{"id":62407,"date":"2024-07-11T21:00:28","date_gmt":"2024-07-11T12:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/?p=62407"},"modified":"2024-07-20T10:11:45","modified_gmt":"2024-07-20T01:11:45","slug":"misrepresentation-of-quality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/en\/general-corporate\/misrepresentation-of-quality","title":{"rendered":"Understanding 'Superior Misrepresentation' under the Japanese 'Premiums and Representations Act' (J\u014dhy\u014dh\u014d): Differences from 'Advantageous Misrepresentation' and Case Studies Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Japanese Premiums and Representations Act (J\u014dhinhy\u014dji-h\u014d), commonly referred to as the Premiums and Representations Law, is a law that regulates premiums and advertising representations. It prohibits unfair deception and inducement of general consumers through premiums and advertising representations. Violations can lead to measures such as suspension of advertisements or orders to pay a penalty, so caution is necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfair representations under the Japanese Premiums and Representations Act are broadly categorized into two types: “superior misrepresentation” and “advantageous misrepresentation.” Here, we will explain in detail both superior and advantageous misrepresentations, along with introducing actual cases. Please use this as a reference to avoid violations of the Premiums and Representations Act in advertising.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n<\/span><\/div>\n