{"id":62781,"date":"2024-02-19T14:27:55","date_gmt":"2024-02-19T05:27:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/?p=62781"},"modified":"2024-03-01T15:51:08","modified_gmt":"2024-03-01T06:51:08","slug":"suspicion-defamation-case-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law","title":{"rendered":"Se poate vorbi de def\u0103imare prin expresii precum 'suspiciune de droguri' sau 'suspiciune antisocial\u0103'?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>C\u00e2nd comenta\u021bi despre al\u021bii, este necesar s\u0103 ave\u021bi grij\u0103 s\u0103 nu reduce\u021bi evaluarea social\u0103. O metod\u0103 larg utilizat\u0103 pentru acest lucru este s\u0103 nu concluziona\u021bi, ci s\u0103 v\u0103 limita\u021bi la &#8220;\u00eendoial\u0103&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>C\u00e2nd descrie\u021bi subiecte negative, cum ar fi utilizarea de droguri, falsificarea bilan\u021burilor, rela\u021biile cu organiza\u021biile antisociale, este posibil s\u0103 se reduc\u0103 daunele evalu\u0103rii sociale dac\u0103 v\u0103 limita\u021bi la &#8220;\u00eendoial\u0103&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cum este evaluat\u0103 aceast\u0103 expresie de &#8220;\u00eendoial\u0103&#8221; \u00een instan\u021b\u0103?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Voi explica prezent\u00e2nd exemple de cazuri judiciare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-decline-in-social-reputation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-decline-in-social-reputation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#In_cazul_%E2%80%9Cexistentei_unor_suspiciuni%E2%80%9D\" title=\"\u00cen cazul &#8220;existen\u021bei unor suspiciuni&#8221;\">\u00cen cazul &#8220;existen\u021bei unor suspiciuni&#8221;<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#Desfasurarea_procesului\" title=\"Desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului\">Desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#Judecata_instantei\" title=\"Judecata instan\u021bei\">Judecata instan\u021bei<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#Cazul_%E2%80%9Csuspiciunii_grave%E2%80%9D\" title=\"Cazul &#8220;suspiciunii grave&#8221;\">Cazul &#8220;suspiciunii grave&#8221;<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#Desfasurarea_procesului-2\" title=\"Desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului\">Desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#Judecata_instantei-2\" title=\"Judecata instan\u021bei\">Judecata instan\u021bei<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/suspicion-defamation-case-law\/#Concluzie\" title=\"Concluzie\">Concluzie<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"In_cazul_%E2%80%9Cexistentei_unor_suspiciuni%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>\u00cen cazul &#8220;existen\u021bei unor suspiciuni&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/suspicion-defamation-case-law2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18577\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>A existat un caz \u00een care o organiza\u021bie non-profit specific\u0103 \u0219i pre\u0219edintele s\u0103u au solicitat desp\u0103gubiri pentru def\u0103imare de la o revist\u0103 s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2nal\u0103, sus\u021bin\u00e2nd c\u0103 &#8220;reputa\u021bia a fost def\u0103imat\u0103 prin articolul publicat&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Desfasurarea_procesului\"><\/span>Desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Articolul publicat \u00een revista s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2nal\u0103 avea titlul &#8220;Suspiciuni de deturnare a 70 de milioane de yeni&#8221;,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-very-light-gray-background-color has-background\">De\u0219i prime\u0219te aproximativ 100 de milioane de yeni \u00een subven\u021bii anual, fluxul de bani este neclar, iar pre\u0219edintele poate fi suspectat de a fi \u00eenfiin\u021bat o companie fantom\u0103 \u0219i de a fi ob\u021binut o remunera\u021bie nejustificat\u0103 de p\u00e2n\u0103 la 70 de milioane de yeni. Acest lucru ar putea \u00eenc\u0103lca Legea Japonez\u0103 de Promovare a Activit\u0103\u021bilor Specifice Nonprofit (NPO).<\/p>\n\n\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Acesta a fost con\u021binutul.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>\u00cen r\u0103spuns, pre\u0219edintele \u0219i al\u021bii au sus\u021binut c\u0103 &#8220;con\u021binutul articolului prezint\u0103 fapte \u0219i a def\u0103imat reputa\u021bia&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Revista s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2nal\u0103, care a fost p\u00e2r\u00e2t\u0103, a sus\u021binut c\u0103,<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph {\"backgroundColor\":\"very-light-gray\"} --><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-very-light-gray-background-color has-background\">&#8220;Exist\u0103 suspiciuni de deturnare&#8221; este o exprimare a unei opinii juridice, nu o prezentare a faptelor, \u0219i nu este nimic mai mult dec\u00e2t o exprimare a opiniei sau a criticii c\u0103 &#8220;exist\u0103 suspiciuni de deturnare a 70 de milioane de yeni de c\u0103tre reclamant, care este pre\u0219edinte&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><br \/><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Acesta a fost argumentul lor.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judecata_instantei\"><\/span>Judecata instan\u021bei<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><!