\nBu durumdaki \u00f6zellik de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine dayal\u0131 geli\u015ftirme s\u00fcresi, yukar\u0131daki toplam s\u00fcre olan 257.5 ki\u015fi\/g\u00fcn olarak kabul edilmesi uygun olup, bunu ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131\/g\u00fcn ba\u015f\u0131na geli\u015ftirme maliyeti olarak bu durumdaki geli\u015ftirme taahh\u00fct s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile ayn\u0131 olan 32,500 yen (K\u0131s\u0131m 3’te, birim fiyat 650,000 yen [ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131\/ay ba\u015f\u0131na] olup, bir ay\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc 20 g\u00fcn olarak kabul edildi\u011finde, ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131\/g\u00fcn ba\u015f\u0131na geli\u015ftirme maliyeti 32,500 yen olur.) olarak d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fczde, bu durumdaki \u00f6zellik de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi talebine dayal\u0131 ek geli\u015ftirme maliyeti, 8,368,750 yen olarak kabul edilmesi uygun olur.<\/p>\nOsaka B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, Heisei 14 (2002) 29 A\u011fustos Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n“Ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131\/g\u00fcn ba\u015f\u0131na” anahtar kelimedir. Ek \u00fccretin hesaplanmas\u0131n\u0131n temelinde, i\u015f saatlerinin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Durum 2: Program Say\u0131s\u0131na Orant\u0131l\u0131 Ek \u00dccretin Kabul Edildi\u011fi \u00d6rnek<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nBu durumda, ek k\u0131sm\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere uygun \u00fccret miktar\u0131n\u0131 inceledi\u011fimizde, bir bilgisayar sisteminin geli\u015ftirilmesinin maliyetinin b\u00fcy\u00fck bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n teknisyenlerin personel maliyeti oldu\u011funu ve bu personel maliyetinin genellikle olu\u015fturulan program\u0131n miktar\u0131na orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7taki s\u00f6zle\u015fme miktar\u0131 olan 23,250,000 yen’i ikinci denetimde tamamlanan 206 program say\u0131s\u0131na b\u00f6leriz ve bu program\u0131n her biri i\u00e7in birim fiyat<\/u> \u00fczerinden \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc denetimden ge\u00e7en 414 program say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7arpar\u0131z<\/u> ve bu miktar olan 46,725,728 yen (23,250,000 \u00f7 206 x 414 = 46,725,728) uygun olarak kabul edilir.<\/p>\nTokyo District Court, April 22, Heisei 17 (2005)<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nBir\u00e7ok say\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olabilir, ancak sakin bir \u015fekilde okudu\u011funuzda karma\u015f\u0131k bir hesaplama yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlayabilirsiniz. Ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7taki s\u00f6zle\u015fme i\u00e7eri\u011fine dayanarak, “her bir program\u0131n birim fiyat\u0131n\u0131 ne kadar olarak tahmin etti\u011fimizi” do\u011frulad\u0131ktan sonra, sadece “birim fiyat x miktar” \u015feklinde basit bir \u00e7arpma i\u015flemi yap\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>Vaka 3: S\u00fcrenin Uzunlu\u011funa Orant\u0131l\u0131 Ek \u00dccretin Kabul Edildi\u011fi \u00d6rnek<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\nVe, J\u014d 3 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde, davac\u0131n\u0131n Heisei 17 y\u0131l\u0131 (2005) Ocak’tan Mart’a kadar olan 3 ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda yar\u0131 zamanl\u0131 olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak, 60 milyon yen belirlenmi\u015ftir. Ancak, ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131ndan itibaren \u00fccretsiz olarak yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar bulunurken, \u00f6nceki y\u0131l oldu\u011fu gibi, ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n Mart ay\u0131na kadar olan s\u00fcreye k\u0131yasla, yeni d\u00f6nemin ba\u015flamas\u0131yla birlikte ders kayd\u0131 vb. sistemlerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131yla ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n Nisan ay\u0131ndan itibaren i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn artmas\u0131 beklenmektedir. Bu durumlar g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yukar\u0131da belirtilen 3 ayl\u0131k<\/u> \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak belirlenen 60 milyon yen temel al\u0131narak<\/u>, davac\u0131n\u0131n Heisei 17 y\u0131l\u0131 (2005) Nisan’dan Eyl\u00fcl’e kadar olan 6 ayl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00fccretin, 120 milyon yen olarak belirlenmesi uygun<\/u> olacakt\u0131r. <\/p>\nTokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, Heisei 22 y\u0131l\u0131 (2010) 22 Ocak Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nYukar\u0131daki karar, uzat\u0131lan s\u00fcre i\u00e7in de, basit bir orant\u0131 hesaplamas\u0131yla ek \u00fccretin hesaplanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\u00d6zet<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nYukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi gibi, birka\u00e7 dava \u00f6rne\u011fini s\u0131ralad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, programc\u0131 ve m\u00fchendislerin ek \u00fccretlerinin hukuki durumu hakk\u0131nda belirli bir d\u00fczenlilik ve ortak noktalar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyoruz. Yani, temel bir ilke olarak, harcanan emek, (teslim edilen programlar gibi) formal i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc, \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan saatler veya s\u00fcreler gibi nispeten objektif g\u00f6stergelere dayanarak, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funca basit bir \u015fekilde hesaplama yapma e\u011filimini g\u00f6rebiliriz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Detayl\u0131 bir prosed\u00fcr veya m\u00fckemmel bir i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc tahmininde ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z olmu\u015f olmam\u0131zdan dolay\u0131, bu t\u00fcr ek geli\u015ftirmelerin veya i\u015flev d\u00fczeltmelerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrsek, harcanan emek kadar, yap\u0131lan i\u015fin formal miktar\u0131 kadar, harcanan zaman kadar ek \u00fccretin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131, belki de \u00e7ok s\u0131radan bir hikaye gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnebilir. Ancak, sonu\u00e7ta hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, m\u00fc\u015fterinin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nceliklendirirken bile i\u015flerin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini hedeflerken, bu t\u00fcr haklar\u0131n hukuki olarak kabul edilebilir olma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, belirli bir kriz y\u00f6netimi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlaml\u0131 olabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fcyor musunuz?
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sistem geli\u015ftirme i\u015fi, hem sipari\u015f veren kullan\u0131c\u0131 taraf\u0131n\u0131 hem de sipari\u015fi alan sat\u0131c\u0131 taraf\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ine alan b\u00fcy\u00fck bir i\u015f g\u00fcc\u00fc gerektirdi\u011fi i\u00e7in, herkesin ayn\u0131 h\u0131zda projeyi ilerletmesi kolay bir i\u015f de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":79716,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[19,31],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61275"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61275"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79720,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61275\/revisions\/79720"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79716"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}