{"id":61171,"date":"2023-12-04T11:16:41","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:16:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61171"},"modified":"2024-03-17T23:24:29","modified_gmt":"2024-03-17T14:24:29","slug":"patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law","title":{"rendered":"Patent Haklar\u0131 \u0130hlali De\u011ferlendirme Kriterleri Nelerdir? \u00d6rnek Kararlar\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Patent sistemi, end\u00fcstrinin geli\u015fmesine katk\u0131da bulunan icatlar\u0131 yapan ki\u015filere, icatlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klama kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu icatlar\u0131 tekel olarak uygulama hakk\u0131 veren bir sistemdir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Patent icad\u0131, hakl\u0131 bir hak veya hakl\u0131 bir neden olmaks\u0131z\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu patent hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali olur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Burada, patent hakk\u0131 ihlalinin somut olarak ne t\u00fcr bir eylemi ifade etti\u011fini ve mahkemede hangi eylemlerin patent hakk\u0131 ihlali olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/patent-infringement-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/patent-infringement-law[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#3_Tur_Patent_Ihlali_Nedir\" title=\"3 T\u00fcr Patent \u0130hlali Nedir?\">3 T\u00fcr Patent \u0130hlali Nedir?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Ifade_Ihlali\" title=\"\u0130fade \u0130hlali\">\u0130fade \u0130hlali<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Esit_Ihlal\" title=\"E\u015fit \u0130hlal\">E\u015fit \u0130hlal<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Dolayli_Ihlal\" title=\"Dolayl\u0131 \u0130hlal\">Dolayl\u0131 \u0130hlal<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Patent_Haklari_Ihlali_Ornekleri\" title=\"Patent Haklar\u0131 \u0130hlali \u00d6rnekleri\">Patent Haklar\u0131 \u0130hlali \u00d6rnekleri<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Konut_Haritasi_Olayi\" title=\"Konut Haritas\u0131 Olay\u0131\">Konut Haritas\u0131 Olay\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Top_Spline_Olayi\" title=\"Top Spline Olay\u0131\">Top Spline Olay\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Yabanci_Madde_Ayirma_ve_Cikarma_Cihazi_Olayi\" title=\"Yabanc\u0131 Madde Ay\u0131rma ve \u00c7\u0131karma Cihaz\u0131 Olay\u0131\">Yabanc\u0131 Madde Ay\u0131rma ve \u00c7\u0131karma Cihaz\u0131 Olay\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_Tur_Patent_Ihlali_Nedir\"><\/span>3 T\u00fcr Patent \u0130hlali Nedir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Patent ihlali, do\u011frudan ve dolayl\u0131 ihlal olmak \u00fczere iki ana kategoriye ayr\u0131l\u0131r ve do\u011frudan ihlal, ifade ihlali ve e\u015fit ihlal olmak \u00fczere ikiye ayr\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Patent \u0130hlali<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Do\u011frudan \u0130hlal (\u0130fade \u0130hlali ve E\u015fit \u0130hlal)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dolayl\u0131 \u0130hlal<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu 3 t\u00fcr patent ihlali hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama yapaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ifade_Ihlali\"><\/span>\u0130fade \u0130hlali<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Bir patent icad\u0131n\u0131n korunan teknik kapsam\u0131, patent ba\u015fvurusu s\u0131ras\u0131nda Patent Ofisi Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8217;na sunulan dilek\u00e7eye eklenen patent talep kapsam\u0131 (&#8216;claim&#8217; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r) ifadesine dayanarak belirlenir. Bir patent icad\u0131, icad\u0131 belirlemek i\u00e7in gerekli olan bile\u015fenler (yap\u0131sal \u00f6\u011feler) taraf\u0131ndan bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, bir patent hakk\u0131 ihlalinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in, hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn veya y\u00f6ntemin t\u00fcm yap\u0131sal \u00f6\u011feleri kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve e\u011fer ihlal durumu, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131sal \u00f6\u011felerinden herhangi birini eksik b\u0131rak\u0131rsa, patent hakk\u0131 ihlali ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buna, do\u011frudan ihlal olarak ifade ihlali denir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ancak, bir patent icad\u0131, patent talep kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ifadesine dayal\u0131 somutla\u015fm\u0131\u015f teknik bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce (Japon Patent Kanunu&#8217;nun 2. maddesi 1. f\u0131kras\u0131) oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, teknik kapsam\u0131 tamamen ifade etmek metin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla zordur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, talep ifadesi \u00e7ok s\u0131k\u0131 bir \u015fekilde yorumlan\u0131rsa, patent hakk\u0131 ihlali kolayca ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131labilir ve patent icad\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 yetersiz kalabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu nedenle, patent talep kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen metnin yorumlanmas\u0131 yoluyla teknik kapsam\u0131 belirlenir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not: Patent talep kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen terimlerin anlam\u0131n\u0131 yorumlarken, dilek\u00e7eye eklenen a\u00e7\u0131klama ve \u00e7izimler dikkate al\u0131nabilir. Ayr\u0131ca, hak kapsam\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda, ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcreci ve bilinen teknoloji de dikkate al\u0131nabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Esit_Ihlal\"><\/span>E\u015fit \u0130hlal<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Patent sahibinin, patent ba\u015fvurusu s\u0131ras\u0131nda gelecekte olu\u015fabilecek t\u00fcm ihlal durumlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rerek patent talebinin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi son derece zordur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen yap\u0131y\u0131, patent ba\u015fvurusu sonras\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan madde veya teknolojilerle de\u011fi\u015ftirerek, patent sahibinin tazminat hakk\u0131 gibi haklar\u0131ndan kolayca ka\u00e7\u0131nabilir. Bu durum, toplumun genel olarak icat etme iste\u011fini azaltabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu durum, sadece patent hukukunun amac\u0131na, yani icatlar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve te\u015fvik edilmesi yoluyla end\u00fcstrinin geli\u015fmesine katk\u0131da bulunma amac\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmakla kalmaz, ayn\u0131 zamanda toplum adaletine ve denge ilkesine de ayk\u0131r\u0131 olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu nedenle, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131 olarak belirtilen i\u00e7erik ve sorunlu teknolojinin i\u00e7eri\u011fi biraz farkl\u0131 olsa bile, ayn\u0131 teknolojik kapsamda oldu\u011fu s\u00fcrece, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131n\u0131n belirtilen ifadesinden bir dereceye kadar geni\u015fletilmi\u015f bir yorum yaparak, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n uygun korunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir hukuk ilkesi vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buna e\u015fitlik teorisi denir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>E\u015fitlik teorisi, teknolojik kapsam\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z geni\u015fletilmi\u015f yorumunu kabul etmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Patent talebinin kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen yap\u0131 ile ihlal edildi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclen hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131 bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm olsa bile, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki 5 gereklili\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, bu hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen yap\u0131 ile e\u015fit olarak kabul edilir ve istisnai olarak, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n teknolojik kapsam\u0131na dahil edilir.&#8221;<\/p>\n<cite>Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131, 24 \u015eubat 1998 (Heisei 10)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu, e\u015fitlik teorisini benimseyerek hak ihlalini kabul eden durumlar\u0131 genellikle e\u015fit ihlal olarak adland\u0131r\u0131r\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn patent icad\u0131n\u0131n temel k\u0131sm\u0131 olmamas\u0131.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc hedef \u00fcr\u00fcnde de\u011fi\u015ftirerek patent icad\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilme<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>ve ayn\u0131 etkiyi elde etme yetene\u011fi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretimi s\u0131ras\u0131nda, yukar\u0131daki farkl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini, sekt\u00f6rdeki bir ki\u015finin kolayca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebilmesi<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n patent ba\u015fvurusu s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki bilinen teknoloji ile ayn\u0131 veya sekt\u00f6rdeki bir ki\u015finin bilinen teknolojiden ba\u015fvuru s\u0131ras\u0131nda kolayca \u00e7\u0131karabilece\u011fi bir \u015fey olmamas\u0131<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Hedef \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, patent