{"id":61238,"date":"2023-12-07T14:38:54","date_gmt":"2023-12-07T05:38:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/?p=61238"},"modified":"2024-03-02T01:45:42","modified_gmt":"2024-03-01T16:45:42","slug":"game-litigation-copyright","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright","title":{"rendered":"Vad var problemet i r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen mellan Nintendo och Colopl?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>P\u00e5 senare \u00e5r har internet utvecklats och kvaliteten p\u00e5 spel har f\u00f6rb\u00e4ttrats, vilket har \u00f6kat spelens popularitet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00c4ven e-sportens framv\u00e4xt har lett till att spel f\u00e5r \u00e4nnu mer uppm\u00e4rksamhet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00e4r det g\u00e4ller spel kan det finnas potentiella problem i relation till olika lagar, och faktum \u00e4r att det har intr\u00e4ffat olika incidenter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D\u00e4rf\u00f6r kan det vara f\u00f6rdelaktigt f\u00f6r spelbolag och faktiska spelare att veta vilka typer av incidenter som har intr\u00e4ffat i samband med spel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I denna artikel kommer vi att ta upp k\u00e4nda r\u00e4ttsfall relaterade till spel och f\u00f6rklara vilka punkter som har varit problematiska i dessa k\u00e4nda r\u00e4ttsfall relaterade till spel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Nintendo_VS_Coloplas_%E2%80%9CWhite_Cat_Project%E2%80%9D_patent_lawsuit\" title=\"Nintendo VS Coloplas &#8220;White Cat Project&#8221; patent lawsuit\">Nintendo VS Coloplas &#8220;White Cat Project&#8221; patent lawsuit<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Case_Overview\" title=\"Case Overview\">Case Overview<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Points_of_Contention\" title=\"Points of Contention\">Points of Contention<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Defendant_Colopla%E2%80%99s_Rebuttal\" title=\"Defendant Colopla&#8217;s Rebuttal\">Defendant Colopla&#8217;s Rebuttal<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Plaintiff_Nintendo%E2%80%99s_Litigation_Response\" title=\"Plaintiff Nintendo&#8217;s Litigation Response\">Plaintiff Nintendo&#8217;s Litigation Response<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#What_can_be_learned_from_the_Nintendo_VS_Colopla_patent_lawsuit\" title=\"What can be learned from the Nintendo VS Colopla patent lawsuit\">What can be learned from the Nintendo VS Colopla patent lawsuit<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#MariCar-rattegangen\" title=\"MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen\">MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Oversikt_over_fallet\" title=\" \u00d6versikt \u00f6ver fallet \"> \u00d6versikt \u00f6ver fallet <\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Tvistefragor\" title=\" Tvistefr\u00e5gor \"> Tvistefr\u00e5gor <\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Domstolens_bedomning_av_tvistefragorna\" title=\"Domstolens bed\u00f6mning av tvistefr\u00e5gorna\">Domstolens bed\u00f6mning av tvistefr\u00e5gorna<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Angaende_tvistefraga_4\" title=\"Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 4\">Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 4<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Angaende_tvistefraga_7\" title=\"Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 7\">Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 7<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Angaende_tvistefraga_9\" title=\"Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 9\">Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 9<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Vad_vi_kan_lara_oss_fran_MariCar-rattegangen\" title=\" Vad vi kan l\u00e4ra oss fr\u00e5n MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen \"> Vad vi kan l\u00e4ra oss fr\u00e5n MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen <\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/general-corporate\/game-litigation-copyright\/#Sammanfattning\" title=\" Sammanfattning \"> Sammanfattning <\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Nintendo_VS_Coloplas_%E2%80%9CWhite_Cat_Project%E2%80%9D_patent_lawsuit\"><\/span>Nintendo VS Coloplas &#8220;White Cat Project&#8221; patent lawsuit<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Overview\"><\/span>Case Overview<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>This case began on December 22, 2017 (Heisei 29), when Nintendo, the plaintiff, claimed that the system implemented in the game app &#8220;White Cat Project&#8221; distributed by Colopla, the defendant, infringed on Nintendo&#8217;s patent rights. Nintendo demanded an injunction against the distribution of the &#8220;White Cat Project&#8221; and claimed damages of 4.4 billion yen, part of the 40 billion yen loss they had suffered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The