{"id":61188,"date":"2023-12-04T11:16:41","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:16:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61188"},"modified":"2024-08-26T11:23:45","modified_gmt":"2024-08-26T02:23:45","slug":"semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy","title":{"rendered":"Y\u00f6neticiler, doktorlar ve profes\u00f6rler gibi &#8220;yar\u0131 kamuya mal olmu\u015f ki\u015filerin&#8221; gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;Kamu ki\u015fisi&#8221; terimi, milletvekilleri, yerel y\u00f6netim ba\u015fkanlar\u0131, meclis \u00fcyeleri ve di\u011fer \u00f6nemli g\u00f6revlere sahip kamu g\u00f6revlilerini ifade eder. Ancak, kamu ki\u015filerine y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7eklere dayal\u0131 ele\u015ftiriler, vatanda\u015flar\u0131n bilme hakk\u0131na hizmet etti\u011fi i\u00e7in, iftira kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutulur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6te yandan, \u00f6zel ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda bile toplumda belirli bir etkisi olan ki\u015filer, i\u015fletme sahipleri, doktorlar, \u00fcniversite profes\u00f6rleri vb. ele\u015ftirilere maruz kalabilir. Bu t\u00fcr ki\u015filerin ele\u015ftirileri, ger\u00e7eklerin kamusal niteli\u011fini kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlar olabilir ve bu nedenle bu ki\u015fileri kamu ki\u015fisine benzer bir anlamda &#8220;yar\u0131 kamu ki\u015fisi&#8221; veya &#8220;varsay\u0131lan kamu ki\u015fisi&#8221; olarak adland\u0131rabiliriz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yar\u0131 kamu ki\u015filerine y\u00f6nelik gizlilik hakk\u0131 ihlallerinin nas\u0131l ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/scope-of-privacyinfringement\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/scope-of-privacyinfringement[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Yari_Kamu_Kisilerin_Gizliligi\" title=\"Yar\u0131 Kamu Ki\u015filerin Gizlili\u011fi\">Yar\u0131 Kamu Ki\u015filerin Gizlili\u011fi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Yari_Kamusal_Kisinin_Gizlilik_Haklarinin_Ihlali_ve_Mesleki_Eylemler\" title=\"Yar\u0131 Kamusal Ki\u015finin Gizlilik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali ve Mesleki Eylemler\">Yar\u0131 Kamusal Ki\u015finin Gizlilik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali ve Mesleki Eylemler<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Davanin_Seyri\" title=\"Davan\u0131n Seyri\">Davan\u0131n Seyri<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Mahkemenin_Karari\" title=\"Mahkemenin Karar\u0131\">Mahkemenin Karar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Yari_Kamusal_Kisinin_Gizlilik_Haklarinin_Ihlali\" title=\"Yar\u0131 Kamusal Ki\u015finin Gizlilik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali\">Yar\u0131 Kamusal Ki\u015finin Gizlilik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Davanin_Seyri-2\" title=\"Davan\u0131n Seyri\">Davan\u0131n Seyri<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Mahkemenin_Karari-2\" title=\"Mahkemenin Karar\u0131\">Mahkemenin Karar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yari_Kamu_Kisilerin_Gizliligi\"><\/span>Yar\u0131 Kamu Ki\u015filerin Gizlili\u011fi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-28583\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>S\u00f6zde &#8220;\u00fcnl\u00fcler&#8221; hakk\u0131nda, \u00f6zel ya\u015famlar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n toplumun me\u015fru ilgi alan\u0131na girebilece\u011fi ve ayr\u0131ca bu t\u00fcr bir mesle\u011fi se\u00e7me ve \u00fcnl\u00fc olma s\u00fcrecinde belirli bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde gizlilikten feragat ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu ki\u015finin \u00fcnl\u00fc oldu\u011fu alanla ilgili bilgilerin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlar olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kamu ki\u015fileri ve yar\u0131 kamu ki\u015fileri hakk\u0131nda da, gizlilik hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinde, \u00f6zel ya\u015famla ilgili ger\u00e7ekler bile, uygunluk ve nitelik de\u011ferlendirme materyali olarak sunuldu\u011funda, ifadenin i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve y\u00f6ntemi amac\u0131na uygun oldu\u011funda, yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yari_Kamusal_Kisinin_Gizlilik_Haklarinin_Ihlali_ve_Mesleki_Eylemler\"><\/span>Yar\u0131 Kamusal Ki\u015finin Gizlilik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali ve Mesleki Eylemler<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>S\u00f6z konusu olan olay, bir doktora y\u00f6nelik iftira davas\u0131d\u0131r. Bir hastan\u0131n, doktorun muayene s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki cinsel taciz eylemleri hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Bu durumla birlikte, dava avukat\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinin bir kopyas\u0131n\u0131 bas\u0131n kul\u00fcb\u00fcne da\u011f\u0131tt\u0131 ve bu dava hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek isimle haber yapt\u0131. Daha sonra, cinsel taciz davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda hastan\u0131n dava kayb\u0131 (doktorun dava kazanmas\u0131) kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131, ancak doktor, iftira ve gizlilik ihlali olarak, avukat ve gazeteye tazminat talep etti. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da, bu durumu ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klayaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davanin_Seyri\"><\/span>Davan\u0131n Seyri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Do\u011fumdan sonra erkek olarak yeti\u015ftirilen ancak ergenlik d\u00f6neminden itibaren kad\u0131n fiziksel \u00f6zelliklerini g\u00f6stermeye ba\u015flayan ve yeti\u015fkinli\u011fe ula\u015fmadan \u00f6nce kad\u0131n olarak ya\u015famaya ba\u015flayan bir hasta, Saitama T\u0131p \u00dcniversitesi Genel T\u0131p Merkezi&#8217;ndeki plastik cerrahi b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, cinsiyet kimli\u011fi bozuklu\u011fu olan ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik t\u0131bbi alanda \u00f6nc\u00fc bir doktorun te\u015fhisini ald\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Muayene s\u0131ras\u0131nda doktorun hastaya kar\u015f\u0131 ciddi bir cinsel taciz eylemi oldu\u011funu iddia etti. Hasta, haks\u0131z eylemlere dayal\u0131 tazminat talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu dava hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olan medya kurulu\u015flar\u0131ndan gelen sorulara yan\u0131t olarak, dava avukat\u0131, i\u015flerini durdurarak tek tek yetersiz a\u00e7\u0131klamalar yapmak yerine, haz\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde birle\u015fik bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmak istedi ve bir bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131 d\u00fczenleyerek dava dilek\u00e7esinin bir kopyas\u0131n\u0131 da\u011f\u0131tt\u0131, hastan\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve doktorun ad\u0131n\u0131 ve adresini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131 ve gazete bunu haber yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu cinsel taciz davas\u0131nda, &#8220;hastan\u0131n ifadesi do\u011fal de\u011fil ve cinsel taciz eylemi ger\u00e7ek olarak kabul edilemez&#8221; denilerek dava a\u00e7an\u0131n dava kayb\u0131 (doktorun dava kazanmas\u0131) oldu. Ancak, daha sonra, doktor, iftira ve gizlilik ihlali olarak, gazeteye tazminat talep etti ve dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Sonucu \u00f6nceden s\u00f6ylemek gerekirse, mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n (doktor taraf\u0131) talebini reddetti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Karari\"><\/span>Mahkemenin Karar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-28584\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme \u00f6ncelikle iftira hakk\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131, dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi ve talep nedeni olan ger\u00e7e\u011fi belirtti ve sadece gazetecilere ger\u00e7e\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131 ve do\u011frudan bu gazetecilerle olan ili\u015fkisinde, \u00f6nceki davan\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan doktorun itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedelemiyor<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gazete haberleri hakk\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Genel halk\u0131n, bir doktorun muayene s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki cinsel taciz ve iftira nedenleriyle bir sivil dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fiyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, hastan\u0131n cinsel taciz olarak alg\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir t\u00fcr eylem olabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 vard\u0131r, \u00f6zellikle g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde muayene s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki cinsel taciz, ahlaka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir eylem olarak kabul edilir ve toplumun genel g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r, bu nedenle, cinsel taciz vb. nedenlerle hastan\u0131n dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi, doktorun toplumsal de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr ve itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeler<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>dedi, ancak bir t\u0131p fak\u00fcltesi profes\u00f6r\u00fc olan ve cinsiyet kimli\u011fi bozuklu\u011fu olan ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik