{"id":61385,"date":"2023-12-04T11:20:33","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:20:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61385"},"modified":"2024-03-16T14:27:29","modified_gmt":"2024-03-16T05:27:29","slug":"privacy-unknownness-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law","title":{"rendered":"\u0130nternet \u00dczerindeki Gizlilik \u0130hlalleri Durumlar\u0131nda Bilinmeyenlik"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u00d6zel hayat\u0131 anlatan &#8220;Ziyafet Sonras\u0131&#8221; adl\u0131 roman\u0131n gizlilik ihlali nedeniyle sorun oldu\u011fu bir dava da, Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, gizlilik hakk\u0131n\u0131 &#8220;\u00f6zel hayat\u0131n haks\u0131z yere a\u00e7\u0131klanmamas\u0131 gereken bir hukuki g\u00fcvence veya hak&#8221; olarak tan\u0131mlam\u0131\u015f ve gizlilik ihlalinin olu\u015fum ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekilde belirlemi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p> 1. \u00d6zel hayata ait bir ger\u00e7ek veya \u00f6yle alg\u0131lanabilecek bir durum olmas\u0131 (\u00d6zel nitelik) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. Genel bir ki\u015finin duyarl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayanarak, bu ki\u015finin durumunda, a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemeyece\u011fi bir durum olmas\u0131 (Gizlilik) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> 3. Genel halk taraf\u0131ndan hen\u00fcz bilinmeyen bir durum olmas\u0131 (Bilinmeyenlik) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4. A\u00e7\u0131klama sonucunda bu ki\u015finin ger\u00e7ekten rahats\u0131zl\u0131k, endi\u015fe hissetmesi <\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 28 Eyl\u00fcl 1964 (Showa 39) Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p> \u0130nternet \u00fczerindeki gizlilik ihlalleri durumunda, genellikle ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n zaten SNS veya forumlara yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgilerin retweet veya kopyalama yoluyla yay\u0131lmas\u0131 ve zarar\u0131n artmas\u0131 durumlar\u0131 \u00e7ok olur. Bu durumda, &#8220;Zaten a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f olan bilgileri sadece kopyalad\u0131m, bu y\u00fczden bilinmeyenlik ad\u0131 verilen gizlilik ihlali ko\u015fulunu kar\u015f\u0131lam\u0131yorum, gizlilik ihlali ile su\u00e7lanmamal\u0131y\u0131m&#8221; diye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnen insanlar vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ancak, \u00f6rne\u011fin, A ki\u015fisi Twitter&#8217;da &#8220;XX bo\u015fand\u0131&#8221; diye bir bilgi yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, B ki\u015fisi bu bilgiyi anonim bir foruma g\u00f6nderirse, B ki\u015fisi sorumluluktan ka\u00e7abilir mi? Mahkeme, bilinmeyenli\u011fi nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/personal-information-and-privacy-violation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Ne%E2%80%99nin_Gizli_Oldugu_Anlamina_Gelir\" title=\"Ne&#8217;nin Gizli Oldu\u011fu Anlam\u0131na Gelir\">Ne&#8217;nin Gizli Oldu\u011fu Anlam\u0131na Gelir<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Dogustan_Ilerleyici_Kekemelik_Durumu_Iddiasi\" title=\"Do\u011fu\u015ftan \u0130lerleyici Kekemelik Durumu \u0130ddias\u0131\">Do\u011fu\u015ftan \u0130lerleyici Kekemelik Durumu \u0130ddias\u0131<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Kitaptan_Alinti\" title=\"Kitaptan Al\u0131nt\u0131\">Kitaptan Al\u0131nt\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Gecmiste_Uye_Oldugu_Kulup_Ismi\" title=\"Ge\u00e7mi\u015fte \u00dcye Oldu\u011fu Kul\u00fcp \u0130smi\">Ge\u00e7mi\u015fte \u00dcye Oldu\u011fu Kul\u00fcp \u0130smi<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Internet_Makalesinden_Alintilar\" title=\"\u0130nternet Makalesinden Al\u0131nt\u0131lar\">\u0130nternet Makalesinden Al\u0131nt\u0131lar<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#%E2%80%9CEstetik_Yuz%E2%80%9D_Ifadesi\" title=\"&#8220;Estetik Y\u00fcz&#8221; \u0130fadesi\">&#8220;Estetik Y\u00fcz&#8221; \u0130fadesi<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Ayni_Konu_Basligi_Altindaki_Diger_Makalelerin_Alintilari\" title=\"Ayn\u0131 Konu Ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Alt\u0131ndaki Di\u011fer Makalelerin Al\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131\">Ayn\u0131 Konu Ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Alt\u0131ndaki Di\u011fer Makalelerin Al\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/privacy-unknownness-law\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ne%E2%80%99nin_Gizli_Oldugu_Anlamina_Gelir\"><\/span>Ne&#8217;nin Gizli Oldu\u011fu Anlam\u0131na Gelir<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/10-1-1024x569.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10869\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00d6rne\u011fin, bir seslendirme sanat\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocuk istismar\u0131 ve yaralanma sonucu \u00f6l\u00fcm olaylar\u0131 nedeniyle tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir olayda, bu seslendirme sanat\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n sahne ad\u0131n\u0131 ve temsil etti\u011fi televizyon reklam\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131n\u0131 belirten raporlar, bunlar\u0131n zaten a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f ger\u00e7ekler oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, gizlilik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi kabul edilmez. Bu, bir \u00f6rnektir (Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 14 Eyl\u00fcl 2015 tarihli karar).