{"id":61162,"date":"2023-12-04T11:16:41","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:16:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61162"},"modified":"2024-03-19T10:47:39","modified_gmt":"2024-03-19T01:47:39","slug":"utilitymodel-patent-difference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference","title":{"rendered":"Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Nedir? Patent Hakk\u0131 ile Aras\u0131ndaki Fark\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r Bir \u015eekilde A\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;Pet \u015fi\u015fe kapaklar\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;yatak d\u00f6vmeleri&#8221; ve &#8220;m\u00fcrekkep gerektirmeyen damgalar (nam-\u0131 di\u011fer: Shachihata)&#8221;&#8230; Bu \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcn\u00fcn ortak noktas\u0131 nedir? Bu, &#8220;Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131&#8221; olarak hukuki koruma alt\u0131nda olmalar\u0131d\u0131r. Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131, g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayatta s\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z bir t\u00fcr fikri m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131d\u0131r ve basit bir \u015fekilde ifade edersek, &#8220;k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck icatlar&#8221; anlam\u0131na gelir. \u00d6zellikle belirtilecek bir teknolojik geli\u015fme olmasa bile, yeni ve \u00f6zg\u00fcn bir \u00f6zellik yaratt\u0131ysan\u0131z, bu faydal\u0131 modelin kapsam\u0131na girer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Peki, tam olarak Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131 nedir, bunu a\u00e7\u0131klamaya devam edelim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Uygulamali_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakki_ve_Patent_Hakki\" title=\"Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve Patent Hakk\u0131\">Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve Patent Hakk\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakki_Nedir\" title=\"Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Nedir?\">Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Nedir?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakki_ve_Incelemesiz_Kayit_Sistemi\" title=\"Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve \u0130ncelemesiz Kay\u0131t Sistemi\">Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve \u0130ncelemesiz Kay\u0131t Sistemi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakkinin_Avantajlari\" title=\"Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Avantajlar\u0131\">Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Avantajlar\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakkinin_Dezavantajlari\" title=\"Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Dezavantajlar\u0131\">Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Dezavantajlar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Faydali_Model_Hakkinin_Ihlali\" title=\"Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali\">Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Faydali_Model_Hakki_ile_Ilgili_Dava_Ornekleri\" title=\"Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131 ile \u0130lgili Dava \u00d6rnekleri\">Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131 ile \u0130lgili Dava \u00d6rnekleri<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Ifade_Ihlali_Hakkinda\" title=\"\u0130fade \u0130hlali Hakk\u0131nda\">\u0130fade \u0130hlali Hakk\u0131nda<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Esit_Ihlal_Hakkinda\" title=\"E\u015fit \u0130hlal Hakk\u0131nda\">E\u015fit \u0130hlal Hakk\u0131nda<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/utilitymodel-patent-difference\/#Buromuz_Tarafindan_Alinan_Onlemler\" title=\"B\u00fcromuz Taraf\u0131ndan Al\u0131nan \u00d6nlemler\">B\u00fcromuz Taraf\u0131ndan Al\u0131nan \u00d6nlemler<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uygulamali_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakki_ve_Patent_Hakki\"><\/span>Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve Patent Hakk\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6nceden &#8220;k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir icat&#8221; dedi\u011fimiz \u015fey, Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n teknik tan\u0131m\u0131 olarak &#8220;do\u011fa yasalar\u0131n\u0131 kullanan teknik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin yarat\u0131lmas\u0131na verilen hak&#8221; olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131r. Patent hakk\u0131 ile benzer g\u00f6r\u00fcnebilir, ancak bu iki aras\u0131nda ne t\u00fcr farkl\u0131l\u0131klar vard\u0131r? <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve Patent Hakk\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki en b\u00fcy\u00fck fark, Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131&#8217;nda icat olarak yenilik ve ilerleme, Patent Hakk\u0131 kadar talep edilmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hukuku (Tan\u0131m)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Madde 2: Bu yasada &#8220;tasar\u0131m&#8221;, do\u011fa yasalar\u0131n\u0131 kullanan teknik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin