{"id":73678,"date":"2026-05-02T02:00:06","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T17:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/?p=73678"},"modified":"2026-05-16T19:53:35","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T10:53:35","slug":"amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy","title":{"rendered":"Strategii juridice pentru revendic\u0103rile de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de design pe Amazon: Puncte cheie \u00een evaluarea similitudinilor \u0219i gestionarea riscurilor de afaceri"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Pia\u021ba de comer\u021b electronic (EC) din Japonia continu\u0103 s\u0103 se extind\u0103, conform \u201e<a href=\"https:\/\/www.meti.go.jp\/press\/2025\/08\/20250826005\/20250826005.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Raportul de cercetare a pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic pentru anul fiscal Reiwa 6 (2025)\">Raportului de cercetare a pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic pentru anul fiscal Reiwa 6 (2025)<\/a>\u201d publicat de Ministerul Economiei, Comer\u021bului \u0219i Industriei \u00een august 2025. Dimensiunea pie\u021bei BtoC-EC a crescut cu 5,1% fa\u021b\u0103 de anul precedent, ajung\u00e2nd la 26,1 trilioane de yeni, iar pia\u021ba BtoB-EC a crescut cu 10,6%, ating\u00e2nd 514,4 trilioane de yeni. \u00cen special, rata de digitalizare a comer\u021bului \u00een domeniul bunurilor a crescut la 9,78%, iar \u00een anumite categorii precum c\u0103r\u021bi, materiale video \u0219i electronice, majoritatea tranzac\u021biilor comerciale s-au mutat online. Odat\u0103 cu aceast\u0103 tranzi\u021bie structural\u0103 c\u0103tre economia digital\u0103, platformele EC precum Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp) \u0219i-au stabilit pozi\u021bia ca infrastructur\u0103 social\u0103, dep\u0103\u0219ind rolul de simplu canal de v\u00e2nzare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cu toate acestea, \u00een spatele acestei convenien\u021be, disputele privind drepturile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 s-au intensificat, \u00een special acuza\u021biile de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de design, care prezint\u0103 riscul de a provoca daune critice continuit\u0103\u021bii afacerilor prin m\u0103suri imediate de \u201esuspendare a list\u0103rii\u201d f\u0103r\u0103 a a\u0219tepta o decizie judiciar\u0103. Sistemul juridic japonez, \u00een special Legea japonez\u0103 a designului, protejeaz\u0103 \u201eestetica perceput\u0103 vizual\u201d, iar evaluarea similitudinii (determinarea dac\u0103 designurile sunt similare) necesit\u0103 un nivel \u00eenalt de expertiz\u0103 \u0219i logic\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen acest articol, vom explica riscurile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 pe platformele EC \u0219i vom detalia strategii juridice \u0219i m\u0103suri practice de contracarare, folosind ca exemplu cazuri de acuza\u021bii de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de design pe Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen plus, acuza\u021biile false de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de proprietate intelectual\u0103 pe Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp) sunt explicate \u00een detaliu \u00een articolul de mai jos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-\u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09 wp-block-embed-\u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PKAtpbnhWJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/intellectual-property-infringement-claims\">Ce sunt &#8216;Acuza\u021biile false de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de proprietate intelectual\u0103&#8217; care se r\u0103sp\u00e2ndesc pe Amazon? Explicarea r\u0103spunsurilor legale \u0219i a cazurilor de judecat\u0103<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Ce sunt &#039;Acuza\u021biile false de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de proprietate intelectual\u0103&#039; care se r\u0103sp\u00e2ndesc pe Amazon? Explicarea r\u0103spunsurilor legale \u0219i a cazurilor de judecat\u0103&#8221; &#8212; \u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/internet\/intellectual-property-infringement-claims\/embed#?secret=b6RYZ8z7Sr#?secret=PKAtpbnhWJ\" data-secret=\"PKAtpbnhWJ\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Extinderea_pietei_de_comert_electronic_si_contextul_structural_al_disputelor_privind_drepturile_de_proprietate_intelectuala_in_Japonia\" title=\"Extinderea pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic \u0219i contextul