{"id":66017,"date":"2025-07-29T19:55:08","date_gmt":"2025-07-29T10:55:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/?p=66017"},"modified":"2025-08-21T15:08:16","modified_gmt":"2025-08-21T06:08:16","slug":"repost-copyright","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright","title":{"rendered":"Je repostov\u00e1n\u00ed (retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed) obr\u00e1zk\u016f zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00fdch bez svolen\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00edm autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b se staly d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdm n\u00e1strojem pro \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed informac\u00ed nejen pro jednotlivce, ale i pro podniky. Sd\u00edlen\u00ed informac\u00ed s vyu\u017eit\u00edm atraktivn\u00edch obr\u00e1zk\u016f je efektivn\u00ed pro PR a marketingov\u00e9 aktivity, av\u0161ak pokud jsou tyto obr\u00e1zky pou\u017eity bez svolen\u00ed t\u0159et\u00edch stran, m\u016f\u017ee to ne\u00famysln\u011b v\u00e9st k riziku poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v. Zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b neopatrn\u00e9 retweety nebo sd\u00edlen\u00ed zam\u011bstnanc\u016f mohou ohrozit celkovou d\u016fv\u011bryhodnost firmy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku se zam\u011b\u0159\u00edme na z\u00e1sadn\u00ed ot\u00e1zku: &#8220;M\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt podnik v Japonsku obvin\u011bn z poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v, pokud dojde k \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed obr\u00e1zk\u016f bez svolen\u00ed?&#8221; a vysv\u011btl\u00edme to na z\u00e1klad\u011b skute\u010dn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f a soudn\u00edch rozhodnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Vztah_mezi_sirenim_obsahu_na_socialnich_sitich_a_autorskym_pravem_v_Japonsku\" title=\"Vztah mezi \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm obsahu na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch a autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem v Japonsku\">Vztah mezi \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm obsahu na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch a autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem v Japonsku<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Pripad_tweetu_a_retweetu_na_Twitteru_nyni_X_podle_japonskeho_prava\" title=\"P\u0159\u00edpad tweet\u016f a retweet\u016f na Twitteru (nyn\u00ed X) podle japonsk\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va\">P\u0159\u00edpad tweet\u016f a retweet\u016f na Twitteru (nyn\u00ed X) podle japonsk\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Argumenty_zalobce_a_zalovaneho\" title=\"Argumenty \u017ealobce a \u017ealovan\u00e9ho\">Argumenty \u017ealobce a \u017ealovan\u00e9ho<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Rozhodnuti_Tokijskeho_okresniho_soudu_Zaloba_zamitnuta\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu: \u017daloba zam\u00edtnuta\">Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu: \u017daloba zam\u00edtnuta<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Rozhodnuti_Odvolaciho_soudu_pro_dusevni_vlastnictvi_Castecne_uznani_zalobcovych_naroku\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed Odvolac\u00edho soudu pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed: \u010c\u00e1ste\u010dn\u00e9 uzn\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealobcov\u00fdch n\u00e1rok\u016f\">Rozhodnut\u00ed Odvolac\u00edho soudu pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed: \u010c\u00e1ste\u010dn\u00e9 uzn\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealobcov\u00fdch n\u00e1rok\u016f<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Rozhodnuti_Nejvyssiho_soudu_Uznani_poruseni_prava_na_uvedeni_jmena\" title=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu: Uzn\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na\">Rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu: Uzn\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Shrnuti_Poradit_se_s_advokatem_ohledne_poruseni_autorskych_prav_na_socialnich_sitich\" title=\"Shrnut\u00ed: Poradit se s advok\u00e1tem ohledn\u011b poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch\">Shrnut\u00ed: Poradit se s advok\u00e1tem ohledn\u011b poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/internet\/repost-copyright\/#Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\" title=\"P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e\">P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vztah_mezi_sirenim_obsahu_na_socialnich_sitich_a_autorskym_pravem_v_Japonsku\"><\/span>Vztah mezi \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm obsahu na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch a autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem v Japonsku<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b jsou v dne\u0161n\u00ed dob\u011b, kdy se informace \u0161\u00ed\u0159\u00ed bleskovou rychlost\u00ed, kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdm komunika\u010dn\u00edm n\u00e1strojem jak pro jednotlivce, tak pro podniky. Av\u0161ak pr\u00e1v\u011b kv\u016fli t\u00e9to rychlosti \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed se \u010dasto objevuj\u00ed probl\u00e9my spojen\u00e9 s autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem. Zejm\u00e9na u d\u011bl jako jsou obr\u00e1zky a videa, kter\u00e1 lze snadno kop\u00edrovat a p\u0159epos\u00edlat, doch\u00e1z\u00ed k jejich \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed bez souhlasu dr\u017eitel\u016f pr\u00e1v.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Japonsk\u00fd z\u00e1kon o autorsk\u00e9m pr\u00e1vu poskytuje tv\u016frc\u016fm d\u011bl r\u016fzn\u00e1 pr\u00e1va a zakazuje \u010diny, kter\u00e9 by tato pr\u00e1va poru\u0161ovaly. Je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 si uv\u011bdomit, \u017ee poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va m\u016f\u017ee nastat nejen \u00famysln\u011b, ale i z nedbalosti nebo z nev\u011bdomosti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jak\u00e9 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed aspekty m\u00e1 tedy &#8220;\u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed&#8221; obsahu na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch? Mezi typick\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edklady pat\u0159\u00ed &#8220;pr\u00e1vo na reprodukci&#8221; a &#8220;pr\u00e1vo na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vo na reprodukci je pr\u00e1vo kop\u00edrovat nebo tisknout d\u00edlo. Pou\u017eit\u00ed funkc\u00ed jako retweet nebo sd\u00edlen\u00ed k zobrazen\u00ed obr\u00e1zku na vlastn\u00edm \u00fa\u010dtu znamen\u00e1, \u017ee obr\u00e1zek je do\u010dasn\u011b ulo\u017een jako cache data pro zobrazen\u00ed na obrazovce za\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, co\u017e m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v rozporu s pr\u00e1vem na reprodukci.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vo na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy je pr\u00e1vo pos\u00edlat d\u00edlo nebo umo\u017enit jeho p\u0159\u00edjem ve\u0159ejnosti prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm komunika\u010dn\u00edch linek jako je internet. Retweetem nebo sd\u00edlen\u00edm, kter\u00e9 umo\u017e\u0148uje va\u0161im sleduj\u00edc\u00edm nebo \u0161irok\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti vid\u011bt obr\u00e1zek, m\u016f\u017eete zasahovat do pr\u00e1va na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Souvisej\u00edc\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nek: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/relation-between-the-publication-of-photos-without-consent-and-copyright\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Vztah mezi publikac\u00ed fotografi\u00ed bez souhlasu a autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Pripad_tweetu_a_retweetu_na_Twitteru_nyni_X_podle_japonskeho_prava\"><\/span>P\u0159\u00edpad tweet\u016f a retweet\u016f na Twitteru (nyn\u00ed X) podle japonsk\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Shutterstock_1996558226.jpg\" alt=\"P\u0159\u00edpad: Tweet a jeho retweet na Twitteru\" class=\"wp-image-59962\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Na internetu a soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch je nahr\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch d\u011bl bez svolen\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00edm autorsk\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va. Jak je to ale s retweetov\u00e1n\u00edm tweet\u016f s obr\u00e1zky, kter\u00e9 byly nahr\u00e1ny bez svolen\u00ed?