yarat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p> Patent Hukuku (Tan\u0131m)<br>Madde 2: Bu yasada &#8220;icat&#8221;, do\u011fa yasalar\u0131n\u0131 kullanan teknik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin yarat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ileri d\u00fczeyde olan\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/utilitymodel-patent-difference-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35428\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130ki aras\u0131ndaki fark, Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n Patent Hakk\u0131 kadar ileri d\u00fczeyde olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011fi noktada da bulunur, bu y\u00fczden Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hukuku&#8217;nda, &#8220;icat&#8221; yerine &#8220;tasar\u0131m&#8221; denir. Fikirler ve bulu\u015flar temelinde yarat\u0131lan yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ayn\u0131 olsa da, kimse taraf\u0131ndan geli\u015ftirilemeyen teknoloji kadar de\u011fil, icat olarak adland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in yenilik\u00e7i ve teknik geli\u015fme olan bir yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 korumak Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n i\u015fidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n koruma konusu, Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hukuku&#8217;nun 3. maddesine g\u00f6re, &#8220;nesnenin \u015fekli, yap\u0131s\u0131 veya kombinasyonu ile ilgili olanlar&#8221; ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r. Patent Hakk\u0131&#8217;nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen y\u00f6ntem tasar\u0131mlar\u0131, nesne \u00fcretim y\u00f6ntemi tasar\u0131mlar\u0131 Uygulamal\u0131 Yeni Tasar\u0131m olarak kaydedilmez. Yaz\u0131l\u0131m ve kimyasal maddeler de ayn\u0131 \u015fekildedir, bu t\u00fcr korumalar\u0131 talep etmek i\u00e7in, patent ba\u015fvurusu yapman\u0131z gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakki_Nedir\"><\/span>Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Nedir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Patent hakk\u0131 elde etmenin en b\u00fcy\u00fck engeli incelemedir. Bir bulu\u015fun gereklilikleri (do\u011fa yasalar\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131yor, tekrarlamas\u0131 zor ve y\u00fcksek d\u00fczeyde yarat\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 vb.) ve bir patentin gereklilikleri (end\u00fcstriyel olarak kullan\u0131labilir olmas\u0131, ilerlemeye sahip olmas\u0131 vb.) olmadan, inceleme konusu bile olamazs\u0131n\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakki_ve_Incelemesiz_Kayit_Sistemi\"><\/span>Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131 ve \u0130ncelemesiz Kay\u0131t Sistemi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6te yandan, patentten farkl\u0131 olarak, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131mlar incelemesiz kay\u0131t sistemini benimser. Ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m ba\u015fvurusunda, maddi i\u00e7erik incelenmez ve belgelerde bir hata yoksa, yakla\u015f\u0131k yar\u0131m y\u0131l i\u00e7inde Japon Patent Ofisi taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilen patent siciline ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131n kayd\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ger\u00e7ek yeni bir tasar\u0131m\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda bulunurken, ba\u015fvuru i\u015flemleri ile birlikte ilk \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l\u0131n kay\u0131t \u00fccretini (y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccret) Japon Patent Ofisi&#8217;ne \u00f6dersiniz. Ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131, patent siciline kaydedilerek olu\u015fur ve ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini ilan eden Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Kay\u0131t B\u00fclteni (Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Yay\u0131n B\u00fclteni) Japon Patent Ofisi taraf\u0131ndan yay\u0131nlan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131, ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren tam 10 y\u0131l sonra sona erer. Ancak, kay\u0131t \u00fccretini Japon Patent Ofisi&#8217;ne \u00f6demeye devam etmezseniz, haklar\u0131n\u0131z sona erer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ge\u00e7erli bir ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131, ge\u00e7erli bir patent hakk\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 etkiye sahiptir. Yani, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131 sahibi, (k\u00e2r amac\u0131 g\u00fctmeyen i\u015fletmeler dahil) i\u015f olarak kay\u0131tl\u0131 ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m\u0131 (ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m kayd\u0131 al\u0131nan bulu\u015f) uygulama hakk\u0131na sahip olur. Ayr\u0131ca, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131 sahibi, kay\u0131tl\u0131 ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m\u0131 uygulama hakk\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fkalar\u0131na lisanslama veya devretme hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/utilitymodel-patent-difference-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35429\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakkinin_Avantajlari\"><\/span>Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Avantajlar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131nda, patent hakk\u0131na k\u0131yasla her zaman yeterli koruma al\u0131nabilece\u011fi s\u00f6ylenemez ve inceleme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in haklar\u0131 kullanma zaman\u0131 geldi\u011finde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekenler artar. Ancak, kolayca kay\u0131t yapt\u0131rabilme \u00f6zelli\u011fi, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131n en b\u00fcy\u00fck avantaj\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m\u0131n ba\u015fvurusundan 3 y\u0131l i\u00e7inde, ayn\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fe sahip bir yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k i\u00e7in patent ba\u015fvurusunda bulunabilirsiniz. Bu durumda, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m\u0131n ba\u015fvuru tarihine geri d\u00f6n\u00fcl\u00fcr ve patent ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015f say\u0131l\u0131rs\u0131n\u0131z. &#8220;Patent ba\u015fvurusu zaman al\u0131r, bu y\u00fczden sadece haklar\u0131 korumak istiyorum&#8221; gibi durumlarda, \u00f6ncelikle kolayca kay\u0131t yapt\u0131r\u0131lan ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m\u0131 ba\u015fvurabilir ve haz\u0131r oldu\u011funuzda patent ba\u015fvurusunda bulunabilirsiniz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gercek_Yeni_Tasarim_Hakkinin_Dezavantajlari\"><\/span>Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Dezavantajlar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Kayd\u0131n kolay olmas\u0131 bir yana, tabii ki dezavantajlar\u0131 da vard\u0131r. Daha \u00f6nce belirtildi\u011fi gibi, patent hakk\u0131n\u0131n koruma s\u00fcresi 20 y\u0131l iken, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131n koruma s\u00fcresi 10 y\u0131l ve yar\u0131 yar\u0131ya k\u0131sad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, \u00f6nceden inceleme yap\u0131lmayan ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131, ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir, bu y\u00fczden ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131na sahip olan hak sahibi, ba\u015fkalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 durdurma veya tazminat talebinde bulunurken, Japon Patent Ofisi Ba\u015fkan\u0131na ba\u015fvuru yapmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Bu ba\u015fvuruyu alan inceleme memuru taraf\u0131ndan olu\u015fturulan, ge\u00e7erlilik hakk\u0131nda karar verme materyali olan &#8220;Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Teknik De\u011ferlendirme Raporu&#8221; adl\u0131 ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirme belgesini kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa sunarak, uyar\u0131da bulunman\u0131z gerekmektedir. Patent hakk\u0131na k\u0131yasla, durdurma veya tazminat talebine kadar olan s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve prosed\u00fcr daha fazla olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/utilitymodel-patent-difference-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35427\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131mlar, inceleme yap\u0131lmadan kaydedildi\u011fi i\u00e7in, ge\u00e7ersizlik nedeninin var olma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 patentten daha y\u00fcksektir. Ge\u00e7ersizlik nedeninin oldu\u011funa karar verildi\u011finde, ihlale kar\u015f\u0131 uyar\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 bu durumu yan\u0131tlayabilirsiniz. Ayr\u0131ca, ge\u00e7ersizlik incelemesi talep edilip ge\u00e7ersizlik karar\u0131 kesinle\u015firse, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131 sona erer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131 sahibi, kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa uyar\u0131da bulundu\u011funda veya haklar\u0131 kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ve ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m kayd\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funa dair bir karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131 sahibi, uyar\u0131 veya hak kullan\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa verdi\u011fi zarar\u0131 tazmin etme sorumlulu\u011funu \u00fcstlenir. Ancak, ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini reddetmeyen bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe dayanan Ger\u00e7ek Yeni Tasar\u0131m Teknik De\u011ferlendirme Raporuna dayanarak uyar\u0131da bulundu\u011funuzda veya haklar\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda veya uygun bir dikkatle uyar\u0131da bulundu\u011funuzda veya haklar\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda, tazminat sorumlulu\u011fu do\u011fmaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu, patent hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda olmayan bir risktir ve ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m ba\u015fvurusunda bulunurken veya ger\u00e7ek yeni tasar\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken \u00f6nceden bilmeniz gereken bir