{"id":60054,"date":"2023-11-22T10:22:32","date_gmt":"2023-11-22T01:22:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/?p=60054"},"modified":"2026-01-14T09:27:44","modified_gmt":"2026-01-14T00:27:44","slug":"jurisdiction-of-judgement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement","title":{"rendered":"What is the Jurisdictional Court for Litigation and Provisional Dispositions Related to Reputational Damage?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>There is a question that arises in all legal matters, not limited to internet-related issues, about &#8220;which regional court will handle the case if it is resolved through the court (via litigation or provisional measures)&#8221;. This issue is referred to in legal terms as &#8220;jurisdiction&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For example, our firm is a law firm located in Tokyo. We can easily reach the Tokyo District Court by train, but if the case is handled in courts in Osaka or Nagoya, we inevitably incur travel expenses. Furthermore, many law firms, including ours, charge a &#8220;daily rate&#8221; to cover the time spent traveling when handling cases in distant courts. It is better for both the lawyer and the client if the proceedings can be conducted in the Tokyo District Court as much as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Can lawsuits and provisional measures related to online reputation damage, such as deletion, and requests for disclosure of IP addresses and personal information, be handled in the Tokyo District Court? We will explain the concept of &#8220;jurisdiction&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#International_Jurisdiction_and_Domestic_Jurisdiction\" title=\"International Jurisdiction and Domestic Jurisdiction\">International Jurisdiction and Domestic Jurisdiction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Types_of_Provisional_Dispositions_and_Lawsuits_Related_to_Reputational_Damage_Management_on_the_Internet\" title=\"Types of Provisional Dispositions and Lawsuits Related to Reputational Damage Management on the Internet\">Types of Provisional Dispositions and Lawsuits Related to Reputational Damage Management on the Internet<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Jurisdiction_for_Post_Deletion_and_Damage_Compensation_Claims\" title=\"Jurisdiction for Post Deletion and Damage Compensation Claims\">Jurisdiction for Post Deletion and Damage Compensation Claims<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Jurisdiction_of_the_Plaintiff_Creditor\" title=\"Jurisdiction of the Plaintiff (Creditor)\">Jurisdiction of the Plaintiff (Creditor)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Jurisdiction_of_the_Defendant_Debtor\" title=\"Jurisdiction of the Defendant (Debtor)\">Jurisdiction of the Defendant (Debtor)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Summary\" title=\"Summary\">Summary<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#If_an_individual_in_Tokyo_demands_the_deletion_of_a_posted_article_from_a_server_company_in_Osaka\" title=\"If an individual in Tokyo demands the deletion of a posted article from a server company in Osaka\">If an individual in Tokyo demands the deletion of a posted article from a server company in Osaka<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#If_a_corporation_in_Saitama_Prefecture_makes_a_damage_compensation_claim_against_an_individual_in_Nagoya\" title=\"If a corporation in Saitama Prefecture makes a damage compensation claim against an individual in Nagoya\">If a corporation in Saitama Prefecture makes a damage compensation claim against an individual in Nagoya<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#If_a_corporation_in_Saitama_Prefecture_demands_the_deletion_of_a_posted_article_from_a_foreign_corporation_that_does_not_have_an_office_business_office_representative_or_business_person_in_Japan\" title=\"If a corporation in Saitama Prefecture demands the deletion of a posted article from a foreign corporation that does not have an office, business office, representative, or business person in Japan\">If a corporation in Saitama Prefecture demands the deletion of a posted article from a foreign corporation that does not have an office, business office, representative, or business person in Japan<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Jurisdiction_for_Disclosure_Requests_of_Sender_Information\" title=\"Jurisdiction for Disclosure Requests of Sender Information\">Jurisdiction for Disclosure Requests of Sender Information<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Simultaneously_Requesting_Post_Deletion_Damages_and_Disclosure_of_Sender_Information\" title=\"Simultaneously Requesting Post Deletion, Damages, and Disclosure of Sender Information\">Simultaneously Requesting Post Deletion, Damages, and Disclosure of Sender Information<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Jurisdiction_in_the_Case_of_a_Lawsuit\" title=\"Jurisdiction in the Case of a Lawsuit\">Jurisdiction in the Case of a Lawsuit<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#When_an_individual_in_Tokyo_requests_post_deletion_and_disclosure_of_sender_information_from_a_server_company_in_Osaka\" title=\"When an individual in Tokyo requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a server company in Osaka\">When an individual in Tokyo requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a server company in Osaka<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#When_an_individual_in_Osaka_Prefecture_requests_disclosure_of_sender_information_and_damages_from_a_foreign_corporation_that_does_not_have_a_main_office_or_person_in_charge_in_Japan\" title=\"When an individual in Osaka Prefecture requests disclosure of sender information and damages from a foreign corporation that does not have a main office or person in charge in Japan\">When an individual in Osaka Prefecture requests disclosure of sender information and damages from a foreign corporation that does not have a main office or person in charge in Japan<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Jurisdiction_in_the_Case_of_a_Provisional_Disposition\" title=\"Jurisdiction in the Case of a Provisional Disposition\">Jurisdiction in the Case of a Provisional Disposition<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#When_an_individual_in_Tokyo_requests_post_deletion_and_disclosure_of_sender_information_from_a_server_company_in_Osaka-2\" title=\"When an individual in Tokyo requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a server company in Osaka\">When an individual in Tokyo requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a server company in