structural al disputelor privind drepturile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia\">Extinderea pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic \u0219i contextul structural al disputelor privind drepturile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Mecanismul_si_Consecintele_Reclamatiilor_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Proprietate_Intelectuala_pe_Amazon_Japonia\" title=\"Mecanismul \u0219i Consecin\u021bele Reclama\u021biilor de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 pe Amazon Japonia\">Mecanismul \u0219i Consecin\u021bele Reclama\u021biilor de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 pe Amazon Japonia<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Intelegerea_juridica_a_drepturilor_de_design_si_principiile_de_baza_ale_evaluarii_similitudinii_sub_Legea_Japoneza_a_Designului\" title=\"\u00cen\u021belegerea juridic\u0103 a drepturilor de design \u0219i principiile de baz\u0103 ale evalu\u0103rii similitudinii sub Legea Japonez\u0103 a Designului\">\u00cen\u021belegerea juridic\u0103 a drepturilor de design \u0219i principiile de baz\u0103 ale evalu\u0103rii similitudinii sub Legea Japonez\u0103 a Designului<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Definitia_si_domeniul_de_protectie_al_designului_in_Japonia\" title=\"Defini\u021bia \u0219i domeniul de protec\u021bie al designului \u00een Japonia\">Defini\u021bia \u0219i domeniul de protec\u021bie al designului \u00een Japonia<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Compararea_impresiei_estetice_centrata_pe_%E2%80%9Cpartea_esentiala%E2%80%9D\" title=\"Compararea impresiei estetice centrat\u0103 pe &#8220;partea esen\u021bial\u0103&#8221;\">Compararea impresiei estetice centrat\u0103 pe &#8220;partea esen\u021bial\u0103&#8221;<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Caz_de_Suspendare_a_Vanzarilor_pe_Amazon_Japonia_din_Cauza_Reclamatiei_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Design\" title=\"Caz de Suspendare a V\u00e2nz\u0103rilor pe Amazon Japonia din Cauza Reclama\u021biei de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Design\">Caz de Suspendare a V\u00e2nz\u0103rilor pe Amazon Japonia din Cauza Reclama\u021biei de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Design<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Reclamatia_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Design_pe_Amazon_Japonia_si_Masura_de_Suspendare_a_Vanzarilor\" title=\"Reclama\u021bia de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Design pe Amazon Japonia \u0219i M\u0103sura de Suspendare a V\u00e2nz\u0103rilor\">Reclama\u021bia de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Design pe Amazon Japonia \u0219i M\u0103sura de Suspendare a V\u00e2nz\u0103rilor<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Depunerea_Opiniei_de_Neincalcare_de_catre_Experti\" title=\"Depunerea Opiniei de Ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare de c\u0103tre Exper\u021bi\">Depunerea Opiniei de Ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare de c\u0103tre Exper\u021bi<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Raspunsul_Initial_si_Managementul_Riscurilor_la_Primirea_unei_Notificari_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Proprietate_Intelectuala_in_Japonia\" title=\"R\u0103spunsul Ini\u021bial \u0219i Managementul Riscurilor la Primirea unei Notific\u0103ri de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia\">R\u0103spunsul Ini\u021bial \u0219i Managementul Riscurilor la Primirea unei Notific\u0103ri de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Guvernanta_Proprietatii_Intelectuale_si_Strategia_Proactiva_de_Proprietate_Intelectuala_in_Japonia\" title=\"Guvernan\u021ba Propriet\u0103\u021bii Intelectuale \u0219i Strategia Proactiv\u0103 de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia\">Guvernan\u021ba Propriet\u0103\u021bii Intelectuale \u0219i Strategia Proactiv\u0103 de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Concluzie_Construirea_unei_guvernante_a_proprietatii_intelectuale_cu_atac_si_aparare_alaturi_de_experti\" title=\"Concluzie: Construirea unei guvernan\u021be a propriet\u0103\u021bii intelectuale cu atac \u0219i ap\u0103rare al\u0103turi de exper\u021bi\">Concluzie: Construirea unei guvernan\u021be a propriet\u0103\u021bii intelectuale cu atac \u0219i ap\u0103rare al\u0103turi de exper\u021bi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/amazon-design-right-infringement-legal-strategy\/#Ghidul_Masurilor_Oferite_de_Firma_Noastra\" title=\"Ghidul M\u0103surilor Oferite de Firma Noastr\u0103\">Ghidul M\u0103surilor Oferite de Firma