen\u00ed nehmotn\u00e9 \u0161kody na z\u00e1klad\u011b pomluvy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud se v prvn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b zab\u00fdval p\u011bti \u010dl\u00e1nky, ve kter\u00fdch se uv\u00e1d\u00ed, \u017ee<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Ka\u017ed\u00fd z t\u011bchto \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f uv\u00e1d\u00ed, \u017ee A, z\u00e1stupce \u017ealobce, sp\u00e1chal sexu\u00e1ln\u00ed napaden\u00ed a byl zat\u010den. Pokud to \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 s b\u011b\u017enou pozornost\u00ed a \u010dten\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdmi dovednostmi posuzuje, tyto \u010dl\u00e1nky vytv\u00e1\u0159ej\u00ed dojem, \u017ee \u017ealobce je spole\u010dnost, kter\u00e1 m\u00e1 jako sv\u00e9ho z\u00e1stupce n\u011bkoho, kdo byl zat\u010den za sexu\u00e1ln\u00ed trestn\u00fd \u010din. Proto by m\u011blo b\u00fdt \u0159e\u010deno, \u017ee tyto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky sni\u017euj\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed \u017ealobce (nav\u00edc, ani podle d\u016fkaz\u016f v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nelze p\u0159ipustit, \u017ee A sp\u00e1chal sexu\u00e1ln\u00ed napaden\u00ed uveden\u00e9 v t\u011bchto \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch v \u00fanoru nebo b\u0159eznu 2017, ani \u017ee byl z tohoto d\u016fvodu zat\u010den). Proto v\u0161echny tyto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky po\u0161kozuj\u00ed \u010dest \u017ealobce a tvo\u0159\u00ed nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<cite> Rozsudek Okresn\u00edho soudu v Tokiu ze dne 14. \u0159\u00edjna 2020 (2020) <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud p\u0159i posuzov\u00e1n\u00ed obsahu, metody, po\u010dtu a motivace t\u011bchto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f zjistil, \u017ee jsou zlomysln\u00e9 a sobeck\u00e9. Na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b, tyto \u010dl\u00e1nky se zam\u011b\u0159uj\u00ed na A, \u0159editele \u017ealobce, a ne na samotnou spole\u010dnost, kter\u00e1 je \u017ealobcem. Soud tedy p\u0159i zohledn\u011bn\u00ed v\u0161ech t\u011bchto faktor\u016f ur\u010dil, \u017ee p\u0159im\u011b\u0159enou finan\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1hradou za nehmotnou \u0161kodu, kterou utrp\u011bla spole\u010dnost \u017ealobce v d\u016fsledku t\u011bchto p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f, je 600 000 jen\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud n\u00e1sledn\u011b na\u0159\u00eddil \u017ealovan\u00e9mu zaplatit celkem 1 060 000 jen\u016f, v\u010detn\u011b 60 000 jen\u016f na n\u00e1klady pr\u00e1vn\u00edka a 400 000 jen\u016f z 617 388 jen\u016f, kter\u00e9 byly vynalo\u017eeny na identifikaci autora p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f, jako\u017eto \u0161kodu s p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinnou souvislost\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalovan\u00fd byl tedy ve dvou soudn\u00edch \u0159\u00edzen\u00edch odsouzen k zaplacen\u00ed celkov\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1stky 2 410 000 jen\u016f na n\u00e1hrad\u011b \u0161kody.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/corporation-compensation-for-damages-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36621\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CZakaz_podani_duplicitni_zaloby%E2%80%9D_a_%E2%80%9CNe_bis_in_idem%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>&#8220;Z\u00e1kaz pod\u00e1n\u00ed duplicitn\u00ed \u017ealoby&#8221; a &#8220;Ne bis in idem&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>V \u010dl\u00e1nku 142 Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du (Japonsk\u00fd Ob\u010dansk\u00fd soudn\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d) je zak\u00e1z\u00e1no pod\u00e1vat duplicitn\u00ed \u017ealoby.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u010cl\u00e1nek 142: Strana nem\u016f\u017ee podat dal\u0161\u00ed \u017ealobu na p\u0159\u00edpad, kter\u00fd je ji\u017e p\u0159ed soudem.<\/p>\n<cite> Ob\u010dansk\u00fd soudn\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d (Z\u00e1kaz pod\u00e1n\u00ed duplicitn\u00ed \u017ealoby) <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e1le, v druh\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti \u010dl\u00e1nku 39 \u00dastavy (Japonsk\u00e1 \u00dastava) je explicitn\u011b stanoven princip &#8220;ne bis in idem&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u010cl\u00e1nek 39: Nikdo nebude trestn\u011b st\u00edh\u00e1n za \u010din, kter\u00fd byl v dob\u011b jeho sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed leg\u00e1ln\u00ed, nebo za \u010din, u kter\u00e9ho byla ji\u017e prok\u00e1z\u00e1na nevina. Nikdo nebude trestn\u011b st\u00edh\u00e1n za stejn\u00fd zlo\u010din v\u00edcekr\u00e1t.