konudur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Faydali_Model_Hakkinin_Ihlali\"><\/span>Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Faydal\u0131 model hakk\u0131 ihlali, patent hakk\u0131 ihlali gibi, do\u011frudan ve dolayl\u0131 ihlal olmak \u00fczere iki ana kategoriye ayr\u0131l\u0131r ve do\u011frudan ihlal, ifade ihlali ve e\u015fit ihlal olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131 \u0130hlali <br>\u30fbDo\u011frudan \u0130hlal (\u0130fade \u0130hlali ve E\u015fit \u0130hlal) <br>\u30fbDolayl\u0131 \u0130hlal <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6ncelikle, bir ihlalin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in, hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn veya hedef y\u00f6ntemin t\u00fcm bile\u015fen gereksinimlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130hlal durumu, bile\u015fen gereksinimlerinden herhangi birini eksik b\u0131rak\u0131rsa, ihlal ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmez. Buna do\u011frudan ihlal ifade ihlali denir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6te yandan, bile\u015fen gereksinimlerinin bir k\u0131sm\u0131 farkl\u0131 olsa bile, ayn\u0131 teknik kapsam i\u00e7indeyse, ifadenin kendisinden belirli bir geni\u015fletilmi\u015f yorum yaparak uygun bir koruma sa\u011flamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir hukuk ilkesi vard\u0131r. Bu, e\u015fitlik teorisi olarak adland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r ve bile\u015fen gereksinimleri ile ihlal edildi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclen hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131 bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm olsa bile, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki 5 gereksinimi kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen bile\u015fenlerle e\u015fit olarak, istisnai olarak, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n teknik kapsam\u0131na ait olarak kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>Farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n temel bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmamas\u0131 (temel olmayan b\u00f6l\u00fcm)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc hedef \u00fcr\u00fcnde de\u011fi\u015ftirerek patent icad\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131na ula\u015fabilme ve ayn\u0131 i\u015flevi \/ etkiyi sa\u011flama (de\u011fi\u015ftirilebilirlik)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretimi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, yukar\u0131daki farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc de\u011fi\u015ftirmenin, sekt\u00f6rdeki ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan kolayca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 (de\u011fi\u015ftirme kolayl\u0131\u011f\u0131)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n patent ba\u015fvurusu s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki bilinen teknoloji ile ayn\u0131 veya sekt\u00f6rdeki ki\u015filerin ba\u015fvuru s\u0131ras\u0131nda bilinen teknolojiden kolayca \u00e7\u0131karabilece\u011fi bir \u015fey olmamas\u0131<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcrecinde, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131ndan bilin\u00e7li olarak hari\u00e7 tutulan bir \u015fey olmamas\u0131 veya benzeri \u00f6zel durumlar\u0131n olmamas\u0131<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, t\u00fcm bile\u015fen gereksinimlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in do\u011frudan bir ihlal olarak kabul edilemeyen bir eylem olsa bile, \u00f6rne\u011fin, sadece ihlal edilen \u00fcr\u00fcnlerde kullan\u0131lan \u00f6zel par\u00e7alar\u0131n tedariki gibi, do\u011frudan ihlali tetikleme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 son derece y\u00fcksek oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, do\u011frudan ihlali tetikleme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 son derece y\u00fcksek olan belirli eylemler dolayl\u0131 ihlal olur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Faydali_Model_Hakki_ile_Ilgili_Dava_Ornekleri\"><\/span>Faydal\u0131 Model Hakk\u0131 ile \u0130lgili Dava \u00d6rnekleri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Ayak Destek Pedleri&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan faydal\u0131 model hakk\u0131na sahip olan ve ana i\u015fi spor dengesi destek ekipmanlar\u0131, spor giysileri vb. \u00fcretip satmak olan davac\u0131 \u015firket, ana i\u015fi internet \u00fczerinden \u00fcr\u00fcn satmak olan daval\u0131 \u015firketin \u00fcretip satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin faydal\u0131 model hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda olan bulu\u015fun teknik kapsam\u0131na dahil oldu\u011funu iddia ederek, faydal\u0131 model hakk\u0131na dayanarak daval\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin \u00fcretiminin, devrinin vb. durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin imhas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu dava kapsam\u0131nda, daval\u0131 \u015firket asl\u0131nda ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta \u00fcr\u00fcnleri davac\u0131 \u015firketten sat\u0131n al\u0131p sat\u0131yordu, ancak bu durumu durdurup daval\u0131n\u0131n kendi \u00fcr\u00fcnlerini geli\u015ftirip satmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/utilitymodel-patent-difference-4.