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Genel halk\u0131n zaten bildi\u011fi bir konuyu makaleye d\u00f6kmek veya benzeri bir \u015fey yapmak, gizlilik ihlali say\u0131lmaz, ancak &#8220;hen\u00fcz bilinmeyen&#8221; ve &#8220;zaten bilinen&#8221; aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131m nas\u0131l yap\u0131l\u0131r?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dogustan_Ilerleyici_Kekemelik_Durumu_Iddiasi\"><\/span>Do\u011fu\u015ftan \u0130lerleyici Kekemelik Durumu \u0130ddias\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131n\u0131n internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir makale, baz\u0131 bilgilerin davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumsal de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve davac\u0131n\u0131n ciddi bir do\u011fu\u015ftan ilerleyici kekemelik durumunda oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle, a Derne\u011fi International&#8217;\u0131n ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131, &#8220;a Derne\u011fi&#8217;nden ayr\u0131lma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir web sitesi olu\u015fturmu\u015ftu. Burada, a Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin B Onursal Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve yabanc\u0131 misafirlerle y\u0131llarca \u0130ngilizce terc\u00fcmanl\u0131k yapan ve \u00f6nemli bir pozisyonda olan A&#8217;n\u0131n, a Derne\u011fi&#8217;nden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu dernekle \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7inde olan bir tap\u0131na\u011f\u0131n takip\u00e7isi oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylentisi hakk\u0131nda, d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan yap\u0131lan bir r\u00f6portajda davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylentiyi do\u011fru kabul etti\u011fi ve A&#8217;n\u0131n ayr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ciddi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in a Derne\u011fi International i\u00e7inde bir sorumluluk sorunu oldu\u011fu i\u00e7 bilgiyi sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir makale yay\u0131nlad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disease-information-and-privacy-infringement\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disease-information-and-privacy-infringement[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kitaptan_Alinti\"><\/span>Kitaptan Al\u0131nt\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Makalede, davac\u0131n\u0131n a Derne\u011fi International&#8217;\u0131n Genel Sekreteri gibi \u00f6nemli bir pozisyonda olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, e\u011fitimini kullanarak hi\u00e7bir sorumluluk almay\u0131p t\u00fcm sorumlulu\u011fu ba\u015fkalar\u0131na y\u00fcklemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan sorumsuz ve korkak bir ki\u015fi oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi i\u00e7in iftira at\u0131ld\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fu\u015ftan ilerleyici kekemeli\u011finin ciddi oldu\u011fu ve davac\u0131yla konu\u015furken yaz\u0131l\u0131 ileti\u015fime haz\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, kitaptan al\u0131nt\u0131 yap\u0131larak yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in gizlilik ihlali oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131 dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, ilgili makalenin, davac\u0131n\u0131n a Derne\u011fi International&#8217;da \u00f6nemli bir pozisyonda olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, &#8220;c \u00dcniversitesi mezunu&#8221; e\u011fitimini kullanarak, a Derne\u011fi International i\u00e7inde sorun olan konular hakk\u0131nda sorumlulu\u011fu ba\u015fkalar\u0131na y\u00fckleyip kendisi sorumluluktan ka\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan sorumsuz ve korkak bir ki\u015fi oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi i\u00e7in, davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumsal de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne karar verdi ve iftira at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, &#8220;Ciddi bir do\u011fu\u015ftan ilerleyici kekemelik durumu olan bir ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda bilgi, yak\u0131n bir konu\u015fma ili\u015fkisi olmad\u0131k\u00e7a bilinemez ve genel insan duyarl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re bu bilginin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 istenmez. Bu nedenle, bu bilginin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal etmi\u015ftir&#8221; diyerek gizlilik ihlali kabul edildi ve do\u011fu\u015ftan ilerleyici kekemelik hakk\u0131ndaki ifade, kitab\u0131n ifadesinin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi al\u0131nt\u0131lad\u0131 ve Heisei 3 y\u0131l\u0131nda (1991) a Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin ilgilileri taraf\u0131ndan geni\u015f \u00e7apta bilindi\u011fi iddia edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Davac\u0131n\u0131n kekemelik hakk\u0131ndaki bilgileri internet sitesinde yay\u0131nlayarak, daha geni\u015f bir kitleye bu bilgiyi a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in gizlilik ihlali a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Hatta, davac\u0131n\u0131n kekemelik hakk\u0131ndaki ger\u00e7ekler Heisei 3 y\u0131l\u0131nda (1991) belirli bir \u00e7evrede biliniyordu, zamanla bu bilinirlik kaybolmu\u015ftur. Bu nedenle, 15 y\u0131l veya daha fazla bir s\u00fcre sonra bunu tekrar a\u00e7\u0131klarsan\u0131z, yeni bir gizlilik ihlali olu\u015fur.