Noastr\u0103<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Extinderea_pietei_de_comert_electronic_si_contextul_structural_al_disputelor_privind_drepturile_de_proprietate_intelectuala_in_Japonia\"><\/span>Extinderea pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic \u0219i contextul structural al disputelor privind drepturile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Odat\u0103 cu extinderea pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic, capacitatea de a vinde pe platformele de comer\u021b electronic a devenit o surs\u0103 de competitivitate \u00een managementul corporativ. \u00cen aceast\u0103 pia\u021b\u0103 uria\u0219\u0103, platformele precum Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp) opereaz\u0103 sisteme de protec\u021bie a propriet\u0103\u021bii intelectuale, cum ar fi \u201eBrand Registry\u201d \u0219i \u201eFormularul de raportare a \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rilor\u201d. Acestea reprezint\u0103 o arm\u0103 puternic\u0103 pentru titularii de drepturi, permi\u021b\u00e2ndu-le s\u0103 elimine rapid produsele contraf\u0103cute. Totu\u0219i, pentru v\u00e2nz\u0103torii care primesc pl\u00e2ngeri, exist\u0103 riscul de a suferi dezavantaje semnificative, cum ar fi \u201esuspendarea list\u0103rii\u201d sau \u201esuspendarea contului\u201d, \u00eenainte de a se efectua o examinare legal\u0103 a legitimit\u0103\u021bii exercit\u0103rii drepturilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dreptul de design, al\u0103turi de dreptul de brevet \u0219i dreptul de marc\u0103, este un drept puternic care permite realizarea exclusiv\u0103 a designului unui produs. Articolul 23 din Legea japonez\u0103 a designului (Legea privind designul) stipuleaz\u0103 c\u0103 \u201etitularul dreptului de design are dreptul exclusiv de a realiza designul \u00eenregistrat \u0219i designurile similare \u00een scopuri comerciale\u201d. \u00cen timp ce dreptul de brevet protejeaz\u0103 ideile tehnice, dreptul de design protejeaz\u0103 \u201eforme care provoac\u0103 o impresie estetic\u0103 prin intermediul vederii\u201d, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t existen\u021ba unei \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri depinde \u00een mare m\u0103sur\u0103 de \u201eimpresia vizual\u0103 uman\u0103\u201d. Acest proces de evaluare a similitudinii, care include multe elemente subiective, este esen\u021ba disputelor privind \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rile pe Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mecanismul_si_Consecintele_Reclamatiilor_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Proprietate_Intelectuala_pe_Amazon_Japonia\"><\/span>Mecanismul \u0219i Consecin\u021bele Reclama\u021biilor de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 pe Amazon Japonia<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/93e439fd946df3e124ab297077e41f02.jpg\" alt=\"Mecanismul \u0219i Consecin\u021bele Reclama\u021biilor de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 pe Amazon Japonia\" class=\"wp-image-211818\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Conflictele de proprietate intelectual\u0103 pe Amazon Japonia evolueaz\u0103 cu o vitez\u0103 \u0219i o logic\u0103 distincte fa\u021b\u0103 de procesele civile obi\u0219nuite din instan\u021bele japoneze. C\u00e2nd un titular de drepturi raporteaz\u0103 un anumit ASIN (Num\u0103r Standard de Identificare Amazon) ca fiind un produs care \u00eencalc\u0103 drepturile, Amazon Japonia poate decide imediat s\u0103 elimine listarea sau s\u0103 restric\u021bioneze stocul.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen cazul \u00een care o reclama\u021bie de \u00eenc\u0103lcare este acceptat\u0103 \u00een sistemul Amazon Japonia, v\u00e2nz\u0103torii se confrunt\u0103 cu o varietate de riscuri, dup\u0103 cum urmeaz\u0103:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Elemente de risc<\/td><td>Impact concret \u0219i daune asupra afacerii<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Pierderi de oportunit\u0103\u021bi de v\u00e2nzare<\/td><td>List\u0103rile sunt suspendate f\u0103r\u0103 a a\u0219tepta o decizie judiciar\u0103, ceea ce duce la \u00eentreruperea veniturilor.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Deteriorarea s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii contului<\/td><td>Se \u00eenregistreaz\u0103 avertismente \u00een \u201eTabloul de bord al s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii contului\u201d din Seller Central, iar acumularea acestora poate duce la \u00eenchiderea \u00eentregului cont.