{"id":61702,"date":"2023-12-04T11:22:57","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:22:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61702"},"modified":"2024-03-17T13:00:20","modified_gmt":"2024-03-17T04:00:20","slug":"suggestion-pollution-judgment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment","title":{"rendered":"Kat\u0131l\u0131m da m\u0131 Kabuledilemez? \u00d6neri Kirlili\u011fi Eylemleri ve Mahkeme Kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Ayr\u0131m Yolu"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;\u00d6neri&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan \u00f6zellik, bir site \u00fczerindeki arama kutusuna bir anahtar kelime girildi\u011finde, otomatik olarak birlikte aranmas\u0131 muhtemel anahtar kelimeleri \u00f6neren (g\u00f6steren) bir i\u015flevi ifade eder.<br> Arama motorunun \u00f6neri alan\u0131nda, kas\u0131tl\u0131 olarak k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli ilgili anahtar kelimelerin \u00e7ok say\u0131da g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclenmesini sa\u011flama eylemi veya bu sonucu &#8220;\u00d6neri Kirlili\u011fi&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131r\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Forumlar\u0131n birden \u00e7ok konu ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na olumsuz kelimeleri yazarak ve tekrar tekrar arama yaparak \u00f6nerileri kirletmek veya bir program kullanarak forumlarda ve benzeri yerlerde \u00e7ok say\u0131da sayfa olu\u015fturarak anahtar kelime ili\u015fkisini art\u0131rmak gibi zararlar artmaktad\u0131r.<br> Ayr\u0131ca, \u00f6nerileri kirletme y\u00f6ntemleri internet \u00fczerinde yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015f olup, herkesin kolayca yapabilmesi, zarar\u0131n geni\u015flemesine neden olan bir fakt\u00f6rd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu makalede, bu t\u00fcr \u00f6neri kirlili\u011finin mahkemede nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Davalinin_Yontemleri_Tavsiye_Ettigi_Durumlar\" title=\"Daval\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemleri Tavsiye Etti\u011fi Durumlar\">Daval\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemleri Tavsiye Etti\u011fi Durumlar<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Davanin_Arka_Plani\" title=\"Davan\u0131n Arka Plan\u0131\">Davan\u0131n Arka Plan\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Davanin_Seyri\" title=\"Davan\u0131n Seyri\">Davan\u0131n Seyri<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Mahkeme_Karari\" title=\"Mahkeme Karar\u0131\">Mahkeme Karar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Davalinin_Oneri_Kirliligini_Gerceklestirdigi_Durumlar\" title=\"Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6neri Kirlili\u011fini Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi Durumlar\">Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6neri Kirlili\u011fini Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi Durumlar<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Davanin_Arka_Plani-2\" title=\"Davan\u0131n Arka Plan\u0131\">Davan\u0131n Arka Plan\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Dava_Sureci\" title=\"Dava S\u00fcreci\">Dava S\u00fcreci<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Mahkeme_Karari-2\" title=\"Mahkeme Karar\u0131\">Mahkeme Karar\u0131<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/suggestion-pollution-judgment\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davalinin_Yontemleri_Tavsiye_Ettigi_Durumlar\"><\/span>Daval\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6ntemleri Tavsiye Etti\u011fi Durumlar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/suggestion-pollution-judgment1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-20333\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130\u015f hayat\u0131 ile birlikte y\u00fcksek lisans yapan bir avukat\u0131n, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yay\u0131nlanan makalelerle tehdit edildi\u011fi, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fiye k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rt\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131 ile ilgili ki\u015filerin itibar\u0131n\u0131n zedelendi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla tazminat talep etti\u011fi bir durum olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/intimidation-duress\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/intimidation-duress[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davanin_Arka_Plani\"><\/span>Davan\u0131n Arka Plan\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131 (X), 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir hukuk b\u00fcrosunun ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yaparken, ayn\u0131 zamanda bir y\u00fcksek lisans program\u0131nda bilgi g\u00fcvenli\u011fi \u00fczerine e\u011fitim al\u0131yordu.<br> Di\u011fer yandan daval\u0131, bir okul \u00f6\u011fretmeniydi ve 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir y\u00fcksek lisans program\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131yd\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2014 y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00f6nce, davac\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik olarak, internet \u00fczerinde hakaret ve zarar verme niyetiyle yap\u0131lan duyurular ve di\u011fer tacizler s\u00fcrekli olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti. &#8220;Shitaraba Forumu&#8221;nda, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir konu ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda, 23 Haziran ayn\u0131 y\u0131l saat 00:13&#8217;te, anonim bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc taraf taraf\u0131ndan,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Gece \u00f6neri kirlili\u011fi yapmak istiyorum, kirlenmesini istedi\u011fim bir \u015fey var m\u0131?