&#8221;<\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 30 A\u011fustos 2010 tarihli karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ruhsal ac\u0131 i\u00e7in 3 milyon yen ve avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti i\u00e7in 300 bin yen, toplamda 3.3 milyon yen \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Sadece al\u0131nt\u0131 yapt\u0131m&#8221; s\u0131k\u00e7a yap\u0131lan bir savunmad\u0131r, ancak internet \u00fczerinde yay\u0131nlayarak daha geni\u015f bir kitleye a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda, \u00f6zellikle kitab\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131ndan 15 y\u0131l veya daha fazla bir s\u00fcre sonra bunu yaparsan\u0131z, yeni bir gizlilik ihlali olu\u015ftu\u011fu kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/calculation-method-of-compensation-for-damages\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/calculation-method-of-compensation-for-damages[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gecmiste_Uye_Oldugu_Kulup_Ismi\"><\/span>Ge\u00e7mi\u015fte \u00dcye Oldu\u011fu Kul\u00fcp \u0130smi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/11-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10870\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>19 Haziran 2003&#8217;te, bir temsilci ve d\u00f6rt erkek \u00fcniversite \u00f6\u011frencisi olmak \u00fczere toplamda be\u015f ki\u015fi tecav\u00fcz \u015f\u00fcphesiyle tutukland\u0131 ve ard\u0131ndan, prestijli bir \u00fcniversiteden mezun olan \u00f6\u011frenciler dahil olmak \u00fczere toplamda 14 ki\u015fi &#8220;Super Free olay\u0131&#8221; (\u30b9\u30fc\u30d1\u30fc\u30d5\u30ea\u30fc\u4e8b\u4ef6) ile ilgili olarak tecav\u00fcz su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcm giydi. \u0130nternet forumlar\u0131nda, bu olayla ilgili oldu\u011fu belirtilen ve ismi zikredilen davac\u0131, internet servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderici bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131, \u00fcniversiteye devam ederken Super Free&#8217;ye personel olarak kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, ancak tecav\u00fcz olay\u0131ndan \u00f6nce kul\u00fcpten ayr\u0131ld\u0131 ve mezuniyetten sonra bir \u00fcniversiteye ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve bir devlet \u00fcniversitesinde asistan olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131. Davac\u0131y\u0131 bu kul\u00fcb\u00fcn bir \u00fcyesi olarak g\u00f6steren ve sanki tecav\u00fcz olay\u0131yla ilgiliymi\u015f gibi g\u00f6steren makaleler, toplumda de\u011ferini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc ve ayr\u0131ca, kul\u00fcbe ge\u00e7mi\u015fte \u00fcye olma ger\u00e7e\u011fi gizlenmek istenen bir konuydu. Bu nedenle, genel halk\u0131n alg\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re, bilinmesini istemedi\u011fi bir ge\u00e7mi\u015fi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, gizlilik ihlali olarak kabul edildi ve bu nedenle, g\u00f6nderici bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Internet_Makalesinden_Alintilar\"><\/span>\u0130nternet Makalesinden Al\u0131nt\u0131lar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130nternet servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131, 2005, 2006 ve 2008 y\u0131llar\u0131nda, davac\u0131ya ili\u015fkin ifadelerin bu makalelerle tamamen ayn\u0131 oldu\u011fu makalelerin internet \u00fczerinde yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumdaki de\u011ferinin bu makalelerle zaten d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu makalelerin yeni bir de\u011fer d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne neden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. Ayr\u0131ca, gizlilik ihlali konusunda da, ge\u00e7mi\u015fteki makalelerle zaten bilinen bir ger\u00e7e\u011fi tekrar belirtmekten ba\u015fka bir \u015fey olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, gizlilik korumas\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken bilinmeyenlik gereksinimini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, genel okuyucunun normal dikkat ve okuma \u015feklini temel al\u0131rsa, bu makalelerin davac\u0131n\u0131n da Super Free&#8217;nin bir \u00fcyesi olarak tecav\u00fcz olay\u0131na dahil oldu\u011fu izlenimini verdi\u011fini ve davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumdaki de\u011ferini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kabul etti. Ancak, t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurdu\u011funda, davac\u0131n\u0131n