{"id":61423,"date":"2023-12-04T11:20:34","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:20:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61423"},"modified":"2024-03-20T13:05:10","modified_gmt":"2024-03-20T04:05:10","slug":"work-for-hire-copyright-disputes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/work-for-hire-copyright-disputes","title":{"rendered":"G\u00f6rev Yap\u0131tlar\u0131 Nedir? Tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 Mahkeme Kararlar\u0131 ve \u00d6rnek Olaylar\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Ba\u015fka bir makalemizde a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z gibi, Japon Telif Hakk\u0131 Yasas\u0131&#8217;na (Copyright Law) g\u00f6re, belirli \u015fartlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, telif hakk\u0131 yarat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 istihdam eden kurulu\u015fa ait olur ve ayr\u0131ca bu kurulu\u015f yarat\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n kendisi olur. Buna, i\u015f g\u00f6revi eserleri (veya kurumsal eserler) denir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130\u015f g\u00f6revi eserlerinin olu\u015fmas\u0131, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fartlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir (Japon Telif Hakk\u0131 Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 15. maddesi 1. f\u0131kras\u0131).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p> \u30fbEserin yarat\u0131lmas\u0131, bir kurulu\u015fun niyetine dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r<br> \u30fbBir kurulu\u015fta g\u00f6rev yapan ki\u015finin i\u015f g\u00f6revi olarak olu\u015fturmas\u0131<br> \u30fbKurulu\u015fun ad\u0131na yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131<br> \u30fbS\u00f6zle\u015fme, i\u015f kurallar\u0131 veya ba\u015fka bir d\u00fczenleme olmamas\u0131<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015eartlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda, mahkemeler genellikle i\u015f g\u00f6revi eserlerini kabul etmezler, ancak her bir \u015fart\u0131n nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fini, ger\u00e7ek mahkeme \u00f6rnekleriyle g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irelim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/requirements-works-for-hire\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/corporate\/requirements-works-for-hire[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/work-for-hire-copyright-disputes\/#%E2%80%9CKurulusun_Iradesine_Dayali%E2%80%9D_Olarak_Kabul_Edilmedigi_Durumlar\" title=\"&#8220;Kurulu\u015fun \u0130radesine Dayal\u0131&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar\">&#8220;Kurulu\u015fun \u0130radesine Dayal\u0131&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/work-for-hire-copyright-disputes\/#%E2%80%9CTuzel_kisi_veya_benzeri_bir_iste_calisan%E2%80%9D_olarak_kabul_edilmedigi_durumlar\" title=\"&#8220;T\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8221; olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi durumlar\">&#8220;T\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8221; olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi durumlar<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/work-for-hire-copyright-disputes\/#%E2%80%9CGorev_Ustlenme%E2%80%9D_Olarak_Kabul_Edilmeyen_Durumlar\" title=\"&#8220;G\u00f6rev \u00dcstlenme&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmeyen Durumlar\">&#8220;G\u00f6rev \u00dcstlenme&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmeyen Durumlar<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/work-for-hire-copyright-disputes\/#%E2%80%9CKurulusun_Adina_Yayinlanacaklar%E2%80%9D_Olarak_Kabul_Edilmedigi_Durumlar\" title=\"&#8220;Kurulu\u015fun Ad\u0131na Yay\u0131nlanacaklar&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar\">&#8220;Kurulu\u015fun Ad\u0131na Yay\u0131nlanacaklar&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/general-corporate\/work-for-hire-copyright-disputes\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CKurulusun_Iradesine_Dayali%E2%80%9D_Olarak_Kabul_Edilmedigi_Durumlar\"><\/span>&#8220;Kurulu\u015fun \u0130radesine Dayal\u0131&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/shutterstock_1385007113-1024x652.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8174\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Yazar\u0131n bir kurulu\u015fun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olmas\u0131, telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n kurulu\u015fa ait olaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Emekli olan bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresince yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kitap hakk\u0131nda i\u015f g\u00f6revi telif hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu iddia eden ve sa\u011fl\u0131k ve sosyal hizmet kurumlar\u0131na y\u00f6netim dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve destek sa\u011flayan bir \u015firketin, yay\u0131nlama, sat\u0131\u015f ve da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 talebinde bulundu\u011fu bir \u00f6rnek vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu durumda sorun olan kitap, hastane y\u00f6netimine ili\u015fkin bir kitap olup, Urban Produce adl\u0131 bir yay\u0131nevi taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131ya yazma talebi g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131, di\u011fer birka\u00e7 