-- \/wp:heading --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Instan\u021ba a exprimat urm\u0103toarea opinie cu privire la articolul \u00een cauz\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:quote --><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Se poate recunoa\u0219te c\u0103 a prezentat faptele c\u0103 a deturnat sau c\u0103 exist\u0103 fapte care sugereaz\u0103 puternic c\u0103 a deturnat. Termenul &#8220;deturnare&#8221; nu numai c\u0103 are sensul unui termen juridic folosit \u00een contextul \u00een care se pune problema responsabilit\u0103\u021bii penale \u0219i civile, dar este folosit \u0219i mai general pentru a exprima actul de a lua \u00een mod necorespunz\u0103tor bunurile altora. Dac\u0103 citi\u021bi articolul \u00een cauz\u0103 conform standardului cititorului mediu, este normal s\u0103 \u00een\u021belege\u021bi c\u0103 este scris c\u0103 reclamantul a deturnat bani de la organiza\u021bia NPO prin mijloace necinstite. Nu se poate interpreta ca o exprimare a unei opinii juridice asupra dac\u0103 se stabile\u0219te sau nu infrac\u021biunea de deturnare sau responsabilitatea civil\u0103 pentru acte ilegale.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><cite>Judecata Tribunalului Districtual Tokyo, 2 decembrie 2019 (Anul 31 al erei Reiwa)<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!-- \/wp:quote --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Instan\u021ba a recunoscut argumentul reclamantului \u0219i a ordonat revistei s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2nale p\u00e2r\u00e2te s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 1 milion de yeni ca desp\u0103gubire moral\u0103, 100.000 de yeni ca cheltuieli de avocat, \u00een total 1,1 milioane de yeni.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Exist\u0103 suspiciuni&#8221; \u00een acest caz a fost considerat ca prezent\u00e2nd faptele \u00een mod distorsionat, nu ca exprim\u00e2nd o opinie sau o critic\u0103, dac\u0103 se adopt\u0103 standardul cititorului mediu.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/expressions-and-defamation\",\"type\":\"wp-embed\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"\u30e2\u30ce\u30ea\u30b9\u6cd5\u5f8b\u4e8b\u52d9\u6240\"} --><\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-\u30e2\u30ce\u30ea\u30b9\u6cd5\u5f8b\u4e8b\u52d9\u6240 wp-block-embed-\u30e2\u30ce\u30ea\u30b9\u6cd5\u5f8b\u4e8b\u52d9\u6240\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\"><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/expressions-and-defamation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/expressions-and-defamation[ja]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p><!-- \/wp:embed --><!-- wp:heading --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Cazul_%E2%80%9Csuspiciunii_grave%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>Cazul &#8220;suspiciunii grave&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><!-- \/wp:heading --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:image {\"id\":18578} --><\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-18578\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/suspicion-defamation-case-law3.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/figure>\n<p><!-- \/wp:image --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>O companie de produc\u021bie \u0219i v\u00e2nzare de aparate de pachinko \u0219i echipamente periferice a solicitat desp\u0103gubiri pentru def\u0103imare, dup\u0103 ce pe site-ul web cu plat\u0103 al companiei p\u00e2r\u00e2te a fost publicat un articol cu titlul &#8220;Dezvoltare nou\u0103 \u00een suspiciunea grav\u0103 a &#8216;companiei XX&#8217; care sus\u021bine familia \u25cf\u25cf&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Desfasurarea_procesului-2\"><\/span>Desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><!-- \/wp:heading --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Reclamantul desf\u0103\u0219ura un proiect de cazinou resort \u00een Republica Filipine, iar unele organiza\u021bii de pres\u0103 au relatat despre acest proiect ca \u0219i cum ar fi fost finan\u021bat \u00een mod ilegal.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Ulterior, un comitet de anchet\u0103 a raportat c\u0103 &#8220;nu exist\u0103 dovezi care s\u0103 indice mit\u0103&#8221;, dar p\u00e2r\u00e2tul a publicat pe site-ul s\u0103u web un articol cu titlul &#8220;Dezvoltare nou\u0103 \u00een suspiciunea grav\u0103 a &#8216;companiei XX&#8217; care sus\u021bine familia \u25cf\u25cf&#8221;, suger\u00e2nd c\u0103 a ap\u0103rut o suspiciune grav\u0103 de mit\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Reclamantul a sus\u021binut urm\u0103toarele:<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph {\"backgroundColor\":\"very-light-gray\"} --><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-very-light-gray-background-color has-background\">De\u0219i articolul \u00een cauz\u0103 se refer\u0103 la o &#8220;suspiciune grav\u0103&#8221;, dac\u0103 este privit din perspectiva aten\u021biei \u0219i interpret\u0103rii cititorului obi\u0219nuit, creeaz\u0103 impresia c\u0103 reclamantul a comis un act ilegal de mituire a unui func\u021bionar public str\u0103in \u0219i ridic\u0103 \u00eendoieli serioase cu privire la faptul dac\u0103 desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 sau nu activit\u0103\u021bi de afaceri corecte. Acesta prejudiciaz\u0103 grav reputa\u021bia \u0219i \u00eencrederea social\u0103 a reclamantului.