tecav\u00fcz olay\u0131na dahil oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren bir kan\u0131t bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu makalelerin belirtti\u011fi ger\u00e7eklerin ger\u00e7ek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edildi ve ayr\u0131ca, g\u00f6ndericinin bunun ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011funa inanmak i\u00e7in makul bir nedenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edildi. Bu nedenle, iftira su\u00e7unu kabul etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kararda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Daval\u0131, internet \u00fczerinde bu makalelerle ayn\u0131 makalelerin zaten yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu makalelerin yeni bir de\u011fer d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne neden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. Ancak, \u00f6nceki makaleler ve bu makalelerin okuyucular\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir, bu nedenle bu makalelerin toplumdaki de\u011feri d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc inkar edemeyiz ve daval\u0131n\u0131n iddias\u0131 kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 22 Kas\u0131m 2012 Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Okuyucular\u0131n \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil&#8221; ifadesi, do\u011fal bir ifade olarak kabul edilebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, gizlilik ihlali konusunda da,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6\u011frencilik d\u00f6neminde Super Free&#8217;nin bir \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fi, genel halk\u0131n hala bilmedi\u011fi bir konu oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyebiliriz. Super Free&#8217;nin tecav\u00fcz olay\u0131n\u0131n ciddiyeti g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, genel halk\u0131n duyarl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 temel alarak, bu ger\u00e7e\u011fin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemeyen bir ger\u00e7ek olarak kabul edilebilir (Bu noktada, internet \u00fczerinde bu makalelerden \u00f6nce ayn\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fe sahip makalelerin var oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fi, bu ger\u00e7e\u011fin bilinen bir ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.). Bu durumda, bu makalelerin davac\u0131n\u0131n gizlilik hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi kabul edilebilir ve yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 engelleyen bir durumun var oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcren bir durum da kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 22 Kas\u0131m 2012 Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve bu makalelerin davac\u0131n\u0131n gizlilik hakk\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ihlal etti\u011fini ve haks\u0131z fiil temelinde tazminat talebi ve durdurma talebi gibi hak ihlallerini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kabul etti. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderici bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmek i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli bir nedeni vard\u0131 ve internet servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131na, g\u00f6ndericinin bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 emretti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130nternet \u00fczerinde ayn\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fe sahip \u00f6nceden var olan makaleler oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, bu ger\u00e7e\u011fin bilinen bir ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/provider-liability-limitation-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/provider-liability-limitation-law[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disclosure-of-the-senders-information\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disclosure-of-the-senders-information[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CEstetik_Yuz%E2%80%9D_Ifadesi\"><\/span>&#8220;Estetik Y\u00fcz&#8221; \u0130fadesi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/4-2-1024x678.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10469\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130nternet \u00fczerindeki bir forumda, davac\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal eden ve ayn\u0131 zamanda davac\u0131y\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131layan bir makaleyi be\u015f kez yay\u0131nlayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z eylem nedeniyle tazminat talep etti\u011fi bir durum olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Makalede, &#8220;\u3010A Ge\u00e7mi\u015fi\u3011 Referans http:\/\/\u3008atlanm\u0131\u015f\u3009&#8221; \u015feklinde bir ifade bulunmaktayd\u0131 ve bu URL&#8217;ye t\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda, davac\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fiyle ilgili bir sayfa a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131yordu. Ayr\u0131ca, makalede davac\u0131n\u0131n temsilcisi oldu\u011fu \u015firketin merkezinin adresi ve \u015firketin ad\u0131 da yer al\u0131yordu. Bu nedenle, makaleyi okuyan bir