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Re\u021binerea (\u00eenghe\u021barea) veniturilor<\/td><td>\u00cen caz de suspiciune de \u00eenc\u0103lcare, Amazon Japonia poate re\u021bine pl\u0103\u021bile pentru o perioad\u0103 lung\u0103, risc\u00e2nd astfel \u00eentreruperea fluxului de numerar.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Pierderea lichidit\u0103\u021bii stocului<\/td><td>\u00cen cazul utiliz\u0103rii FBA (Fulfillment by Amazon), stocul devine nevandabil, iar taxele de depozitare continu\u0103 s\u0103 se acumuleze.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Deteriorarea imaginii de brand<\/td><td>R\u0103m\u00e2ne o \u00eenregistrare a v\u00e2nz\u0103rii de produse care \u00eencalc\u0103 drepturile, ceea ce poate duce la sc\u0103derea \u00eencrederii din partea partenerilor de afaceri \u0219i a creditorilor.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Aceste m\u0103suri sunt luate autonom de Amazon Japonia \u0219i nu necesit\u0103 ordine provizorii conform Codului de Procedur\u0103 Civil\u0103 Japonez. Prin urmare, pentru a combate o reclama\u021bie nejustificat\u0103, este esen\u021bial s\u0103 se prezinte rapid platformei o \u201edemonstra\u021bie de ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare bazat\u0103 pe temeiuri legale\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Intelegerea_juridica_a_drepturilor_de_design_si_principiile_de_baza_ale_evaluarii_similitudinii_sub_Legea_Japoneza_a_Designului\"><\/span>\u00cen\u021belegerea juridic\u0103 a drepturilor de design \u0219i principiile de baz\u0103 ale evalu\u0103rii similitudinii sub Legea Japonez\u0103 a Designului<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Pentru a determina dac\u0103 exist\u0103 o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de design \u00een Japonia, este esen\u021bial s\u0103 \u00een\u021belegem corect conceptul de &#8220;similitudine&#8221; conform Legii Japoneze a Designului. Articolul 24, alineatul 2 din Legea Japonez\u0103 a Designului stipuleaz\u0103 clar c\u0103 evaluarea similitudinii \u00eentre un design \u00eenregistrat \u0219i alte designuri se bazeaz\u0103 pe impresia estetic\u0103 creat\u0103 prin percep\u021bia vizual\u0103 a consumatorului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Definitia_si_domeniul_de_protectie_al_designului_in_Japonia\"><\/span>Defini\u021bia \u0219i domeniul de protec\u021bie al designului \u00een Japonia<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Conform articolului 2, alineatul 1 din Legea Japonez\u0103 a Designului, un design se refer\u0103 la &#8220;forma, modelul sau culoarea unui obiect sau la combina\u021bia acestora, care creeaz\u0103 o impresie estetic\u0103 prin percep\u021bia vizual\u0103.&#8221; Drepturile de design ofer\u0103 o exclusivitate puternic\u0103, extinz\u00e2ndu-se nu doar asupra designului identic \u00eenregistrat, ci \u0219i asupra domeniului de &#8220;similitudine&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen practic\u0103, evaluarea similitudinii designului se realizeaz\u0103 \u00een trei pa\u0219i:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>Recunoa\u0219terea identit\u0103\u021bii sau similitudinii obiectelor: Se confirm\u0103 dac\u0103 obiectele implicate \u00een design sunt identice sau similare. Dac\u0103 obiectele nu sunt similare (de exemplu, &#8220;scaun&#8221; \u0219i &#8220;lingur\u0103&#8221;), chiar dac\u0103 formele sunt asem\u0103n\u0103toare, nu se va considera o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de design.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recunoa\u0219terea structurii compozi\u021bionale: Se extrag structura de baz\u0103 (scheletul general) \u0219i structura specific\u0103 (detaliile formei \u0219i decora\u021biunile) ale ambelor designuri.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Evaluarea punctelor comune \u0219i diferen\u021belor: Se identific\u0103 punctele comune \u0219i diferen\u021bele dintre cele dou\u0103 designuri \u0219i se evalueaz\u0103 impactul acestora asupra &#8220;impresiei estetice create prin percep\u021bia vizual\u0103 a consumatorului&#8221;.