icad\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcrecinde, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131ndan bilin\u00e7li olarak hari\u00e7 tutulan bir \u015fey olmamas\u0131 veya benzeri \u00f6zel durumlar\u0131n olmamas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Yukar\u0131daki 5 gereklili\u011fi tamamen kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bile\u015fenlerin tamamen uyu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131mlar olsa bile, istisnai olarak patent hakk\u0131 ihlalinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dolayli_Ihlal\"><\/span>Dolayl\u0131 \u0130hlal<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Patent talebinin kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen icat \u00f6zelliklerinin tamam\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamayan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla do\u011frudan bir ihlal olarak kabul edilemeyen eylemler bile, \u00f6rne\u011fin, sadece patent hakk\u0131 ihlali olu\u015fturan \u00fcr\u00fcnlerde kullan\u0131lan \u00f6zel par\u00e7alar\u0131n tedariki gibi, do\u011frudan ihlali tetikleme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 son derece y\u00fcksektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>E\u011fer bu t\u00fcr eylemler \u00fczerinde hi\u00e7bir d\u00fczenleme yoksa, patent sahipleri patent haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilme ihtimaline kar\u015f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir \u015fey yapamaz hale gelir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Patent Kanunu&#8217;nda (Japon Patent Kanunu Madde 101), bu t\u00fcr ihlal \u00f6ncesi veya yard\u0131mc\u0131 eylemler aras\u0131nda, do\u011frudan ihlali tetikleme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 son derece y\u00fcksek olan belirli eylemler, patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00f6zel uygulama hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder olarak kabul edilir. Bu, dolayl\u0131 ihlal olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan durumdur ve patent icad\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131n etkinli\u011fini art\u0131rmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu konuda, Patent Kanunu \u015f\u00f6yle der:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Patent Kanunu Madde 101 (\u0130hlal olarak kabul edilen eylemler)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen eylemler, ilgili patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00f6zel uygulama hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder olarak kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. Patent, bir \u00fcr\u00fcn icad\u0131 ile ilgili oldu\u011funda, sadece bu \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretiminde kullan\u0131lan bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretimi, devri veya ithalat\u0131 veya devir teklifi gibi eylemler<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(2, 3 atlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4. Patent, bir y\u00f6ntem icad\u0131 ile ilgili oldu\u011funda, sadece bu y\u00f6ntemin kullan\u0131m\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcretimi, devri veya ithalat\u0131 veya devir teklifi gibi eylemler<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. ve 4. maddeler esasen ayn\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmler olarak kabul edilebilir, ancak burada bahsedilen &#8220;sadece&#8221; ifadesi, belirli bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn sadece patent icad\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan ihlal \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc veya ihlal eylemi ile ilgili \u00fcr\u00fcn \u00fcretiminde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve &#8220;pratik ba\u015fka bir kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n olmamas\u0131&#8221; anlam\u0131na gelir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Patent_Haklari_Ihlali_Ornekleri\"><\/span>Patent Haklar\u0131 \u0130hlali \u00d6rnekleri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z \u00fc\u00e7 t\u00fcr patent haklar\u0131 ihlaline ili\u015fkin ger\u00e7ek \u00f6rnekleri inceleyece\u011fiz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Konut_Haritasi_Olayi\"><\/span>Konut Haritas\u0131 Olay\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-33371\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130cad\u0131n ad\u0131 &#8220;Konut Haritas\u0131&#8221; olan bir patent hakk\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, patent sahibinden \u00f6zel uygulama hakk\u0131 alan davac\u0131, Yahoo! taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilen ve internet \u00fczerinden kullan\u0131c\u0131lara sunulan elektronik haritan\u0131n, patent hakk\u0131n\u0131n teknik kapsam\u0131na dahil oldu\u011funu iddia ederek, daval\u0131dan tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkemede, patent talebinin kapsam\u0131 ve ayr\u0131nt\u0131 belgesinin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131ndan bu