t\u0131bbi alanda \u00f6nc\u00fc bir konumda olan bir doktor oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, bu bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131 ve haberlerin amac\u0131 kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamakt\u0131 ve iftiray\u0131 kabul etmedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bir t\u0131p fak\u00fcltesi profes\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcniversite hastanesindeki muayene s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki eylemleri gibi y\u00fcksek derecede profesyonel bir meslekte olan bir ki\u015finin mesleki eylemleri sorun olmu\u015ftur, bu, doktorun toplumsal etkinlikleri, topluma y\u00f6nelik ifadeleri ile ilgili bir konudur ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6zel alana ait bir konu olarak kabul edilemez<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>dedi ve,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131 da eylemin \u00f6znesini belirleyen bir konudur&#8230; gizlilik olarak korunmas\u0131 gereken bir konu de\u011fildir<\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi 31 A\u011fustos 2006 tarihli karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\n\nve gizlilik hakk\u0131 ihlalini de kabul etmedi.\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Profesyonel bir pozisyonda olan bir ki\u015finin mesleki eylemleri sorun oldu\u011funda, dava i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve adres ki\u015fisel \u00f6zel alana ait konular olmaz ve gizlilik korumas\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girmez, bu bir karard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yari_Kamusal_Kisinin_Gizlilik_Haklarinin_Ihlali\"><\/span>Yar\u0131 Kamusal Ki\u015finin Gizlilik Haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlali<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/semi-public-figure-right-to-privacy3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-28585\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Bakusai.com&#8221; sitesine yap\u0131lan bir g\u00f6nderi nedeniyle itibar\u0131n\u0131n zedelendi\u011fini ve gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia eden bir di\u015f hekimi, internet servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderenin bilgilerini a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda, sadece itibar zedelenmesi de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda gizlilik ihlali de kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davanin_Seyri-2\"><\/span>Davan\u0131n Seyri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Bakusai.com&#8221; sitesinin &#8220;Kanto B\u00f6lgesi&#8221; ve &#8220;Takasaki \u015eehri Sohbet&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 konular\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;\u25cb\u25cb&#8217;n\u0131n Dr. X&#8217;i&#8221; &#8220;\u25a1\u25a1&#8217;da aldatma maratonu yap\u0131yor&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015feklinde bir makale yay\u0131nland\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu konuda, davac\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;\u25cb\u25cb&#8217;n\u0131n Dr. X&#8217;i&#8221; ifadesinin, Takasaki \u015fehrine biti\u015fik &#8220;\u25cb\u25cb \u015fehri&#8221;ndeki &#8220;X&#8221; isimli &#8220;doktor&#8221; veya &#8220;di\u015f hekimi&#8221;ni belirtti\u011fi ku\u015fkusuzdur. Ve \u25cb\u25cb \u015fehrinde, &#8220;X&#8221; isimli bir doktor veya di\u015f hekimi, davac\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimse yoktur. Bu nedenle, bu g\u00f6nderinin &#8220;Dr. X&#8221; ifadesinin, davac\u0131y\u0131 belirtti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r ve bu g\u00f6nderi, davac\u0131n\u0131n aldatma maratonu yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtir ve bunu okuyan ki\u015filere, davac\u0131n\u0131n aldatmay\u0131 g\u00fcnl\u00fck bir eylem gibi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 izlenimini verir, sosyal de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr ve davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ifadeleriyle, g\u00f6nderenin bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, internet servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n bir di\u015f hastanesinin ba\u015fkan\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve belirli bir sosyal stat\u00fcye sahip oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin konular hakk\u0131ndaki g\u00f6nderinin kamu yarar\u0131na ve kamu hizmeti amac\u0131na hizmet etmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle, bu durumda, yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 engelleme sebepleri (yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n reddedilmesi durumu) var olabilece\u011fini reddedemeyiz.