patents claimed by Nintendo are Patent No. 4262217 (the so-called &#8220;Charge Attack&#8221; technology), Patent No. 3734820 (the &#8220;Joystick&#8221; technology on the touch panel), Patent No. 3637031 (the technology to display characters hidden by obstacles by making the obstacles transparent), Patent No. 4010533 (the so-called &#8220;Sleep Mode&#8221; technology that inserts a confirmation screen when the player resumes the game from the power-saving mode), Patent No. 5595991 (the &#8220;Follow System&#8221; technology that allows cooperative play and message sending\/receiving with other users), and Patent No. 6271692 (the communication system technology related to the &#8220;Follow System&#8221;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Points_of_Contention\"><\/span>Points of Contention<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The point of contention in this case is simply whether the technology used in the &#8220;White Cat Project&#8221; distributed by the defendant, Colopla, infringes on Nintendo&#8217;s patent rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Defendant_Colopla%E2%80%99s_Rebuttal\"><\/span>Defendant Colopla&#8217;s Rebuttal<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>There are various rebuttals from the defendant, Colopla, but the main rebuttal is that Nintendo&#8217;s patent is invalid in the first place (defense of patent invalidity).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Specifically, the rebuttal is that Nintendo&#8217;s patents do not have novelty (the technology is objectively recognized as new) and progressiveness (difficulty is recognized in the invention of the technology), and the patents are invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The defense of patent invalidity is a defense in which the defendant claims that the patent that forms the basis of the plaintiff&#8217;s claim is invalid in a patent infringement lawsuit like this case, and is based on the following Article 104-3 of the Japanese Patent Law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>(Restriction on the Exercise of Rights by Patentees, etc.)<br>Article 104-3 In a lawsuit concerning the infringement of a patent right or an exclusive license, when it is recognized that the patent should be invalidated by a patent invalidation trial or that the extension registration of the patent right&#8217;s duration should be invalidated by an extension registration invalidation trial, the patentee or the exclusive licensee cannot exercise their rights against the other party.<br>2 The court may decide to dismiss a method of attack or defense under the preceding paragraph if it is recognized that it was submitted for the purpose of unduly delaying the trial.<br>3 The provisions of Article 123, paragraph 2, do not prevent a person other than a person who can request a patent invalidation trial for the invention related to the patent from submitting a method of attack or defense under paragraph 1. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>If the defense of patent invalidity is accepted, the patent that forms the basis of the plaintiff Nintendo&#8217;s claim will be invalidated, and the plaintiff Nintendo&#8217;s claim will be dismissed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Plaintiff_Nintendo%E2%80%99s_Litigation_Response\"><\/span>Plaintiff Nintendo&#8217;s Litigation Response<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>As the plaintiff, Nintendo, if the defendant Colopla&#8217;s defense of patent invalidity is accepted, the possibility of losing the lawsuit becomes extremely high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, in order to block Colopla&#8217;s defense of patent invalidity, Nintendo requested a correction trial for the patents that form the basis of Nintendo&#8217;s claim in this case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The correction trial is provided for in the following Article 126 of the Japanese Patent Law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>(Correction Trial)<br>Article 126 The patentee may request a correction trial for the correction of the specification, the scope of the patent claim, or the drawings attached to the application. However, the correction is limited to the following purposes.<br>1 Reduction of the scope of the patent claim<br>2 Correction of a typographical or translation error<br>3 Explanation of unclear descriptions<br>4 Making a claim that cites the description of another claim not cite the description of the other claim. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Of the above Article 126 of the Patent Law, the first item is important in relation to this case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nintendo reduced the scope of the patent claim, excluding parts that were likely to deny the novelty and progressiveness of the patent from the scope of the patent, and blocked Colopla&#8217;s defense of patent invalidity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_can_be_learned_from_the_Nintendo_VS_Colopla_patent_lawsuit\"><\/span>What can be learned from the Nintendo VS Colopla patent lawsuit<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>As of the time of writing this article (May 30, 2020), this case is still pending and future developments are attracting attention, but what can be learned from this case is that lawsuits over the intellectual property of games can potentially develop into very large cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both Nintendo and Colopla have released many popular games, and when it comes to disputes over intellectual property, the amount of damages can be large.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, as a game company, it is necessary to be particularly careful in handling intellectual property to avoid trouble.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Related article: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/intellectual-property-infringement-risk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">What is the risk of infringement of intellectual property rights such as patents, trademarks, and copyrights, and what are the countermeasures?[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"MariCar-rattegangen\"><\/span>MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Det \u00e4r troligt att m\u00e5nga av er har sett personer kl\u00e4dda i kostymer av Nintendo-karakt\u00e4rer som Mario, k\u00f6randes p\u00e5 allm\u00e4nna v\u00e4gar. D\u00e4rf\u00f6r kanske m\u00e5nga av er \u00e4r medvetna om existensen av MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Men, det \u00e4r inte m\u00e5nga som vet exakt vad denna r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng handlar om.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>S\u00e5, l\u00e5t oss f\u00f6rklara MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>F\u00f6r \u00f6vrigt, ett mellandom har redan utf\u00e4rdats i MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen, s\u00e5 f\u00f6r mer information om relationen till detta mellandom, v\u00e4nligen se f\u00f6ljande artikel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Relaterad artikel: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/character-maricar-compensation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mellandom i Mario Kart-fallet och kr\u00e4nkning av immateriella r\u00e4ttigheter[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Oversikt_over_fallet\"><\/span> \u00d6versikt \u00f6ver fallet <span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Detta fall handlar om att Nintendo, som \u00e4r k\u00e4rande, har st\u00e4mt MariCar (nu: MARI Mobility) och dess VD f\u00f6r brott mot den japanska lagen om f\u00f6rhindrande av illojal konkurrens (h\u00e4danefter kallad &#8220;Konkurrenslagen&#8221;) och kr\u00e4vt upph\u00f6rande av intr\u00e5ng i immateriella r\u00e4ttigheter samt skadest\u00e5nd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Det f\u00f6retagsnamn som svaranden anv\u00e4nde var &#8220;MariCar&#8221;, vilket anv\u00e4ndes som en f\u00f6rkortning f\u00f6r &#8220;Mario Kart&#8221;, ett popul\u00e4rt spel fr\u00e5n Nintendo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tvistefragor\"><\/span> Tvistefr\u00e5gor <span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p> I detta fall \u00e4r tvistefr\u00e5ga 1 till 15 i fr\u00e5ga, men de stora tvistefr\u00e5gorna \u00e4r f\u00f6ljande. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li> Om den svarandes anv\u00e4ndning av varum\u00e4rke 1 (MariCar, MARICAR, maricar) i aff\u00e4rsverksamhet och som f\u00f6retagsnamn utg\u00f6r en or\u00e4ttvis konkurrenshandling enligt artikel 2, punkt 1, nummer 1 eller 2 i den japanska lagen om or\u00e4ttvis konkurrens (tvistefr\u00e5ga 4) <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Om en serie handlingar som innefattar uppladdning av bilder och videor som inneh\u00e5ller liknande delar av Nintendo&#8217;s v\u00e4lk\u00e4nda eller framst\u00e5ende produktuttryck (Mario, Luigi, Yoshi, Bowser) till en webbplats p\u00e5 internet, anst\u00e4lldas anv\u00e4ndning av Mario, Luigi, Yoshi och Bowser kostymer, och placering av en Mario docka i butiken (h\u00e4refter kallad &#8220;denna reklamhandling&#8221;), samt handlingen att l\u00e5na ut ovanst\u00e5ende kostymer till anv\u00e4ndare (h\u00e4refter kallad &#8220;denna utl\u00e5ningshandling&#8221;), utg\u00f6r en or\u00e4ttvis konkurrenshandling enligt artikel 2, punkt 1, nummer 1 eller 2 i den japanska lagen om or\u00e4ttvis konkurrens (tvistefr\u00e5ga 7) <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Om anv\u00e4ndningen av dom\u00e4nnamn som liknar teckenuttrycket och &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221; uttrycket, vilket \u00e4r en specifik produktuttryck av Nintendo (maricar.jp, maricar.co.jp, fuji-maricar.jp, maricar.com) (h\u00e4refter kallad &#8220;dessa dom\u00e4nnamn&#8221;), utg\u00f6r en or\u00e4ttvis konkurrenshandling enligt artikel 2, punkt 1, nummer 13 i den japanska lagen om or\u00e4ttvis konkurrens (tvistefr\u00e5ga 9) <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Domstolens_bedomning_av_tvistefragorna\"><\/span>Domstolens bed\u00f6mning av tvistefr\u00e5gorna<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/9-1024x673.