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I kdy\u017e retweetujete tweet s obr\u00e1zkem podle specifikac\u00ed Twitteru (nyn\u00ed X), m\u016f\u017ee to podle japonsk\u00e9ho Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu znamenat poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v, jak ukazuje p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00fd soudn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V tomto p\u0159\u00edpadu byl \u017ealobcem profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed fotograf. \u017dalobce p\u0159idal do rohu fotografie konvalinky text \u201e\u24b8 (jm\u00e9no autora)\u201c a um\u00edstil tento obr\u00e1zek na sv\u016fj provozovan\u00fd web. Fotografie konvalinky byla nahr\u00e1na bez svolen\u00ed, a proto \u017ealobce podal \u017e\u00e1dost o zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed informac\u00ed o odes\u00edlateli proti spole\u010dnosti Twitter, kter\u00e1 v t\u00e9 dob\u011b provozovala Twitter (japonsk\u00e1 pobo\u010dka Twitter Japan Inc. a mate\u0159sk\u00e1 spole\u010dnost Twitter Inc.; n\u00e1zvy spole\u010dnost\u00ed jsou uvedeny v dob\u011b ud\u00e1losti).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Osoba A, jej\u00ed\u017e jm\u00e9no nen\u00ed zn\u00e1mo, nahr\u00e1la fotografii bez svolen\u00ed \u017ealobce jako sv\u016fj profilov\u00fd obr\u00e1zek. T\u00edm byl obr\u00e1zek automaticky ulo\u017een a zobrazen na URL adrese pro ukl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed profilov\u00fdch obr\u00e1zk\u016f na Twitteru a na \u010dasov\u00e9 ose osoby A se za\u010dala zobrazovat tato fotografie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Osoba B, jej\u00ed\u017e jm\u00e9no nen\u00ed zn\u00e1mo, tweetovala fotografii bez svolen\u00ed \u017ealobce. T\u00edm byl obr\u00e1zek automaticky ulo\u017een a zobrazen na URL adrese pro ukl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed obr\u00e1zk\u016f tweet\u016f na Twitteru a na URL adrese pro zobrazen\u00ed tweet\u016f a na \u010dasov\u00e9 ose \u00fa\u010dtu osoby B se za\u010dala zobrazovat tato fotografie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Osoby CDE, jejich\u017e jm\u00e9na nejsou zn\u00e1ma, provedly retweet tweetu osoby B, \u010d\u00edm\u017e se fotografie za\u010dala zobrazovat na jejich \u010dasov\u00fdch os\u00e1ch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tvrdil, \u017ee zobrazen\u00edm fotografie na \u00fa\u010dtech A a B do\u0161lo k poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy (\u010dl\u00e1nek 23 odstavec 1 japonsk\u00e9ho autorsk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona). Twitter spole\u010dnost nezpochyb\u0148ovala, \u017ee nastaven\u00ed obr\u00e1zku jako profilov\u00e9ho obr\u00e1zku a tweetov\u00e1n\u00ed samotn\u00e9ho obr\u00e1zku bez svolen\u00ed p\u0159edstavuje poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy. Sporn\u00fdm bodem v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b byla ot\u00e1zka, zda retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed osobami CDE znamen\u00e1 poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v \u017ealobce t\u00edm, \u017ee se fotografie zobrazovala a byla tak poru\u0161ena \u017ealobcova autorsk\u00e1 pr\u00e1va.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Souvisej\u00edc\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nek: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/copyright-property-and-author-by-posting-photos\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Autorsk\u00e1 pr\u00e1va a autorstv\u00ed p\u0159i zve\u0159ej\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed fotografi\u00ed[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Argumenty_zalobce_a_zalovaneho\"><\/span>Argumenty \u017ealobce a \u017ealovan\u00e9ho<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tvrdil poru\u0161en\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>pr\u00e1va na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>pr\u00e1va na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>pr\u00e1va na ochranu cti a reputace<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Poj\u010fme se na ka\u017ed\u00e9 z nich pod\u00edvat zvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tvrdil, \u017ee nejen ti, kdo zve\u0159ejnili tweet s obr\u00e1zkem, ale i ti, kdo tento tweet retweeetli, poru\u0161uj\u00ed pr\u00e1vo na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy a dal\u0161\u00ed