icad\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>Konut haritas\u0131nda,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Genel konutlar ve binalar i\u00e7in, arama k\u0131lavuzu olarak hizmet eden kamu tesisleri ve \u00fcnl\u00fc binalar hari\u00e7, sakinlerin isimlerini ve bina isimlerini \u00e7\u0131kararak sadece konut ve bina poligonlar\u0131n\u0131 ve adres numaralar\u0131n\u0131 belirtir,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u00d6l\u00e7e\u011fi k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fclterek geni\u015f bir ku\u015f bak\u0131\u015f\u0131 perspektifi sa\u011flayan bir harita olu\u015fturur,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Haritay\u0131 belirtilen her sayfay\u0131 uygun \u015fekilde b\u00f6ler ve b\u00f6lgelere ay\u0131r\u0131r,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ek olarak bir indeks b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc sa\u011flar,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u0130ndeks b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, haritada belirtilen t\u00fcm konut binalar\u0131n\u0131n adres numaralar\u0131n\u0131, haritadaki konut binalar\u0131n\u0131n belirtilen sayfa ve b\u00f6lge numaralar\u0131yla birlikte listeler,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bu \u00f6zelliklere sahip bir konut haritas\u0131d\u0131r<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131 ve her bir bile\u015fenin dil ihlali olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi. Ancak, &#8220;4. Haritay\u0131 belirtilen her sayfay\u0131 uygun \u015fekilde b\u00f6ler ve b\u00f6lgelere ay\u0131r\u0131r,&#8221; maddesi hakk\u0131nda;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Kullan\u0131c\u0131lar, ekranda g\u00f6r\u00fcnen haritay\u0131 incelerler ve \u00e7izgiler veya di\u011fer y\u00f6ntemler ve sembol numaralar\u0131 ile, sayfadaki birden fazla b\u00f6lgeden, arama hedefi olan binan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu adres numaras\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen b\u00f6lgeyi tan\u0131yamazlar. (&#8230;) Bu nedenle, daval\u0131n\u0131n haritas\u0131nda, \u00e7izgiler veya di\u011fer y\u00f6ntemler ve sembol numaralar\u0131 ile, sayfadaki birden fazla b\u00f6lgeden, arama hedefi olan binan\u0131n bulundu\u011fu adres numaras\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelen b\u00f6lgeyi tan\u0131yamazlar. Bu durumda, daval\u0131n\u0131n haritas\u0131nda, &#8220;her sayfan\u0131n&#8221;, &#8220;uygun \u015fekilde b\u00f6l\u00fcnerek b\u00f6lgeye ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 31 Ocak 2019 (Gregorian Takvimine g\u00f6re 2019) Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak, dil ihlalini kabul etmedi ve davac\u0131n\u0131n talebini reddetti. Di\u011fer bile\u015fenler yerine getirildi, ancak sadece 4. bile\u015fen yerine getirilmedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Top_Spline_Olayi\"><\/span>Top Spline Olay\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n patent hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu &#8220;sonsuz s\u00fcrt\u00fcnmeli top spline rulman\u0131&#8221;n\u0131n daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretildi\u011fi ve sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir durumda, patent hakk\u0131 ihlali nedeniyle tazminat talep edildi. Bu, e\u015fit ihlal kavram\u0131yla ilgili bir \u00f6rnektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu dava en y\u00fcksek mahkemeye kadar ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131, ancak Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, e\u015fitlik teorisini onaylad\u0131 ve bunun kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in be\u015f kriter belirledi. Ayr\u0131ca, Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Bu t\u00fcr bir durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurdu\u011fumuzda, bir patentin ger\u00e7ek de\u011feri, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir taraf\u0131n patent talebinin kapsam\u0131nda belirtilen yap\u0131dan esasen ayn\u0131 olan bir teknolojiyi kolayca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebilmesi ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir taraf\u0131n bunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun olacakt\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<cite>Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, 24 \u015eubat 1998 Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak belirtmi\u015ftir. Japon Patent Ofisi&#8217;nin web sitesindeki &#8220;Patent \u0130ncelemesi&#8221; b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, e\u015fitlik teorisi hakk\u0131nda, &#8220;Patent hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 daha geni\u015f bir \u015fekilde kabul etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir yakla\u015f\u0131m oldu\u011funu&#8221; belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yabanci_Madde_Ayirma_ve_Cikarma_Cihazi_Olayi\"><\/span>Yabanc\u0131 Madde Ay\u0131rma ve \u00c7\u0131karma