{"id":61344,"date":"2023-12-04T11:20:31","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:20:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61344"},"modified":"2024-03-17T22:29:27","modified_gmt":"2024-03-17T13:29:27","slug":"unfair-competition-prevention-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law","title":{"rendered":"Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131'n\u0131 (Japon Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131) A\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz: \u0130tibar Zarar\u0131na Yol A\u00e7an Eylemlerin Tazminat \u015eartlar\u0131 ve \u00d6rnek Kararlar"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u0130\u015fletme kredibilitesini zedeleyen eylemler, Japon Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nda (Ceza Kanunu Madde 233), kredibiliteyi zedeleyen su\u00e7lar ve i\u015fleri engelleme su\u00e7lar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, kredibiliteyi zedeleyen eylemler ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finde, Japon Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nda belirtilen &#8220;haks\u0131z eylemler&#8221; nedeniyle tazminat talep etmek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Medeni Kanunu Madde 709).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6te yandan, Medeni Kanun&#8217;daki haks\u0131z eylem sorumlulu\u011fundan ayr\u0131 olarak, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131 (Haks\u0131z Rekabet Yasas\u0131) uyar\u0131nca, i\u015fletme kredibilitesini zedeleyen yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 ger\u00e7ekleri if\u015fa etmek veya yaymak gibi haks\u0131z rekabet eylemlerine kar\u015f\u0131, sadece tazminat de\u011fil, durdurma veya \u00f6nleme talepleri de yap\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Burada, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine dayanarak tazminat talep etme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 ve bu durumda hangi avantajlar\u0131n oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/trust-damage-crime-establishment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/trust-damage-crime-establishment[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Itibar_ve_Kredi_Zarari\" title=\"\u0130tibar ve Kredi Zarar\u0131\">\u0130tibar ve Kredi Zarar\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabetin_Onlenmesi_Yasasi_ve_Haksiz_Rekabet_Eylemleri\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131 ve Haks\u0131z Rekabet Eylemleri\">Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131 ve Haks\u0131z Rekabet Eylemleri<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_1_Rekabet_Iliskisi\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 1: Rekabet \u0130li\u015fkisi\">Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 1: Rekabet \u0130li\u015fkisi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_2_Diger_Kisi\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 2: Di\u011fer Ki\u015fi\">Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 2: Di\u011fer Ki\u015fi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_3_Yaniltici_Bilgi\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 3: Yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 Bilgi\">Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 3: Yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 Bilgi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_4_Duyuru_ve_Yayilma\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 4: Duyuru ve Yay\u0131lma\">Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 4: Duyuru ve Yay\u0131lma<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabetle_Ilgili_Dava_Ornekleri\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabetle \u0130lgili Dava \u00d6rnekleri\">Haks\u0131z Rekabetle \u0130lgili Dava \u00d6rnekleri<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabet_Davalari\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabet Davalar\u0131\">Haks\u0131z Rekabet Davalar\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Haksiz_Rekabet_Eylemi_Olup_Olmadigi\" title=\"Haks\u0131z Rekabet Eylemi Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\">Haks\u0131z Rekabet Eylemi Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Zararin_Varligi_ve_Miktari\" title=\"Zarar\u0131n Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Miktar\u0131\">Zarar\u0131n Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Miktar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/unfair-competition-prevention-law\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Itibar_ve_Kredi_Zarari\"><\/span>\u0130tibar ve Kredi Zarar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p> Japon Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 230. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131, &#8220;a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bir ger\u00e7e\u011fi belirterek bir ki\u015finin itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyen ki\u015fi&#8221; hakk\u0131nda, itibar zedelenmesi su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011funu belirtir. Bu &#8220;ki\u015fi&#8221; terimi, t\u00fczel ki\u015filikler ve di\u011fer organizasyonlar\u0131 da i\u00e7erir ve bir t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fin itibar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmesi durumunda, &#8220;maddi olmayan zarar&#8221; olarak tazminat talep edilebilece\u011fi yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 haline gelmi\u015ftir (Japon Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, 28 Ocak 1964 (1964) karar\u0131).