pr\u00e1va t\u00edm, \u017ee &#8220;retweetov\u00e1n\u00edm bez svolen\u00ed kop\u00edrovan\u00e9ho tweetu s obr\u00e1zkem na \u010dasov\u00e9 ose doch\u00e1z\u00ed k poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e1le \u017ealobce tvrdil, \u017ee kv\u016fli specifikac\u00edm Twitteru, kdy\u017e je tweet s obr\u00e1zkem retweetov\u00e1n a zobrazen na \u010dasov\u00e9 ose, doch\u00e1z\u00ed automaticky k o\u0159\u00edznut\u00ed (tzv. &#8220;inline link&#8221;), co\u017e poru\u0161uje pr\u00e1vo na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity (Autorsk\u00fd z\u00e1kon \u010dl\u00e1nek 20, odstavec 1). Pr\u00e1vo na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity znamen\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo, aby obsah nebo n\u00e1zev d\u00edla nebyl m\u011bn\u011bn proti v\u016fli autora.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce tak\u00e9 tvrdil, \u017ee o\u0159\u00edznut\u00edm se st\u00e1v\u00e1 jeho jm\u00e9no nerozpoznateln\u00fdm, co\u017e poru\u0161uje pr\u00e1vo na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nav\u00edc \u017ealobce tvrdil, \u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00edm d\u00e1vaj\u00ed u\u017eivatel\u00e9 ostatn\u00edm dojmem, \u017ee fotografie \u017ealobce mohou b\u00fdt &#8220;bez svolen\u00ed pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1ny a maj\u00ed n\u00edzkou hodnotu&#8221;, co\u017e poru\u0161uje pr\u00e1vo na ochranu cti a reputace (Autorsk\u00fd z\u00e1kon \u010dl\u00e1nek 113, odstavec 6).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na to Twitter Inc. odpov\u011bd\u011bl, \u017ee &#8220;retweeter nep\u0159en\u00e1\u0161\u00ed obr\u00e1zek (fotografii) dat samotn\u00fdch, ale pouze nep\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e1 data, a proto to neporu\u0161uje pr\u00e1vo na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Twitter Inc. tak\u00e9 odpov\u011bd\u011bl na tvrzen\u00ed \u017ealobce o poru\u0161en\u00ed mor\u00e1ln\u00edch pr\u00e1v autora n\u00e1sledovn\u011b:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Podle specifikac\u00ed Twitteru se o\u0159\u00edznut\u00ed prov\u00e1d\u00ed na po\u010d\u00edta\u010di internetov\u00e9ho u\u017eivatele, kter\u00fd prohl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed obsah, tak\u017ee subjektem \u010dinu o\u0159\u00edznut\u00ed nen\u00ed osoba retweetuj\u00edc\u00ed, ale internetov\u00fd u\u017eivatel, a proto poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity a pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>O\u0159\u00edznut\u00ed je na Twitteru automatick\u00fd a mechanick\u00fd proces, kter\u00fd umo\u017e\u0148uje p\u0159irozen\u00e9 zobrazen\u00ed v\u00edce fotografi\u00ed na omezen\u00e9m prostoru obrazovky, a proto se jedn\u00e1 o &#8220;nevyhnutelnou&#8221; (Autorsk\u00fd z\u00e1kon \u010dl\u00e1nek 20, odstavec 2, bod 4) zm\u011bnu, a pr\u00e1vo na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity t\u00edm nen\u00ed poru\u0161eno.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Retweetov\u00e1n\u00edm p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 pova\u017eovat za sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed objektivn\u00ed cti a reputace \u017ealobce, a proto pr\u00e1vo na ochranu cti a reputace nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Souvisej\u00edc\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nek: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/protection-author-moral-rights\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Co jsou mor\u00e1ln\u00ed pr\u00e1va autora a ochrana cti nebo reputace?[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_Tokijskeho_okresniho_soudu_Zaloba_zamitnuta\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu: \u017daloba zam\u00edtnuta<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Prvoinstan\u010dn\u00ed Tokijsk\u00fd okresn\u00ed soud posoudil retweet spole\u010dnosti CDE n\u00e1sledovn\u011b:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Retweetov\u00e1n\u00edm do\u0161lo k automatick\u00e9mu nastaven\u00ed inline odkazu na URL v \u010dasov\u00e9 ose, kter\u00fd p\u0159\u00edmo pos\u00edl\u00e1 data obr\u00e1zkov\u00e9ho souboru z dan\u00e9 URL na u\u017eivatelovo za\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, jako je po\u010d\u00edta\u010d.