Cihaz\u0131 Olay\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/patent-infringement-judgment-criteria-case-law3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-33372\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Canl\u0131 Yosma Yabanc\u0131 Madde Ay\u0131rma ve \u00c7\u0131karma Cihaz\u0131nda Canl\u0131 Yosma Ortak D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f \u00d6nleme Cihaz\u0131&#8221; adl\u0131 icat i\u00e7in patent hakk\u0131na sahip olan davac\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcretip satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;Ham Yosma Yabanc\u0131 Madde \u00c7\u0131karma ve Temizleme Makinesi&#8221; ve benzeri (daval\u0131 cihaz\u0131) cihazlar\u0131n bu icat\u0131n teknik kapsam\u0131na dahil oldu\u011funu ve ayr\u0131ca daval\u0131 cihaz\u0131n\u0131n par\u00e7alar\u0131 olan d\u00f6ner plaka ve levha plakan\u0131n, Japon Patent Kanunu&#8217;nun 101. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen &#8220;yaln\u0131zca \u00fcretim i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan \u015feyler&#8221;e dahil oldu\u011funu belirterek, ayn\u0131 kanunun 100. maddesi uyar\u0131nca daval\u0131 cihaz\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcretim ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 ve imhas\u0131 ile haks\u0131z fiil nedeniyle tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, bu icatla ilgili olarak, d\u00f6ner plakan\u0131n &#8220;Ortak D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f \u00d6nleme Cihaz\u0131&#8221;n\u0131n zorunlu bir bile\u015feni oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir, ancak daval\u0131 cihaz\u0131nda da, t\u0131kan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nlemek ve ortak d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fc engellemek i\u00e7in, bu d\u00f6ner plakan\u0131n levha plaka ile birlikte zorunlu bir bile\u015fen oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir ve<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bu d\u00f6ner plakada, icad\u0131n uygulanmayan i\u015flevini yaln\u0131zca kullanmaya devam ederken, bu icad\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 i\u015flevini hi\u00e7 kullanmamak gibi bir kullan\u0131m \u015feklinin, bu \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik, ticari veya pratik kullan\u0131m \u015fekli olarak kabul edilemez. Bu durumda, bu d\u00f6ner plaka ve levha plaka her ikisi de, bu icad\u0131n 3. teknik kapsam\u0131na dahil olan daval\u0131 cihaz\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca \u00fcretimi i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan \u015feyler olarak kabul edilmesi uygun olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<cite> Fikri M\u00fclkiyet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, 23 Haziran 2011 tarihli karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak, daval\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6ner plaka ve levha plakay\u0131 \u00fcretme ve satma eylemlerinin, davac\u0131n\u0131n patent haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bir patent icad\u0131n\u0131n bir par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan bile\u015fenler, patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir \u00fcr\u00fcn i\u00e7in &#8220;yaln\u0131zca&#8221; kullan\u0131lan bile\u015fenler ise, bu bile\u015fenleri \u00fcretmek patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal olarak kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Do\u011frudan bir ihlal olmasa bile, e\u015fit ihlal veya dolayl\u0131 ihlal gibi durumlar, istisnai olarak patent hakk\u0131 ihlali olarak kabul edilebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bir patent icad\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm bile\u015fenlerine uymuyor olmas\u0131, kesinlikle patent hakk\u0131 ihlaline yol a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu da dahil olmak \u00fczere, patent hakk\u0131 ihlali konusunda karar vermek \u00e7ok zordur, bu y\u00fczden l\u00fctfen deneyimli bir avukata dan\u0131\u015f\u0131n.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/patent-merit-lawyer-invention\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/patent-merit-lawyer-invention[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patent sistemi, end\u00fcstrinin geli\u015fmesine katk\u0131da bulunan icatlar\u0131 yapan ki\u015filere, icatlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klama kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu icatlar\u0131 tekel olarak uygulama hakk\u0131 veren bir sistemdir. Patent icad\u0131, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64398,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[24,28],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61171"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61171"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64399,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61171\/revisions\/64399"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}