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35431\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ifade_Ihlali_Hakkinda\"><\/span>\u0130fade \u0130hlali Hakk\u0131nda<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkemede, \u00f6ncelikle bu bulu\u015fun bile\u015fen gereksinimlerini a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki 7 maddeye ay\u0131rd\u0131k ve bu konuda bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k olmad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bulu\u015fun bile\u015fen gereksinimlerinin ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2460 Ayak parmaklar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6k k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131na yerle\u015ftirilir,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2461 Esnek ve elastik bir malzeme olan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2462 Ayak ucu destek pedi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2463 Ayak taban\u0131ndaki topuk b\u00f6lgesinin \u00fcst kenar\u0131ndan en az ikinci, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck parmaklar\u0131n u\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n alt kenar\u0131na kadar yerle\u015ftirilen yatay b\u00f6l\u00fcm ve,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2464 En az ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc parmak aras\u0131nda, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc parmak aras\u0131nda, d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc parmak ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck parmak aras\u0131nda yer alan birinci, ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u00e7\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerden olu\u015fur,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2465 Pedin yatay b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcst y\u00fczeyi ve \u00fc\u00e7 ped \u00e7\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn her iki yan y\u00fczeyi, her parma\u011f\u0131n k\u00f6k k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131 ile tam temas edebilecek \u015fekilde genel olarak hafif\u00e7e k\u0131vr\u0131l\u0131r,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2466 En az birinci ve ikinci \u00e7\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler y\u00fckseklik y\u00f6n\u00fcnde uzar, b\u00f6ylece birinci ve ikinci \u00e7\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler aras\u0131 ve ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u00e7\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler aras\u0131 yar\u0131 daire \u015feklinde yan y\u00fczeyler olu\u015fturur ve ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc parmak aras\u0131nda ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc parmak aras\u0131nda ayak taban\u0131nda tutulan ayak ucu destek pedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, bu bile\u015fen gereksinimlerin ifade \u00fczerinde yerine getirilip getirilmedi\u011fine karar verdi ve daval\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn bu bulu\u015fun bile\u015fen gereksinimlerini \u2460, \u2461, \u2462, \u2464, \u2466 ifade \u00fczerinde yerine getirdi\u011fini, ancak bile\u015fen gereksinimlerini \u2463 ve \u2465&#8217;n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 ifade \u00fczerinde yerine getiremeyece\u011fini belirtti ve ifade ihlalini reddetti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Esit_Ihlal_Hakkinda\"><\/span>E\u015fit \u0130hlal Hakk\u0131nda<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Ancak, bu farkl\u0131l\u0131kla ilgili olarak, birinci gereklilik (esas olmayan k\u0131smi) i\u00e7in &#8220;temel etkiyi olu\u015fturan esas k\u0131sm\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131&#8221;, ikinci gereklilik (yer de\u011fi\u015ftirilebilirlik) i\u00e7in &#8220;daval\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alarak, bile\u015fen \u2463 ve \u2465&#8217;n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fimizde, bu durumun ayn\u0131 etkiyi yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilir&#8221; ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc gereklilik (kolay yer de\u011fi\u015ftirilebilirlik) i\u00e7in &#8220;bile\u015fen \u2463 ve \u2465 ile daval\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcn aras\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n, her birinin daval\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn yap\u0131s\u0131na de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi konusunda, bir uzman\u0131n \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretim a\u015famas\u0131nda kolayca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebilece\u011fi&#8221; \u015feklinde ifade edilmi\u015ftir. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc ve be\u015finci gereklilikler i\u00e7in, &#8220;e\u015fitli\u011fin kuruldu\u011fu taraf\u0131n, hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k teknolojiden kolayca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131labilece\u011fi veya hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn bilin\u00e7li bir \u015fekilde icat kapsam\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi \u00f6zel durumlar\u0131n iddia ve kan\u0131t y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi yerde, bu durumlarla ilgili herhangi bir iddia veya kan\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r&#8221; denilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, daval\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcn, bu icad\u0131n teknik kapsam\u0131na e\u015fit bir \u00fcr\u00fcn olarak kabul edilir ve e\u015fit ihlal kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/utilitymodel-patent-difference-5.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35432\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve daval\u0131n\u0131n ihlal eylemleri sonucu davac\u0131 \u015firkete verilen zarar miktar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Yararl\u0131 Model Kanunu&#8217;nun (Japon Yararl\u0131 Model Kanunu) 29. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131, ihlal eden ki\u015finin ihlal eylemini olu\u015fturan nesneyi devretti\u011fi durumda, devredilen miktar\u0131n, yararl\u0131 model hakk\u0131 sahibi veya \u00f6zel uygulama hakk\u0131 sahibinin ihlal eylemi olmasayd\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f yapabilece\u011fi nesnenin birim miktar\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na kar miktar\u0131 ile \u00e7arp\u0131larak elde edilen miktar\u0131n, yararl\u0131 model hakk\u0131 sahibi veya \u00f6zel uygulama hakk\u0131 sahibinin zarar miktar\u0131 olarak kabul edilebilece\u011fini belirtir. &#8220;Birim miktar ba\u015f\u0131na kar miktar\u0131&#8221;, \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn sat\u0131\u015f fiyat\u0131ndan, \u00fcretim ve sat\u0131\u015f i\u00e7in ekstra masraflar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 miktar (marjinal kar) olarak kabul edilir.<\/p>\n<cite>Osaka B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 17 Mart 2016 (Gregorian Takvimi) Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu nedenle, davac\u0131 \u015firketin zarar miktar\u0131 1 milyar 479 milyon 6617 yen ve avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti 15 milyon yen, toplamda 1 milyar 629 milyon 6617 yen \u00f6deme ve \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretiminin, devrinin vb. yasaklanmas\u0131 emredildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bir \u015firketin, kendi \u00fcr\u00fcnlerini sat\u0131n al\u0131p satan bir \u015firketten, kendi geli\u015ftirdi\u011fi ihlal eden \u00fcr\u00fcnleri satmas\u0131, di\u011fer \u00fcr\u00fcnlerde de g\u00f6r\u00fclen bir durumdur ve yararl\u0131 model haklar\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda, yayg\u0131n bir sorun olarak kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/intellectual-property-infringement-risk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/intellectual-property-infringement-risk[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Do\u011frudan bir ihlal olmasa bile, e\u015fit ihlal veya dolayl\u0131 ihlal gibi durumlarla Japon pratik yenilik hakk\u0131 ihlali s\u00f6z konusu olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130cat kadar ileri d\u00fczeyde olmayan bir yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k olan Japon pratik yeniliklerle ilgili olarak, icatla farkl\u0131 hak ihlalleri sorun olabilir. Ancak, bu durumlarda bile, uzmanlar taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczg\u00fcn bir yan\u0131t verilirse, kar\u015f\u0131 koymak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Buromuz_Tarafindan_Alinan_Onlemler\"><\/span>B\u00fcromuz Taraf\u0131ndan Al\u0131nan \u00d6nlemler<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Monolith Hukuk B\u00fcrosu, \u00f6zellikle IT ve hukuk alanlar\u0131nda y\u00fcksek uzmanl\u0131\u011fa sahip bir hukuk firmas\u0131d\u0131r. Son y\u0131llarda, kullan\u0131m yeni tasar\u0131m haklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin fikri m\u00fclkiyet haklar\u0131 giderek daha fazla dikkat \u00e7ekmekte ve hukuki kontrol\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi artmaktad\u0131r. B\u00fcromuz, fikri m\u00fclkiyet haklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmler sunmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki makalede belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/practices\/corporate\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/practices\/corporate[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Pet \u015fi\u015fe kapaklar\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;yatak d\u00f6vmeleri&#8221; ve &#8220;m\u00fcrekkep gerektirmeyen damgalar (nam-\u0131 di\u011fer: Shachihata)&#8221;&#8230; Bu \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcn\u00fcn ortak noktas\u0131 nedir? Bu, &#8220;Faydal\u0131 Mode [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64515,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[24,28],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61162"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61162"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64516,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61162\/revisions\/64516"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}