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u017d\u00e1dn\u00e1 data s informacemi o distribuci nejsou pos\u00edl\u00e1na na jednotliv\u00e9 URL a tedy ani z t\u011bchto URL na u\u017eivatelovo za\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, tak\u017ee samotn\u00fd akt retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed nep\u0159edstavuje odes\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161e zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdch dat ani neumo\u017e\u0148uje jejich odesl\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Na z\u00e1klad\u011b t\u011bchto skute\u010dnost\u00ed soud rozhodl, \u017ee se nejedn\u00e1 o ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159enosy. D\u00e1le, vzhledem k povaze retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e9 neumo\u017e\u0148uje modifikaci obr\u00e1zkov\u00fdch soubor\u016f, nebylo poru\u0161eno pr\u00e1vo na ochranu integrity d\u00edla, a proto\u017ee retweety nep\u0159edstavuj\u00ed poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo prezentaci fotografi\u00ed ve\u0159ejnosti ze strany retweeter\u016f, nebylo poru\u0161eno ani pr\u00e1vo na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce v\u0161ak tvrdil, \u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed fotografi\u00ed z URL distribu\u010dn\u00edch informac\u00ed na klientsk\u00e9 po\u010d\u00edta\u010de p\u0159edstavuje automatick\u00fd ve\u0159ejn\u00fd p\u0159enos a \u017ee retweete\u0159i by m\u011bli b\u00fdt pova\u017eov\u00e1ni za subjekty tohoto p\u0159enosu, a tedy \u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161uje pr\u00e1va k ve\u0159ejn\u00e9mu p\u0159enosu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, proto\u017ee obr\u00e1zkov\u00e9 soubory byly nahr\u00e1ny na servery Twitteru osobou B, kter\u00e1 t\u00edm vytvo\u0159ila mo\u017enost jejich ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho p\u0159enosu, soud rozhodl, \u017ee subjektem p\u0159enosu by m\u011bla b\u00fdt tato osoba. Soud na\u0159\u00eddil odhalen\u00ed informac\u00ed o odes\u00edlateli pro A a B, ale odm\u00edtl na\u0159\u00eddit odhalen\u00ed odpov\u00eddaj\u00edc\u00ed e-mailov\u00e9 adresy pro CDE (rozhodnut\u00ed Tokijsk\u00e9ho okresn\u00edho soudu ze dne 15. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2016 (2016)).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u017dalobce se proti tomuto rozhodnut\u00ed odvolal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_Odvolaciho_soudu_pro_dusevni_vlastnictvi_Castecne_uznani_zalobcovych_naroku\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed Odvolac\u00edho soudu pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed: \u010c\u00e1ste\u010dn\u00e9 uzn\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealobcov\u00fdch n\u00e1rok\u016f<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Shutterstock_1835941030.jpg\" alt=\"Rozhodnut\u00ed Odvolac\u00edho soudu pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed: \u010c\u00e1ste\u010dn\u00e9 uzn\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealobcov\u00fdch n\u00e1rok\u016f\" class=\"wp-image-59961\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Odvolac\u00ed soud pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed, kter\u00fd se zab\u00fdval druh\u00fdm stupn\u011bm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, rozhodl, \u017ee nelze pova\u017eovat retweetuj\u00edc\u00ed osoby za subjekty automatick\u00e9ho ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho p\u0159enosu v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na ve\u0159ejn\u00fd p\u0159enos spole\u010dnost\u00ed CDE, a proto\u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed samo o sob\u011b neusnadnilo automatick\u00fd ve\u0159ejn\u00fd p\u0159enos, nelze retweetuj\u00edc\u00ed osoby pova\u017eovat za pomocn\u00edky v tomto poru\u0161en\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e1le soud uvedl, \u017ee proto\u017ee fotografie jako d\u00edlo byla p\u0159en\u00e1\u0161ena pouze jako data, nelze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00edm do\u0161lo k jej\u00edmu kop\u00edrov\u00e1n\u00ed, a tedy neuznal poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na reprodukci. Vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee nebylo uzn\u00e1no poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na ve\u0159ejn\u00fd p\u0159enos, nebylo ani m\u00edsto pro uzn\u00e1n\u00ed pomoci k tomuto poru\u0161en\u00ed, a soud tak u\u010dinil stejn\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed jako v prvn\u00edm stupni.