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ifadeleriyle, &#8220;haklar\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k&#8221; oldu\u011funu kabul etmedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Karari-2\"><\/span>Mahkemenin Karar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, gizlilik ihlalini kabul etti. Gerek\u00e7esi a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bu g\u00f6nderinin &#8220;\u25cb\u25cb&#8217;n\u0131n Dr. X&#8217;i&#8221; ifadesi, davac\u0131y\u0131 belirtti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r ve Takasaki \u015fehrinde ger\u00e7ekten var olan &#8220;\u25a1\u25a1 K\u00f6y\u00fc&#8221; adl\u0131 bir i\u00e7ki mekan\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu g\u00f6nderinin &#8220;\u25a1\u25a1&#8217;da aldatma maratonu&#8221; ifadesi, normal bir ki\u015finin dikkati ve okuma \u015fekliyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n Takasaki \u015fehrindeki \u25a1\u25a1 K\u00f6y\u00fc&#8217;nde s\u0131k s\u0131k aldatma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya aldatma partneriyle \u25a1\u25a1 K\u00f6y\u00fc&#8217;ne gitti\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fini belirtir. Bu nedenle, bu g\u00f6nderi, davac\u0131n\u0131n itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeler ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ifadeleriyle karar verdi. Ayr\u0131ca,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p> Davac\u0131n\u0131n bir di\u015f hastanesinin ba\u015fkan\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve belirli bir sosyal stat\u00fcye sahip olmas\u0131, ki\u015finin aldatma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi ile di\u015f hekimli\u011fi teknikleri veya di\u015f hastanesindeki tedaviler aras\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir ili\u015fki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu g\u00f6nderide belirtilen ger\u00e7eklerin kamu yarar\u0131na oldu\u011funu kabul etmek zordur. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu g\u00f6nderinin i\u00e7eri\u011finin do\u011frulu\u011fu ve bunun do\u011fru oldu\u011funa inanmak i\u00e7in makul bir neden oldu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 20 Mart 2015 tarihli karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ifadeleriyle, internet servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na, g\u00f6nderenin bilgilerini a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 emretti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131 kamusal bir ki\u015fi oldu\u011fu varsay\u0131lsa bile, g\u00f6nderide belirtilen ger\u00e7eklerin di\u015f hekimli\u011fi teknikleri veya di\u015f hastanesindeki tedavilerle hi\u00e7bir ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, sadece itibar zedelenmesi de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali de kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not: Bu durum, bir di\u015f hastanesinin ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n aldatma olay\u0131yla ilgilidir, ancak i\u015fletme sahiplerinin aldatma olaylar\u0131na ili\u015fkin dava \u00f6rnekleri a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki makalede toplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/adultery-of-president\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/adultery-of-president[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Yar\u0131 kamusal ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda, \u00f6zel ya\u015famla ilgili ger\u00e7ekler bile, ifadenin i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve y\u00f6ntemi amac\u0131na uygun ve haks\u0131z olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece, bu durumun gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi durumlar olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gizlilik hakk\u0131 ihlalinin kabul edilip edilmedi\u011fine dair karar vermek \u00e7o\u011fu zaman zordur, bu y\u00fczden deneyimli bir avukata dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131z\u0131 \u00f6neririz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/privacy-invasion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/privacy-invasion[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Kamu ki\u015fisi&#8221; terimi, milletvekilleri, yerel y\u00f6netim ba\u015fkanlar\u0131, meclis \u00fcyeleri ve di\u011fer \u00f6nemli g\u00f6revlere sahip kamu g\u00f6revlilerini ifade eder. Ancak, kamu ki\u015filerine y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7eklere day [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64815,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[24,29],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61188"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61188"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72295,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61188\/revisions\/72295"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64815"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}