&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>diye bir yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131ld\u0131 ve davac\u0131 (X)&#8217;i hedef olarak \u00f6neren bir yaz\u0131dan sonra, daval\u0131 &#8220;X&#8217;in kirlili\u011fine dikkat et&#8221; diye yazd\u0131 ve ard\u0131ndan anonim bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc taraf taraf\u0131ndan,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;X&#8217;i kirletirken, onun ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu hukuk b\u00fcrosunu da kirletmek daha iyi olur&#8221; diye bir yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131ld\u0131 ve bunun ard\u0131ndan daval\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Onun ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00fcniversitenin ara\u015ft\u0131rma laboratuvar\u0131 s\u00fcrekli olarak h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve sahtecilik yap\u0131yor, bu yolda gitsek ne olur?&#8221; ve &#8220;X de\u011fil, X&#8217;in \u00e7evresine rahats\u0131zl\u0131k vererek X&#8217;in rahats\u0131z olmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak hakk\u0131nda ne d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorsunuz?&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>diye, \u00f6neri kirlili\u011fi y\u00f6ntemini tavsiye eden bir makale yay\u0131nlad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bunun \u00fczerine, ismi bilinmeyen bir \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc taraf, ertesi g\u00fcn ak\u015famdan geceye kadar, &#8220;5chan&#8221; adl\u0131 platformda 44 kez, bir script (elektronik mesaj panosunda otomatik olarak \u00e7ok say\u0131da g\u00f6nderi yapmak i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan bir yaz\u0131l\u0131m) kullanarak, davac\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu hukuk b\u00fcrosu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ara\u015ft\u0131rma laboratuvar\u0131ndaki profes\u00f6r A ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 do\u00e7ent B&#8217;nin isimleri veya unvanlar\u0131 ile birlikte, &#8220;su\u00e7lu&#8221;, &#8220;tez h\u0131rs\u0131z\u0131&#8221; gibi itibar zedeleyici kelimeleri s\u0131ralayan, \u00f6neri kirlili\u011fi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k olan anonim g\u00f6nderileri tekrarlad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davanin_Seyri\"><\/span>Davan\u0131n Seyri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda (Gregorian takvimine g\u00f6re), davac\u0131, &#8220;Shitaraba&#8221;n\u0131n y\u00f6neticisi olan Caesar Corporation&#8217;a kar\u015f\u0131 yay\u0131nlay\u0131c\u0131 bilgilerinin ge\u00e7ici if\u015fas\u0131 talebinde bulundu ve 9 Eyl\u00fcl&#8217;de IP adresi ve zaman damgas\u0131n\u0131n if\u015fas\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131. Ard\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda Sonnet Corporation&#8217;a kar\u015f\u0131 yay\u0131nlay\u0131c\u0131 bilgilerinin if\u015fas\u0131n\u0131 talep eden bir dava a\u00e7t\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 y\u0131l 26 Haziran&#8217;da yay\u0131nlay\u0131c\u0131 bilgilerinin if\u015fas\u0131na izin verildi. Bu, davac\u0131n\u0131n babas\u0131 olan C&#8217;nin ad\u0131, adresi ve e-posta adresi gibi internet ileti\u015fim hatt\u0131 abone bilgileri olarak if\u015fa edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu nedenle, davac\u0131 27 Ocak 2016&#8217;da (Gregorian takvimine g\u00f6re), C&#8217;ye kar\u015f\u0131 bir dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Ancak, ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n 29 Temmuz civar\u0131nda, daval\u0131dan davac\u0131ya, ilgili makalelerin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir belge g\u00f6nderildi ve C&#8217;nin \u00f6nceki davada avukat\u0131ndan da ayn\u0131 iddia ve belge sunuldu. Davac\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine 22 A\u011fustos&#8217;ta \u00f6nceki davay\u0131 geri \u00e7ekti ve yakla\u015f\u0131k bir y\u0131l sonra, 11 May\u0131s 2018&#8217;de (Gregorian takvimine g\u00f6re), bu dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu nedenle, &#8220;suggestive pollution&#8221; (\u00f6neri kirlili\u011fi) olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan &#8216;k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtma&#8217; ve g\u00f6nderimlerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamandan itibaren, olduk\u00e7a fazla zaman ge\u00e7tikten sonra dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkeme_Karari\"><\/span>Mahkeme Karar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme \u00f6ncelikle,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Bu olaydaki her bir makale, genel olarak insanlar\u0131 korkutmak i\u00e7in yeterli derecede k\u00f6t\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn duyurulmas\u0131 olarak kabul edilebilir. Ayr\u0131ca, daval\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131y\u0131 suggestif kirlili\u011fin hedefi olarak belirlemek durumunda dava riskinin y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek &#8216;X&#8217;in kirlili\u011fine dikkat et&#8217; \u015feklinde bir yaz\u0131 yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu makaleleri okuyaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi ve tehdit etme niyetini kabul etmesi durumunda, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu makaleleri yay\u0131nlamas\u0131, davac\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik tehdit eylemi olarak haks\u0131z fiil olu\u015fturur.