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b soud zkoumal poru\u0161en\u00ed osobnostn\u00edch pr\u00e1v autora. Co se t\u00fd\u010de pr\u00e1va na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity, soud uznal, \u017ee obraz v p\u0159\u00edpadu je tvo\u0159iv\u00fdm vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00edm my\u0161lenek nebo pocit\u016f a spad\u00e1 do oblasti literatury, v\u011bdy, um\u011bn\u00ed nebo hudby, a tedy je d\u00edlem chr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fdm autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b, proto\u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed zp\u016fsobilo zm\u011bnu um\u00edst\u011bn\u00ed a velikosti obr\u00e1zku, kdy\u017e byl zobrazen na \u00fa\u010dtu CDE, bylo uzn\u00e1no, \u017ee obr\u00e1zek byl retweetuj\u00edc\u00edmi osobami zm\u011bn\u011bn a do\u0161lo k poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity. D\u00e1le, proto\u017ee jm\u00e9no profesion\u00e1ln\u00edho fotografa, kter\u00fd je \u017ealobcem, nebylo zobrazeno p\u0159i prezentaci, soud uznal, \u017ee retweetuj\u00edc\u00ed osoby poru\u0161ily pr\u00e1vo autora na zobrazen\u00ed jm\u00e9na p\u0159i poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo prezentaci d\u00edla ve\u0159ejnosti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Odvolac\u00ed soud pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed tak\u00e9 zv\u00e1\u017eil argumenty ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch, kte\u0159\u00ed tvrdili, \u017ee zm\u011bny v d\u016fsledku retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed spadaj\u00ed pod &#8220;nevyhnuteln\u00e9&#8221; zm\u011bny podle \u010dl\u00e1nku 20 odstavec 4 autorsk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona, ale soud rozhodl, \u017ee takov\u00e9 zm\u011bny nemohou b\u00fdt pova\u017eov\u00e1ny za &#8220;nevyhnuteln\u00e9&#8221;, proto\u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed bylo provedeno bez svolen\u00ed \u017ealobce na \u00fa\u010dtu 2, kde byl tweet obsahuj\u00edc\u00ed obrazov\u00fd soubor fotografie zve\u0159ejn\u011bn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Co se t\u00fd\u010de pr\u00e1va na ochranu cti a pov\u011bsti, soud neuznal poru\u0161en\u00ed. Jako d\u016fvod uvedl, \u017ee i kdy\u017e byla fotografie zobrazena spole\u010dn\u011b s postavami od Sanria nebo Disney, nem\u016f\u017ee se z toho okam\u017eit\u011b usuzovat, \u017ee jde o &#8220;d\u00edlo n\u00edzk\u00e9 hodnoty, kter\u00e9 lze pou\u017e\u00edt bez svolen\u00ed&#8221; nebo &#8220;levn\u00e9 d\u00edlo&#8221;, kter\u00e9 by vzbuzovalo nespr\u00e1vn\u00fd dojem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V d\u016fsledku toho bylo Twitteru na\u0159\u00edzeno, aby odhalilo e-mailov\u00e9 adresy dr\u017eitel\u016f \u00fa\u010dt\u016f A, B a tak\u00e9 CDE (rozhodnut\u00ed Odvolac\u00edho soudu pro du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed ze dne 25. dubna 2018 (2018)).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Twitter se proti tomuto rozhodnut\u00ed odvolal a po p\u0159ijet\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dosti o p\u0159ijet\u00ed odvol\u00e1n\u00ed se nyn\u00ed \u010dek\u00e1 na rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rozhodnuti_Nejvyssiho_soudu_Uznani_poruseni_prava_na_uvedeni_jmena\"><\/span>Rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu: Uzn\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud Japonska rozhodl, \u017ee poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity bylo vylou\u010deno z d\u016fvod\u016f pro p\u0159ijet\u00ed odvol\u00e1n\u00ed a rozhodoval pouze o poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Spole\u010dnost Twitter jako d\u016fvod sv\u00e9ho pod\u00e1n\u00ed uvedla, \u017ee jednotliv\u00ed u\u017eivatel\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed p\u0159epos\u00edlali tweet, nepou\u017e\u00edvali d\u00edlo poru\u0161uj\u00edc\u00ed autorsk\u00e1 pr\u00e1va prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm ka\u017ed\u00e9ho retweetu, a tedy neprov\u00e1d\u011bli &#8220;poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo prezentaci d\u00edla ve\u0159ejnosti&#8221; podle \u010dl\u00e1nku 19 odstavec 1 japonsk\u00e9ho autorsk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona. Nav\u00edc u\u017eivatel\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed si prohl\u00ed\u017eeli webov\u00e9 str\u00e1nky, mohli kliknut\u00edm na jednotliv\u00e9 obr\u00e1zky v \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch retweet\u016f vid\u011bt p\u016fvodn\u00ed obr\u00e1zky s \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed, kde je uvedeno jm\u00e9no, tak\u017ee lze \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee jednotliv\u00ed u\u017eivatel\u00e9 retweet\u016f &#8220;zobrazovali jm\u00e9no autora v souladu s t\u00edm, jak ji\u017e bylo autorem uvedeno&#8221; (tento paragraf, odstavec 2). Proto tvrdili, \u017ee rozhodnut\u00ed p\u016fvodn\u00edho soudu, kter\u00e9 uznalo poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm retweet\u016f, obsahuje chyby v interpretaci a aplikaci autorsk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud v\u0161ak poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na uznal a odvol\u00e1n\u00ed zam\u00edtl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jako d\u016fvody pro toto rozhodnut\u00ed uvedl n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed dva body:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>I kdy\u017e je mo\u017en\u00e9 kliknut\u00edm na obr\u00e1zek zobrazit p\u016fvodn\u00ed obr\u00e1zek s \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed, kde je uvedeno jm\u00e9no, z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 toto uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na omezeno pouze na webovou str\u00e1nku odd\u011blenou od t\u00e9, na kter\u00e9 je obr\u00e1zek zobrazen.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>U\u017eivatel\u00e9 prohl\u00ed\u017eej\u00edc\u00ed webov\u00e9 str\u00e1nky neuvid\u00ed jm\u00e9no autora, pokud na obr\u00e1zek nekliknou, a neexistuj\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 okolnosti, kter\u00e9 by nazna\u010dovaly, \u017ee u\u017eivatel\u00e9 obvykle na obr\u00e1zky klikaj\u00ed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Takto Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud dosp\u011bl k z\u00e1v\u011bru, \u017ee samotn\u00fd fakt, \u017ee je mo\u017en\u00e9 kliknut\u00edm na obr\u00e1zek v \u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch retweet\u016f zobrazit p\u016fvodn\u00ed obr\u00e1zek s uveden\u00fdm jm\u00e9nem autora, neznamen\u00e1, \u017ee u\u017eivatel\u00e9 retweet\u016f jm\u00e9no autora zobrazili.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>T\u00edmto bylo potvrzeno rozhodnut\u00ed p\u016fvodn\u00edho soudu, \u00dast\u0159edn\u00edho patentov\u00e9ho soudu, a bylo uzn\u00e1no, \u017ee retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt poru\u0161en\u00edm osobnostn\u00edch pr\u00e1v autora a \u017ee i p\u0159i retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed tweet\u016f s obr\u00e1zky podle specifikac\u00ed Twitteru m\u016f\u017ee doj\u00edt k odhalen\u00ed informac\u00ed o odes\u00edlateli (Rozsudek Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu z 21. \u010dervence 2020 (Reiwa 2) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courts.go.jp\/app\/hanrei_jp\/detail2?id=89597\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Rozsudek Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu z 21. \u010dervence 2020[ja]<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A\u010dkoli Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud vylou\u010dil pr\u00e1vo na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity z d\u016fvod\u016f pro p\u0159ijet\u00ed odvol\u00e1n\u00ed a rozhodoval pouze o pr\u00e1vu na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na, uzn\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na samo o sob\u011b znamen\u00e1 uzn\u00e1n\u00ed poru\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00e1v, a proto m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt rozhodnut\u00ed o pr\u00e1vu na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity pova\u017eov\u00e1no za m\u00e9n\u011b d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159esto \u00dast\u0159edn\u00ed patentov\u00fd soud rozhodl, \u017ee &#8220;\u010dinnost o\u0159ez\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed obrazu m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt poru\u0161en\u00edm pr\u00e1va na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity&#8221;, a Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud toto rozhodnut\u00ed nezam\u00edtl. Z\u00e1m\u011br pr\u00e1va na