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Burada, genel itibar zedelenmesi davalar\u0131nda kabul edilen zarar, davac\u0131n\u0131n itibar zedelenmesi eylemi nedeniyle maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 manevi tazminatla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r ve maddi zarar\u0131n kabul edilmesi nadirdir, ancak<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> \u0130tibar zedelenmesi durumunda, bir i\u015fletmenin ekonomik y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki sosyal de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcren kredi zarar\u0131 nedeniyle olu\u015fan zarar, maddi olmayan zararlarla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 kalmaz ve kredi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f\u00fc nedeniyle i\u015flem durdurma veya sat\u0131\u015f azalmas\u0131 gibi maddi zararlara neden olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Bu nedenle, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;na dayanarak kredi zarar\u0131 eylemini dava etmek, &#8220;zarar miktar\u0131n\u0131n tahmin edilmesi h\u00fckm\u00fc&#8221; (ayn\u0131 yasa maddesi 4) kullan\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Kredi zarar\u0131 eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finde bile, bu eylem ve zarar aras\u0131ndaki nedensellik ili\u015fkisinin ne kadar olaca\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Medeni Kanun&#8217;a dayanarak hesaplama veya kan\u0131tlama yapmak \u00e7ok zordur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Ancak, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;na dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ihlal eden ki\u015finin bu eylemden dolay\u0131 elde etti\u011fi miktar\u0131n zarar miktar\u0131 olarak tahmin edilece\u011fi gibi h\u00fck\u00fcmler kullan\u0131labilir ve hak sahibinin zarar kan\u0131tlama zorlu\u011fu azal\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> Ayr\u0131ca, Medeni Kanun&#8217;a dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, tazminat talebi kabul edilirken, durdurma talebinin kabul edilece\u011fi garanti edilmez. Ancak, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;na dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu haks\u0131z rekabet eylemine kar\u015f\u0131 durdurma talebi (ayn\u0131 yasa maddesi 3), itibar\u0131n geri kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nlemi talebi (ayn\u0131 yasa maddesi 14) kabul edilebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabetin_Onlenmesi_Yasasi_ve_Haksiz_Rekabet_Eylemleri\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131 ve Haks\u0131z Rekabet Eylemleri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/unfair-competition-prevention-law1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31559\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131 (Japon Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131), haks\u0131z rekabeti a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde tan\u0131mlar:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Madde 2: Bu yasada &#8220;haks\u0131z rekabet&#8221;, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki durumlar\u0131 ifade eder:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>14. Rakip bir i\u015fletmenin ticari itibar\u0131n\u0131 zarara u\u011fratan yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilgilerin duyurulmas\u0131 veya yay\u0131lmas\u0131<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015eimdi, haks\u0131z rekabetin gerekliliklerine daha yak\u0131ndan bakal\u0131m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_1_Rekabet_Iliskisi\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 1: Rekabet \u0130li\u015fkisi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z rekabetin ilk gereklili\u011fi, bir rekabet ili\u015fkisinin var olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rekabet\u00e7i olmayan taraflar aras\u0131ndaki iftira ve benzeri itibar zedeleyici eylemler, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n bir sorunu olmay\u0131p, genel hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemler olarak ele al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Burada, rekabet ili\u015fkisi, &#8220;her iki taraf\u0131n i\u015fletmesinin, m\u00fc\u015fterilerini veya i\u015f ortaklar\u0131n\u0131 ortakla\u015fa payla\u015fma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu durumlar&#8221; (Ekonomi, Ticaret ve Sanayi Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131: Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n maddelerine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131klama) olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, \u00f6nceki yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131ndan, adil rekabet d\u00fczenini koruma bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, ayn\u0131 t\u00fcr \u00fcr\u00fcnleri i\u015fleyen i\u015f ili\u015fkilerinde rekabet ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011fu ve ger\u00e7ekte rekabet ili\u015fkisi olmasa bile, pazarda rekabetin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya potansiyel rekabet ili\u015fkisi varsa, bu yeterli kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_2_Diger_Kisi\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 2: Di\u011fer Ki\u015fi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z rekabetin ikinci gereklili\u011fi olarak, belirli bir duyuru veya benzeri eylemle itibar\u0131 zarar g\u00f6ren &#8220;di\u011fer ki\u015fi&#8221;nin belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ancak, belirli &#8220;di\u011fer ki\u015fi&#8221;nin ad\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmemi\u015f olsa bile, &#8220;duyuru veya