Bir \u015firket, tedarik\u00e7ilerden at\u0131k plastik vb. al\u0131p bunlar\u0131 fabrikada \u00f6\u011f\u00fctme gibi i\u015flemlerle yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na ihra\u00e7 etmeyi i\u015f edinmi\u015ftir. Bu \u015firket, Y1, Y2, Y3 adl\u0131 eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 ve bu ki\u015fileri yeni i\u015fe alan \u015firketi, gizlilik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlali ve rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlali gibi su\u00e7lamalarla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015f ve haks\u0131z eylem veya i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi \u00fczerinden zarar tazminat\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 \u015firketin i\u015f kurallar\u0131nda, “\u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar, i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra bile \u015firketin, m\u00fc\u015fterilerin ve tedarik\u00e7ilerin gizli bilgilerini ve i\u015fle ilgili bilgileri, know-how’\u0131 vb. ba\u015fkalar\u0131na s\u0131zd\u0131rmamal\u0131d\u0131r” ve “\u015eirketin gizliliklerine (i\u015f know-how’\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteri bilgileri vb. dahil) dahil olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonraki 3 y\u0131l boyunca bu gizlilikleri kullanarak, ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rdeki di\u011fer \u015firketlere i\u015f de\u011fi\u015ftirmemeli veya ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rde i\u015f yapmamal\u0131d\u0131r” h\u00fck\u00fcmleri bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 \u015firket, bu \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin m\u00fc\u015fteri baz\u0131nda i\u015flem t\u00fcrleri, tedarik miktarlar\u0131, fiyatlar gibi \u00f6nemli i\u015f bilgilerini yeni i\u015f yerlerinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ancak mahkeme, bu bilgilerin i\u015f s\u0131rr\u0131 olarak korunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek \u015firket s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 reddetti ve<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nRekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin veya anla\u015fma ile rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ge\u00e7erli kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, i\u015fverenin korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin en az d\u00fczeyde olmas\u0131 ve yeterli tazminat \u00f6nlemlerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kabul edilir. Ve bu t\u00fcr ko\u015fullar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamayan durumlarda, s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmler veya \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmler, i\u015f\u00e7inin haklar\u0131n\u0131 tek tarafl\u0131 ve haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde k\u0131s\u0131tlar ve bu nedenle kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r ve Japon Medeni Kanunu’nun 90. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ge\u00e7ersiz kabul edilir.Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 13 Mart 2012 (2012) Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\ndedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Her \u00e7al\u0131\u015fandan ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rdeki di\u011fer \u015firketlere i\u015f de\u011fi\u015ftirmeme talep etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir ve i\u015f s\u0131rlar\u0131 veya bu seviyeye ula\u015fmayan durumlarda bile \u00f6zel know-how veya bilgiler vb., “korunmas\u0131 gereken \u015firket \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rdeki di\u011fer \u015firketlere i\u015f de\u011fi\u015ftirmeme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ge\u00e7erlili\u011finin kabul edilip edilmeyece\u011finin en \u00f6nemli noktas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\u300c\u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n Stat\u00fcs\u00fc\u300dnin Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\u00dccretli i\u015f bulma hizmetleri sunan ve sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na hastane gibi yerlerde i\u015f bulma hizmeti sa\u011flayan davac\u0131 \u015firket, eski bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n rakip A \u015firketine ge\u00e7i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n kay\u0131tl\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 bilgilerini \u00e7ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu bilgileri kullanarak, davac\u0131ya kay\u0131tl\u0131 bir doktoru ba\u015fka bir sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015funa i\u015fe yerle\u015ftirdi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Bu durum, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fandan tazminat talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme, sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na hastane gibi yerlerde i\u015f bulma hizmeti sa\u011flayan i\u015fletmelerin davac\u0131 ve A \u015firketi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda da oldu\u011funu, bu i\u015fletmelerin internet \u00fczerinde sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kay\u0131t formlar\u0131 olu\u015fturarak i\u015f arayanlar\u0131 toplad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bir\u00e7ok sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n birden fazla i\u015fletmeye kay\u0131t oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, daval\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fe yerle\u015ftirme eylemini kabul etmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nBu duruma bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, daval\u0131 sadece bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve davac\u0131da sadece yakla\u015f\u0131k bir y\u0131l \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f. Di\u011fer yandan, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f