ki\u015finin, makaledeki A&#8217;n\u0131n davac\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirlemesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bunun \u00fczerine, makalede &#8220;estetik y\u00fcz&#8221; ifadesi bulunmaktayd\u0131. Mahkeme, bu ifadenin, genel bir okuyucunun normal okuma \u015fekliyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n estetik bir y\u00fcz\u00fc oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fini, estetik y\u00fcz ifadesinin estetik ameliyatla de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f bir y\u00fcz anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fini ve bu durumda, &#8220;estetik y\u00fcz&#8221; ifadesinin, \u00f6zel hayata dair bir konu veya bu \u015fekilde alg\u0131lanabilecek bir konu oldu\u011funu ve genel bir ki\u015finin hassasiyetine dayanarak, bu konunun a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemeyece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ayni_Konu_Basligi_Altindaki_Diger_Makalelerin_Alintilari\"><\/span>Ayn\u0131 Konu Ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Alt\u0131ndaki Di\u011fer Makalelerin Al\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, daval\u0131, ayn\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fe sahip makalenin ayn\u0131 konu ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;\u25cb\u25cb\u25cb&#8221; alt\u0131ndaki di\u011fer makalelerde zaten yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu makalenin, daval\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki ki\u015filerin yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 makaleleri temel alarak, kopyalama vb. yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir makale oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, gizlilik ihlalinin bir gereklili\u011fi olan bilinmeyenlik gereklili\u011finin eksik oldu\u011funu savunmu\u015ftur. Ancak, mahkeme, ayn\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fe sahip di\u011fer makalelerin yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu makalelerde de davac\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;estetik y\u00fcz&#8221; oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bu konu ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda \u00e7ok say\u0131da makale yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, genellikle, belirli bir konu ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 okuyan bir ki\u015finin, bu konu ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm makaleleri okuyaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek zordur. Bu noktalar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurdu\u011funda, bu makale, genel halk taraf\u0131ndan hen\u00fcz bilinmeyen bir konudur ve bilinmeyenlik gereklili\u011fini kar\u015f\u0131lar. <\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 17 Temmuz 2014 (Gregorian Takvimi) Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu nedenle, gizlilik ihlalini kabul etmi\u015ftir. K\u00f6t\u00fc s\u00f6zler veya iftira atan makaleler, daha \u00f6nceki g\u00f6nderileri okumam\u0131\u015f yeni okuyucular taraf\u0131ndan okunarak gizlilik daha fazla ihlal edilir ve alevlenir. Bu, internetin e\u011filimini yakalayan bir karard\u0131r. Di\u011fer makalelerde yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in k\u00f6t\u00fc s\u00f6zler veya iftira yayarsan\u0131z, yeni bir sorumlulukla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kal\u0131rs\u0131n\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, makaledeki &#8220;Chon&#8221; ifadesi hakk\u0131nda, aptal, ahmak vb. anlamlara sahip olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, Kore veya Korelileri a\u015fa\u011f\u0131layan bir kelime olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bu, onur duygular\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder ve davac\u0131y\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lar. Bu nedenle, ayr\u0131ca, 500.000 yen tazminat, 100.000 yen avukat \u00fccreti, 518.700 yen g\u00f6nderenin belirlenmesi \u00fccreti olmak \u00fczere toplam 1.118.700 yen \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Sadece al\u0131nt\u0131 yapt\u0131m&#8221; ya da &#8220;Ba\u015fkalar\u0131 da yaz\u0131yor&#8221; demeniz, \u00e7o\u011fu zaman sorumluluktan ka\u00e7man\u0131z\u0131 sa\u011flamaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gizlilik ihlalinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi \u00e7o\u011fu zaman zordur, bu y\u00fczden bu konuda deneyimli bir avukata ba\u015fvurman\u0131z iyi olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00d6zel hayat\u0131 anlatan &#8220;Ziyafet Sonras\u0131&#8221; adl\u0131 roman\u0131n gizlilik ihlali nedeniyle sorun oldu\u011fu bir dava da, Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, gizlilik hakk\u0131n\u0131 &#8220;\u00f6zel hayat\u0131n haks\u0131z yere a\u00e7\u0131klanmamas\u0131 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":63953,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61385"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61385"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63954,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61385\/revisions\/63954"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63953"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}