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana b\u00f6l\u00fcm yazma talebinde bulunurken, kitab\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 metnin bu eserin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011funu kabul etti. Ancak, bu eserin &#8220;davac\u0131n\u0131n iradesine dayal\u0131&#8221; olarak, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131nda olu\u015fturulmu\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunu inceledi. Ancak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Kitab\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 talebi, Urban Produce taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frudan daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Davac\u0131 kitab\u0131n yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenene kadar, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde, kitap hakk\u0131nda Urban Produce ile ileti\u015fim kuran ba\u015fka kimse yoktu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Davac\u0131 ve Urban Produce aras\u0131nda kitab\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde, davac\u0131n\u0131n Urban Produce&#8217;dan kitab\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 talebini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren bir i\u015f talep belgesi veya i\u015f kabul raporu gibi belgeler olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Daval\u0131 davac\u0131dan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde kitab\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u015fleminin gelecekteki i\u015flemleri hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir karar al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve daha sonra yazma i\u015flemi hi\u00e7 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Kitap sonunda daval\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131yla yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015f ve kitab\u0131n telif \u00fccreti Urban Produce taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131ya \u00f6denmi\u015ftir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>gibi nedenlerle,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi gibi, kitab\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Urban Produce taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131ya talep edildi\u011fi kabul edilemez, aksine, kitab\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, Urban Produce taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131ya talep edilmi\u015ftir ve her bir yazar, daval\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel talebine dayanarak yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda, i\u015f g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131nda olu\u015fturulan bu eser, &#8220;davac\u0131n\u0131n iradesine dayal\u0131&#8221; olarak olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bir eser oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 30 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 (2010) Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ve &#8220;kurulu\u015fun iradesine dayal\u0131&#8221; olarak i\u015f g\u00f6revi telif hakk\u0131 gereksinimini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla i\u015f g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131nda olu\u015fturulmu\u015f olarak kabul edilemedi\u011fi i\u00e7in, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f g\u00f6revi telif hakk\u0131 talebini reddetti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yazar\u0131n bir kurulu\u015fun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olmas\u0131, telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n kurulu\u015fa ait olaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez. &#8220;Kurulu\u015fun iradesine dayal\u0131&#8221; olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemek i\u00e7in, bu dava \u00f6rne\u011fi gibi, \u00e7e\u015fitli durumlar kapsaml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CTuzel_kisi_veya_benzeri_bir_iste_calisan%E2%80%9D_olarak_kabul_edilmedigi_durumlar\"><\/span>&#8220;T\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8221; olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi durumlar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/shutterstock_1108543940-1024x583.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8175\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Serbest foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8221; olarak kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in, t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fin y\u00f6netim ve denetimi alt\u0131nda hizmet sunma durumu da \u00f6nemlidir.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;T\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8221; konusunda, ilk ve temyiz mahkemeleri aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131 kararlar verildi\u011fi durumlar olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Serbest foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131 olan ve kendi foto\u011fraf st\u00fcdyosunu i\u015fleten temyiz eden ki\u015fi (ilk dava davac\u0131s\u0131), daval\u0131ya (ilk dava daval\u0131s\u0131) kar\u015f\u0131, temyiz eden ki\u015finin \u00e7ekti\u011fi ve sundu\u011fu, yar\u0131\u015f pistinde ko\u015fan bir motosikletin foto\u011fraf\u0131 (bu dava konusu foto\u011fraf) hakk\u0131nda, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu elektronik veriyi A \u015firketi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla B \u015firketi&#8217;ne