tarihinden itibaren 3 y\u0131l boyunca rekabet ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7inde olan i\u015fletmelere i\u015fe giri\u015fi yasaklamakt\u0131r ve herhangi bir b\u00f6lgesel s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirilmemi\u015ftir, bu nedenle olduk\u00e7a geni\u015f oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek zorunday\u0131z.Osaka B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 14 Temmuz 2016 Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nVe “Bu durumda, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin taahh\u00fctnamenin kapsam\u0131 makul bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve ge\u00e7ersizdir ve rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 anla\u015fmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 taleplerin hi\u00e7bir gerek\u00e7esi yoktur” diyerek, talebi reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u015eirket s\u0131rlar\u0131na veya \u00f6zel bilgilere eri\u015fim olana\u011f\u0131 olmayan d\u00fczg\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlardan bile rakip \u015firketlere ge\u00e7i\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 talep etmek genellikle mant\u0131ks\u0131zd\u0131r. Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n mevcut stat\u00fcs\u00fcne g\u00f6re, i\u015f de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyi yasaklaman\u0131n makul oldu\u011fu kabul edilmezse, bu durum kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak kabul edilir ve ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi reddedilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\u300cB\u00f6lgesel S\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n Bulunup Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u300d Kabul Edilmeyen Durumlar<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\nBir davac\u0131, eski bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan olan daval\u0131n\u0131n hemen emekli olduktan sonra bir rakip \u015firkette i\u015fe ba\u015flamas\u0131n\u0131n emekli maa\u015f\u0131 \u00f6denmeme sebebi oldu\u011funu iddia ederek, \u00f6denmi\u015f olan emekli maa\u015f\u0131 i\u00e7in haks\u0131z kazan\u00e7 temelli geri \u00f6deme talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 \u015firket, hava ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 kontrol eden cihazlar ve yanma g\u00fcvenli\u011fi otomatik kontrol cihazlar\u0131 montaj\u0131, bak\u0131m\u0131 ve bina y\u00f6netimi i\u015fleri yapan bir anonim \u015firkettir. Daval\u0131, davac\u0131 \u015firketinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, davac\u0131 \u015firketin eski y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyesinin dan\u0131\u015fman olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daha sonra genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak atand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u015firkete ge\u00e7i\u015f yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 \u015firket ve daval\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n emekli oldu\u011fu s\u0131rada “Gizlilik ve Rekabetten Ka\u00e7\u0131nma Taahh\u00fctnamesi” adl\u0131 bir belge imzalam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu belgede,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nEmekli olduktan sonra 1 y\u0131l boyunca, \u015firketinizin ticari s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere if\u015fa etmeyecek, s\u0131zd\u0131rmayacaks\u0131n\u0131z.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Emekli olduktan sonra 1 y\u0131l boyunca, \u015firketinizin ticari s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 kendi \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131z i\u00e7in veya \u015firketinizle rekabet eden i\u015fletmeler veya di\u011fer \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer i\u00e7in kullanmayacaks\u0131n\u0131z.<\/li>\n\n\n\n \u015eirketinizin ticari s\u0131rlar\u0131yla ilgili veriler, belgeler vb. emekli oldu\u011funuzda tamamen iade edilecek ve d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmayacak.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Bu taahh\u00fctname ve ticari s\u0131rlarla ilgili t\u00fcm h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ederek \u015firketinize zarar verirseniz, tazminat\u0131 sorumlulukla kar\u015f\u0131layacaks\u0131n\u0131z.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\nYaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, mahkeme,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nDavac\u0131 \u015firketin “ticari s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131” korumaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 ve benzeri h\u00fck\u00fcmler, s\u00f6z konusu bilgi ve beceriler olsa bile, \u00f6nemleri davac\u0131 \u015firket i\u00e7in o kadar korunmas\u0131 gereken \u015feyler de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 ve benzeri h\u00fck\u00fcmler, s\u00fcre nispeten k\u0131sa olsa da, hedef eylemler rakip \u015firketlere i\u015fe giri\u015fi geni\u015f bir \u015fekilde yasaklar ve m\u00fc\u015fteri \u00e7alma eylemleri vb. ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildir ve b\u00f6lge hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Buna ra\u011fmen, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara kar\u015f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir tazminat \u00f6nlemi al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 9 Kas\u0131m 2009 (Gregorian Takvimi) Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nVe davac\u0131 \u015firketin ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rdeki di\u011fer \u015firketlere ge\u00e7i\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, mant\u0131kl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f se\u00e7me \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 bir k\u0131s\u0131tlama getirdi\u011fini ve kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu belirterek, davac\u0131n\u0131n emekli maa\u015f\u0131 geri \u00f6deme talebini reddetti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yasaklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a s\u0131n\u0131rlanmamas\u0131 ve \u00e7ok geni\u015f bir alana yay\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonu\u00e7 olarak sadece di\u011fer sekt\u00f6rlerdeki \u015firketlere i\u015fe girebilmek, kazan\u0131lan deneyimi tam olarak kullanamama gibi bir dezavantaj\u0131 beraberinde getirdi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\u300cRekabetten Ka\u00e7\u0131nma Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn S\u00fcresi\u300dnin Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\u0130\u015f\u00e7i g\u00f6nderme i\u015fi yapan daval\u0131 \u015firket (Tanaka Grubu), bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n istifa ettikten sonra B \u015firketine ge\u00e7ip tekrar A \u015firketine g\u00f6nderilmesi durumunda, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesindeki rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlali veya haks\u0131z eylem temelinde tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Daval\u0131 \u015firketin, “\u0130stifa etti\u011finizde bile, istifa tarihinden itibaren 3 y\u0131l i\u00e7inde rekabet ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fumuz sekt\u00f6rlerle ilgilenmeyi yasaklayan” bir i\u015f kurallar\u0131 vard\u0131 ve istifa s\u0131ras\u0131nda “\u0130\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fimiz m\u00fc\u015fterilere ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc taraflara kendi i\u015f faaliyetlerimizi yapmayaca\u011f\u0131z ve do\u011frudan i\u015f teklifi geldi\u011finde, Tanaka Grubuna bildirip yaz\u0131l\u0131 onay alarak i\u015fi kabul edece\u011fiz” deniliyordu. Ayr\u0131ca, istifa s\u0131ras\u0131nda talep edilen taahh\u00fctnameye, “\u00d6nceki maddenin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, kendisinin rekabet eden bir i\u015fletme dahil di\u011fer \u015firketler taraf\u0131ndan istihdam edilmesi durumunda, bu \u015firket i\u00e7indeki faaliyetlere uygulan\u0131r” denmi\u015ftir. Ancak, mahkeme, daval\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkette sadece yakla\u015f\u0131k bir y\u0131l \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\u0130\u015fteki rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, her biri soyut i\u00e7erikli gereklilikler belirler (\u0130\u015f Kurallar\u0131 Madde 13 “Rekabet \u0130li\u015fkisindeki Sekt\u00f6rler”, \u0130lgili Not “G\u00f6revdeyken \u00d6\u011frenilen \u0130\u015fletmeler”, \u0130lgili Taahh\u00fctname “G\u00f6revdeyken \u00d6\u011frenilen M\u00fc\u015fteriler ve \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Taraflar”, “Rekabet Edici \u0130\u015fletmeler Dahil Di\u011fer \u015eirketler”) ve geni\u015f bir yelpazede \u015firketlere ge\u00e7i\u015f yasaklan\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, yasaklanan s\u00fcre de, 3 y\u0131ll\u0131k rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma s\u00fcresi (\u0130\u015f Kurallar\u0131 Madde 13) daval\u0131n\u0131n 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k hizmet s\u00fcresi ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ok uzun kabul edilir ve ilgili taahh\u00fctname ve ilgili not i\u00e7in s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 yoktur, bu nedenle her ikisi de daval\u0131ya a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar getirir.Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 30 Ekim 2015 Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nVe, daval\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f de\u011fi\u015ftirmesini bu rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile yasaklaman\u0131n mant\u0131kl\u0131 oldu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini reddetti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yukar\u0131daki “\u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n Stat\u00fcs\u00fc”n\u00fcn Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar” \u00f6rne\u011fi ile ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde, 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k hizmet s\u00fcresine k\u0131yasla 3 y\u0131ll\u0131k rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma s\u00fcresi \u00e7ok uzun ve s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 olmayan taahh\u00fctname ve notlar kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.
<\/span>\u300cYasaklanan Rekabet Eylemlerinin Kapsam\u0131\u300d Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durum<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\nYasaklanan rekabet eylemlerinin kapsam\u0131na dair \u00f6rnekler sunaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\nDaval\u0131 \u015firketten ayr\u0131lan ve rakip bir \u015firkete ge\u00e7en banka sigortac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revlisi davac\u0131, daval\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmama h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine dayanarak tazminat \u00f6demesi reddedildi. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131, bu \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmama h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek, tazminat \u00f6deme anla\u015fmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 tazminat ve benzeri \u00f6demeleri talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme, rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile i\u015f de\u011fi\u015ftirme yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndaki yetkililerin anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bile belirsiz oldu\u011funu ve davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki anlay\u0131\u015fta farkl\u0131l\u0131klar oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nRekabetin yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flerin kapsam\u0131 belirsiz olabilir, ancak banka sigortac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flerini