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Pe de alt\u0103 parte, p\u00e2r\u00e2tul a r\u0103spuns astfel:<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph {\"backgroundColor\":\"very-light-gray\"} --><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-very-light-gray-background-color has-background\">Articolul \u00een cauz\u0103 indic\u0103 faptul c\u0103 a ap\u0103rut o suspiciune grav\u0103, iar existen\u021ba unei astfel de suspiciuni este adev\u0103rat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Reclamantul a contestat \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 afirma\u021bia c\u0103 &#8220;a oferit mit\u0103 oficialilor guvernamentali filipinezi pentru a ob\u021bine o licen\u021b\u0103 temporar\u0103&#8221; nu este echivalent\u0103 cu &#8220;apari\u021bia unei suspiciuni grave de mituire&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} --><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judecata_instantei-2\"><\/span>Judecata instan\u021bei<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><!-- \/wp:heading --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Instan\u021ba a considerat c\u0103, chiar dac\u0103 se folosesc expresii abstracte precum &#8220;suspiciune grav\u0103&#8221;, impresia cititorului obi\u0219nuit nu se schimb\u0103 \u0219i a recunoscut c\u0103 articolul \u00een cauz\u0103 a indicat faptele, judec\u00e2nd c\u0103 &#8220;prejudiciaz\u0103 reputa\u021bia social\u0103 a reclamantului \u0219i distruge \u00eencrederea social\u0103&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:quote --><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Obiectul dovezii de veridicitate \u0219i justificare ar trebui s\u0103 fie faptul c\u0103 reclamantul a comis mit\u0103 prin intermediul filialelor sale, nu existen\u021ba suspiciunii (omis)<br \/>Nu se poate recunoa\u0219te c\u0103 exist\u0103 motive rezonabile pentru a crede c\u0103 faptele indicate de articolul \u00een cauz\u0103 sunt adev\u0103rate.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><cite>Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Cur\u021bii Districtuale Tokyo, 20 ianuarie 2014 (2014)<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!-- \/wp:quote --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Instan\u021ba a recunoscut def\u0103imarea reputa\u021biei \u0219i a \u00eencrederii \u0219i a ordonat plata a 1,5 milioane de yeni ca desp\u0103gubire pentru daunele nemateriale, 150.000 de yeni pentru cheltuielile de avocat, un total de 1,65 milioane de yeni, precum \u0219i \u0219tergerea articolului care continu\u0103 s\u0103 fie publicat pe site-ul web \u0219i publicarea unei scuze.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Chiar dac\u0103 se exprim\u0103 ca o &#8220;suspiciune grav\u0103&#8221;, dac\u0103 se citesc \u0219i con\u021binuturile \u00eenainte \u0219i dup\u0103, poate fi considerat ca indic\u00e2nd faptele. Obiectul veridicit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i justific\u0103rii nu mai este existen\u021ba suspiciunii.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:embed {\"url\":\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company\",\"type\":\"wp-embed\",\"providerNameSlug\":\"\u30e2\u30ce\u30ea\u30b9\u6cd5\u5f8b\u4e8b\u52d9\u6240\"} --><\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-\u30e2\u30ce\u30ea\u30b9\u6cd5\u5f8b\u4e8b\u52d9\u6240 wp-block-embed-\u30e2\u30ce\u30ea\u30b9\u6cd5\u5f8b\u4e8b\u52d9\u6240\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\"><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company[ja]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p><!-- \/wp:embed --><!-- wp:heading --><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Concluzie\"><\/span>Concluzie<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><!-- \/wp:heading --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Chiar \u0219i atunci c\u00e2nd se utilizeaz\u0103 expresii abstracte precum &#8220;\u00eendoial\u0103&#8221; sau &#8220;suspiciune&#8221;, declara\u021biile care pot induce \u00een eroare la un nivel \u00een\u021beles de cititorii sau telespectatorii obi\u0219nui\u021bi pot fi interpretate ca &#8220;diminu\u00e2nd reputa\u021bia social\u0103 a reclamantului \u0219i def\u0103im\u00e2ndu-i creditul social&#8221;, exist\u00e2nd astfel posibilitatea de a se stabili o def\u0103imare.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>Dac\u0103 drepturile dvs. sunt \u00eenc\u0103lcate prin astfel de expresii, nu trebuie s\u0103 suporta\u021bi \u00een t\u0103cere, ci s\u0103 consulta\u021bi un avocat specializat. Ei vor examina cu aten\u021bie situa\u021bia \u0219i con\u021binutul, \u0219i, asemenea cazului prezentat \u00een acest articol, pot fi \u00een m\u0103sur\u0103 s\u0103 stabileasc\u0103 o def\u0103imare \u0219i s\u0103 solicite daune morale.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C\u00e2nd comenta\u021bi despre al\u021bii, este necesar s\u0103 ave\u021bi grij\u0103 s\u0103 nu reduce\u021bi evaluarea social\u0103. O metod\u0103 larg utilizat\u0103 pentru acest lucru este s\u0103 nu concluziona\u021bi, ci s\u0103 v\u0103 limita\u021bi la &#8220;\u00eendoial\u0103&#038;#82 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64843,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62781"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62781"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62781\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64845,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62781\/revisions\/64845"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}