Osaka<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#When_an_individual_in_Osaka_Prefecture_requests_post_deletion_and_disclosure_of_sender_information_from_a_foreign_corporation_that_does_not_have_a_main_office_or_person_in_charge_in_Japan\" title=\"When an individual in Osaka Prefecture requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a foreign corporation that does not have a main office or person in charge in Japan\">When an individual in Osaka Prefecture requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a foreign corporation that does not have a main office or person in charge in Japan<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/internet\/jurisdiction-of-judgement\/#Summary-2\" title=\"Summary\">Summary<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"International_Jurisdiction_and_Domestic_Jurisdiction\"><\/span>International Jurisdiction and Domestic Jurisdiction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Regarding this concept of &#8220;jurisdictional courts&#8221;, there are two main issues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>The question of whether Japanese courts can handle the trial or provisional measures in the first place (International Jurisdiction)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If Japanese courts can handle it, the question arises as to whether it would be, for example, the Tokyo District Court or the Osaka District Court (Territorial Jurisdiction within Domestic Jurisdiction)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>This article will explain the latter. The former is explained in a separate article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/against-facebook-amazon\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/against-facebook-amazon[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Types_of_Provisional_Dispositions_and_Lawsuits_Related_to_Reputational_Damage_Management_on_the_Internet\"><\/span>Types of Provisional Dispositions and Lawsuits Related to Reputational Damage Management on the Internet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"735\" height=\"490\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-69282\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-2.jpg 735w, https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-2-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-2-250x167.jpg 250w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 735px) 100vw, 735px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">We will explain about the lawsuits and provisional dispositions related to reputational damage management, considering the jurisdiction of the courts.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Firstly, there are three main types of provisional dispositions and lawsuits related to reputational damage management on the Internet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Post deletion<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Request for disclosure of sender&#8217;s information (Request for disclosure of IP address, name and address)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Claim for damages (Claim for damages after identifying the poster)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>We provide a detailed explanation about these relationships and the general flow in a separate article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/identifying-contributors-after-deletion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/identifying-contributors-after-deletion[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These can be divided into two categories in relation to the &#8220;jurisdictional court&#8221;:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Post deletion and claim for damages<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Request for disclosure of sender&#8217;s information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The &#8220;post deletion&#8221; and &#8220;claim for damages&#8221; fall under the same jurisdictional court, while the &#8220;request for disclosure of sender&#8217;s information&#8221; is separate. We will explain each of these in order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Jurisdiction_for_Post_Deletion_and_Damage_Compensation_Claims\"><\/span>Jurisdiction for Post Deletion and Damage Compensation Claims<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Firstly, in the case of post deletion or damage compensation claims, you can choose between the jurisdiction of the &#8220;plaintiff (creditor)&#8221; and the &#8220;defendant (debtor)&#8221;. This might be a bit confusing, but in a lawsuit, the &#8220;plaintiff&#8221; is referred to as the &#8220;creditor&#8221; in provisional disposition procedures, and the &#8220;defendant&#8221; is referred to as the &#8220;debtor&#8221;. In essence, it&#8217;s about the party filing the lawsuit and the party being sued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Jurisdiction_of_the_Plaintiff_Creditor\"><\/span>Jurisdiction of the Plaintiff (Creditor)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>This refers to the jurisdiction based on the circumstances of the party filing the lawsuit, i.e., the party requesting the deletion of the post or claiming damages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This simply corresponds to the domicile of the party requesting the deletion of the post or claiming damages. For example,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>If an individual lives (or more precisely, has their registered address) in Tokyo, it would be the Tokyo District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If a corporation has its head office in Tokyo, it would be the Tokyo District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If a corporation has its head office in Yokohama, it would be the Yokohama District Court<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>And so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Jurisdiction_of_the_Defendant_Debtor\"><\/span>Jurisdiction of the Defendant (Debtor)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>This refers to the jurisdiction based on the circumstances of the party being sued, i.e., the party from whom the deletion of the post or damages is being claimed. In the case of a damage compensation claim, it is usually the &#8220;person who wrote the article&#8221;. In the case of post deletion, it would be the person who has the right and obligation to delete the article, for example,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>The person who wrote the article<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If the article is a