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Un concept important aici este &#8220;partea esen\u021bial\u0103&#8221; a designului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Compararea_impresiei_estetice_centrata_pe_%E2%80%9Cpartea_esentiala%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>Compararea impresiei estetice centrat\u0103 pe &#8220;partea esen\u021bial\u0103&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen jurispruden\u021b\u0103 \u0219i \u00een criteriile de examinare ale Oficiului Japonez de Brevete, evaluarea similitudinii designului nu se bazeaz\u0103 doar pe num\u0103rul de diferen\u021be, ci se concentreaz\u0103 pe dac\u0103 &#8220;partea esen\u021bial\u0103&#8221;, adic\u0103 partea care atrage cel mai mult aten\u021bia consumatorului, este comun\u0103. Partea esen\u021bial\u0103 este determinat\u0103 pe baza urm\u0103toarelor elemente:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Natura, utilizarea \u0219i modul de utilizare al obiectului<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>P\u0103r\u021bile de crea\u021bie nou\u0103 care nu exist\u0103 \u00een designurile cunoscute (designuri deja existente \u00een lume)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>De exemplu, pentru un instrument utilizat frecvent \u00een m\u00e2n\u0103, forma m\u00e2nerului poate fi considerat\u0103 important\u0103, iar pentru un produs cu un mecanism complex, partea expus\u0103 a mecanismului poate atrage aten\u021bia. Identificarea corect\u0103 a acestei &#8220;p\u0103r\u021bi esen\u021biale&#8221; \u0219i accentuarea diferen\u021belor \u00een acea parte constituie o strategie juridic\u0103 esen\u021bial\u0103 pentru a sus\u021bine ne\u00eenc\u0103lcarea drepturilor de design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Caz_de_Suspendare_a_Vanzarilor_pe_Amazon_Japonia_din_Cauza_Reclamatiei_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Design\"><\/span>Caz de Suspendare a V\u00e2nz\u0103rilor pe Amazon Japonia din Cauza Reclama\u021biei de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Design<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/276a5f4d45a01b7a2dddc21bcf832983.jpg\" alt=\"Structura \u0219i Practica Eficient\u0103 a Opiniei de Ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare pe Amazon Japonia\" class=\"wp-image-211816\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Aici vom explica un caz \u00een care compania B a sus\u021binut \u00eenc\u0103lcarea drepturilor de design \u0219i a solicitat suspendarea v\u00e2nz\u0103rilor produsului comercializat de compania A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reclamatia_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Design_pe_Amazon_Japonia_si_Masura_de_Suspendare_a_Vanzarilor\"><\/span>Reclama\u021bia de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Design pe Amazon Japonia \u0219i M\u0103sura de Suspendare a V\u00e2nz\u0103rilor<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Compania B a depus o reclama\u021bie la Amazon Japonia, sus\u021bin\u00e2nd c\u0103 produsul companiei A \u00eencalc\u0103 drepturile sale de design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Totu\u0219i, \u00een acest caz, existau diferen\u021be structurale fundamentale \u00eentre designul \u00eenregistrat al companiei B \u0219i produsul companiei A. \u00cen procesul de evaluare a similitudinii, diferen\u021bele \u00een &#8220;p\u0103r\u021bile esen\u021biale&#8221; care atrag cel mai mult aten\u021bia comercian\u021bilor \u0219i consumatorilor sunt cruciale. Dac\u0103 exist\u0103 diferen\u021be semnificative \u00een &#8220;p\u0103r\u021bile esen\u021biale&#8221; care constituie baza designului \u0219i aceste diferen\u021be creeaz\u0103 o impresie estetic\u0103 distinct\u0103, nu se poate stabili &#8220;similitudinea&#8221; conform Legii Japoneze a Designului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Depunerea_Opiniei_de_Neincalcare_de_catre_Experti\"><\/span>Depunerea Opiniei de Ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare de c\u0103tre Exper\u021bi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Pentru a solicita ridicarea suspend\u0103rii v\u00e2nz\u0103rilor pe Amazon Japonia, este eficient s\u0103 se depun\u0103 o &#8220;opinie de ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare&#8221; de c\u0103tre exper\u021bi precum avoca\u021bi sau consilieri \u00een proprietate intelectual\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Deoarece reprezentan\u021bii Amazon nu sunt neap\u0103rat exper\u021bi \u00een legisla\u021bia japonez\u0103, opinia trebuie s\u0103 fie compus\u0103 dintr-o &#8220;concluzie clar\u0103&#8221; \u0219i o &#8220;demonstra\u021bie vizual\u0103 u\u0219or de \u00een\u021beles&#8221;. Se specific\u0103 ASIN-ul, denumirea, desenele produsului acuzat de \u00eenc\u0103lcare \u0219i num\u0103rul designului \u00eenregistrat comparat. Dac\u0103 este necesar, se ata\u0219eaz\u0103 imagini care explic\u0103 modul de utilizare al produsului pentru a clarifica obiectul compara\u021biei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen opinie, am efectuat evaluarea similitudinii \u00een urm\u0103toarea ordine:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Compararea structurii de baz\u0103 (identificarea punctelor comune)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Compararea