<\/p>\n<cite> \u00dastava (Z\u00e1kaz retroaktivn\u00edho trest\u00e1n\u00ed, ne bis in idem) <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>V t\u00e9to souvislosti ob\u017ealovan\u00fd tvrdil, \u017ee tato \u017ealoba (druh\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad) je toto\u017en\u00e1 s p\u0159edchoz\u00ed \u017ealobou (prvn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad) a poru\u0161uje \u010dl\u00e1nek 142 Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du a tak\u00e9 je v rozporu s principem &#8220;ne bis in idem&#8221; stanoven\u00fdm v druh\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti \u010dl\u00e1nku 39 \u00dastavy, a proto by m\u011bla b\u00fdt zam\u00edtnuta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud na to odpov\u011bd\u011bl, \u017ee v\u00fdrok v prvn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpadu byl u\u010din\u011bn p\u0159ed pod\u00e1n\u00edm \u017ealoby v druh\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpadu, tak\u017ee prvn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad nespad\u00e1 pod &#8220;p\u0159\u00edpad, kter\u00fd je ji\u017e p\u0159ed soudem&#8221; podle \u010dl\u00e1nku 142 Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, a proto \u017ealoba v druh\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpadu tento \u010dl\u00e1nek neporu\u0161uje. D\u00e1le, druh\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st \u010dl\u00e1nku 39 \u00dastavy se t\u00fdk\u00e1 trestn\u00ed odpov\u011bdnosti, a proto se nevztahuje na ot\u00e1zku platnosti t\u00e9to ob\u010dansk\u00e9 \u017ealoby.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Soud tak\u00e9 uvedl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u3010Citace\u3011P\u0159edm\u011btem t\u00e9to \u017ealoby je n\u00e1rok na n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody zp\u016fsoben\u00e9 nez\u00e1konn\u00fdm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm \u017ealovan\u00e9ho v\u016f\u010di \u017ealobci, zat\u00edmco p\u0159edm\u011btem p\u0159edchoz\u00ed \u017ealoby byl n\u00e1rok na n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody zp\u016fsoben\u00e9 nez\u00e1konn\u00fdm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm A v\u016f\u010di \u017ealovan\u00e9mu. \u017dalobce a jeho gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel A jsou dv\u011b r\u016fzn\u00e9 osoby, tak\u017ee ob\u011b \u017ealoby nemaj\u00ed stejn\u00fd p\u0159edm\u011bt. Z tohoto d\u016fvodu tato \u017ealoba neporu\u0161uje \u010dl\u00e1nek 142 Ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du.<\/p>\n<cite>Tamt\u00e9\u017e<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalovan\u00fd byl v prvn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpadu odsouzen k zaplacen\u00ed 1,35 milionu jen\u016f \u017ealobci z prvn\u00edho p\u0159\u00edpadu, kter\u00fd je gener\u00e1ln\u00edm \u0159editelem spole\u010dnosti, kter\u00e1 je \u017ealobcem v druh\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpadu, a je tedy fakticky stejnou osobou. Pokud by byla uzn\u00e1na n\u00e1hrada \u0161kody v druh\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpadu nav\u00edc k n\u00e1hrad\u011b \u0161kody uzn\u00e1van\u00e9 v rozsudku prvn\u00edho p\u0159\u00edpadu, do\u0161lo by k dvojit\u00e9mu hodnocen\u00ed \u0161kody. \u017dalovan\u00fd tvrdil, \u017ee v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b by m\u011blo b\u00fdt ch\u00e1p\u00e1no, \u017ee \u017ealobce nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou nehmotnou \u0161kodu. Av\u0161ak, proto\u017ee \u017ealobce, spole\u010dnost, a jej\u00ed gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel jsou dv\u011b r\u016fzn\u00e9 osoby, nedoch\u00e1z\u00ed k dvojit\u00e9mu hodnocen\u00ed \u0161kody.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Shrnuti\"><\/span>Shrnut\u00ed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Nejen v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b po\u0161kozen\u00ed cti, ale tak\u00e9 v soudn\u00edch sporech t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00edch se poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1v, pokud je ob\u011bt\u00ed osoba provozuj\u00edc\u00ed spole\u010dnost, m\u016f\u017ee doj\u00edt k poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1v spole\u010dnosti a k obchodn\u00edm ztr\u00e1t\u00e1m, i kdy\u017e spole\u010dnost nebyla p\u0159\u00edmo ter\u010dem pomluv. Proto nejen jednotliv\u00fd podnikatel, ale tak\u00e9 pr\u00e1vnick\u00e1 osoba jako je spole\u010dnost, m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt sou\u010dasn\u011b, a v n\u011bkter\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech i samostatn\u011b, \u017ealobcem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\"><\/span>P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolis je pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 s vysokou odbornost\u00ed v oblasti IT, zejm\u00e9na internetu a pr\u00e1va. V posledn\u00edch letech informace o \u0161kod\u00e1ch zp\u016fsoben\u00fdch \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm na internetu a pomluvami zp\u016fsobuj\u00ed v\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 \u0161kody jako &#8220;digit\u00e1ln\u00ed tetov\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;. Na\u0161e kancel\u00e1\u0159 nab\u00edz\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed pro opat\u0159en\u00ed proti &#8220;digit\u00e1ln\u00edmu tetov\u00e1n\u00ed&#8221;. Podrobnosti jsou uvedeny v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pokud jste na internetu pomlouv\u00e1ni a toto se pova\u017euje za ur\u00e1\u017eku na cti, je b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 podat soudn\u00ed \u017ealobu jako ob\u010danskopr\u00e1vn\u00ed spor o n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody. Kdo tedy bude hlavn\u00edm \u017eadatelem o n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody za ur\u00e1\u017eku [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63960,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61549"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61549"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63961,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61549\/revisions\/63961"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63960"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}