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10233\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Angaende_tvistefraga_4\"><\/span>Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 4<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>F\u00f6rst och fr\u00e4mst, i paragraf 2, punkt 1, nummer 2 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221; (\u4e0d\u6b63\u7af6\u4e89\u9632\u6b62\u6cd5) anges f\u00f6ljande:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>(Definition)<br> Artikel 2 I denna lag avses med &#8220;ojust konkurrens&#8221; f\u00f6ljande:<br> 2. Att anv\u00e4nda n\u00e5got som \u00e4r identiskt med eller liknar en annan persons framst\u00e5ende produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseende som sitt eget produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseende, eller att \u00f6verf\u00f6ra, leverera, visa f\u00f6r \u00f6verf\u00f6ring eller leverans, exportera, importera, eller tillhandah\u00e5lla via en telekommunikationslinje, en produkt som anv\u00e4nder det produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseende. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>F\u00f6r att uppfylla &#8220;ojust konkurrens&#8221; i den f\u00f6rsta delen av ovanst\u00e5ende paragraf, \u00e4r det n\u00f6dv\u00e4ndigt att &#8220;anv\u00e4nda n\u00e5got som \u00e4r identiskt med eller liknar en annan persons framst\u00e5ende produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseende som sitt eget produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseende&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>F\u00f6r att uttrycka det enkelt, om du imiterar en annan persons framst\u00e5ende produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseende, kommer det att anses vara en handling av ojust konkurrens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 4, bed\u00f6mde domstolen att &#8220;Mario Kart&#8221; och &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221; \u00e4r framst\u00e5ende produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseenden f\u00f6r Nintendo, och att teckenm\u00e4rkena som Maricar Inc. anv\u00e4nder (Maricar, MariCar, MARICAR, maricar) liknar dessa, och att anv\u00e4ndningen av dessa teckenm\u00e4rken av Maricar Inc. utg\u00f6r anv\u00e4ndning som produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseenden, och erk\u00e4nde att det uppfyller paragraf 2, punkt 1, nummer 2 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Angaende_tvistefraga_7\"><\/span>Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 7<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 7, bed\u00f6mde domstolen att formerna av Mario, Luigi, Yoshi och Bowser \u00e4r framst\u00e5ende produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseenden f\u00f6r Nintendo, och att kostymerna etc. som Maricar Inc. anv\u00e4nder f\u00f6r Mario, Luigi, Yoshi och Bowser liknar dessa, och att anv\u00e4ndningen av dessa kostymer etc. av Maricar Inc. utg\u00f6r anv\u00e4ndning som produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseenden, och erk\u00e4nde att det uppfyller paragraf 2, punkt 1, nummer 2 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Detta \u00e4r i stort sett samma tankeg\u00e5ng som f\u00f6r tvistefr\u00e5ga 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Angaende_tvistefraga_9\"><\/span>Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 9<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00e4sta, i paragraf 2, punkt 1, nummer 13 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221; anges f\u00f6ljande:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>(Definition)<br> Artikel 2 I denna lag avses med &#8220;ojust konkurrens&#8221; f\u00f6ljande:<br> 13. Att avsl\u00f6ja data som har erh\u00e5llits, med vetskap om att det har f\u00f6rekommit en otillb\u00f6rlig erh\u00e5llning av begr\u00e4nsat tillhandah\u00e5llna data efter att dessa data har erh\u00e5llits. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00c4ven, ang\u00e5ende &#8220;begr\u00e4nsat tillhandah\u00e5llna data&#8221;, i paragraf 2, punkt 7 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221; anges f\u00f6ljande:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>7 I denna lag avses med &#8220;begr\u00e4nsat tillhandah\u00e5llna data&#8221; teknisk eller aff\u00e4rsm\u00e4ssig information som har ackumulerats och f\u00f6rvaltats i betydande m\u00e4ngd genom elektromagnetiska metoder (elektroniska metoder, magnetiska metoder och andra metoder som inte kan uppfattas av m\u00e4nskliga sinnen. Samma g\u00e4ller i n\u00e4sta punkt.) som information som tillhandah\u00e5lls till specifika personer som en del av en verksamhet (exklusive information som f\u00f6rvaltas som hemlig). <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Ang\u00e5ende tvistefr\u00e5ga 9, bed\u00f6mde domstolen att Maricar