y\u00fcr\u00fcten bir hayat sigortas\u0131 \u015firketine ge\u00e7i\u015fin yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 13 Ocak 2012 (Gregorian Takvimi) Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nMahkeme, yasaklanan i\u015flerin kapsam\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok geni\u015f oldu\u011funu ve di\u011fer durumlar\u0131 da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak, bu rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin mant\u0131ks\u0131z oldu\u011funu ve i\u015f\u00e7inin meslek se\u00e7me \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc haks\u0131z yere ihlal etti\u011fini, bu nedenle kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu belirtti. Bu nedenle, bu \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmama h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini temel alan h\u00fck\u00fcmler de ge\u00e7ersizdir ve davac\u0131ya tazminat \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 emretti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Uzun s\u00fcre bir hayat sigortas\u0131 \u015firketinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve sadece bu sekt\u00f6rdeki bilgi birikimine sahip bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana, bir hayat sigortas\u0131 \u015firketine ge\u00e7i\u015fi tamamen yasaklamak mant\u0131ks\u0131zd\u0131r. Bir kuaf\u00f6r\u00fcn i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bir kuaf\u00f6r salonuna ge\u00e7i\u015fini tamamen yasaklamak da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde mant\u0131ks\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>“Tazminat \u00d6nlemlerinin Al\u0131n\u0131p Al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\nYukar\u0131daki \u00f6rnek do\u011frudan uygulanabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131, bir hayat sigortas\u0131 \u015firketinde banka sigortac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flerini y\u00fcr\u00fcten bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve y\u00f6neticiydi ve olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksek bir pozisyonda bulunuyordu. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla maa\u015f\u0131 olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksekti. Ancak, mahkeme (ayn\u0131 yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi gibi),<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nRakip i\u015fletmelerden ka\u00e7\u0131nma maddesinin belirlendi\u011fi d\u00f6nem \u00f6ncesi ve sonras\u0131nda, maa\u015f miktar\u0131nda \u00e7ok fazla bir fark olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, davac\u0131n\u0131n maa\u015f miktar\u0131n\u0131n, bu rakip i\u015fletmelerden ka\u00e7\u0131nma maddesi i\u00e7in yeterli bir tazminat \u00f6nlemi olarak kabul edilmesi zordur.<\/li>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131ndaki ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda, davac\u0131dan daha y\u00fcksek maa\u015f alan bir\u00e7ok ki\u015fi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ancak, bu ki\u015filere \u00f6zel bir rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirlenmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, davac\u0131ya verilen tazminat \u00f6nlemlerinin yeterli oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek yine zordur.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\nBu nedenle, rekabetten ka\u00e7\u0131nma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015fman\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\u00d6zet<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rdeki ba\u015fka bir \u015firkete ge\u00e7i\u015fini yasaklayan maddeler, i\u015f kurallar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri veya taahh\u00fctname varsa kolayca kabul edilir, \u015feklinde bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Ayn\u0131 sekt\u00f6rdeki ba\u015fka bir \u015firkete ge\u00e7i\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 maddesi, i\u015ften ayr\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n meslek se\u00e7me \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve ticaret \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131tlama derecesi y\u00fcksek oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, i\u015fverenin ticaret hakk\u0131 ile uyumlu olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u015eirket olarak ger\u00e7ekten korunmas\u0131 gereken bir \u00e7\u0131kar varsa, ge\u00e7i\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131n\u0131n da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan en az d\u00fczeyde tutulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Uygun kurallar ve uygun uygulamalar gereklidir, ancak somut durumlarla ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle bireysel ve somut olarak incelenmesi gerekmektedir. Bir avukat\u0131n tavsiyesi gereklidir diyebiliriz.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde, i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve i\u015fverenin \u00fccret \u00f6deme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi temel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, ek y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar. Bu ek y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerden biri olarak, her iki […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63777,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[25,24],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61058"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61058"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61058\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64103,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61058\/revisions\/64103"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61058"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61058"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61058"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}