<br> Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu makaleleri yay\u0131nlamas\u0131, davac\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik bir tehdit eylemi olarak haks\u0131z fiil olu\u015fturur.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 11 Ocak 2019 (Gregorian Takvimi ile 2019) Karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>ve tehdit eylemini kabul ederek, bir forumda suggestif kirlilik hedefi hakk\u0131nda \u00f6neri isteyen bir yaz\u0131 yazan ki\u015finin, bir script kullanarak suggestif kirlilik yapmay\u0131 ima etti\u011fi, bu yaz\u0131ya di\u011fer okuyucular\u0131n davac\u0131y\u0131 suggestif kirlilik hedefi olarak belirlemeyi \u00f6nerdi\u011fi, bu s\u0131rada, davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu hukuk firmas\u0131n\u0131n da hedef olarak belirlendi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu makaleleri yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu y\u00fcksek lisans program\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131rma laboratuvar\u0131n\u0131n intihal veya sahtecilik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla, ayn\u0131 laboratuvar\u0131 suggestif kirlilik hedefi olarak belirlemeyi \u00f6nerdi\u011fi t\u00fcm s\u00fcreci kabul etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bunun \u00fczerine, davac\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik suggestif kirlilik amac\u0131yla yaz\u0131lan b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin davac\u0131n\u0131n onurunu veya onur duygusunu ihlal etti\u011fi kabul edilirken, suggestif kirlilik hedefi olarak davac\u0131y\u0131 \u00f6neren ki\u015finin daval\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu makalelerin yazar\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtarak davac\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik suggestif kirlilik yapmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131p iftira atma haks\u0131z fiilini \u00e7ekti\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fini kabul etmek i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu makalelerin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n, bu makalelerin yazar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtma eylemi olarak da haks\u0131z fiil olu\u015fturdu\u011fu davac\u0131n\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemez oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daha sonra a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki durumlar\u0131 dikkate alarak, manevi zarara kar\u015f\u0131 tazminat olarak 250.000 yen \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131ya emretti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Bu makalelerin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 tek seferlik bir durum olup, daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcrekli olarak tehdit etti\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fi kabul edilemez<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Daval\u0131n\u0131n, bu makaleleri yay\u0131nlayarak davac\u0131n\u0131n korkmas\u0131n\u0131 veya bu makalelerin okuyucular\u0131n\u0131n bu makaleleri yay\u0131nlamas\u0131n\u0131 aktif olarak ama\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilemez<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li> Bu makalelerin yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131ndan zaten 4 y\u0131ldan fazla zaman ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131n\u0131n sadece suggestif kirlilik y\u00f6ntemini tavsiye etti\u011fi ve iftira atan makaleleri do\u011frudan yay\u0131nlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131, ancak suggestif kirlilik yapan ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 durumunda veya makale yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131ndan zaman ge\u00e7memi\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda, daha sert bir sonu\u00e7 olabilirdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/shitaraba-specific\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/shitaraba-specific[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davalinin_Oneri_Kirliligini_Gerceklestirdigi_Durumlar\"><\/span>Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6neri Kirlili\u011fini Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi Durumlar<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/suggestion-pollution-judgment2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-20334\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fimiz \u00f6rnekteki ayn\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6neri kirlili\u011fi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren daval\u0131y\u0131 dava etti\u011fi bir durum bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davanin_Arka_Plani-2\"><\/span>Davan\u0131n Arka Plan\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131, 9 May\u0131s 2015 tarihinde saat 16:08&#8217;den 16:46&#8217;ya kadar olan 38 dakika boyunca onlarca kez g\u00f6nderi yaparak, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda &#8220;M\u00fcvekkiline sald\u0131r\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;Ge\u00e7 kalan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na s\u0131cak su d\u00f6kmek&#8221;, &#8220;Sab\u0131ka kayd\u0131 var&#8221; gibi yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 ger\u00e7ekleri belirtmi\u015f ve ayr\u0131ca &#8220;Yeteneksiz&#8221;, &#8220;Bok&#8221;, &#8220;\u00c7\u00f6p&#8221;, &#8220;Tutuklama&#8221;, &#8220;Su\u00e7lu&#8221;, &#8220;Avukatl\u0131k hakk\u0131n\u0131n iptali&#8221;, &#8220;\u0130dam&#8221;, &#8220;Ka\u00e7ak&#8221;, &#8220;Disiplin cezas\u0131 ile i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma&#8221;, &#8220;\u00d6rtbas etme&#8221;, &#8220;Korku&#8221;, &#8220;Tehlike&#8221;, &#8220;Sat\u0131n alma&#8221;, &#8220;\u00c7ocuk pornografisi&#8221; gibi olumsuz imaj\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc kelimeler veya ger\u00e7ekleri belirterek, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu \u00f6zelliklere sahip oldu\u011fu veya bu eylemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f gibi bir izlenim yaratm\u0131\u015f, davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumdaki de\u011ferini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve avukatl\u0131k g\u00f6revini engellemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, yukar\u0131da belirtilen avukat, tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131 avukat, g\u00f6nderi say\u0131s\u0131 ve i\u00e7eri\u011fi ile g\u00f6nderi s\u00fcresini bir arada d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrsek, daval\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131y\u0131 \u0131srarla s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirtmi\u015f ve bu g\u00f6nderilerin durumu, &#8220;\u00d6neri Kirlili\u011fi&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan \u00fcnl\u00fc bir sald\u0131r\u0131 tekni\u011fi olup, yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da bu tekni\u011fin yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyeti vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dava_Sureci\"><\/span>Dava S\u00fcreci<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131, Temmuz 2015&#8217;te (2015\u5e747\u6708), &#8216;Shitaraba&#8217; y\u00f6neticisi olan Caesar \u015eirketi&#8217;ne (\u30b7\u30fc\u30b5\u30fc\u682a\u5f0f\u4f1a\u793e) kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6nderici bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7ici bir tedbir talep etmi\u015f ve ayn\u0131 ay\u0131n 31&#8217;inde IP adresi ve zaman damgas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bunun \u00fczerine davac\u0131, ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n A\u011fustos ay\u0131nda NTT Plala&#8217;ya (NTT\u3077\u3089\u3089) kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6nderici bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f ve 29 Ekim 2015&#8217;te (\u540c\u5e7410\u670829\u65e5) NTT Plala&#8217;dan g\u00f6nderici bilgileri a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f ve daval\u0131n\u0131n babas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli hatt\u0131 \u00fczerinden g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle, davay\u0131 geri \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir. Daha sonra, daval\u0131n\u0131n avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, bu konudaki her makalenin g\u00f6ndericisinin o zamanlar 13 ya\u015f\u0131nda bir ortaokul \u00f6\u011frencisi oldu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015ftir ve uzla\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak, 25 Kas\u0131m&#8217;da (11\u670825\u65e5), davac\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fi tatmin edici bulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in uzla\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerini sonland\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ve mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131 beklemeye karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disclosure-of-the-senders-information\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/disclosure-of-the-senders-information[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkeme_Karari-2\"><\/span>Mahkeme Karar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u0130lgili her yaz\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131y\u0131 i\u015faret etti\u011fi konusunda bir sorun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu yaz\u0131lardan &#8220;M\u00fcvekkiline sald\u0131r\u0131&#8221;, &#8220;Ge\u00e7 kalan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na s\u0131cak su d\u00f6kme&#8221;, &#8220;Sab\u0131ka kayd\u0131 var&#8221; gibi ifadelerin, ger\u00e7ekleri belirtti\u011fini ve ayr\u0131ca, genel okuyucunun normal dikkat ve okuma \u015feklini temel al\u0131rsak, &#8220;Tutuklama&#8221;, &#8220;Yeteneksiz&#8221; gibi di\u011fer ifadelerle birlikte, davac\u0131n\u0131n, bir avukat olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 eylemler ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi veya ge\u00e7mi\u015fte tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya su\u00e7lu bulundu\u011fu izlenimini verdi\u011fini, bu durumun davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumdaki de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirtti. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu yaz\u0131lar\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n itibar haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi i\u00e7in haks\u0131z fiil olarak kabul edildi.