structurii specifice (identificarea diferen\u021belor)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Determinarea &#8220;p\u0103r\u021bilor esen\u021biale&#8221; (definirea celor mai importante p\u0103r\u021bi)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Impactul diferen\u021belor asupra impresiei estetice generale (explicarea de ce nu sunt similare)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Aici, am subliniat caracteristicile specifice folosind imagini \u0219i am descris cum designul companiei B \u0219i produsul companiei A ofer\u0103 impresii vizuale diferite. Este necesar s\u0103 se construiasc\u0103 logica conform c\u0103reia &#8220;punctele de similitudine sus\u021binute de partea advers\u0103 (de\u021bin\u0103torul drepturilor) nu sunt esen\u021biale, iar produsul \u00een cauz\u0103 prezint\u0103 inova\u021bii complet diferite \u00een aceste p\u0103r\u021bi esen\u021biale (diferen\u021be \u00een structura specific\u0103)&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>De asemenea, implicarea exper\u021bilor este un punct important. Dac\u0103 v\u00e2nz\u0103torul r\u0103spunde unei reclama\u021bii oficiale din partea de\u021bin\u0103torului drepturilor doar cu propriile cuvinte, spun\u00e2nd &#8220;nu am \u00eenc\u0103lcat&#8221;, este rar ca Amazon s\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i schimbe pozi\u021bia. Totu\u0219i, c\u00e2nd se depune o opinie redactat\u0103 \u00een numele unui avocat sau alt reprezentant, Amazon este obligat s\u0103 ia \u00een considerare riscurile legale, cresc\u00e2nd astfel \u0219ansele de reluare a v\u00e2nz\u0103rilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen acest caz, prin depunerea unei opinii redactate de un avocat, Amazon a ridicat m\u0103sura de suspendare a v\u00e2nz\u0103rilor produsului companiei A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Raspunsul_Initial_si_Managementul_Riscurilor_la_Primirea_unei_Notificari_de_Incalcare_a_Drepturilor_de_Proprietate_Intelectuala_in_Japonia\"><\/span>R\u0103spunsul Ini\u021bial \u0219i Managementul Riscurilor la Primirea unei Notific\u0103ri de \u00cenc\u0103lcare a Drepturilor de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>C\u00e2nd Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp) trimite o notificare privind \u201esuspiciunea de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de proprietate intelectual\u0103\u201d, mul\u021bi operatori de afaceri intr\u0103 \u00een panic\u0103 \u0219i tind s\u0103 fac\u0103 gre\u0219eli \u00een r\u0103spunsul ini\u021bial. Totu\u0219i, un r\u0103spuns calm \u0219i strategic este cheia pentru a minimiza daunele asupra afacerii. Cele dou\u0103 \u201egre\u0219eli\u201d pe care operatorii ar trebui s\u0103 le evite sunt urm\u0103toarele:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Scuzele imediate \u0219i recunoa\u0219terea \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii: Dac\u0103 r\u0103spunde\u021bi cu \u201eNe pare r\u0103u, vom retrage imediat produsul\u201d \u00eenainte de a efectua o examinare legal\u0103, aceasta poate fi folosit\u0103 ca dovad\u0103 defavorabil\u0103 \u00een cazul unui proces ulterior.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ignorarea notific\u0103rii: Dac\u0103 continua\u021bi s\u0103 ignora\u021bi notificarea, Amazon poate considera c\u0103 \u201ea\u021bi recunoscut \u00eenc\u0103lcarea\u201d \u0219i exist\u0103 o probabilitate crescut\u0103 de suspendare (\u00eenchidere) a contului.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Ca ac\u021biune ini\u021bial\u0103 recomandat\u0103, este ideal s\u0103 urma\u021bi procesul de mai jos \u00een termen de 24 p\u00e2n\u0103 la 48 de ore de la primirea notific\u0103rii.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Pas<\/td><td>Con\u021binutul Ac\u021biunii<\/td><td>Scop<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Verificarea faptelor<\/td><td>Ob\u021bine\u021bi buletinul de design pe baza num\u0103rului de \u00eenregistrare al p\u0103r\u021bii adverse \u0219i verifica\u021bi domeniul de aplicare al drepturilor.<\/td><td>Pentru a evalua legitimitatea cererii.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Consultarea cu un expert<\/td><td>Solicita\u021bi unui avocat sau consilier specializat \u00een legea designului s\u0103 efectueze o evaluare a similitudinii.<\/td><td>Pentru a construi o logic\u0103 obiectiv\u0103 de ne\u00eenc\u0103lcare.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>R\u0103spuns provizoriu c\u0103tre Amazon<\/td><td>R\u0103spunde\u021bi cu \u201e\u00cen prezent, examin\u0103m prin intermediul unui expert \u0219i vom prezenta o opinie detaliat\u0103 ulterior\u201d.