sundu\u011funu ve B \u015firketi&#8217;nin temyiz eden ki\u015finin onay\u0131 olmadan bu foto\u011fraf\u0131 kendi web sitesinde ve posterlerinde yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, bu foto\u011fraf hakk\u0131ndaki telif hakk\u0131 (\u00e7o\u011faltma hakk\u0131, devir hakk\u0131) ve yazar\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131 (yay\u0131n hakk\u0131, isim g\u00f6sterme hakk\u0131, ayn\u0131l\u0131k koruma hakk\u0131) ihlali nedeniyle tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk mahkeme, daval\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netim ve denetiminde oldu\u011funu kabul ederek talebi reddetti ve bu nedenle temyiz eden ki\u015fi temyize ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Temyiz mahkemesinde, mahkeme, &#8220;Bir ki\u015finin &#8216;t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8217; olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015f ve eser yarat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi ger\u00e7ekte g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak, t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fin y\u00f6netim ve denetimi alt\u0131nda hizmet sunma durumunda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fin bu ki\u015fiye \u00f6dedi\u011fi paran\u0131n hizmet sunma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fin durumu, y\u00f6netim ve denetimin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve \u00f6deme y\u00f6ntemi gibi somut durumlar\u0131 genel olarak dikkate alarak karar vermek gerekti\u011fi&#8221; (Yarg\u0131tay, 11 Nisan 2003 tarihli karar) \u015feklindeki emsal karar\u0131 al\u0131nt\u0131layarak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Yukar\u0131daki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe dayanarak bu durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurdu\u011fumuzda, daha \u00f6nce belirtildi\u011fi gibi, temyiz eden ki\u015fi daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 de\u011fil, serbest bir foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131 olarak kendi foto\u011fraf st\u00fcdyosunu i\u015fleten bir ki\u015fidir. Bu dava konusu foto\u011fraf sat\u0131\u015f i\u015finde, temyiz eden ki\u015fi genel y\u00f6netim alt\u0131nda foto\u011fraf \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir, ancak foto\u011fraf \u00e7ekimi s\u0131ras\u0131nda profesyonel bir foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131 olarak bunu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. (Orta k\u0131s\u0131m atlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r) Temyiz eden ki\u015fi temelde daval\u0131 ile s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 olarak profesyonel bir foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131 olarak hareket eden bir ki\u015fiydi ve daval\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netim ve denetimi alt\u0131nda hizmet sunma durumunda oldu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Fikri M\u00fclkiyet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, 24 Aral\u0131k 2009 tarihli karar<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ve &#8220;t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan&#8221; oldu\u011funu ve bu nedenle i\u015f eseri oldu\u011funu iddia eden daval\u0131n\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131 reddetti ve ilk karar\u0131 iptal etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Profesyonel bir foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131 olarak hareket eden bir ki\u015finin, t\u00fczel ki\u015fi veya benzeri bir i\u015fin y\u00f6netim ve denetimi alt\u0131nda hizmet sunma durumunda oldu\u011funu mahkemeye kabul ettirmek zordur, bu nedenle \u00f6nceden bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme yapmal\u0131 ve telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n aidiyetini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmelisiniz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CGorev_Ustlenme%E2%80%9D_Olarak_Kabul_Edilmeyen_Durumlar\"><\/span>&#8220;G\u00f6rev \u00dcstlenme&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmeyen Durumlar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/shutterstock_1104907541-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8176\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"> &#8220;G\u00f6rev \u00fcstlenme&#8221; olarak kabul edilmeyen durumlar\u0131n \u00f6rneklerini sunaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131, m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc oldu\u011fu bir patent hukuk firmas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken, davac\u0131n\u0131n yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir metni, davac\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131n\u0131 belirtmeden ve ba\u015fka bir yazarla birlikte &#8220;\u3007\u3007 Fikri M\u00fclkiyet Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc&#8221; ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda yay\u0131nlad\u0131. Bu durum \u00fczerine, davac\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n eylemlerinin davac\u0131n\u0131n telif hakk\u0131 ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 (ad\u0131n\u0131 belirtme hakk\u0131, ayn\u0131l\u0131k koruma hakk\u0131, yay\u0131n hakk\u0131) ihlal etti\u011fini iddia ederek daval\u0131dan tazminat talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netti\u011fi patent hukuk firmas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken patent vekili sertifikas\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi daval\u0131dan y\u0131ll\u0131k maa\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve patent hukuk firmas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flerini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirtti. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 aras\u0131nda bir i\u015f ili\u015fkisi oldu\u011funu kabul etti. Ancak, yazma s\u00fcrecini inceledi:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Yazarlar, patent hukuk firmas\u0131n\u0131n personeli aras\u0131nda g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc kat\u0131l\u0131m \u015feklinde topland\u0131 ve bu \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ya yan\u0131t verenler aras\u0131ndan se\u00e7ildi<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Metin olu\u015fturma i\u015flemi, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan patent hukuk firmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtildi ve metin, bu talimatlara uygun olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olu\u015fturuldu<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Metnin i\u00e7eri\u011fi hakk\u0131nda daval\u0131dan somut bir talimat verilmedi<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Birka\u00e7 yazar toplant\u0131s\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi, ancak metnin somut i\u00e7eri\u011fi belirlenmedi<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>ve daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 belirtti,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bu kitab\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131, patent hukuk firmas\u0131n\u0131n asli i\u015flerinin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 de\u011fildir ve ayr\u0131ca, bu kitap i\u00e7in metin yazma, patent hukuk firmas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcnl\u00fck olarak \u00fcstlendi\u011fi i\u015flerin do\u011frudan bir par\u00e7as\u0131 da de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca, metnin yaz\u0131lma durumu, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu s\u00fcre\u00e7teki kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131, kitab\u0131n format\u0131, yay\u0131n \u015fekli vb. g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, metnin, Telif Hakk\u0131 Yasas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n 15. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen &#8220;g\u00f6rev \u00fcstlenme&#8221; kapsam\u0131na girdi\u011fini kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 12 Kas\u0131m 2004 (Gregorian Takvimi 2004) karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ve &#8220;g\u00f6rev \u00fcstlenme&#8221; olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in i\u015f g\u00f6revi eseri olarak kabul edilmedi ve daval\u0131n\u0131n, telif hakk\u0131 sahibi olan davac\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 telif hakk\u0131 ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 (ad\u0131n\u0131 belirtme hakk\u0131) ihlal etti\u011fini kabul etti. Yazar\u0131n bir \u015firket \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olmas\u0131, telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u015firkete ait olaca\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez. &#8220;G\u00f6rev \u00fcstlenme&#8221;yi incelemek i\u00e7in de, \u00e7e\u015fitli durumlar genel olarak dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CKurulusun_Adina_Yayinlanacaklar%E2%80%9D_Olarak_Kabul_Edilmedigi_Durumlar\"><\/span>&#8220;Kurulu\u015fun Ad\u0131na Yay\u0131nlanacaklar&#8221; Olarak Kabul Edilmedi\u011fi Durumlar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/shutterstock_134934863-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8177\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">&#8220;Bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi olu\u015fturdu\u011fu eserler&#8221; olsa bile, bu eserlerin telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n kurulu\u015fa ait olaca\u011f\u0131 garantili de\u011fildir.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131 \u015firketin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 olan davac\u0131, g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi daval\u0131 End\u00fcstri Derne\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen bir seminere g\u00f6nderildi ve &#8220;Heisei 12 Y\u0131l\u0131 (2000) \u00d6l\u00e7\u00fcm Teknisyenli\u011fi Teknik Bak\u0131m Semineri&#8221; adl\u0131 seminer materyalini olu\u015fturdu. Davac\u0131, bu materyalin telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n istifa ettikten sonra daval\u0131 \u015firketin, davac\u0131n\u0131n yerine semineri veren \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na, 12. y\u0131l materyalinin kopyalar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131rarak &#8220;13. Y\u0131l Materyali&#8221; ve &#8220;14. Y\u0131l Materyali&#8221;ni olu\u015fturdu\u011funu ve seminerde bu materyallerin kopyalar\u0131n\u0131 kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lara da\u011f\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. Bu durumun, davac\u0131n\u0131n telif hakk\u0131n\u0131 (\u00e7o\u011faltma hakk\u0131, s\u00f6zl\u00fc ifade hakk\u0131) ve yazar\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 (isim g\u00f6sterme hakk\u0131, ayn\u0131l\u0131k koruma hakk\u0131) ihlal etti\u011fini savundu ve tazminat talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n 