benzeri i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve sekt\u00f6rdeki bilinen bilgilerden, i\u015f orta\u011f\u0131 olan di\u011fer ki\u015finin kim oldu\u011funu anlayabiliyorsa, bu yeterli&#8221; (Ekonomi, Ticaret ve Sanayi Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131: Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n maddelerine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131klama) olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Belirli bir di\u011fer ki\u015fi olsa bile, isim belirtme zorunlulu\u011fu yoktur. Di\u011fer taraf\u0131n kim oldu\u011funu belirleyebiliyorsan\u0131z, gereklili\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131lar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu di\u011fer ki\u015fiye, \u015firketler ve di\u011fer t\u00fczel ki\u015filikler, bireysel i\u015fletmeler dahildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, hukuki ki\u015fili\u011fi olmayan bir grup (haklar\u0131 olmayan bir dernek) gibi bir dernek de di\u011fer ki\u015fi olabilir, ancak belirli bir di\u011fer ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi i\u00e7in, sekt\u00f6r\u00fcn genel itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyen durumlar genellikle di\u011fer ki\u015fi olarak kabul edilmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_3_Yaniltici_Bilgi\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 3: Yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 Bilgi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z rekabetin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc gereklili\u011fi olan &#8220;yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilgi&#8221;, objektif ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 bilgiyi ifade eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Eylemci taraf\u0131ndan uydurulan veya ba\u015fkas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan uydurulan, ifadenin yumu\u015fat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda bile, ifadenin ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7eri\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131ysa, bu duruma dahil olur&#8221; (Ekonomi, Ticaret ve Sanayi Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131: Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n maddelerine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131klama).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, &#8220;eylemci taraf\u0131ndan uydurulan veya ba\u015fkas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan uydurulan&#8221; oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, eylemci, belirli bir duyuru veya yay\u0131lma i\u00e7eri\u011finin yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011funu biliyorsa, elbette, ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011funu yan\u0131lg\u0131yla anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, bu durum tek ba\u015f\u0131na haks\u0131z rekabetin olu\u015fumunu engellemez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn performans\u0131 veya kalitesi hakk\u0131ndaki ele\u015ftiriler bile, bunlar objektif ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 de\u011filse, yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilgi olmazlar, ancak ger\u00e7eklerin duyurulmas\u0131 veya yay\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, ger\u00e7ekleri kesinle\u015ftirmenize gerek olmadan, &#8220;belki&#8221; veya &#8220;olas\u0131l\u0131k var&#8221; gibi &#8220;ifadenin yumu\u015fat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f&#8221; olmas\u0131 durumunda bile, &#8220;ifadenin ger\u00e7ek i\u00e7eri\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131ysa&#8221;, yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilgiye dahil olabilecek durumlar olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabetin_Gerekliligi_4_Duyuru_ve_Yayilma\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin Gereklili\u011fi 4: Duyuru ve Yay\u0131lma<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/unfair-competition-prevention-law2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31560\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z rekabetin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc gereklili\u011fi olan &#8220;duyuru&#8221;, yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilginin belirli bir ki\u015fiye bireysel olarak iletilmesi eylemini ifade eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6rne\u011fin, bir m\u00fc\u015fteriye rakip i\u015fletmenin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn kusurlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmek, rakip bir \u015firketin i\u015f orta\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirimde bulunmak gibi eylemler bu duruma dahildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Yay\u0131lma&#8221;, yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bilginin belirsiz veya \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015fiye iletilmesi eylemini ifade eder. \u00d6rne\u011fin, bir makalenin internete yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 bu duruma dahildir, bir rakip i\u015fletmenin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc bir gazetede iftira eden bir reklam\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 gibi eylemler de bu duruma dahildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabetle_Ilgili_Dava_Ornekleri\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabetle \u0130lgili Dava \u00d6rnekleri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n (Japon Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131) 2. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 14. bendine dayanarak, tazminat talep edilen \u00f6rnekleri inceleyerek, bu gerekliliklerin ger\u00e7ek davalar\u0131n nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fini g\u00f6relim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabet_Davalari\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabet Davalar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Di\u015f d\u00fczeltme s\u0131ras\u0131nda di\u015flere tak\u0131lan ve braket olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan cihaz\u0131n patent haklar\u0131n\u0131 elinde bulundurdu\u011funu iddia eden daval\u0131 \u015firket, davac\u0131 \u015firketin i\u015f orta\u011f\u0131 olan A \u015firketine, Amerikan \u015firketi olan davac\u0131 \u015firketin \u00fcretti\u011fi ve A \u015firketinin ithal etti\u011fi ve satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 davac\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnleri hakk\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Kendi patent haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal ediyorlar&#8221; diye e-posta ile bildirdi. Bu nedenle, A \u015firketi davac\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnlerinin ithalat\u0131n\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 durdurmak zorunda kald\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/unfair-competition-prevention-law3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31561\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131 \u015firketin ifadesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 \u015firketin y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyesi olan B ve C, bu \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc birlikte icat etmi\u015f ve iki ki\u015fi birlikte patent ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ancak, ger\u00e7ekte, daval\u0131 \u015firket B&#8217;den patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 devralma hakk\u0131n\u0131 almad\u0131 ve bu patent ba\u015fvurusu, patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 elinde bulundurmayan bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan sahte bir ba\u015fvuruydu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yakla\u015f\u0131k 3 y\u0131l s\u00fcren sat\u0131\u015f durdurma sonras\u0131nda bunu \u00f6\u011frenen davac\u0131 \u015firket, sat\u0131\u015fa devam etti ve daval\u0131 \u015firkete, yukar\u0131daki patent hakk\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla daval\u0131 \u015firketin A \u015firketine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirimin yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bir ger\u00e7ek bildirimi oldu\u011funu ve Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 2. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 14. bendinde belirtilen haks\u0131z rekabet eylemi oldu\u011funu iddia ederek, tazminat talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Haksiz_Rekabet_Eylemi_Olup_Olmadigi\"><\/span>Haks\u0131z Rekabet Eylemi Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, daval\u0131 \u015firketin A \u015firketine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyar\u0131n\u0131n, A \u015firketinin davac\u0131 \u015firketten ithal etti\u011fi ve satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 davac\u0131 \u015firket \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn patent ihlali oldu\u011funa dair bir bildirim oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, davac\u0131 \u015firketin ticari itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyen bir ger\u00e7ek bildirimi oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve bu icatla ilgili patent, sahte bir ba\u015fvuruydu ve bu patent hakk\u0131 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta hi\u00e7 var olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edildi (Japon Patent Yasas\u0131 125. madde), A \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131 \u015firket \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn ithalat\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 \u015firketin patent haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmez ve daval\u0131 \u015firket patent hakk\u0131na dayanarak haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanamaz, bu nedenle,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, daval\u0131n\u0131n A \u015firketine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu bildirimler, bu icatla ilgili patentin var olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, davac\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin ithalat\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bu patent hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fini bildirenlerdir ve yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bir ger\u00e7ek bildirimi olarak kabul edilmesi uygun olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 17 \u015eubat 2017 (Gregorian Takvimi) Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, daval\u0131 \u015firket &#8220;Hak ihlali \u015f\u00fcphesi olan bir eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015fiye hak ihlali ger\u00e7e\u011fini ifade etme eylemi, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 2. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 14. bendinde belirtilen haks\u0131z rekabet eylemi olmayacakt\u0131r&#8221; diye iddia etti ancak mahkeme,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>A \u015firketi hak ihlali \u015f\u00fcphesi olan bir eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015fi olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, A \u015firketine bu bildirimlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucunda, A \u015firketi de\u011fil, davac\u0131 \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin \u00fcreticisi olan davac\u0131n\u0131n ticari itibar\u0131 zarar g\u00f6r\u00fcr, bu nedenle bu bildirimler, &#8220;ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n ticari itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyen yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bir ger\u00e7ek bildirimi&#8221; olarak kabul edilmelidir<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Her iki \u015firketin de di\u015f d\u00fczeltme s\u0131ras\u0131nda di\u015flere tak\u0131lan braketleri satan davac\u0131 \u015firket ve daval\u0131 \u015firketin rekabet ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r, bu nedenle daval\u0131 \u015firketin eylemi &#8220;rekabet ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7inde olan ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n ticari itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyen yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bir ger\u00e7ek bildirimi veya yayma eylemi&#8221; olur ve Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 2. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 14. bendinde belirtilen haks\u0131z rekabet eylemi olarak kabul edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Zararin_Varligi_ve_Miktari\"><\/span>Zarar\u0131n Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Miktar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/unfair-competition-prevention-law4.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31562\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131, tazminat\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekilde tan\u0131mlar:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Madde 4 &#8211; Kas\u0131tl\u0131 veya ihmal sonucu haks\u0131z rekabet yaparak ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n ticari \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden ki\u015fi, bu nedenle olu\u015fan zarar\u0131 tazmin etmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Buna dayanarak, mahkeme, sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n durduruldu\u011fu yakla\u015f\u0131k 3 y\u0131l boyunca elde edilemeyen kar\u0131 tazminat olarak hesaplad\u0131. Sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n hemen \u00f6ncesindeki 1 y\u0131l ve hemen sonras\u0131ndaki 1 y\u0131l\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f miktar\u0131ndan y\u0131ll\u0131k ortalama sat\u0131\u015f miktar\u0131n\u0131 hesaplad\u0131, 3 y\u0131l boyunca sat\u0131\u015f yap\u0131labilir olan miktar\u0131 tahmin etti, bu miktar\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f birim fiyat\u0131yla \u00e7arpt\u0131, ham madde maliyeti ve d\u0131\u015f kaynak kullan\u0131m maliyetini \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>B\u00f6ylece, tahmin edilen kay\u0131p kar 127,174.5 Amerikan Dolar\u0131, avukat \u00fccreti 13,000 Amerikan Dolar\u0131, toplamda 141,174.5 Amerikan Dolar\u0131 tazminat olarak kabul edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu \u015fekilde, Haks\u0131z Rekabetin \u00d6nlenmesi Yasas\u0131&#8217;na dayanarak itibar zedeleyici eylemleri dava ederseniz, tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n tahmini yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu \u00f6rnekte, sadece sat\u0131\u015f \u015firketine e-posta g\u00f6nderildi ve geni\u015f \u00e7apta &#8220;yay\u0131lmad\u0131&#8221;, bu y\u00fczden davac\u0131 \u00f6z\u00fcr reklam\u0131 talep etmedi ancak, internet \u00fczerinde geni\u015f \u00e7apta bildirim yap\u0131l\u0131p yay\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131, \u00f6z\u00fcr reklam\u0131 talep edilebilecek bir durumdu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/credit-damage-litigation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/credit-damage-litigation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015eirketinizin itibar\u0131 veya kredibilitesi zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, zarar miktar\u0131n\u0131 maddi olarak de\u011ferlendirmek genellikle zordur ve kan\u0131tlaman\u0131n zor oldu\u011fu durumlar s\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kar. Ancak, Japon Haks\u0131z Rekabet \u00d6nleme Yasas\u0131&#8217;na dayanarak zarar\u0131n telafisini talep ederseniz, mahkeme zarar miktar\u0131n\u0131 takdir yetkisi ile belirleyecektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015eirketinizin itibar\u0131 veya kredibilitesinin zedelendi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorsan\u0131z, Japon Haks\u0131z Rekabet \u00d6nleme Yasas\u0131&#8217;na dayanarak tazminat talep etme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z vard\u0131r. Deneyimli bir avukata dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131z\u0131 \u00f6neririz.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130\u015fletme kredibilitesini zedeleyen eylemler, Japon Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nda (Ceza Kanunu Madde 233), kredibiliteyi zedeleyen su\u00e7lar ve i\u015fleri engelleme su\u00e7lar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelebilir. Ayr\u0131ca, kredibiliteyi  [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64358,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[25,24],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61344"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61344"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61344\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64359,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61344\/revisions\/64359"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}