<\/td><td>Pentru a preveni temporar suspendarea contului.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Organizarea istoricului de proiectare<\/td><td>Aduna\u021bi desene \u0219i \u00eenregistr\u0103ri care demonstreaz\u0103 c\u0103 produsul propriu a fost proiectat independent.<\/td><td>Pentru a nega \u201edependen\u021ba (dac\u0103 a fost copiat)\u201d.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Examinarea strategiilor paralele<\/td><td>Examina\u021bi posibilitatea de a invalida dreptul de design al p\u0103r\u021bii adverse (procedura de invalidare) sau de a ini\u021bia un proces de confirmare a ne\u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii.<\/td><td>Pentru a lua m\u0103suri de contraatac \u00eempotriva p\u0103r\u021bii adverse.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen special, evaluarea similitudinii drepturilor de design este extrem de specializat\u0103 \u0219i, chiar dac\u0103 un design poate p\u0103rea \u201esimilar\u201d pentru un ochi neavizat, exist\u0103 multe cazuri \u00een care diferen\u021bele \u00een \u201ep\u0103r\u021bile esen\u021biale\u201d din punct de vedere legal duc la o concluzie de \u201enon-similaritate\u201d. Folosirea acestei \u201eexpertize legale\u201d este singura modalitate de a influen\u021ba un gigant precum Amazon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Guvernanta_Proprietatii_Intelectuale_si_Strategia_Proactiva_de_Proprietate_Intelectuala_in_Japonia\"><\/span>Guvernan\u021ba Propriet\u0103\u021bii Intelectuale \u0219i Strategia Proactiv\u0103 de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103 \u00een Japonia<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/fe056a8585a56dedff679e4c389edd8e.jpg\" alt=\"Guvernan\u021ba Propriet\u0103\u021bii Intelectuale \u0219i Strategia Proactiv\u0103 de Proprietate Intelectual\u0103\" class=\"wp-image-211817\" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.5;width:840px;height:auto\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen Japonia, operatorii economici trebuie s\u0103 integreze disputele de proprietate intelectual\u0103 de pe Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp) nu doar ca simple &#8220;incidente&#8221;, ci ca parte a &#8220;gestion\u0103rii riscurilor&#8221; \u0219i &#8220;strategiei competitive&#8221; \u00een managementul lor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cea mai bun\u0103 metod\u0103 de a preveni cererile nejustificate din partea altor companii este \u00eenregistrarea timpurie a designului produselor proprii. Dac\u0103 de\u021bine\u021bi un design \u00eenregistrat, acesta devine o dovad\u0103 puternic\u0103 pentru a demonstra c\u0103tre Amazon Japan c\u0103 &#8220;vinde\u021bi pe baza unor drepturi legitime&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>De asemenea, este important s\u0103 include\u021bi clauze de garantare a drepturilor de proprietate intelectual\u0103 (care garanteaz\u0103 c\u0103 nu exist\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri \u0219i, \u00een caz de nevoie, ofer\u0103 compensa\u021bii pentru daune) \u00een contractele cu furnizorii, ca o m\u0103sur\u0103 practic\u0103 de ap\u0103rare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pe de alt\u0103 parte, dac\u0103 dezvolta\u021bi un design inovator, ob\u021binerea activ\u0103 a drepturilor de design \u0219i \u00eenregistrarea acestora \u00een registrul de branduri al Amazon Japan v\u0103 permite s\u0103 elimina\u021bi rapid produsele contraf\u0103cute de pe pia\u021b\u0103. Astfel, pute\u021bi men\u021bine avantajul brandului f\u0103r\u0103 a fi implica\u021bi \u00een competi\u021bia de pre\u021buri.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen contextul afacerilor moderne de comer\u021b electronic, drepturile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 nu sunt doar o &#8220;ap\u0103rare juridic\u0103&#8221;, ci pot fi considerate \u0219i o &#8220;arm\u0103 ofensiv\u0103&#8221; pentru generarea de venituri \u0219i profituri.