Inc. anv\u00e4nder olika dom\u00e4nnamn som liknar &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221; och &#8220;Maricar&#8221; (maricar.jp, maricar.co.jp, fuji-maricar.jp, maricar.com) i syfte att otillb\u00f6rligt erh\u00e5lla f\u00f6rdelar, och erk\u00e4nde att det uppfyller paragraf 2, punkt 1, nummer 13 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mer specifikt, domstolen indikerade att eftersom det kan erk\u00e4nnas att Maricar Inc. har anv\u00e4nt de relevanta dom\u00e4nnamnen som liknar Nintendos specifika produkt- eller tj\u00e4nsteutseenden och &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221;-utseendet i syfte att otillb\u00f6rligt erh\u00e5lla f\u00f6rdelar, s\u00e5 uppfyller denna handling paragraf 2, punkt 1, nummer 13 i den japanska &#8220;Ojust konkurrenslag&#8221; som en handling av ojust konkurrens, och skadar Nintendos aff\u00e4rsintressen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vad_vi_kan_lara_oss_fran_MariCar-rattegangen\"><\/span> Vad vi kan l\u00e4ra oss fr\u00e5n MariCar-r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen <span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p> I detta fall \u00e4r huvudproblemet att MariCar-f\u00f6retaget har anv\u00e4nt beteckningen &#8220;MariCar&#8221;. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> M\u00e5nga m\u00e4nniskor kanske f\u00f6rkortar &#8220;Mario Kart&#8221; till &#8220;MariCar&#8221;, men n\u00e4r det g\u00e4ller varum\u00e4rket f\u00f6r beteckningen &#8220;MariCar&#8221;, \u00e4r MARI Mobility Development Corporation (tidigare MariCar Corporation) varum\u00e4rkesinnehavaren i m\u00e5nga kategorier. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Fr\u00e5n Nintendos perspektiv, \u00e4ven om det \u00e4r med facit i hand, kan man s\u00e4ga att det var n\u00f6dv\u00e4ndigt att registrera inte bara det officiella namnet &#8220;Mario Kart&#8221;, men ocks\u00e5 dess f\u00f6rkortning som varum\u00e4rke. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> \u00c5 andra sidan, f\u00f6r MARI Mobility Development Corporation, \u00e4ven om de \u00e4r varum\u00e4rkesinnehavare, kan man s\u00e4ga att de borde ha \u00f6verv\u00e4gt deras f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till konkurrenslagen. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> I detta fall, i \u00f6verklagandedomstolens dom, har MARI Mobility Development Corporation och dess VD beordrats att gemensamt betala 50 miljoner yen och r\u00e4nta p\u00e5 5% per \u00e5r fr\u00e5n den 31 oktober 2018 (Heisei 30) tills betalningen \u00e4r fullst\u00e4ndig. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Relaterade artiklar: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/trademark-infringement-cases-illegalityjudgment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"> Vad \u00e4r varum\u00e4rkesintr\u00e5ng? En f\u00f6rklaring av ramverket f\u00f6r olaglighet [ja]<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Relaterade artiklar: <a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/trade-secrets-unfair-competition-prevention-act\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"> Vad \u00e4r sambandet mellan att ta med sig f\u00f6retagshemligheter och lagen om f\u00f6rebyggande av illojal konkurrens? [ja]<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sammanfattning\"><\/span> Sammanfattning <span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Vi har nu f\u00f6rklarat vad som var problemet i k\u00e4nda r\u00e4ttsfall relaterade till spel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Det \u00e4r viktigt att f\u00f6rst\u00e5 vilka lagar som kan bli problematiska i samband med spel, men det \u00e4r ocks\u00e5 viktigt att k\u00e4nna till de faktiska fallen f\u00f6r att f\u00f6rst\u00e5 vilka specifika punkter som kan bli problematiska. D\u00e4rf\u00f6r b\u00f6r de som arbetar p\u00e5 spelbolag eller spelar spel \u00e5tminstone vara medvetna om de k\u00e4nda r\u00e4ttsfallen relaterade till spel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ang\u00e5ende vilka punkter som blev juridiska problem i k\u00e4nda r\u00e4ttsfall relaterade till spel, kr\u00e4vs det juridisk kunskap och expertbed\u00f6mning. Om du vill veta mer om detaljerna, v\u00e4nligen konsultera en advokatbyr\u00e5.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>P\u00e5 senare \u00e5r har internet utvecklats och kvaliteten p\u00e5 spel har f\u00f6rb\u00e4ttrats, vilket har \u00f6kat spelens popularitet. \u00c4ven e-sportens framv\u00e4xt har lett till att spel f\u00e5r \u00e4nnu mer uppm\u00e4rksamhet. N\u00e4r det g\u00e4 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64071,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[25,24],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61238"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61238"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64070,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61238\/revisions\/64070"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64071"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}