uveden\u00ed jm\u00e9na, jak jej formuloval Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud, by mohl b\u00fdt aplikov\u00e1n i na pr\u00e1vo na zachov\u00e1n\u00ed identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Shrnuti_Poradit_se_s_advokatem_ohledne_poruseni_autorskych_prav_na_socialnich_sitich\"><\/span>Shrnut\u00ed: Poradit se s advok\u00e1tem ohledn\u011b poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>V tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku jsme vysv\u011btlili rizika spojen\u00e1 s neopr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00fdm \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00edm obr\u00e1zk\u016f a poru\u0161en\u00edm autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch. Zejm\u00e9na rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu z 21. \u010dervence Reiwa 2 (2020) jasn\u011b ukazuje, \u017ee i retweetov\u00e1n\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt pova\u017eov\u00e1no za poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v, a proto je nutn\u00e1 opatrnost p\u0159i \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed informac\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Autorsk\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo je slo\u017eit\u00e9 a rozhodnut\u00ed se m\u016f\u017ee li\u0161it v z\u00e1vislosti na konkr\u00e9tn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpadu. &#8220;Nev\u011bd\u011bl jsem&#8221; nemus\u00ed b\u00fdt dostate\u010dnou obranou proti odpov\u011bdnosti. Pokud m\u00e1te obavy, \u017ee pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00ed va\u0161\u00ed spole\u010dnosti m\u016f\u017ee poru\u0161ovat autorsk\u00e1 pr\u00e1va, nebo jste se ji\u017e dostali do probl\u00e9m\u016f s poru\u0161en\u00edm autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v, doporu\u010dujeme v\u00e1m co nejd\u0159\u00edve se poradit s advok\u00e1tem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Souvisej\u00edc\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nek: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/twitter-screenshot\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Je pou\u017eit\u00ed screenshotu z Twitteru poru\u0161en\u00edm autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v? Rozbor rozhodnut\u00ed z Reiwa 5 (2023)[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Predstaveni_opatreni_nasi_kancelare\"><\/span>P\u0159edstaven\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed na\u0161\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Monolith je firma s bohat\u00fdmi zku\u0161enostmi v oblasti IT, zejm\u00e9na internetu, a pr\u00e1va. V posledn\u00edch letech se st\u00e1le v\u00edce pozornosti v\u011bnuje poru\u0161ov\u00e1n\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v na internetu. Na\u0161e kancel\u00e1\u0159 se t\u00e9to problematice v\u011bnuje prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm t\u00fdmu zku\u0161en\u00fdch pr\u00e1vn\u00edk\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed se specializuj\u00ed na p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed \u00fa\u010dinn\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed. Podrobnosti naleznete v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Oblasti pr\u00e1ce Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e Monolith: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/practices\/itlaw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">IT a du\u0161evn\u00ed vlastnictv\u00ed pro r\u016fzn\u00e9 podniky[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Soci\u00e1ln\u00ed s\u00edt\u011b se staly d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdm n\u00e1strojem pro \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed informac\u00ed nejen pro jednotlivce, ale i pro podniky. Sd\u00edlen\u00ed informac\u00ed s vyu\u017eit\u00edm atraktivn\u00edch obr\u00e1zk\u016f je efektivn\u00ed pro PR a marketingov\u00e9 aktivity, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":66205,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66017"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66017"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66017\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66206,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66017\/revisions\/66206"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/66205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}