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Concluzie_Construirea_unei_guvernante_a_proprietatii_intelectuale_cu_atac_si_aparare_alaturi_de_experti\"><\/span>Concluzie: Construirea unei guvernan\u021be a propriet\u0103\u021bii intelectuale cu atac \u0219i ap\u0103rare al\u0103turi de exper\u021bi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Atunci c\u00e2nd desf\u0103\u0219ori afaceri pe o platform\u0103 uria\u0219\u0103 precum Amazon Japan (Amazon.co.jp), cererile de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de proprietate intelectual\u0103 devin un risc de management inevitabil. \u00cen special, drepturile de design, datorit\u0103 naturii lor de a crea o &#8220;impresie estetic\u0103 prin vizual&#8221;, sunt predispuse la interpret\u0103ri subiective din partea titularilor de drepturi \u00een evaluarea similitudinilor, ceea ce poate duce la suspend\u0103ri nejustificate ale list\u0103rilor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ceea ce se cere de la operatori este un r\u0103spuns ini\u021bial calm la notific\u0103rile de \u00eenc\u0103lcare \u0219i construirea unei logici juridice folosind la maximum expertiza speciali\u0219tilor. O contraargumentare precis\u0103 printr-un aviz de expert este o metod\u0103 eficient\u0103 de a contracara procesul de evaluare mecanic\u0103 al Amazon Japan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen plus, stabilirea unei &#8220;guvernan\u021be a propriet\u0103\u021bii intelectuale&#8221; care s\u0103 integreze aceste riscuri de proprietate intelectual\u0103 \u00een fundamentul managementului, prin cercet\u0103ri preventive \u0219i promovarea drepturilor proprii, genereaz\u0103 un avantaj competitiv. Utilizarea strategic\u0103 a &#8220;activelor intangibile&#8221; reprezentate de drepturile de proprietate intelectual\u0103 \u0219i promovarea afacerii cu legitimitate juridic\u0103 sunt esen\u021biale pentru viitorul afacerilor de comer\u021b electronic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00cen ceea ce prive\u0219te cererile de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de marc\u0103 pe Amazon Japan, am explicat detaliat \u00een articolul de mai jos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-\u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09 wp-block-embed-\u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"H3t86Uf8Ba\"><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/legal-strategy-false-trademark-claims-amazon-japan\">Strategii juridice \u00eempotriva reclama\u021biilor false de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de marc\u0103 pe Amazon \u0219i practici pentru deblocarea conturilor<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Strategii juridice \u00eempotriva reclama\u021biilor false de \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor de marc\u0103 pe Amazon \u0219i practici pentru deblocarea conturilor&#8221; &#8212; \u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/general-corporate\/legal-strategy-false-trademark-claims-amazon-japan\/embed#?secret=1HoFSkzxYH#?secret=H3t86Uf8Ba\" data-secret=\"H3t86Uf8Ba\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ghidul_Masurilor_Oferite_de_Firma_Noastra\"><\/span>Ghidul M\u0103surilor Oferite de Firma Noastr\u0103<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Firma de avocatur\u0103 Monolith este o firm\u0103 cu o experien\u021b\u0103 vast\u0103 at\u00e2t \u00een domeniul IT, \u00een special internet, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een domeniul juridic din Japonia. Gestionarea adecvat\u0103 a propriet\u0103\u021bii intelectuale, de la drepturile de autor la m\u0103rcile comerciale care protejeaz\u0103 brandurile \u0219i brevetele care protejeaz\u0103 tehnologiile unice, este direct legat\u0103 de competitivitatea companiilor. Firma noastr\u0103 ofer\u0103 solu\u021bii strategice pentru proprietatea intelectual\u0103 dintr-o perspectiv\u0103 multidimensional\u0103. Detalii suplimentare sunt prezentate \u00een articolul de mai jos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-\u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09 wp-block-embed-\u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EIjnaBhMRS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/it\">IT<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;IT&#8221; &#8212; \u30b3\u30fc\u30dd\u30ec\u30fc\u30c8\u30b5\u30a4\u30c8\uff08\u30eb\u30fc\u30de\u30cb\u30a2\u8a9e\uff09\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/it\/embed#?secret=VNxL5zUZdW#?secret=EIjnaBhMRS\" data-secret=\"EIjnaBhMRS\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pia\u021ba de comer\u021b electronic (EC) din Japonia continu\u0103 s\u0103 se extind\u0103, conform \u201eRaportului de cercetare a pie\u021bei de comer\u021b electronic pentru anul fiscal Reiwa 6 (2025)\u201d publicat de Ministerul Economiei,  [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":73679,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[24,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73678"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73678"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73678\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73787,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73678\/revisions\/73787"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}