12. y\u0131l materyalini olu\u015fturdu\u011fu konusunda taraflar aras\u0131nda bir anla\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktu, ancak daval\u0131lar, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firketin talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine, daval\u0131 \u015firketin g\u00f6revlisi olarak g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi olu\u015fturdu\u011funu ve bu nedenle eserin yazar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firket oldu\u011funu iddia etti. Bu nedenle, mahkeme 12. y\u0131l materyalinin olu\u015fturulma s\u00fcrecini ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini inceledi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve, 12. y\u0131l materyalinin daval\u0131 \u015firketin talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine olu\u015fturuldu\u011funu ve g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan olu\u015fturuldu\u011funu kabul etti. Ancak, bu materyalin daval\u0131 \u015firket ad\u0131na yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi konusunda bir karar vermek i\u00e7in, daval\u0131 \u015firketin yazar olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek \u00fczere i\u015f g\u00f6revi eseri olarak inceleme yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Teknik Bak\u0131m Semineri materyallerinin format\u0131 yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi gibidir ve bu durumda, 12. y\u0131l materyalinde, sadece davac\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131 e\u011fitmen olarak belirtilmi\u015ftir ve telif hakk\u0131 ad\u0131na herhangi bir g\u00f6sterim yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r veya seminer materyallerinin kapa\u011f\u0131nda belirtilen daval\u0131 End\u00fcstri Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin telif hakk\u0131 ad\u0131 olarak kabul edilmelidir ve daval\u0131 \u015firketin ad\u0131na yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilemez. (&#8230;) Bu nedenle, 12. y\u0131l materyalinin, daval\u0131 \u015firketin talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine, daval\u0131 \u015firketin g\u00f6revlisi olan davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi olu\u015fturuldu\u011funu kabul edebiliriz, ancak daval\u0131 \u015firket ad\u0131na yay\u0131nlanmam\u0131\u015f ve yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 gereken bir \u015fey de\u011fildir, bu nedenle daval\u0131 \u015firketin i\u015f g\u00f6revi eseri olarak kabul edilemez ve daval\u0131 \u015firketin yazar oldu\u011funu kabul edemeyiz.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 27 \u015eubat 2006 Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Ve, daval\u0131 \u015firket ad\u0131na yay\u0131nlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 gereken bir \u015fey olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, daval\u0131 \u015firketin i\u015f g\u00f6revi eseri olarak kabul edilemez ve daval\u0131 \u015firketin yazar oldu\u011funu kabul edemeyiz dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Eserin olu\u015fturulmas\u0131, kurulu\u015fun talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir&#8221; ve &#8220;kurulu\u015fun g\u00f6revlisi taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi olu\u015fturulur&#8221; olsa bile, bu eserin telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n kurulu\u015fa ait olaca\u011f\u0131 garantili de\u011fildir. \u0130\u015f g\u00f6revi eseri, sadece ba\u015fta belirtilen t\u00fcm fakt\u00f6rlerin kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda kabul edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>T\u00fczel ki\u015filiklerin ekonomik y\u00fck\u00fc alt\u0131nda olu\u015fturulan eserlerin ilgili t\u00fczel ki\u015filikler taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda, eserlerin hak ili\u015fkilerini merkezile\u015ftirmek ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirlemek gerekmektedir. Aksi takdirde, eserlerin sorunsuz kullan\u0131m\u0131 engellenebilir. \u0130\u015f g\u00f6revi eserlerinin d\u00fczenlemesi bu nedenle benimsenmi\u015ftir, ancak hak ili\u015fkilerini \u00f6nceden a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirlemek gereklidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bir i\u015f g\u00f6revi eserini iddia edip edemeyece\u011finiz veya bir i\u015f g\u00f6revi eserini iddia edildi\u011fi halde kabul etmek zorunda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z, karar verilmesi zor bir sorundur. Deneyimli bir avukata dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131z\u0131 \u00f6neririz.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ba\u015fka bir makalemizde a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z gibi, Japon Telif Hakk\u0131 Yasas\u0131&#8217;na (Copyright Law) g\u00f6re, belirli \u015fartlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, telif hakk\u0131 yarat\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 istihdam eden kurulu\u015fa ait olur ve ayr\u0131ca bu [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64803,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[25,24],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61423"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61423"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64804,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61423\/revisions\/64804"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64803"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}