comment on a bulletin board, the bulletin board administrator<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If the article is on a site on a rental server, the server administrator<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>And so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If these are domestic individuals or domestic corporations, the court of their domicile, as mentioned above, will have jurisdiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For foreign corporations, it&#8217;s a bit complicated, but<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>If they have a main office or business office in Japan \u2192 The court of the location of the main office or business office in Japan<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If they have a representative or other main business person in Japan \u2192 The court of the domicile of the representative or other main business person in Japan<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Would have jurisdiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If neither of these exist, there is no jurisdiction on the defendant (debtor) side, and the lawsuit can only be conducted in the jurisdiction of the plaintiff (creditor).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Summary\"><\/span>Summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the above, the following examples can be given:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"If_an_individual_in_Tokyo_demands_the_deletion_of_a_posted_article_from_a_server_company_in_Osaka\"><\/span>If an individual in Tokyo demands the deletion of a posted article from a server company in Osaka<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>From the perspective of the plaintiff (creditor), the Tokyo District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>From the perspective of the defendant (debtor), the Osaka District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, either the Tokyo District Court or the Osaka District Court would be acceptable<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"If_a_corporation_in_Saitama_Prefecture_makes_a_damage_compensation_claim_against_an_individual_in_Nagoya\"><\/span>If a corporation in Saitama Prefecture makes a damage compensation claim against an individual in Nagoya<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>From the perspective of the plaintiff (creditor), the Saitama District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>From the perspective of the defendant (debtor), the Nagoya District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, either the Saitama District Court or the Nagoya District Court would be acceptable<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"If_a_corporation_in_Saitama_Prefecture_demands_the_deletion_of_a_posted_article_from_a_foreign_corporation_that_does_not_have_an_office_business_office_representative_or_business_person_in_Japan\"><\/span>If a corporation in Saitama Prefecture demands the deletion of a posted article from a foreign corporation that does not have an office, business office, representative, or business person in Japan<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>From the perspective of the plaintiff (creditor), the Saitama District Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>From the perspective of the defendant (debtor), no jurisdiction<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, only the Saitama District Court would be acceptable<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Jurisdiction_for_Disclosure_Requests_of_Sender_Information\"><\/span>Jurisdiction for Disclosure Requests of Sender Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In cases where you are requesting the disclosure of a poster&#8217;s IP address, name, and address from a server or provider, you cannot use the &#8216;plaintiff (creditor) jurisdiction&#8217;. In other words, you can only use the court that corresponds to the &#8216;defendant (debtor) jurisdiction&#8217;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/provider-liability-limitation-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/provider-liability-limitation-law[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If the defendant (debtor) is a domestic individual or corporation, the court of the defendant&#8217;s domicile will be used, as mentioned above.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For foreign corporations, the basic principle is the same, but there are slight differences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>If the main office or business office is located in Japan \u2192 The court of the location of the main office or business office in Japan<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If there is a representative or other main business person in Japan \u2192 The court of the domicile of the representative or other main business person in Japan<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If neither exists \u2192 The Tokyo District Court, as a case of &#8216;undefined jurisdiction&#8217;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>There is a rule that &#8216;if neither exists, it is okay to use the Tokyo District Court&#8217;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Simultaneously_Requesting_Post_Deletion_Damages_and_Disclosure_of_Sender_Information\"><\/span>Simultaneously Requesting Post Deletion, Damages, and Disclosure of Sender Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"735\" height=\"490\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-69283\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-3.jpg 735w, https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-3-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-of-judgement-3-250x167.jpg 250w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 735px) 100vw, 735px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">If a claim for damages is involved, it will be a lawsuit, not a provisional disposition.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to the rules mentioned above, what happens when you simultaneously request post deletion, damages, and disclosure of sender information?