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 21 Haziran 2016 (2016) karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak, iftira su\u00e7unu kabul etti. Bunun \u00fczerine, <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Tarih vb. belirlemek gibi bir durum s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somutluk a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yetersiz kelimeler veya \u00e7ok k\u0131sa c\u00fcmlelerin s\u0131raland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n defalarca tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ve bunlar\u0131n k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde bir\u00e7ok kez ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi bir durum s\u00f6z konusu. Bu t\u00fcr bir durumda bile, toplumsal de\u011ferlendirmenin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc inkar edemeyiz, ancak bu derece g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fil.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 21 Haziran 2016 (2016) karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak, daval\u0131ya 400.000 yen \u00f6deme emri verdi. Belki de bir \u015faka olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olabilir, ancak sonu\u00e7 olduk\u00e7a sert oldu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, daval\u0131n\u0131n 13 ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu konusunda, <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/suggestion-pollution-judgment3-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-20336\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Daval\u0131, ilgili her yaz\u0131y\u0131 yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada 13 ya\u015f\u0131nda bir ortaokul 2. s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencisiydi. Bu ya\u015f grubundaki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n, yeti\u015fkinlere k\u0131yasla, toplumsal deneyim eksikli\u011fi vb. nedenlerle uygun karar verme yeteneklerinin daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011funu inkar edemeyiz. Ancak, bir avukat\u0131n ne t\u00fcr bir i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 soyut bir \u015fekilde anlayabilecek kadar b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebiliriz. Ve en az\u0131ndan, bu davada, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu t\u00fcr bir anlay\u0131\u015fa bile sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmek i\u00e7in yeterli kan\u0131t yok. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bu davada, daval\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131, tazminat miktar\u0131 \u00fczerinde \u00f6nemli bir etkiye sahip olacak bir durum olarak kabul edilemez (ilgili her yaz\u0131n\u0131n durumuna g\u00f6re, bu ya\u015f nedeniyle dikkatsiz bir eylem oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilebilir, ancak ilgili her yaz\u0131n\u0131n durumu hakk\u0131nda yukar\u0131da (1) &#8216;de de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve en az\u0131ndan, yukar\u0131dakinden daha fazla daval\u0131 lehine de\u011ferlendirilecek bir durum de\u011fildir). Ayr\u0131ca, zarar veren ki\u015finin \u00f6deme yetene\u011fi hakk\u0131nda da, bu davada, tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131 etkileyecek bir durum olarak kabul edilemez.<br><\/p>\n<cite>Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 21 Haziran 2016 (2016) karar\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>olarak belirtmi\u015ftir. \u00c7ocuk oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, yumu\u015fak bir karar beklenemezdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Kelime veya \u00e7ok k\u0131sa c\u00fcmlelerin s\u0131raland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n defalarca tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ve bunlar\u0131n k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde bir\u00e7ok kez ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi bir durum&#8221;dan, &#8220;Bu t\u00fcr bir durumda bile, toplumsal de\u011ferlendirmenin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc inkar edemeyiz, ancak bu derece g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fil&#8221; yarg\u0131s\u0131na, \u00f6neri kirlili\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetini g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmadan, bu karar\u0131n verildi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez ve sorular kal\u0131r. Ancak, bu belki de \u00f6neri kirlili\u011fini \u00f6neren ki\u015fiye de\u011fil, sadece tek seferlik bir eylem ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik bir karard\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Suggest kirlili\u011fi konusunda, \u00f6neride bulunan ki\u015fi tabii ki sorumluluk ta\u015f\u0131r, ancak bu y\u00f6ntemi tavsiye eden veya uygulayan ki\u015filer de sorumlulukla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kal\u0131r. Bu duruma sadece e\u011flence olsun diye kat\u0131lmamal\u0131s\u0131n\u0131z.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Suggest kirlili\u011finin zararlar\u0131n\u0131 ya\u015fayan bireyler ve \u015firketler, deneyimli bir avukata dan\u0131\u015farak h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde harekete ge\u00e7meli ve ayn\u0131 zamanda sorumluluklar\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131 bir \u015fekilde sorgulamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;\u00d6neri&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan \u00f6zellik, bir site \u00fczerindeki arama kutusuna bir anahtar kelime girildi\u011finde, otomatik olarak birlikte aranmas\u0131 muhtemel anahtar kelimeleri \u00f6neren (g\u00f6steren) bir [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64183,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61702"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61702"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64184,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61702\/revisions\/64184"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}