{"id":61709,"date":"2023-12-04T11:22:57","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T02:22:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/?p=61709"},"modified":"2024-03-19T11:09:11","modified_gmt":"2024-03-19T02:09:11","slug":"corporation-compensation-for-damages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages","title":{"rendered":"T\u00fczel ki\u015filer de tazminat talebinde bulunabilir mi? \u0130tibar zedelenmesi hukuk davalar\u0131na dayanarak a\u00e7\u0131klama"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u0130nternet \u00fczerinde iftira ve hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda ve bu durumun iftira ve hakaret su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011funda, genellikle sivil dava olarak tazminat talebiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r. Peki, iftira ve hakaret su\u00e7u nedeniyle tazminat talebinin \u00f6znesi kim olacakt\u0131r? \u0130ftira ve hakaret su\u00e7unun hedefi sadece bireyler de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda t\u00fczel ki\u015filikler de olabilece\u011fi i\u00e7in bu bir sorun olu\u015fturur. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130ftira ve hakaret davas\u0131nda ma\u011fdurun bir \u015firket i\u015fletti\u011fi durumlarda, \u015firketin itibar\u0131 da ayn\u0131 anda zarar g\u00f6r\u00fcr ve i\u015fletme zarar\u0131 olu\u015fabilir. Bu durumda, \u015firket gibi bir t\u00fczel ki\u015filik davac\u0131 olabilir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu durumda, genellikle, \u015firket, \u00f6rne\u011fin davac\u0131 A olarak kredi ve itibar haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali, i\u015fletme sahibi birey ise \u00f6rne\u011fin davac\u0131 B olarak itibar haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131yla dava a\u00e7ar. Ancak, \u015firket ve i\u015fletme sahibi farkl\u0131 ki\u015filiklere sahip oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, her biri davac\u0131 olabilir ve ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 dava a\u00e7abilir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu noktan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirlendi\u011fi bir \u00f6rne\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yorum. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_53 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Ornek_Olayin_Seyri\" title=\"\u00d6rnek Olay\u0131n Seyri\">\u00d6rnek Olay\u0131n Seyri<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Yonetim_Kurulu_Baskani%E2%80%99nin_Davaci_Oldugu_Ilk_Dava\" title=\"Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n Davac\u0131 Oldu\u011fu \u0130lk Dava\">Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n Davac\u0131 Oldu\u011fu \u0130lk Dava<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Sirketin_Davaci_Oldugu_Ikinci_Dava\" title=\"\u015eirketin Davac\u0131 Oldu\u011fu \u0130kinci Dava\">\u015eirketin Davac\u0131 Oldu\u011fu \u0130kinci Dava<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#%E2%80%9CTekrarlayan_Davalarin_Yasaklanmasi%E2%80%9D_ve_%E2%80%9CNe_Bis_in_Idem%E2%80%9D\" title=\"&#8220;Tekrarlayan Davalar\u0131n Yasaklanmas\u0131&#8221; ve &#8220;Ne Bis in Idem&#8221;\">&#8220;Tekrarlayan Davalar\u0131n Yasaklanmas\u0131&#8221; ve &#8220;Ne Bis in Idem&#8221;<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Ozet\" title=\"\u00d6zet\">\u00d6zet<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/internet\/corporation-compensation-for-damages\/#Buromuz_Tarafindan_Alinan_Onlemler\" title=\"B\u00fcromuz Taraf\u0131ndan Al\u0131nan \u00d6nlemler\">B\u00fcromuz Taraf\u0131ndan Al\u0131nan \u00d6nlemler<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ornek_Olayin_Seyri\"><\/span>\u00d6rnek Olay\u0131n Seyri<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015eirket y\u00f6netim dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve benzeri hizmetler sunan bir anonim \u015firketin CEO&#8217;su, 2017 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131 civar\u0131nda, toplamda 5 kez, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibi yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 tutuklama bilgilerini bloguna yazd\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>2017 \u015eubat&#8217;\u0131nda cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelisi olarak sorguland\u0131<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphesiyle tutukland\u0131<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya uygundu, ancak ma\u011fdur kad\u0131nla anla\u015fma veya uzla\u015fma sa\u011flad\u0131<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu makaleler, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u015firketi ve medya kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bir g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcmle, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yay\u0131nland\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 seyir belirsiz olsa da, daval\u0131, bu konudaki her bir yay\u0131nla ilgili olarak, 2019 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131nda 1 y\u0131l 2 ay ve 7 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ald\u0131 ve cezai hakaret su\u00e7u kesinle\u015fti. Ceza hukukunda hakaret, \u015fikayet su\u00e7u oldu\u011fundan (Japon Ceza Kanunu&#8217;nun 232. maddesi), ma\u011fdurun \u015fikayeti olmadan ceza s\u00fcreci ilerleyemez. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131 zaten ceza davas\u0131nda \u015fikayette bulunmu\u015f ve hapis cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, su\u00e7un a\u011f\u0131r oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/corporation-compensation-for-damages-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36620\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yonetim_Kurulu_Baskani%E2%80%99nin_Davaci_Oldugu_Ilk_Dava\"><\/span>Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n Davac\u0131 Oldu\u011fu \u0130lk Dava<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131, bir \u015firketin y\u00f6netim dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flerini y\u00fcr\u00fcten bir \u015firketin y\u00f6netim kurulu ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak, su\u00e7 duyurusundan sonra, bu makalelerin itibar zedelenmesine neden oldu\u011funu ve daval\u0131dan manevi zararlar i\u00e7in tazminat talep etmek \u00fczere dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131, her bir g\u00f6nderiyi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n e\u015finin davac\u0131dan ge\u00e7im paras\u0131 alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve mobbinge maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ona sempati duydu\u011funu iddia etti. Davac\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 bir ilgi duydu\u011funu ve bu imkans\u0131z hale geldi\u011finde, bu makalelerin her birini \u00f6fkeyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bunun \u00fczerine mahkeme,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>&#8220;Bu makalelerin &#8216;toplumdan al\u0131nan objektif de\u011ferlendirmeyi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217; gerek\u00e7esiyle, sivil itibar zedelenmesini kabul etti ve daval\u0131ya 1.2 milyon yen tazminat, 150 bin yen avukat \u00fccreti, toplamda 1.35 milyon yen tazminat \u00f6demesi emretti.<\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 25 Kas\u0131m 2019 Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Not: Davac\u0131, zarar veren ki\u015finin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in gereken g\u00f6nderen bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 maliyeti olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n \u015firketinin 617,388 yen \u00f6demesini talep etti, ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131 olarak kabul edilmedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-decline-in-social-reputation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/defamation-and-decline-in-social-reputation[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/corporation-compensation-for-damages-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36622\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sirketin_Davaci_Oldugu_Ikinci_Dava\"><\/span>\u015eirketin Davac\u0131 Oldu\u011fu \u0130kinci Dava<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>G\u00f6nderen bilgilerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 talebinin maliyeti kabul edilmemi\u015f olabilir mi? Ayn\u0131 dava konusunda, ilk davada davac\u0131 olan ve temsilci direkt\u00f6r\u00fc olan bir \u015firket, bu sefer davac\u0131 olmu\u015f ve itibar zedelenmesine dayal\u0131 manevi zararlar\u0131n \u00f6denmesini talep eden bir dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkeme, ilk davada da ele al\u0131nan 5 makale hakk\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Bu makaleler, davac\u0131n\u0131n temsilcisi olan A&#8217;n\u0131n cinsel taciz eylemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fini belirtir ve genel bir okuyucunun normal dikkat ve okuma \u015fekli g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n cinsel su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 tutuklanabilecek bir ki\u015fiyi temsilci olarak atan bir \u015firket oldu\u011fu izlenimini verir. Bu nedenle, bu makalelerin her biri, davac\u0131n\u0131n toplumsal de\u011ferlendirmesini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr (Ayr\u0131ca, her bir kan\u0131tla, A&#8217;n\u0131n, 2017 \u015eubat veya Mart ay\u0131nda belirtilen cinsel taciz eylemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve bu nedenle tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fini kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bu makalelerin her biri, davac\u0131n\u0131n itibar\u0131n\u0131 zedeler ve bu, haks\u0131z bir eylemi olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n<cite> Tokyo B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi 14 Ekim 2020 Karar\u0131 <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Yine de, bu makalelerin i\u00e7eri\u011fi, y\u00f6ntemi, say\u0131s\u0131, motivasyonu vb. k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli ve bencil olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, bu makaleler davac\u0131 olan \u015firketin temsilci direkt\u00f6r\u00fc olan A&#8217;ya odaklanm\u0131\u015f olup, davac\u0131 olan \u015firketin kendisini do\u011frudan hedef almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak, bu makalelerin neden oldu\u011fu manevi zarar\u0131n mali de\u011ferlendirmesi 60.000 Yen olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daha sonra, mahkeme, avukat \u00fccreti olarak 6.000 Yen, g\u00f6nderenin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in gereken maliyetin 617.388 Yen&#8217;inden 400.000 Yen&#8217;ini nedensellik ili\u015fkisi olan zarar olarak kabul etti ve toplamda 1.060.000 Yen \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131dan talep etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131, iki dava sonucunda toplamda 2.410.000 Yen tazminat \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/reputation\/honor-infringement-and-intangible-damage-to-company[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/corporation-compensation-for-damages-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36621\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CTekrarlayan_Davalarin_Yasaklanmasi%E2%80%9D_ve_%E2%80%9CNe_Bis_in_Idem%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>&#8220;Tekrarlayan Davalar\u0131n Yasaklanmas\u0131&#8221; ve &#8220;Ne Bis in Idem&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Sivil Usul Kanunu&#8217;nun 142. maddesinde, tekrarlayan davalara izin verilmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Madde 142: Bir olayla ilgili olarak, taraflar\u0131n tekrar dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<cite> Sivil Usul Kanunu (Tekrarlayan Davalar\u0131n Yasaklanmas\u0131) <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 39. maddesinin son b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, ne bis in idem ilkesi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>Madde 39: Hi\u00e7 kimse, yasal oldu\u011fu zaman yap\u0131lan bir eylem veya zaten su\u00e7suz oldu\u011fu belirlenen bir eylem i\u00e7in cezai sorumlulukla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmaz. Ayr\u0131ca, ayn\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u00e7in tekrar cezai sorumlulukla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmaz.<\/p>\n<cite>Anayasa (Retroaktif Cezaland\u0131rman\u0131n Yasaklanmas\u0131, Ne Bis in Idem) <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu konuda, daval\u0131, bu dava (2. olay) ile \u00f6nceki dava (1. olay) aras\u0131nda ayn\u0131 konunun oldu\u011funu, Sivil Usul Kanunu&#8217;nun 142. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 39. maddesinin son b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirtilen ne bis in idem ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k mahkeme, 1. olaya ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n, 2. olay\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce kesinle\u015fti\u011fi i\u00e7in, 1. olay\u0131n Sivil Usul Kanunu&#8217;nun 142. maddesinde belirtilen &#8220;mahkemeye ba\u011fl\u0131 olay&#8221; kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fini, bu nedenle 2. olay\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 bu maddeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 39. maddesinin son b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn cezai sorumlulukla ilgili oldu\u011funu ve bu nedenle sivil dava olan bu davan\u0131n uygunlu\u011funa uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, mahkeme,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n[Al\u0131nt\u0131] Bu davan\u0131n konusu, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 haks\u0131z fiil temelinde tazminat talebi iken, \u00f6nceki davan\u0131n konusu, A&#8217;n\u0131n daval\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 haks\u0131z fiil temelinde tazminat talebi olup, davac\u0131 ve temsilcisi olan A&#8217;n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ki\u015filikler oldu\u011fu ve her iki davan\u0131n konular\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, bu noktadan da, bu dava, Sivil Usul Kanunu&#8217;nun 142. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<cite>Ayn\u0131<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131, 1. olayda, 1. olay\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131na 135.000 Yen \u00f6deme yapmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir karar ald\u0131, ancak 1. olay\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131, 2. olay\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131 olan \u015firketin CEO&#8217;su oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, 2. olay\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131 ve fiilen ayn\u0131 ki\u015fi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, 1. olay\u0131n karar\u0131nda kabul edilen tazminata ek olarak, 2. olay\u0131n tazminat\u0131 kabul edilirse, zarar\u0131n iki kez de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu durumda, davac\u0131n\u0131n maddi olmayan zarar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu, ancak davac\u0131 \u015firket ve CEO&#8217;su ayr\u0131 ki\u015filikler oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, zarar\u0131n iki kez de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ozet\"><\/span>\u00d6zet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130tibar zedelenmesiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmamakla birlikte, hak ihlali iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda, ma\u011fdurun bir \u015firket vb. i\u015fletmesi durumunda, s\u00f6z konusu \u015firket do\u011frudan iftira veya hakarete maruz kalmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile, \u015firketin haklar\u0131 ihlal edilebilir ve i\u015fletme \u00fczerinde zararlar olu\u015fabilir. Bu nedenle, sadece i\u015fletme sahibi de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda \u015firket gibi bir t\u00fczel ki\u015fi de, duruma ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 davac\u0131 olabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Buromuz_Tarafindan_Alinan_Onlemler\"><\/span>B\u00fcromuz Taraf\u0131ndan Al\u0131nan \u00d6nlemler<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Monolit Hukuk B\u00fcrosu, \u00f6zellikle internet ve hukuk olmak \u00fczere IT alan\u0131nda y\u00fcksek uzmanl\u0131\u011fa sahip bir hukuk firmas\u0131d\u0131r. Son y\u0131llarda, internet \u00fczerinde yay\u0131lan itibar zararlar\u0131 ve iftira bilgileri, &#8220;Dijital D\u00f6vme&#8221; olarak ciddi zararlara yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r. B\u00fcromuz, &#8220;Dijital D\u00f6vme&#8221; \u00f6nlemlerini sa\u011flayan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmler sunmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki makalede belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/monolith.law\/digitaltattoo[ja]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130nternet \u00fczerinde iftira ve hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda ve bu durumun iftira ve hakaret su\u00e7u olu\u015fturdu\u011funda, genellikle sivil dava olarak tazminat talebiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r. Peki, iftira ve hakaret su\u00e7u nedeni [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":64533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[21,41],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61709"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61709"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61709\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64534,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61709\/revisions\/64534"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monolith.law\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}