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This involves the rules of &#8220;provisional disposition&#8221;. Firstly, you cannot request damages in a provisional disposition. Provisional dispositions are quick procedures, and are only used in situations where quick action is required, such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>When damages occur daily due to illegal posts if they are not promptly removed<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When the logs held by the provider will disappear if the IP address is not promptly disclosed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Claims for damages do not fall under these categories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Jurisdiction_in_the_Case_of_a_Lawsuit\"><\/span>Jurisdiction in the Case of a Lawsuit<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In a lawsuit, you can consolidate all claims and file them at once in a court that has jurisdiction over at least one of the multiple claims. For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"When_an_individual_in_Tokyo_requests_post_deletion_and_disclosure_of_sender_information_from_a_server_company_in_Osaka\"><\/span>When an individual in Tokyo requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a server company in Osaka<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>The Tokyo District Court has jurisdiction over the post deletion<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Only the Osaka District Court has jurisdiction over the request for disclosure of sender information<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, you can request post deletion and disclosure of sender information in one lawsuit at the Tokyo District Court<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"When_an_individual_in_Osaka_Prefecture_requests_disclosure_of_sender_information_and_damages_from_a_foreign_corporation_that_does_not_have_a_main_office_or_person_in_charge_in_Japan\"><\/span>When an individual in Osaka Prefecture requests disclosure of sender information and damages from a foreign corporation that does not have a main office or person in charge in Japan<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>The Tokyo District Court has jurisdiction over the request for disclosure of sender information<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Osaka District Court has jurisdiction over the claim for damages<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, you can request disclosure of sender information and damages in one lawsuit at the Tokyo District Court<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>This is how it works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Jurisdiction_in_the_Case_of_a_Provisional_Disposition\"><\/span>Jurisdiction in the Case of a Provisional Disposition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In contrast, in the case of a provisional disposition, there is no rule that &#8220;you can consolidate all claims and file them at once in a court that has jurisdiction over at least one of the multiple claims&#8221;. Therefore:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Post deletion follows the jurisdiction for post deletion<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The request for disclosure of sender information follows the jurisdiction for the request for disclosure of sender information<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If the above two coincide by chance, you can request post deletion and disclosure of sender information in one procedure at that court<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This is how it works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/provisional-disposition\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/provisional-disposition[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"When_an_individual_in_Tokyo_requests_post_deletion_and_disclosure_of_sender_information_from_a_server_company_in_Osaka-2\"><\/span>When an individual in Tokyo requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a server company in Osaka<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>The Tokyo District Court and Osaka District Court have jurisdiction over the post deletion<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>However, the Tokyo District Court does not have jurisdiction over the request for disclosure of sender information, and only the Osaka District Court has jurisdiction<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, since only the Osaka District Court has jurisdiction over both, if you want to request both in one provisional disposition, you need to use the Osaka District Court<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"When_an_individual_in_Osaka_Prefecture_requests_post_deletion_and_disclosure_of_sender_information_from_a_foreign_corporation_that_does_not_have_a_main_office_or_person_in_charge_in_Japan\"><\/span>When an individual in Osaka Prefecture requests post deletion and disclosure of sender information from a foreign corporation that does not have a main office or person in charge in Japan<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>Only the Osaka District Court has jurisdiction over the post deletion<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Only the Tokyo District Court has jurisdiction over the request for disclosure of sender information<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, you cannot request both in one procedure<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>This is how it works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Summary-2\"><\/span>Summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>As discussed above, the rules of jurisdiction are incredibly complex. In addition to the complexity of the rules themselves, specific information about foreign corporations such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and FC2, for example,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Principal offices or branches in Japan<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Representatives or other main business handlers in Japan<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>is information held as &#8216;know-how&#8217; by lawyers who handle a large number of reputation damage control cases. It can be said that it is a difficult issue to judge unless you are a lawyer who handles a large number of such lawsuits and provisional dispositions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is a question that arises in all legal matters, not limited to internet-related issues, about &#8220;which regional court will handle the case if it is resolved through the court (via litigation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":69281,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60054"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60054"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60054\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":69284,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60054\/revisions\/69284"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}